ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 29 January 2019

Sec. Neuroepidemiology

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00001

Association Between HLA Genotype and Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Antiepileptic Drugs Among Epilepsy Patients in Northwest China

  • 1. Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China

  • 2. Department of Neurology, The First People's Hospital, Shizuishan, China

  • 3. Department of Neurology, The First Hospital of Tongxiang, Tongxiang, China

  • 4. Ningxia Key Laboratory of Cerebrocranial Diseases, The Incubation Base of National Key Laboratory, Yinchuan, China

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the association between HLA genotypes and antiepileptic drug-induced cutaneous adverse reactions (AEDs-cADRs) among patients with epilepsy in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region of Northwest China. Fifteen patients with AEDs-cADRs and 30 matched AEDs tolerant controls from anested case-control study were tested the HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 genotype using the polymerase chain reaction sequence-based typing (PCR-SBT). Significant difference was not observed between AEDs-cADRs and AEDs tolerant groups in terms of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 genotype frequencies. Future studies using larger cohorts are needed to verify this observation.

Introduction

Cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) are common adverse reactions observed in patients using antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Studies have demonstrated that the incidence of AEDs-cADRs was about 3.61%. Also, cADRs are relatively common with the use of aromatic antiepileptic drugs (AAEDs), including carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), and phenobarbital (PB) (). They manifest as ordinary maculopapular eruption (MPE), eventually leading to serious life-threatening conditions such as hypersensitivity syndrome (HSS), Steven-Johnson syndrome (SJS), or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). AEDs-cADRs often lead to drug discontinuation in patients with epilepsy, resulting in the inability to control seizures. A 40% mortality rate has been reported in patients with severe cADRs ().

Since 2004, a number of studies have suggested a strong association of HLA genotype with the occurrence of AEDs-cADRs. However, this association differs between different races and areas (). In China, the majority of studies have been carried out in southern Chinese Han population (). Since the seventh century, central Asians, Arabs, and Persians have migrated to China and settled to gradually form the Hui ethnicity. Some studies have suggested genetic differences between the Hui and the Han (). Ningxia, located in Northwest China, has the largest Hui population in China. Therefore, Ningxia is an ideal state to study regional and ethnic differences. A nested case-control study was conducted in patients who were AEDs-cADRs and AEDs tolerant to determine the association between HLA genotypes and patients with AEDs-cADRs in Ningxia.

Materials and Methods

Study Participants

Study participants were patients diagnosed with epilepsy by the Department of Neurology in Ningxia Medical University General Hospital. The inclusion criteria were as follows: ① Ningxia resident with no history of marriages with other ethnic groups for more than three generations; ② Clear indications for AEDs treatment; ③ Have not been administered oral AEDs, and potential adverse drug reactions declared in patients or their guardians, after which signed informed consents were obtained; and ④ The initial dose and increasing dose of AEDs determined according to the “Pharmacopeia of People's Republic of China” (2010 edition). The exclusion criteria were as follows: ① Having a history of alcohol-related epilepsy; ② Having a treatable cause (such as metabolic disorders, poisoning, and infection); ③ With progressive brain or central nervous system diseases, such as encephalitis, tumors, or degenerative diseases; ④ Suffering from other diseases and the emergence of allergy during the follow-up period; and ⑤ Having to discontinue or substitute medications and not completing 12 weeks of prescribed oral AEDs.

Four hundred and fifteen patients were followed up bi-weekly for 12 weeks after initiating oral AEDs. The initial dosage of PHT, LTG, CBZ, and valproate (VPA) was 200, 500, 12.5, 100 mg/d, and 5 mg/kg/d, respectively. They were examined for symptoms and signs of cADRs in an epileptic clinic every 2 weeks. AEDs tolerance was defined as patients who were able to tolerate AEDs without cADRs manifestation. If cADRs manifested, the AEDs were discontinued immediately and a dermatologist was consulted to diagnose and treat the patients (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Two attending or one chief physician from the Department of Dermatology examined the patients. The criteria for the diagnosis and classification of cADRs were as follows: ① MPE: a rash, not involving the mucosa, no organ or system damage, and resolved after 1–2 weeks; ② HSS: in addition to skin rash, numerous viscera involvement with systemic manifestations, such as fever, arthralgia, eosinophilia, and lymphadenopathy; ③ SJS: the occurrence of skin exfoliation, involving a range of no <10% of the body area, with or without other organ or system damage; ④ TEN: the presence of skin exfoliation, involving more than 30% of the body area, with or without other organ or system damage; and ⑤ SJS/TEN: the presence of skin exfoliation, involving a range of 10–30% of the total body area. The patients were treated for skin damage based on the severity as determined by a dermatologist after cADRs diagnosis was confirmed. These patients were assigned to the AEDs-cADRs group.

Nested case-control design is the most common way to reduce the costs of exposure assessment in prospective epidemiological studies. They can also reduce the sample size through matching (). In this study, 15 patients with epilepsy who developed cADRs were defined as the AEDs-cADRs group. For each patient with AEDs-cADRs, two patients with AEDs tolerance were selected and matched by AEDs, gender, age (±3 years), and ethnicity.

Clinical Data Collection

A unified AEDs-cADRs epidemiological questionnaire, including demographics, underlying diseases, medication history, allergies, and seizure history, was used. The occurrence of cADRs during the 12 weeks was recorded, including the date of cADRs manifestation and other clinical manifestations involving the mucosa and subtypes.

Ethics Statement

The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University Ethics Committee approved the study. Also, the study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Access to the patient information database was granted by the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University and approved by the ethics committee following study review. All enrolled patients agreed to have their data published and signed a written informed consent form.

HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 Genotyping

Peripheral venous blood (3 mL) from each participant was collected in anticoagulant tubes. An extraction kit (Beijing Tiangen Biotech Company, China) was used to extract genomic DNA from whole blood according to the manufacturer's protocols. HLA genotype was performed using PCR-SBT at the Beijing Boao Crystal Biotechnology Company, China. The following procedural steps were adopted: ① amplification of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 loci; ② purification and detection of the amplified products; and ③ HLA genotyping sequencing using a 3730XL ABI detector.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables as frequencies (%). The Pearson chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables and the Student t-test to compare continuous variables. Differences in HLA genotype frequency between the groups were analyzed using the Fisher's exact test. Risk association between HLA alleles and AEDs-cADRs were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values and 95% CIs were estimated using two-tailed tests. Data were analyzed using SPSS13.0 software.

Results

Characteristics of the Study Participants

The age of the 15 patients with AEDs-cARDs ranged from 14 to 60 years old, with an average age of 39.2 ± 15.4 years old. These included 10 male patients and 5 female patients with a ratio of 2:1. Twelve patients were of Han ethnicity and three of Hui ethnicity. Ten patients were with generalized epileptic seizures and five were with partial epileptic seizures. One patient had a pollen allergy history. One patient received PHT that induced cADRs, two patients received CBZ, two received LEV, one received VPA, and nine received LTG. Moreover, there were 14 patients with MPE and one Hui female patient with HSS who accepted treatment after onset. Further, five patients had cADRs after taking the initial dose of AEDs, of which one patient received CBZ, one received LEV, and three received LTG. The average time from patients taking AEDs to the occurrence of cADRs was 93.4 ± 70 days, with the longest latency period being 6 months and the shortest being 1 day (Table 1).

Table 1

AEDs-cADRs groupGenderAge (years)EthnicityAddress (city)Allergy historyType of AEDsDaily doseTime of occurrenceType of cARDs
C01M19HanZhongningNoPHT300 mgAfter 6 mMPE
C02M14HanShizuishanNoLEV1250 mgAfter 5 dMPE
C03F20HanYinchuanNoCBZ100 mgAfter 6 dMPE
C04M41HanYinchuanNoCBZ200 mgAfter 43 dMPE
C05F25HanShiZuiShanNoLTG6.25 mgAfter 5 dMPE
C06F31HuiYinchuanYESLTG50 mgAfter 7 dMPE
C07M14HanShiZuiShanNoLEV500 mgAfter 1 mMPE
C08M27HanShiZuiShanNoLTG12.5 mgAfter 2 mMPE
C09F41HuiPengyangNoLTG25 mgAfter 1 mHSS
C10M55HanYinchuanNoLTG25 mgAfter 2 mMPE
C11M40HuiYongningNoLTG50 mgAfter 15 dMPE
C12M22HanJingyuanNoLTG25 mgAfter 13 dMPE
C13M60HanZhongNingNoVPA400 mgAfter 1 dMPE
C14F16HanGuyuanNoLTG12.5 mgAfter 10 dMPE
C15M55HanYinchuanNoLTG25 mgAfter 5 dMPE

The characteristics of AEDs-cADRs group.

The age of the 30 AEDs tolerant patients ranged from 12 to 65 years old, with an average age of 31.7 ± 12.4 years old. These included 19 male patients and 11 female patients at a ratio of 1.7:1. Further, 26 patients were of Han ethnicity and 4 were of Hui ethnicity. Twenty-three had generalized seizures, and seven had partial seizures. Moreover, two received PHT, four received LEV, four received CBZ, two received VPA, and eighteen received LTG (Table 2).

Table 2

AEDs tolerant groupGenderAge (years)EthnicityAddress (city)Type of AEDsAEDs tolerance groupAddress (city)GenderAge (years)EthnicityType of AEDs
M01M24HanQingtongxiaPHTM16YongningM26HanLTG
M02M24HanYongningPHTM17YongningF25HuiLTG
M03M17HanJingyuanLEVM18YongningF25HuiLTG
M04M24HanYanchiLEVM19YinchuanM30HanLTG
M05F27HanHelanCBZM20YinchuanM65HanLTG
M06F25HanZhongweiCBZM21HelanM35HanLTG
M07M45HanWuzhongCBZM22HelanM36HanLTG
M08M39HanZhongningCBZM23ShizuishanM17HanLTG
M09F17HanYingchuanLTGM24ZhongweiM28HanLTG
M10F22HanYongningLTGM25ZhongweiM32HanVPA
M11F27HuiYongningLTGM26YinchuanM12HanVPA
M12F20HuiYanchiLTGM27QingtongxiaF20HanLTG
M13F23HanYinchuanLEVM28HelanF44HanLTG
M14M21HanYinchuanLEVM29HelanM23HanLTG
M15M35HanHelanLTGM30ZhongningM30HanLTG

The characteristics of AEDs tolerant group.

Genotypes of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1

In the AEDs-cADRs group, the number of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 genotypes detected was 12, 18, and 15, respectively. Higher distribution frequencies of HLA-A genotype were A*0207 (16.67%) and A*2402 (13.33%). The highest distribution frequency of HLA-B genotype was B*5101 (20%). The distribution frequency of A*0201, A*0206, A*3101, A*3303, B*3501, DRB1*0701, DRB1*0803, DRB1*0901, DRB1*1101, DRB1*1202, and DRB1*1454 was 10% (Table 3).

Table 3

AEDs-cADRs groupType of AEDsType of cADRsHLA sub-type
HLA-A*HLA-B*HLA-DRB1*
C01PHTMPE320133033501440304050803
C02LEVMPE020732014601520109011202
C03CBZMPE110124021505510108031210
C04CBZMPE020124021518510111011454
C05LTGMPE020102071501480104051405
C06LTGMPE020302074601580103011454
C07LEVMPE020611011518350104011501
C08LTGMPE020633034403510113021454
C09LTGHSS240231012705510101010701
C10LTGMPE020124021302150107011501
C11LTGMPE010102061301570104010901
C12LTGMPE290131010705510108031202
C13VPAMPE310133034006510211011101
C14LTGMPE020711013501400209011202
C15LTGMPE020730011302510107011201

Genotypes of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 in AEDs-cADRs group.

In the HLA naming protocol,“*” separates the HLA locus (A, B and DRB1) from the serotype (32, 33 and 35), eg. HLA-A* 3201.

In the AEDs tolerant group, the number of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 genotypes detected was 13, 26, and 23, respectively. Higher distribution frequencies of the HLA-A genotype were A*0201 (21.67%) and A*1101 (20%). The distribution frequency of the HLA-B genotype was lower than 10%. Higher distribution frequency of the HLA-DRB1 genotype was DRB1*0901 (15%), followed by DRB1*0301(10%) and DRB1*1202 (10%) (Table 4).

Table 4

AEDs tolerant groupType of AEDsHLA sub-type
HLA-A*HLA-B*HLA-DRB1*
M01PHT110126010801400103010405
M02PHT110111013503510211011123
M03LEV110124020702540104051501
M04LEV110111010702400101010901
M05CBZ020102014003670113021405
M06CBZ110133035201580103010803
M07CBZ030211010801150203011202
M08CBZ020133031501500107011101
M09LTG020711010702510109011501
M10LTG020130045801580104101454
M11LTG110130011302520107011502
M12LTG020133031301580103011202
M13LEV020103013502410101010301
M14LEV010130011302350311031301
M15LTG010102014002460111011202
M16LTG010101014001400114541454
M17LTG240224023802510112011312
M18LTG240230013503540111011501
M19LTG020333031801550211041602
M20LTG030133035201580103011502
M21LTG020124021501510109011001
M22LTG110131010702400101010901
M23LTG020126014006400608030901
M24LTG300131011302510107011454
M25VPA020102014006460109011210
M26VPA020126011301570107011202
M27LTG020124024801550209011405
M28LTG020724024006460109010901
M29LTG020711014601550208031202
M30LTG020731014601510112021454

Genotypes of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 in AEDs tolerant group.

In the HLA naming protocol,“*” separates the HLA locus (A, B and DRB1) from the serotype (32, 33 and 35), eg. HLA-A* 3201.

Association Between HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 Genotypes and AEDs-cADRs, LTG-cADRs, and AAEDs-cADRs

As shown in Table 5, OR values of 15 HLA genotypes were >1. No significant differences in HLA genotype frequencies were observed between the AEDs-cADRs and AEDs tolerant group (P > 0.05).

Table 5

HLA typeFrequencyOR(95%CI)P-value
AEDs-cADRs group (2n = 30)AEDs tolerant group (2n = 60)
A*02031/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00
A*02075/30 (16.7%)4/60 (6.7%)2.800 (0.69~11.32)0.15
A*24024/30 (13.3%)7/60 (11.7%)1.165 (0.31~4.34)1.00
A*31013/30 (10.0%)3/60 (5.0%)2.111 (0.40~11.15)1.00
A*33033/30 (10.0%)5/60 (8.3%)1.222 (0.27~5.50)1.00
B*15012/30 (6.7%)2/60 (3.3%)2.071 (0.28~15.48)0.60
B*15020/30 (0.0%)1/60 (1.7%)1.017 (0.98~1.05)1.00
B*40021/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00
B*48011/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00
B*51021/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00
DRB1*04052/30 (6.7%)2/60 (3.3%)2.071 (0.28~15.48)0.60
DRB1*08033/30 (10.0%)3/60 (5.0%)2.111 (0.40~11.15)0.40
DRB1*12011/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00
DRB1*12101/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00
DRB1*13021/30 (3.3%)1/60 (1.7%)2.034 (0.12~33.70)1.00

Association between HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DRB1, and AEDs-cADRs.

HLA genotyping in 9 patients with LTG-cADRs identified a total of 11 HLA-A types, 13 HLA-B types, and 13 HLA-DRB1 types. In 18 patients of LTG tolerant group, 12 HLA-A types, 17 HLA-B types, and 17 HLA-DRB1 types were identified. OR values of 5 HLA genotypes were >1. No significant differences in HLA genotype frequency were found between the LTG-cADRs and LTGtolerant group (P > 0.05) (Table 6).

Table 6

HLA typeFrequencyOR(95%CI)P-value
LTG-cADRs group (2n = 18)LTG tolerant group (2n = 36)
A*02064/18 (22.2%)4/36 (11.1%)2.28 (0.50~10.5)0.29
A*24022/18 (11.1%)2/36 (5.6%)2.12 (0.27~16.5)0.48
A*31012/18 (11.1%)2/36 (5.6%)2.12 (0.27~16.5)0.48
B*51014/18 (22.2%)2/36 (5.6%)4.85 (0.80~29.6)0.76
DRB1*33033/18 (16.7%)2/36 (5.6%)3.40 (0.51~22.5)0.19

Association between HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DRB1, and LTG-cADRs.

HLA genotyping in 12 patients with AAEDs-cADRs identified a total of 12 HLA-A types, 15 HLA-B types, and 15 HLA-DRB1 types. In 24 patients of AAEDs tolerant group, 13 HLA-A types, 23 HLA-B types, and 20 HLA-DRB1 types were identified. The OR values of 13 HLA genotypes were >1. No significant difference in HLA genotype frequency was observed between AAEDs-cADRs and AAEDs tolerant group (P > 0.05) (Table 7).

Table 7

HLA typeFrequencyOR(95%CI)P-value
AAEDs-cADRs group (2n = 24)AAEDs tolerant group (2n = 48)
A*02031/24 (4.2%)1/48 (2.1%)2.043 (0.12~34.16)1.00
A*02074/24 (16.7%)4/48 (8.3%)2.00 (0.50~9.70)0.42
B*13022/24 (8.3%)2/48 (4.2%)2.091 (0.28~15.83)0.60
B*15012/24 (8.3%)2/48 (4.2%)2.091 (0.28~15.83)0.60
B*40021/24 (4.2%)1/48 (2.1%)2.043 (0.12~34.16)1.00
B*48011/24 (4.2%)1/48 (2.1%)2.043 (0.12~34.16)1.00
B*51016/24 (25.0%)5/48 (10.4%)2.87 (0.77~10.60)0.16
DRB1*01011/24 (4.2%)1/48 (2.1%)2.043 (0.12~34.16)1.00
DRB1*04052/24 (8.3%)1/48 (2.1%)4.273 (0.37~49.68)0.25
DRB1*07013/24 (12.5%)3/48 (6.3%)2.143 (0.40~11.15)0.39
DRB1*08033/24 (12.5%)3/48 (6.3%)2.143 (0.40~11.15)0.39
DRB1*12011/24 (4.2%)1/48 (2.1%)2.043 (0.12~34.16)1.00
DRB1*13021/24 (4.2%)1/48 (2.1%)2.043 (0.12~34.16)1.00

Association between HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-DRB1, and AAEDs-cADRs.

Discussion

The occurrence of AEDs-cADRs in patients with epilepsy may be influenced by gender, age, initial AEDs dosage, incremental AEDs dosage, and adding rate, with or without a history of allergies, monotherapy or polytherapy, functional status of the liver and kidney, and genetic factors (). Chung and colleagues reported that HLA-B*1502 was strongly correlated with CBZ-SJS/TEN in Taiwan Han populations (). This result was later supported by others (), especially for serious cADRs, with HLA susceptibility genes being the most important factor.

Different AEDs induce different cADR symptoms. In a large-scale study on 3,793 patients with epilepsy taking AEDs, the overall incidence rate of AEDs-cADRs reached 3.61%. The incidence rates of AEDs induced by cADRs were as follows: LTG (11.11%), OXC (8.92%), CBZ (3.80%), PHT (1.98%), PB (0.42%), VPA (0.57%), and LEV (1.65%) (). About 88.41% of cADRs were induced by AAEDs of CBZ (47.56%), LTG (17.07%), OXC (9.15%), PHT(9.15%), and PB(5.49%) (). These results suggested that AAEDs were more likely to induce cADRs in clinical practice compared with other types of AEDs. In the present study, 80% of patients with AEDs-cADRs were AAEDs-cADRs (12/15). Of these, LTG-cADRs was the most common (9/15).

Correlation studies on HLA genotypes and AEDs-cADRs have been conducted in mainland China (), Taiwan (), Hong Kong (), Southeast Asia (), Japan (), Korea (), Europe (), North America (), and other regions. The reported correlations between HLA genotypes and AEDs-cADRs have the following characteristics: ① Susceptible genes associated with AEDs-cADRs may be different among different races. For example, HLA-B*1502 is the susceptible gene for AEDs-SJS/TEN in Han Chinese and Southeast Asians. However, in Japan, Europe, and other parts of the world, the susceptible gene for CBZ-cADRs is HLA-A*3101. ② In the Han population in Southeast Asia, HLA-B*1502 may have a susceptibility to aromatic AEDs-SJS/TEN. ③ The incidence rate of AEDs-cADRs is relevant to the distribution rate of HLA-B*1502 alleles among different races. The higher the distribution rate of HLA-B*1502 in the race, the higher the incidence rates for AEDs-cADRs.

Ningxia, located in Northwest China, is an agglomeration of Hui ethnicities that are unlike the southern Han Chinese population genetically. Whether any HLA susceptibility genes are responsible for the occurrence of AEDs-cADRs among the northwestern population in China is not known. Therefore, the distribution rate of HLA genotypes was compared in the following groups: all patients in the AEDs-cADRs group vs. patients in the AEDs tolerant group, AAEDs-cADRs group vs. AAEDs tolerant group, and LTG-cADRs group vs. LTGtolerant group. The results suggested that the HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DRB1 genotype distribution frequencies were not statistically significantly different between the two groups.

The present study had some limitations that might have impacted the outcome. First, selecting a large number of patients with AEDs-cADRs was difficult. Nine patients with LTG-cADRs were enrolled in this study. However, only one patient with CBZ-cADRs, one patient with PHT-cADRs, two patients with CBZ-cADRs, two patients with LEV-cADRs, and one patient with VPA-cADRs. Future studies focusing on large-sample populations with similar epilepsy and AEDs should be conducted. Second, the study did not adjust for age, gender, and other possible confounding variables during statistical analysis due to the small sample size. This might have had a minor impact on the results because the patients and controls were matched using a nested case–control design.

Conclusions

The presentstudy did not find a significant association between any HLA genotypes and AEDs-cADRs in patients with epilepsy in Northwest China. Future studies using larger cohorts are needed to verify this observation.

Statements

Ethics statement

The General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University Ethics Committee approved the study. Also, the study was performed in compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Access to the patient information database was granted by the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University and approved by the ethics committee following study review. All enrolled patients agreed to have their data published and signed a written informed consent form.

Author contributions

QZ conceived this study. XW, LC, XL, and XX recruited patient samples and collected clinical data. Beijing Boao Crystal Biotechnology Company Completed HLA Genotyping. XW provided statistical analyses of the patient data and laboratory analyses.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by CAAE-UCB Scientific Research Grant (Grant No. 2016001), and Key Research Project of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant No. 2016YFC0904400).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Summary

Keywords

antiepileptic drugs, Chinese, epilepsy, HLA genotype, cutaneous adverse reaction

Citation

Wang X, Chao L, Liu X, Xu X and Zhang Q (2019) Association Between HLA Genotype and Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Antiepileptic Drugs Among Epilepsy Patients in Northwest China. Front. Neurol. 10:1. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00001

Received

26 September 2018

Accepted

03 January 2019

Published

29 January 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Ding Ding, Fudan University, China

Reviewed by

Janet Mifsud, University of Malta, Malta; Qianyi Xiao, Fudan University, China

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Qing Zhang

This article was submitted to Neuroepidemiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics