Intravenous Thrombolysis Benefits Mild Stroke Patients With Large-Artery Atherosclerosis but No Tandem Steno-Occlusion

Abstract

At present, there is controversy regarding whether thrombolysis is beneficial for patients suffering from a mild stroke. In this study, we therefore sought to determine whether the therapeutic benefit of thrombolysis is dependent upon stroke subtype for those with mild stroke. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from consecutive mild stroke patients (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ≤5) with and without recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) therapy. The TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment) criteria was used to determine stroke subtypes. Patients suffering from large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) were subdivided based upon whether or not they exhibited tandem steno-occlusion, as defined by the association of a proximal intracranial occlusion and a cervical internal carotid artery lesion (complete occlusion or severe stenosis ≥ 90%). For this study, favorable outcomes at 90 days of onset (modified Rankin Scale Score [mRS] of 0–1) were the primary measured outcome. Three hundred thirty-nine patients were included in the study. For patients with non-LAA, there were not statistically significant improvements in favorable outcomes for rt-PA treatment (p = 0.889, 0.929, 0.708; respectively). For patients with LAA, compared with non-treated group, rt-PA-treated patients had a significant in the rate of favorable outcomes at 90 days (82.8 vs. 64.9%; OR 2.59; 95%CI, 1.13–5.92; P = 0.024). Among LAA patients exhibiting tandem lesions, favorable outcomes were observed in 66.7% of rt-PA-treated patients, with no significant differences to those observed in untreated patients (OR 1.00; 95%CI, 0.23–4.28; p = 1.000). Among LAA patients without tandem lesions, compared with non-treated group, we found that rt-PA treatment was associated with a significant beneficial impact on favorable outcomes after 90 days (64.4 vs. 88.4%; OR 4.20; 95%CI, 1.43–12.30; p = 0.009). Our findings suggest that intravenous rt-PA is only beneficial in mild stroke patients with LAA-type strokes that do not exhibit tandem steno-occlusion.

Introduction

Stroke incidence in China is very high, with ~2.5 million cases annually (1), of which 30% are mild ischemic strokes (2, 3). Mild stroke represents one of the main reasons for not receiving intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in time-eligible acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients (4, 5); this is despite current guidelines which make no formal recommendations on of the use of rt-PA in these patients (6). Cases of mild stroke have been excluded due to contraindications from most randomized thrombolysis trials citing reasons that symptoms were not severe enough to warrant a high-risk treatment intervention; although, these decisions are not support by data (7). It must be noted that there is substantive evidence to suggest that a significant proportion of mild stroke patients has subsequent neurological deterioration (8–10). Further, Prior analyses have additionally suggested that stroke subtype may be an independent predictor of prognosis in mild stroke patients (11, 12). A retrospective analysis indicated that both primary rt-PA and endovascular therapy had better outcome at 90 days than primary conservative therapy in patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score (NIHSS score ≤ 5) (13).

Tandem lesions, defined as a combination of high-grade stenosis or occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) with concomitant occlusion of an intracranial vessel (14, 15), accounted for about 10–15% of AIS due to large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) (16). The treatment of AIS with tandem lesions remains a unique technical challenge due to the low recanalization rate and poor outcomes after rt-PA (17, 18). None of the studies have focused on mild strokes with tandem lesions.

The aim of our study is to identify the impact of rt-PA treatment in mild stroke patients by stroke subtype and further assess the effect on patients with tandem leisons.

Methods

Patients Population

This study was a retrospective analysis of 339 mild stroke patients (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS≤5) that had presented in the stroke unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Figure 1). Patients were included in this analysis if they presented within 4.5 h of stroke onset and either were or were not treated with rt-PA in a standard 0.9 mg/kg dose between August 2016 and January 2019. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients were NIHSS≤5 and met all other standard IV rt-PA eligibility criteria (19); (2) patients had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1 prior to stroke onset; and (3) patients did not undergo further endovascular therapy within the study period. Patients who had undergone catheter interventions (1), had brain tumors (2), were suffering from severe hepatic or renal dysfunction (3), or were suffering from severe end-stage disease (4) were excluded from analyses. The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University ethics committee approved the present study, with all relevant guidelines and regulations being observed. All patients and/or their legal guardians provided informed consent.

Figure 1

Tandem lesions were defined by the association of a proximal intracranial occlusion and a cervical ICA lesion (complete occlusion or severe stenosis ≥ 90%) (20).

The following data were collected for all patients: age, sex, medical history (including smoking status, and history of hyperlipidemia, diabetes, stroke, coronary heart disease, and hypertension), and clinical data collected at time of hospital admission (including stroke severity as measured via NIHSS, onset-to-treatment (OTT) time, stroke subtype, and rate of hemorrhagic transformation). TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment) criteria were used for stroke subtype classification, and LAA strokes were further subdivided based upon whether or not patients were presented with tandem lesions.

Outcome Measures

The primary outcome for this study was a favorable patient outcome at 90 days, as indicated by an mRS score between 0 and 1 (12, 21, 22). In addition, we analyzed safety outcomes including hemorrhagic transformations (including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) based upon ECASS II criteria (23), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality within a 90-day period.

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages), while continuous variables are presented as means [with standard deviations (SD)]. Baseline patient characteristics were compared via Chi-squared (χ2) test, Fisher exact test, Student's t-tests, and Mann–Whitney U tests when data were categorical, normally distributed, and non-normally distributed, respectively. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to examine factors associated with favorable patient outcomes, following adjustment for specific covariates including age, sex, NIHSS score and OTT time. All tests were 2-sided, and the p-value level of significance was set at 0.05. SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, NC, USA) was used for statistical analyses, and Figures were prepared using GraphPad Prism 5 and Review Manager 5.3.

Results

Patient Characteristics

In total, we analyzed outcome data from 160 and 179 patients that were and were not treated via rt-PA, respectively. The rt-PA-treated and -untreated groups had mean ages of 63.4 ± 12.0 and 65.7 ± 12.3 years, respectively (Table 1). There were 44 female patients (27.5%) in the rt-PA treated group and 62 female patients (34.6%) in the rt-PA untreated group. With respect to medical history, in the rt-PA-treated group, 17.5% of patients had a history of stroke, 65.0% had hypertension, 23.1% had hyperlipidemia, 14.4% had atrial fibrillation, and 5.9% had CHD in the rt-PA-treated group, while in the rt-PA-untreated group these percentages were 21.8, 70.9, 20.1, 15.1, and 5.6%, respectively. Patients in rt-PA treated group had a higher proportion of history of smoking (P = 0.010), while a lower proportion of history of diabetes mellitus (P = 0.029). Laboratory findings were comparable for patients in these two groups, with the exception of LDL-C levels, which were elevated in patients in the rt-PA-treated group relative to untreated controls (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 0.8; P = 0.018). Patients in the rt-PA-treated and -untreated groups had average NIHSS scores of 2.5 ± 1.4 and 2.2 ± 1.5 at admission, respectively (P = 0.066). There was no significant difference in OTT time between the two groups (163.2 ± 57.2 vs. 161.0 ± 57.0 min; P = 0.716).

Baseline characteristics of LAA patients with and without tandem lesions were shown in Table 2. There were 33 patients (24.4%) with tandem lesions and 102 patients (75.6%) without tandem lesions. Percentage of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia were higher in the group with tandem lesions (45.4 vs. 23.5%, P = 0.016; 24.2 vs. 9.80%, P = 0.034). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between two groups. Among 102 patients without tandem lesions, 76 patients (74.5%) were with isolated stenosis to occlusion of middle cerebral artery (MCA), 23 patients (22.5%) were with isolated stenosis to occlusion of ICA, 3 patients (2.9%) were with isolated stenosis to occlusion of anterior cerebral artery (ACA).

Outcomes

In this study, we compared 90-day outcomes between mild stroke patients with and without rt-PA treatment. The mRS score distributions at this time point were shown for all mild stroke patients in Figure 2. We found that rt-PA-treated patients exhibited a non-significant trend toward more favorable outcomes relative to untreated patients after adjusting for age, sex, NIHSS score and OTT time (OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 0.96–2.86; P = 0.072), with 82.5% (132/160) in rt-PA treated group having good outcome (mRS: 0–1) at 90 days, while the proportion was 74.9% (134/179) in the untreated group.

Figure 2

We additionally conducted subgroup analyses according to stroke subtypes after adjusting for above specified covariates (Figure 3). This analysis revealed that LAA-type patients had significantly favorable outcomes at 90 days after rt-PA treatment compared to untreated patients (82.8 [48/58] vs. 64.9% [50/77]; OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.13–5.92; P = 0.024). In contrast, no such differences were observed in other stroke subtypes including cardioembolism (CE), small vessel occlusion (SVO), or other determined/undetermined subtypes (P = 0.889, P = 0.929, and 0.708, respectively). ORs and corresponding 95% CIs for patients in the rt-PA-treated and -untreated groups were shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

An additional subgroup analysis was performed adjusting for above specified covariates was performed wherein LAA-type patients were subdivided based upon whether or not they presented tandem lesions (Figure 4). In this analysis, we found that 66.7% (10/15) and 66.7% (12/18) of LAA tandem lesion patients in the rt-PA-treated and -untreated subgroups, respectively, exhibited favorable outcomes at the 90-day time point (OR, 1.00; 95%CI, 0.23–4.28; P = 1.000). Based on these analyses, we concluded that rt-PA treatment of LAA-type patients without tandem lesions was associated with a clear beneficial effect, with favorable outcome proportions of 88.4% (38/43) and 64.4% (38/59) in the treated and untreated groups, respectively (OR, 4.20; 95%CI, 1.43–12.30; P = 0.009).

Figure 4

Overall, we observed mortality rates of 1.2% (n = 2/160) and 0.6% (n = 1/178) among rt-PA-treated and -untreated patients, respectively (OR 2.25; 95%CI, 0.20–25.09; P = 0.604). Only two (1.2%) patients in the rt-PA treatment group exhibited symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within the 90-day study period, as determined based upon ECASSII criteria.

Discussion

The results of the present study suggest that the IV rt-PA treatment of mild stroke patients is associated with high rates (82.5%) of 90-day favorable outcomes (mRS 0-1). In particular, we found that patients with LAA-subtype strokes were more likely to benefit from rt-PA treatment than patients suffering from other stroke subtypes. However, we found that the therapeutic benefits of rt-PA treatment in LAA patients were limited to patients that did not exhibit tandem steno-occlusion. In patients with such tandem lesions, these results instead suggest that the efficacy of IV rt-PA treatment may be limited.

In this study, we were able to estimate the effect of rt-PA in mild stroke patients who were excluded from most randomized trials based on varied exclusion criteria (24). Our findings also suggest that mild stroke patients may benefit from rt-PA treatment, particularly patients suffering from strokes with an LAA-type etiology. Previous randomized (25–28) and observational (29, 30) studies have yielded inconsistent findings with respect to the therapeutic benefits of rt-PA treatment in mild stroke patients. One prior pooled analysis of six thrombolysis trials failed to find any reason to exclude mild stroke patients from undergoing rt-PA treatment (31); these findings are consistent with findings from the NINDS rt-PA stroke subgroup study regarding minor stroke (32). One prospective cohort study found that, regardless of their baseline NIHSS scores, patients suffering from mild but with disabling symptoms should undergo rt-PA (33). In addition, one retrospective study of Chinese patients similarly found that patients with LAA-type strokes were likely to benefit from undergoing rt-PA treatment (3).

Treatment of AIS patients with tandem lesions is known to be technically challenging. However, there have been no specific studies conducted to date regarding the relative impact of rt-PA treatment in LAA-type mild stroke patients with and without tandem lesions. In the present study, we found that rt-PA treatment of mild stroke patients was associated with a therapeutic benefit only in LAA-subtype patients that did not exhibit tandem steno-occlusion. In LAA patients exhibiting such tandem lesions, our findings suggest that the benefits of rt-PA intervention may be minimal. All the following previous studies focused on the rt-PA treatment on tandem lesions were enrolled with severe stroke patients (NIHSS>5). Tandem lesions treated with rt-PA may sometimes achieve recanalization, but have poorer outcome than those with isolated occlusion (34–37). A large prospective study demonstrates that identification of a tandem lesion independently predicts poor response to rt-PA in terms of recanalization (38–40). While platelet activation is accelerated at the site of ruptured atherosclerotic plaque (18, 38), the lack of effect of rt-PA could be related to the fact that most tandem lesions were secondary to atherothrombotic disease of the carotid artery with large clot burden, which is a known predictor of poor recanalization after rt-PA (41–43). Kim et al. supposed that the low recanalization rate may be attributed to the large amount of thrombus (44). ICA lesion may cause hypoperfusion and reduce the delivery of rtPA to the thrombus in the MCA and ACA. Moreover, experimental researches demonstrated that the presence of a cervical ICA lesion (complete occlusion or severe stenosis) leads to decrease of cerebral perfusion pressure, which not only hinder dissolution of distal vessels but also increase the possibility of rethrombosis after incomplete recanalization (42). In terms of carotid atherothrombosis, the presence of a distal MCA occlusion usually is associated to an artery to artery embolism, with a clot proceeding from the carotid plaque which was platelet-rich lytic-resistant (41). Despite this, Ali et al. confirmed that 30% of the tandem -PAlesions achieved good outcome treated with rt-PA. AIS with tandem lesions should not be used as an exclusion from standard rt-PA therapy within the therapeutic window (18).

Based on the evidence of recent clinical trials, including HERMES (45), STRATIS (46), MR CLEAN (47), ESCAPE (48), and REVASCAT (49) trials have confirmed the benefit and favorable clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment for AIS with tandem lesions. A recent meta-analysis, data suggest that patients with tandem lesions can achieve spontaneous intracranial recanalization after recanalization of the cervical ICA (50, 51). Despite the obvious benefit from endovascular treatment for tandem lesions, there is no consensus about the ideal technical strategy (34, 45). Different endovascular approaches have been proposed; however, there has been no standardized recommendation (43). Previous studies comparing bridging therapy to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone demonstrated a higher rate of successful reperfusion and functional independence with bridging therapy. The results support the current guidelines of offering intravenous thrombolysis to eligible patients even if they are being considered for MT (52). TITAN (Thrombectomy in Tandem occlusions) which was a result of a collaborative effort to identify the best therapeutic approach for AIS due to tandem lesions (16), demonstrated that an approach associating emergent carotid stenting with rt-PA in conjunction to thrombectomy may be the best therapeutic option for AIS with tandem lesions leading to higher reperfusion and recanalization rates; this approach was not found to be associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications (39, 53, 54).

Our study has strengths and limitations. The main strength is that we analyzed the effect on rt-PA treatment based on TOAST classification in mild stroke patients. Furthermore, in a subgroup analysis, we analyzed rt-PA treatment in mild stroke patients with tandem lesions which were with limited evidence for the optimal management. There are limitations to the present study. First, the population of patients in the subgroup of LAA-type patients with tandem lesions was quite small, our statistical power was therefore relatively limited. In addition, this study was retrospective and observational in nature, thus it does not offer robust insight regarding the clinical benefit of the IV rt-PA treatment of mild stroke patients. Future research efforts including scientifically rigorous randomized clinical trials will be needed in order to formally establish the clinical relevance of our findings.

Conclusion

In summary, the results of this study indicate that intravenous rt-PA is only beneficial for the treatment of mild stroke patients with LAA-subtype strokes and without tandem steno-occlusion. Our findings suggest that intravenous rt-PA treatment may be of limited value in mild stroke patients with tandem lesions. The rapid vascular assessment and treatment of mild stroke patients are clinically important, as it allows for the identification of patients in need of emergency endovascular therapy.

References

• 1.

  HuangZXLinXLLuHKLiangXYFanLJLiuXT. Lifestyles correlate with stroke recurrence in Chinese inpatients with first-ever acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol. (2019) 266:1194–202. 10.1007/s00415-019-09249-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  ZhaoDLiuJWangWZengZChengJLiuJet al. Epidemiological transition of stroke in China: twenty-one-year observational study from the Sino-MONICA-Beijing Project. Stroke. (2008) 39:1668–74. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502807

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  ChenWPanYZhaoXLiuLLiHLiaoXet al. Intravenous thrombolysis in chinese patients with different subtype of mild stroke: thrombolysis in patients with mild stroke. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:2299. 10.1038/s41598-017-02579-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  CochoDBelvisRMarti-FabregasJMolina-PorcelLDiaz-ManeraJAleuAet al. Reasons for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy following acute ischemic stroke. Neurology. (2005) 64:719–20. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000152041.20486.2F

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  MesseSRKhatriPReevesMJSmithEESaverJLBhattDLet al. Why are acute ischemic stroke patients not receiving IV tPA? Results from a national registry. Neurology. (2016) 87:1565–74. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003198

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  AsdaghiNWangKCiliberti-VargasMAGutierrezCMKochSGardenerHet al. Predictors of thrombolysis administration in mild stroke: Florida-puerto rico collaboration to reduce stroke disparities. Stroke. (2018) 49:638–45. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019341

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  HassanAEHassanzadehBTohidiVKirmaniJF. Very mild stroke patients benefit from intravenous tissue plasminogen activator without increase of intracranial hemorrhage. South Med J. (2010) 103:398–402. 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181d7814a

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  BaumannCRBaumgartnerRWGandjourJvon BudingenHCSiegelAMGeorgiadisD. Good outcomes in ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis despite regressing neurological symptoms. Stroke. (2006) 37:1332–3. 10.1161/01.STR.0000217272.38455.a2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  SmithEEFonarowGCReevesMJCoxMOlsonDMHernandezAFet al. Outcomes in mild or rapidly improving stroke not treated with intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator: findings from get with the guidelines-stroke. Stroke. (2011) 42:3110–5. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613208

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  KhatriPConawayMRJohnstonKCAcute Stroke Accurate Prediction Study I. Ninety-day outcome rates of a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with mild ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2012) 43:560–2. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593897

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  LovettJKCoullAJRothwellPM. Early risk of recurrence by subtype of ischemic stroke in population-based incidence studies. Neurology. (2004) 62:569–73. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000110311.09970.83

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  FerrariJKnoflachMKiechlSWilleitJSchnablSSeyfangLet al. Early clinical worsening in patients with TIA or minor stroke: the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry. Neurology. (2010) 74:136–41. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c9188b

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  HeldnerMRChaloulos-IakovidisPPanosLVolbersBKaesmacherJDobrockyTet al. Outcome of patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation and low NIHSS score. J Neurol. (2020). 10.1007/s00415-020-09744-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  PolitiMKastrupAMarmagkiolisKGrunwaldIQPapanagiotouP. Endovascular therapy for acute stroke. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. (2017) 59:534–41. 10.1016/j.pcad.2017.03.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  PapanagiotouPHaussenDCTurjmanFLabreucheJPiotinMKastrupAet al. Carotid stenting with antithrombotic agents and intracranial thrombectomy leads to the highest recanalization rate in patients with acute stroke with tandem lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. (2018) 11:1290–9. 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.05.036

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  ZhuFBracardSAnxionnatRDerelleALTonneletRLiaoLet al. Impact of emergent cervical carotid stenting in tandem occlusion strokes treated by thrombectomy: a review of the TITAN collaboration. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:206. 10.3389/fneur.2019.00206

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  PikijaSMagdicJSztrihaLKKiller-OberpfalzerMBubelNLukicAet al. Endovascular therapy for tandem occlusion in acute ischemic stroke: intravenous thrombolysis improves outcomes. J Clin Med. (2019) 8:228. 10.3390/jcm8020228

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  Sultan-QurraieAWittTde HavenonARiboMZaidatOO. SEIMLESS: simultaneous extracranial, intracranial management of. (tandem) LESsions in stroke. J Neurointerv Surg. (2019) 11:879–83. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014403

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  PowersWJRabinsteinAAAckersonTAdeoyeOMBambakidisNCBeckerKet al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke. (2018) 49:e46–e110. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000158

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  GoryBPiotinMHaussenDCSteglich-ArnholmHHoltmannspotterMLabreucheJet al. Thrombectomy in acute stroke with tandem occlusions from dissection versus atherosclerotic cause. Stroke. (2017) 48:3145–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018264

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  ChoiJCJangMUKangKParkJMKoYLeeSJet al. Comparative effectiveness of standard care with IV thrombolysis versus without IV thrombolysis for mild ischemic stroke. J Am Heart Assoc. (2015) 4:e001306. 10.1161/JAHA.114.001306

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  LaurencinCPhilippeauFBlanc-LasserreKValletAECakmakSMechtouffLet al. Thrombolysis for acute minor stroke: outcome and barriers to management. results from the RESUVAL stroke network. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2015) 40:3–9. 10.1159/000381866

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  HackeWKasteMFieschiCvon KummerRDavalosAMeierDet al. Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke. (ECASS II). Second European-Austral Acute Stroke Study Investigat Lancet. (1998) 352:1245–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08020-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  KhatriPKleindorferDOYeattsSDSaverJLLevineSRLydenPDet al. Strokes with minor symptoms: an exploratory analysis of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke recombinant tissue plasminogen activator trials. Stroke. (2010) 41:2581–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.593632

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  SandercockPLindleyRWardlawJWhiteleyWMurrayG. Statistical analysis plan for the third International Stroke Trial. (IST-3); part of a 'thread' of reports of the trial. Int J Stroke. (2012) 7:186–7. 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00782.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  EmbersonJLeesKRLydenPBlackwellLAlbersGBluhmkiEet al. Effect of treatment delay, age, and stroke severity on the effects of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. (2014) 384:1929–35. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60584-5

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  WhiteleyWNThompsonDMurrayGCohenGLindleyRIWardlawJet al. Effect of alteplase within 6 hours of acute ischemic stroke on all-cause mortality. (third International stroke trial). Stroke. (2014) 45:3612–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006890

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC european carotid surgery trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe. (70–99%) or with mild. (0–29%) carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Lancet. (1991) 337:1235–43. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  FrankBGrottaJCAlexandrovAVBluhmkiELydenPMeretojaAet al. Thrombolysis in stroke despite contraindications or warnings?Stroke. (2013) 44:727–33. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.674622

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  StrbianDRinglebPMichelPBreuerLOllikainenJMuraoKet al. Ultra-early intravenous stroke thrombolysis: do all patients benefit similarly?Stroke. (2013) 44:2913–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000819

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  HackeWDonnanGFieschiCKasteMvon KummerRBroderickJPet al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment: pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet. (2004) 363:768–74. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15692-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  National Institute of Neurological Disorders Stroke rt PASSG. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for minor strokes: the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study experience. Ann Emerg Med. (2005) 46:243–52. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.02.013

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  KohrmannMNoweTHuttnerHBEngelhornTStruffertTKollmarRet al. Safety and outcome after thrombolysis in stroke patients with mild symptoms. Cerebrovasc Dis. (2009) 27:160–6. 10.1159/000185607

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  ChristouIFelbergRADemchukAMBurginWSMalkoffMGrottaJCet al. Intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and flow improvement in acute ischemic stroke patients with internal carotid artery occlusion. J Neuroimaging. (2002) 12:119–23. 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2002.tb00107.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  LavalleePCMazighiMSaint-MauriceJPMeseguerEAbboudHKleinIFet al. Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. (2007) 38:2270–4. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.481093

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  MiyamotoNNaitoITakatamaSShimizuTIwaiTShimaguchiH. Urgent stenting for patients with acute stroke due to atherosclerotic occlusive lesions of the cervical internal carotid artery. Neurol Med Chir. (2008) 48:49–55; discussion 55–46. 10.2176/nmc.48.49

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  EngelterSTRutgersMPHatzFGeorgiadisDFluriFSekoranjaLet al. Intravenous thrombolysis in stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection. Stroke. (2009) 40:3772–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555953

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  RubieraMRiboMDelgado-MederosRSantamarinaEDelgadoPMontanerJet al. Tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion: an independent predictor of poor outcome after systemic thrombolysis. Stroke. (2006) 37:2301–5. 10.1161/01.STR.0000237070.80133.1d

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  AnadaniMSpiottaAMAlawiehATurjmanFPiotinMHaussenDCet al. Emergent carotid stenting plus thrombectomy after thrombolysis in tandem strokes: analysis of the TITAN registry. Stroke. (2019) 50:2250–2. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024733

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  LinJLiangYLinJ. Endovascular therapy versus intravenous thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection-related ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. J Neurol. (2019). 10.1007/s00415-019-09474-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  MolinaCAMontanerJArenillasJFRiboMRubieraMAlvarez-SabinJ. Differential pattern of tissue plasminogen activator-induced proximal middle cerebral artery recanalization among stroke subtypes. Stroke. (2004) 35:486–90. 10.1161/01.STR.0000110219.67054.BF

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  RubieraMAlvarez-SabinJRiboMMontanerJSantamarinaEArenillasJFet al. Predictors of early arterial reocclusion after tissue plasminogen activator-induced recanalization in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2005) 36:1452–6. 10.1161/01.STR.0000170711.43405.81

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43.

  YangDShiZLinMZhouZZiWWangHet al. Endovascular retrograde approach may be a better option for acute tandem occlusions stroke. Interv Neuroradiol. (2019) 25:194–201. 10.1177/1591019918805140

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44.

  ZivinJALydenPDDeGirolamiUKochharAMazzarellaVHemenwayCCet al. Tissue plasminogen activator. Reduction of neurologic damage after experimental embolic stroke. Arch Neurol. (1988) 45:387–91. 10.1001/archneur.1988.00520280033012

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45.

  GoyalMMenonBKvan ZwamWHDippelDWMitchellPJDemchukAMet al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  Sivan-HoffmannRGoryBArmoiryXGoyalMRivaRLabeyriePEet al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy for acute anterior ischemic stroke with tandem occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. (2017) 27:247–54. 10.1007/s00330-016-4338-y

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47.

  BerkhemerOAFransenPSBeumerDvan den BergLALingsmaHFYooAJet al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:11–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48.

  GoyalMDemchukAMMenonBKEesaMRempelJLThorntonJet al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:1019–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49.

  JovinTGChamorroACoboEde MiquelMAMolinaCARoviraAet al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. (2015) 372:2296–306. 10.1056/NEJMoa1503780

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50.

  MalikAMVoraNALinRZaidiSFAleuAJankowitzBTet al. Endovascular treatment of tandem extracranial/intracranial anterior circulation occlusions: preliminary single-center experience. Stroke. (2011) 42:1653–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.595520

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51.

  SonSChoiDSOhMKKimSKKangHParkKJet al. Emergency carotid artery stenting in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to occlusion or stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery: a single-center experience. J Neurointerv Surg. (2015) 7:238–44. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011141

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52.

  GoyalNTsivgoulisGFreiDTurkABaxterBFroehlerMTet al. Comparative safety and efficacy of combined IVT and MT with direct MT in large vessel occlusion. Neurology. (2018) 90:e1274–82. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006654

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53.

  GoryBHaussenDCPiotinMSteglich-ArnholmHHoltmannspotterMLabreucheJet al. Impact of intravenous thrombolysis and emergent carotid stenting on reperfusion and clinical outcomes in patients with acute stroke with tandem lesion treated with thrombectomy: a collaborative pooled analysis. Eur J Neurol. (2018) 25:1115–20. 10.1111/ene.13633

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54.

  Sadeh-GonikUTauNFriehmannTBracardSAnxionnatRDerelleALet al. Thrombectomy outcomes for acute stroke patients with anterior circulation tandem lesions: a clinical registry and an update of a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. (2018) 25:693–700. 10.1111/ene.13577

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar