Anti-CD20 B Cell Treatment for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of lytic therapies targeting B cells in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). More modest efficacy has been noted in the primary progressive subtype of MS. Clinical success has increased interest in the role of B cells in the pathogenesis of MS and in ways to potentially improve upon current B cell therapies. In this mini review, we will critically review previous and ongoing clinical trials of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in MS, including rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab. Side effects and adverse event profiles will be discussed. Studies examining the proposed mechanisms of action of B cell depleting therapies will also be reviewed.

Introduction

Four lytic monoclonal antibodies that target the CD20 molecule on B cells have now undergone clinical trials in relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). These successful trials showed B cell depletion to be an effective treatment for RMS, focusing scientific attention on the role of B cells in MS. Here we summarize trials using anti-CD20 therapies in RMS and discuss proposed mechanisms of action. Although rituximab (RTX) and ocrelizumab (OCR) have been studied in and OCR is approved for primary progressive MS (PPMS) (1, 2), due to word limitations PPMS studies will not be discussed.

Clinical Trials of B-Cell Therapies in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Rituximab

Rituximab is a chimeric mouse-human monoclonal lytic antibody directed at CD20 (3, 4). Two early phase clinical trials of B-cell depletion using RTX as a therapy in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) (5, 6) are summarized in Table 1A. An early phase 2 trial in 30 RMS patients with contrast-enhanced lesions (CELs) on brain MRI used RTX at oncology dosing (375 mg/m² weekly, 4 doses) as add-on to injectable disease modifying therapies (DMTs) (5). It showed 88% reduction of number of CELs on brain MRIs after RTX treatment (p < 0.0001).

The HERMES trial was the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of RTX in RMS, and demonstrated a significant reduction in CELs (p < 0.001) along with an almost 50% reduction in ARR at 48 weeks (p = 0.04) vs. placebo (6). CELs remained near zero at 48 weeks, despite no further treatment. These and concurrent observational studies (10) led to increased interest in targeting B cell therapies for the treatment of MS.

As a mouse-human chimeric mAb, development of anti-drug neutralizing mAbs is of concern. RTX is approved for chronic use in several diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and Wegener's granulomatosis (but not for MS in the United States). Depending on the disease, the duration of exposure to RTX and the assay methodology, anti-RTX Abs (not all of which were shown to be neutralizing) have been reported in 11 to >50% of people taking RTX chronically (11).

Ocrelizumab

Ocrelizumab (OCR) is a fully humanized lytic mAb targeting CD20 (14). As a fully humanized mAb, it evokes less anti-drug antibody formation. A phase 2 randomized, double-blind trial compared 600 mg OCR and 2,000 mg OCR delivered intravenously on days 1 and 15 with placebo and with IFNβ-1a 30 micrograms IM weekly 1:1:1:1 in 218 RRMS subjects (Table 1A) (14). The study showed 89% reduction in the total number of CELs at 24 weeks in the OCR 600 mg group (p < 0.0001) and 96% reduction in the 2,000 mg group (p < 0.0001) vs. placebo. ARR at 24 weeks was 0.13 in the 600 mg dose OCR group, significantly <0.64 for placebo and 0.36 for IFNβ-1a. ARR was also reduced in the 2,000 mg dose OCR group compared to placebo but did not reach statistical significance compared to IFNβ-1a.

Two identically designed phase 3 trials (OPERA I and II) compared OCR with IFNβ-1a in RRMS (12). These multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trials enrolled 1,656 RRMS patients (OPERA I 821; OPERA II 835) who were randomized 1:1 to receive OCR 600 mg every 24 weeks or IFNβ-1a 44 micrograms subcutaneously injected three times per week over 96 weeks. Patients were between 18 and 55 years of age, with EDSS score ≤ 5.5, and had at least two documented clinical attacks within 2 years, or 1 within 1 year prior to screening. The primary endpoint, ARR, was reduced relative to IFNβ-1a by 46 and 47%, CELs were reduced by 94 and 95%, the number of new and/or enlarging T2 lesions was reduced by 77 and 83%, and rate of brain volume loss was reduce by 22.8 and 14.9% in OPERA I and OPERA II, respectively. In pre-specified pooled analyses, the percentage of subjects with 3 months confirmed disability worsening (CDW) and 6-months CDW was 40% lower in the OCR groups compared with IFNβ-1a (Table 1B).

Ofatumumab

Ofatumumab (OFA) is fully human mAb targeting CD20-expressing cells (15). An early small phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial demonstrated no safety concerns in 38 RRMS subjects OFA or placebo 2 weeks apart (Table 1A) (8). This study was followed by a larger, phase 2, multicenter, double-blind study of OFA (17) that enrolled 232 RRMS subjects randomized to receive subcutaneous OFA 3, 30, or 60 mg every 12 weeks, OFA 60 mg every 4 weeks, or placebo every 12 weeks or every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. After the 12-weeks placebo-controlled period, the placebo group received a single 3 mg OFA dose while the remaining subjects continued their original dose of OFA. At 12 weeks, mean cumulative new CELs was reduced 65% for all OFA groups compared with placebo (p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis excluding weeks 1–4 estimated a ≥90% reduction in CELs at 12 weeks for all groups that received ≥30 mg OFA.

Two identically designed multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group phase 3 trials compared 20 mg subcutaneous OFA every 4 weeks to 14 mg oral teriflunomide daily, randomized 1:1 (13). The trials enrolled 927 and 955 subjects, respectively. Subjects enrolled were mostly RRMS, but a small percentage (5.9% in ASCLEPIOS I and 5.6% in ASCLEPIOS II) had active secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Inclusion required at least 2 documented clinical attacks within 2 years or 1 within 1 year of screening, or a CEL on MRI in the year before randomization. EDSS scores at baseline were ≤ 5.5. Both studies met their primary endpoint with similar and significant relative reductions in ARR in the OFA arms. ARR for the OFA arms were reduced by over 50% relative to the teriflunomide arms (0.11 vs. 0.22 and 0.10 vs. 0.25 in ASCLEPIOS I and II, respectively). Significant (>30%) reductions in CDW relative to teriflunomide were seen in pooled 3 and 6-months CDW analyses (10.9 vs. 15.0% and 8.1 vs. 12.0%, respectively). Six-months sustained disability improvement favored the OFA arm in both trials but did not reach statistical significance. Significant reductions in mean CELs per scan (0.01 vs. 0.45, and 0.03 vs. 0.51 in ASCLEPIOS I and II, respectively) and new or enlarging T2 lesions per year (0.72 vs. 4.00, and 0.64 vs. 4.15, respectively) were seen in the OFA vs. teriflunomide groups. Serum neurofilament light chain concentrations were reduced in the OFA arm relative to teriflunomide arm by 7% at month 3, 27% at month 12, and 23% at month 24 in ASCLEPIOS I and by 11% at month 3, 26% at month 12, and 24% at month 24 in ASCLEPIOS II (Table 1B).

Ublituximab

Ublituximab (UTX) is a chimeric mAb targeting CD20 that has been glycoengineered to remove sugar molecules, resulting in enhanced lytic potency (18) (Table 2). In a phase 2, placebo-controlled trial of UTX, 48 RRMS subjects were randomized 3:1 to receive UTX IV or placebo on day 1, day 15, and week 24 (9). No CELs were seen at weeks 24 and 48, and a 10.6% reduction in T2 lesion volume was seen in the UTX group vs. placebo. Further studies of this drug are ongoing. As a chimeric mAb, the potential development of anti-UTX Abs will need to be monitored.

Safety Considerations

Infusion Reactions

Infusion reactions were the most common adverse events in the OCR and RTX phase 3 trials. These were mostly mild to moderate in severity and decreased in rate and severity with subsequent dosing. There were no fatal or life-threatening reactions in the phase 3 trials. Longer-term safety event reporting data suggest that infusion related reactions occur at similar rates in MS patients treated with RTX and OCR at 4.82 and 4.76%, respectively (19). Injection reactions with subcutaneous OFA occurred at 16.1 and 24.1% in the ASCLEPIOS I and II trials, respectively and were largely confined to the first dose.

Infections Including Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) and COVID-19

The most common minor infections seen in the phase 3 trials of RTX, OCR, and OFA were upper respiratory infections, nasopharyngitis, and urinary tract infections (UTIs). These occurred at similar rates in the anti-CD20 groups of these trials. Recent real-world safety reporting data showed nearly a 2-fold higher rate of minor infections in OCR compared to RTX with significantly higher rates of UTIs, nasopharyngitis, and oral herpes (19).

As of end of January 2020, nine cases of definite PML according to AAN criteria have been reported in MS patients receiving OCR (20). Seven of these cases were in anti-JCV antibody positive patients who had previously received natalizumab; one case occurred in a patient previously treated with fingolimod. One reported case of PML occurred in a patient treated with OCR that had not received prior DMTs, but this was confounded by older patient age (78 years) and low absolute lymphocyte counts prior to OCR treatment.

A potential risk of anti-CD20 therapies in people with MS infected with SARS-CoV-2 has been reported. A retrospective study of 784 MS patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection conducted by the Italian MS and COVID-19 registry found increased risk of severe COVID-19 in people treated with OCR or RTX with an odds ratio of 2.59 (p = 0.002) (21). A multi-center retrospective French study with only 347 total patients did not find an association of severe COVID-19 with anti-CD20 therapies (22). The North American COViMS Registry has reported 858 MS patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (23). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated an OR of 2.31 (p < 0.002) for those on anti-CD20 to have higher chance of death, ICU or hospitalization compared with those on other DMTs. None of these early reports have true denominators. Research in this area is ongoing; COViMS Registry and several other worldwide efforts continue to accrue data.

Malignancy

Fifteen malignancies were observed over the 96-weeks study periods in patients randomized to OCR compared to 4 in the IFNβ-1a or placebo groups in the phase 3 trials in RRMS and PPMS. The latest OCR package insert (dated May 2020) states that “an increased risk of malignancy, including breast cancer, may exist with OCREVUS.” We recommend that all patients taking anti-CD20 mAbs closely adhere to standard cancer screening guidelines, including periodic skin checks for skin cancers.

Mechanism of Action of Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies in Multiple Sclerosis

The most consistent laboratory abnormality found in MS patients is increased intrathecal production of antibodies (Abs), which is most sensitively detected as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCB). CSF-restricted OCBs are present in more than 90% of persons with definite MS (24). Elevated levels of CSF IgG and IgM, and number of OCBs have been correlated with worse MS prognosis (25, 26). This indirectly implicates B lymphocytes, as B cells produce Abs. However, plasma cells (which differentiate from B cells but do not express CD20) are the long-lived cells that produce most Abs.

Some insights into the mechanisms of action of B cell depletion with anti-CD20 mAb derived from the Phase 2 study we performed using oncologic doses of RTX (375 mg/m² weekly × 4 weeks). In this MRI-blinded open-label study (5), 26 of the 30 subjects underwent CSF and blood collection before and 6 months after RTX treatment. B cells declined in the CSF after RTX treatment in 20 of the 26 subjects (p < 0.0001 by Wilcoxon matched pairs test). In the remaining six subjects, B cells were undetectable in CSF prior to or after RTX. CSF Abs as measured by IgG index, IgG concentration, and oligoclonal band number did not decline 6 months post-RTX (27). Because the major producers of Ab are plasma cells that do not express CD20, this was not surprising. Given the rapidity of the beneficial effects of anti-CD20 mAbs in RRMS, these studies suggested that reduced Ab levels are unlikely to be critical for the mechanism of action of anti-CD20 mAb therapies.

However, B cells have other functions aside from their role in Ab production (Figure 1). B cells comprise several subtypes, such as naïve and memory B cells, and including B cells that produce proinflammatory (e.g., IL-6), or anti-inflammatory (e.g., IL-10) cytokines (28). Memory B cells are strongly implicated in the underlying pathophysiology of MS (29, 30). For this reason, studies to test the possibility of tailoring anti-CD20 treatments to target continued absence of circulating memory B cells are being pursued (31). Bar-Or and colleagues showed that B cell signaling via the combination of B cell receptor engagement and CD40 leads to production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., lymphotoxin and tumor necrosis alpha), while reducing B cell production of IL-10 (32). Two chemokines, CXCL13 and CCL19, were significantly decreased (P = 0.002, P = 0.03, respectively) in post-RTX CSF (27). Lysis of B cells using anti-CD20 eliminates their production of cytokines and chemokines and may contribute to the mechanism of action of anti-CD20 treatments.

Figure 1

T cells were also reduced in the CSF of 81% of subjects 6 months after RTX treatment (27, 33, 34). The mean reduction of CSF B cells was 95% and of CSF T cells was 55%. T cells were reduced in the CSF to a larger degree than the 12% reduction observed in blood, suggesting reduced T cell trafficking into the CNS. Activated T cells express CXCR5, the receptor for the chemoattractant factor CXCL13. CXCL13 is increased in CSF during several CNS inflammatory conditions, including MS (35) and CXCL13 was reduced 6 months post-RTX (27). Reduced trafficking of T cells into the CSF appears to be an indirect consequence of B cell elimination, especially since B cells themselves do not produce CXCL13 (36). A better understanding of the manifold effects of anti-CD20 mAb therapy in MS is expected from a multicenter longitudinal study that is underway (NCT02688985).

B cells are constitutively able to process and present antigen to T cells, and they are extraordinarily efficient at this when presenting their own cognate antigen to T cells recognizing the same antigen (37, 38). B cells that target myelin recognize it via surface B cell receptors, which enables efficient antigen capture of a self-antigen that is at low concentration. As B cells constitutively express MHC-I and MHC-II and the T cell costimulatory molecules CD86 and CD80, they are ready to process and present antigens to pathogenic autoreactive T cells (39). A process by which B cells that capture low concentration myelin antigens and then serve as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to activate myelin-reactive T cells is postulated to be a trigger of MS activity. The interaction of T with B cells further cross-activates the B cells. Several groups have reported evidence that this process can occur in deep cervical lymph nodes (40, 41). In established MS, the process may occur in meningeal ectopic lymphoid-like structures (42).

Yet another mechanism through which anti-CD20 mAbs may act is the elimination of CD20-expressing T cells. A small proportion of circulating T cells express surface CD20; these cells are eliminated by anti-CD20 treatments. CD20⁺ T cells comprise only 3–5% of circulating T cells of healthy persons (43), but comprise a slightly higher proportion (up to 10%) in MS patients (44, 45). CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ CD20⁺ T cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon gamma, TNF-alpha and GM-CSF, which could contribute to MS pathogenesis (45). In MS, CSF T cells are enriched for those expressing CD20⁺, but are still <50% of CSF T cells (45) suggesting that the CSF T cell reduction observed after RTX treatment cannot be fully explained by their lysis by anti-CD20 mAb.

An early report using the lytic anti-CD19 mAb, inebilizumab, in MS showed benefit on MRI activity to a similar strong degree as seen with anti-CD20 therapies (46). This study may provide insights, as the CD19 molecule is expressed on B cells but not on T cells. Results using inebilizumab hinted that lysis of CD20⁺ T cells is not responsible for all beneficial effects of anti-CD20 mAb treatments.

Other Emerging B Cell Therapies in MS

Success in therapeutics with targeting CD20 on B cells has raised interest in other mechanisms to target B cells, but the results have not always been as expected. Early on, the drug atacicept was tried in two studies, one in optic neuritis patients in hope of preventing MS development and the second in MS patients in a phase 2 trial. Atacicept is a human recombinant fusion protein that comprises the binding portion of a receptor for both B-Lymphocyte Stimulator (B-LyS) and A PRoliferation-Inducing Ligand (APRIL), two important factors supporting B cell maturation and survival. Unexpectedly atacicept led to more attacks (47). These ill-fated trials may in fact point to the importance of memory B cells in MS activity because, while inhibiting late state B cells and plasma cells, atacicept selectively spares memory B cells (48).

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a cytoplasmic enzyme important for B cell signaling; inhibition of BTK results in B cell inhibition (49). A phase 2 placebo-controlled trial in RMS patients of varying doses of the oral BTK inhibitor evobrutinib showed fewer CELS at the higher doses compared to placebo (50). Currently, this and several other BTK inhibitors are being studied in MS patients. Early reports suggest moderate efficacy of BTK inhibitors that is not as profound as that seen with anti-CD20 mAb therapies.

Conclusions

In summary, eliminating circulating CD20⁺ B cells leads to a profound reduction in MS clinical and MRI activity in RMS patients. B cells likely contribute to MS pathogenesis in several ways, including their enhancement of T cell activation and proliferation. B cells are critical for capturing and presenting low concentration antigens, such as myelin proteins to T cells. B cells also likely contribute to MS pathogenesis by direct and indirect production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Elimination of pro-inflammatory CD20⁺ T cells may also play a role. The mechanism by which B cells contribute to MS activity appears to be independent of their role in Ab production. Collecting longer-term safety data will be important to determine the safety of using these therapies chronically. Studies to determine exactly how B cell depletion inhibits MS activity will undoubtedly lead to better understanding of MS pathogenesis.

References

• 1.

  HawkerKO'ConnorPFreedmanMSCalabresiPAAntelJSimonJet al. Rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Ann Neurol. (2009) 66:460–71. 10.1002/ana.21867

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2.

  MontalbanXHauserSLKapposLArnoldDLBar-OrAComiG. Ocrelizumab versus placebo in primary progressive multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376:209–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1606468

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3.

  WeinerGJ. Rituximab: mechanism of action. Semin Hematol. (2010) 47:115–23. 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2010.01.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4.

  QuastIKellerCWMaurerMAGiddensJPTackenbergBWangLXet al. Sialylation of IgG Fc domain impairs complement-dependent cytotoxicity. J Clin Invest. (2015) 125:4160–70. 10.1172/JCI82695

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5.

  NaismithRTPiccioLLyonsJALauberJTutlamNTParksBJet al. Rituximab add-on therapy for breakthrough relapsing multiple sclerosis: a 52-week phase II trial. Neurology. (2010) 74:1860–7. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181e24373

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6.

  HauserSLWaubantEArnoldDLVollmerTAntelJFoxRJet al. B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. (2008) 358:676–88. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706383

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7.

  KapposLLiDCalabresiPAO'ConnorPBar-OrABarkhofF. Ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. (2011) 378:1779–87. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61649-8

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8.

  SorensenPSLisbySGroveRDerosierFShackelfordSHavrdovaEet al. Safety and efficacy of ofatumumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase 2 study. Neurology. (2014) 82:573–81. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000125

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9.

  FoxELovett-RackeAEGormleyMLiuYPetraccaMCocozzaSet al. A phase 2 multicenter study of ublituximab, a novel glycoengineered anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. (2020). 10.1177/1352458520918375. [Epub ahead of print].

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 10.

  Bar-OrACalabresiPAJArnlodDMarkowitzCShaferSKasperLH. Rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 72-week, open-label, phase I trial. Ann Neurol. (2008) 63:395–400. 10.1002/ana.21363

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11.

  Rituximab Prescribing Information. Reference ID: 4663614. (2020). Available online at: https://www.gene.com/download/pdf/rituxan_prescribing.pdf

  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  HauserSLBar-OrAComiGGiovannoniGHartungHPHemmerB. Ocrelizumab versus interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376:221–34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1601277

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13.

  HauserSLBar-OrACohenJAComiGCorrealeJCoylePK. Ofatumumab versus teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:546–57. 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14.

  MorschhauserFMarltonPVitoloULindénOSeymourJFCrumpMet al. Results of a phase I/II study of ocrelizumab, a fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb, in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Ann Oncol. (2010) 21:1870–6. 10.1093/annonc/mdq027

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15.

  TaylorRPPawluczkowyczAWLindorferMAvan de WinkelJGJBeurskensFJParrenPWHI. Binding of submaximal C1q to B cells opsonized with anti-CD20 mabs ofatumumab (OFA) or rituximab (RTX) promotes complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), and considerably higher levels of CDC are induced by OFA than by RTX. Blood. (2008) 112:1578–8. 10.1182/blood.V112.11.1578.1578

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16.

  LeGarff-Tavernier MHerbiLDe RomeufCNguyen-KhacFDaviFGrelierAet al. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of the optimized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody ublituximab on chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells with the 17p deletion. Leukemia. (2014) 28:230–3. 10.1038/leu.2013.240

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17.

  Bar-OrAGroveRAAustinDJTolsonJMVanmeterSALewisEW. Subcutaneous ofatumumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: the MIRROR study. Neurology. (2018) 90:E1805–14. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005516

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18.

  De RomeufCDutertreCALeGarff-Tavernier MFournierNGaucherCGlacetAet al. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells are efficiently killed by an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody selected for improved engagement of FcγRIIIA/CD16. Br J Haematol. (2008) 140:635–43. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06974.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19.

  CalditoNGShiraniASalterAStuveO. Adverse event profile differences between rituximab and ocrelizumab: findings from the FDA adverse event reporting database. Mult Scler J. (2020). 10.1177/1352458520949986. [Epub ahead of print].

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20.

  CliffordDBGassARichertNTornatoreCVermerschPHughesRet al. Cases reported as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in Ocrelizumab-treated patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. (2019) 25:509.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21.

  SormaniMPDe RossiNSchiavettiICarmiscianoLCordioliCMoiolaLet al. Disease modifying therapies and COVID-19 severity in multiple sclerosis. SSRN. (2020). 10.2139/ssrn.3631244

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22.

  LouapreCCollonguesNStankoffBGiannesiniCPapeixCBensaCet al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 and multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. (2020) 77:1079–88. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2581

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23.

  SalterAHalperJBeboBKanellisPCostelloKCutterGet al. COViMS Registry: clinical characterization of SARS-CoV-2 infected multiple sclerosis patients in North America. In: MS Virtual (2020). Abstract #2128.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24.

  SimonsenCSFlemmenHØLauritzenTBerg-HansenPMoenSMCeliusEG. The diagnostic value of IgG index versus oligoclonal bands in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. (2020) 6:205521731990129. 10.1177/2055217319901291

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25.

  VillarLMGarcía-BarragánNEspiñoMRoldánESádabaMGómez-RialJet al. Influence of oligoclonal IgM specificity in multiple sclerosis disease course. Mult Scler. (2008) 14:183–7. 10.1177/1352458507082046

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26.

  AvasaralaJRCrossAHTrotterJL. Oligoclonal band number as a marker for prognosis in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. (2001) 58:2044–5. 10.1001/archneur.58.12.2044

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27.

  PiccioLNaismithRTTrinkausKKleinRSParksBJLyonsJAet al. Changes in B- and T-lymphocyte and chemokine levels with rituximab treatment in multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol. (2010) 67:707–14. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.99

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28.

  BarrTAShenPBrownSLampropoulouVRochTLawrieSet al. B cell depletion therapy ameliorates autoimmune disease through ablation of IL-6-producing B cells. J Exp Med. (2012) 209:1001–10. 10.1084/jem.20111675

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29.

  LongbrakeEECrossAH. Effect of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies on B cells and humoral immunity. JAMA Neurol. (2016) 73:219–25. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3977

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30.

  BakerDMartaMPryceGGiovannoniGSchmiererK. Memory B cells are major targets for effective immunotherapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis. EBioMedicine. (2017) 16:41–50. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.042

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  NoviGBovisFFabbriSTazzaFGazzolaPMaiettaIet al. Tailoring B cell depletion therapy in MS according to memory B cell monitoring. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation. (2020) 7:845. 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000845

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32.

  DuddyMNiinoMAdatiaFHebertSFreedmanMAtkinsHet al. Distinct effector cytokine profiles of memory and naive human B cell subsets and implication in multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. (2007) 178:6092–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.10.6092

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33.

  CrossAHStarkJLLauberJRamsbottomMJLyonsJA. Rituximab reduces B cells and T cells in cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuroimmunol. (2006) 180:63–70. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.06.029

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 34.

  CrossAHKleinRSPiccioL. Rituximab combination therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. (2012) 5:311–9. 10.1177/1756285612461165

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 35.

  AlvarezEPiccioLMikesellRJKlawiterECParksBJNaismithRTet al. CXCL13 is a biomarker of inflammation in multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, and other neurological conditions. Mult Scler J. (2013) 19:1204–8. 10.1177/1352458512473362

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 36.

  KrumbholzMTheilDCepokSHemmerBKivisäkkPRansohoffRMet al. Chemokines in multiple sclerosis: CXCL12 and CXCL13 up-regulation is differentially linked to CNS immune cell recruitment. Brain. (2006) 129:200–11. 10.1093/brain/awh680

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 37.

  ConstantSL. B lymphocytes as antigen-presenting cells for CD4⁺ T cell priming in vivo. J Immunol. (1999) 162:5695–703.

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 38.

  PierceSKMorrisJFGrusbyMJKaumayaPBuskirkA VANSrinivasanMet al. Antigen-presenting function of B lymphocytes. Immunol Rev. (1988) 106:149–80. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.1988.tb00778.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 39.

  LinsleyPSClarkEALedbetterJA. T-cell antigen CD28 mediates adhesion with B cells by interacting with activation antigen B7/BB-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1990) 87:5031–5. 10.1073/pnas.87.13.5031

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 40.

  SternJNHYaariGVander HeidenJAChurchGDonahueWFHintzenRQet al. B cells populating the multiple sclerosis brain mature in the draining cervical lymph nodes. Sci Transl Med. (2014) 6:248ra107. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008879

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 41.

  PalanichamyAApeltsinLKuoTCSirotaMWangSPittsSJet al. Immunoglobulin class-switched B cells form an active immune axis between CNS and periphery in multiple sclerosis. Sci Transl Med. (2014) 6:248ra106. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008930

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 42.

  SerafiniBRosicarelliBMagliozziRStiglianoEAloisiF. Detection of ectopic B-cell follicles with germinal centers in the meninges of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathol. (2004) 14:164–74. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2004.tb00049.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 43.

  SchuhEBererKMulazzaniMFeilKMeinlILahmHet al. Features of human CD3⁺ CD20⁺ T cells. J Immunol. (2016) 197:1111–7. 10.4049/jimmunol.1600089

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 44.

  PalanichamyAJahnSNicklesDDerstineMAbounasrAHauserSLet al. Rituximab efficiently depletes increased CD20-expressing T cells in multiple sclerosis patients. J Immunol. (2014) 193:580–6. 10.4049/jimmunol.1400118

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 45.

  Von EssenMRAmmitzbøllCHansenRHPetersenERSMcWilliamOMarquartHVet al. Proinflammatory CD20⁺ T cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Brain. (2019) 142:120–32. 10.1093/brain/awy301

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  AgiusMAKlodowska-DudaGMaciejowskiMPotemkowskiALiJPatraKet al. Safety and tolerability of inebilizumab (MEDI-551), an anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis: Results from a phase 1 randomised, placebo-controlled, escalating intravenous and subcutaneous dose study. Mult Scler J. (2019) 25:235–45. 10.1177/1352458517740641

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 47.

  KapposLHartungHPFreedmanMSBoykoARadüEWMikolDDet al. ATAMS: A randomised trial of the B-cell-targeting agent atacicept in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. (2011) 17:S40. 10.3325/cmj.2019.60.87

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 48.

  HartungHPKieseierBC. Atacicept: targeting B cells in multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. (2010) 3:205–16. 10.1177/1756285610371146

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 49.

  CroffordLJNyhoffLESheehanJHKendallPL. The role of Bruton's tyrosine kinase in autoimmunity and implications for therapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (2016) 12:763–73. 10.1586/1744666X.2016.1152888

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 50.

  MontalbanXArnoldDLWeberMSStaikovIPiasecka-StryczynskaKWillmerJet al. Placebo-controlled trial of an oral BTK inhibitor in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:2406–17. 10.1056/NEJMoa1901981

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article