Abstract
Vestibular and optokinetic space is represented in three-dimensions in vermal lobules IX-X (uvula, nodulus) and hemisphere lobule X (flocculus) of the cerebellum. Vermal lobules IX-X encodes gravity and head movement using the utricular otolith and the two vertical semicircular canals. Hemispheric lobule X encodes self-motion using optokinetic feedback about the three axes of the semicircular canals. Vestibular and visual adaptation of this circuitry is needed to maintain balance during perturbations of self-induced motion. Vestibular and optokinetic (self-motion detection) stimulation is encoded by cerebellar climbing and mossy fibers. These two afferent pathways excite the discharge of Purkinje cells directly. Climbing fibers preferentially decrease the discharge of Purkinje cells by exciting stellate cell inhibitory interneurons. We describe instances adaptive balance at a behavioral level in which prolonged vestibular or optokinetic stimulation evokes reflexive eye movements that persist when the stimulation that initially evoked them stops. Adaptation to prolonged optokinetic stimulation also can be detected at cellular and subcellular levels. The transcription and expression of a neuropeptide, corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), is influenced by optokinetically-evoked olivary discharge and may contribute to optokinetic adaptation. The transcription and expression of microRNAs in floccular Purkinje cells evoked by long-term optokinetic stimulation may provide one of the subcellular mechanisms by which the membrane insertion of the GABAA receptors is regulated. The neurosteroids, estradiol (E2) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), influence adaptation of vestibular nuclear neurons to electrically-induced potentiation and depression. In each section of this review, we discuss how adaptive changes in the vestibular and optokinetic subsystems of lobule X, inferior olivary nuclei and vestibular nuclei may contribute to the control of balance.
Introduction
Vestibular and optokinetic space is represented in three-dimensions in vermal lobules IX-X (uvula, nodulus) and hemispheric lobule X (flocculus) of the cerebellum. The coordinates of these spaces correspond physically to the planar orientation of the three semicircular canals and to the planes of action of the three pairs of extraocular muscles (–). Although reflexive and centrally-initiated movements can be made without a fully functional cerebellum, its circuitry maintains a central representation of head position in space and is capable of adapting to modifications in vestibular and optokinetic stimulation.
In this review we describe the anatomy, physiology and certain molecular features of the vestibular and optokinetic afferent pathways to cerebellar Purkinje neurons. These pathways include information processing at the levels of the medial accessory optic system, vestibular nuclei, nuclei of the inferior olive and cellular features of the cerebellar cortical interneurons. At each step along the way we consider evidence that each nuclear structure may contribute to the adaptive balance of the vestibular system.
Vestibular Primary Afferent Fibers Project to Ipsilateral Vestibular Nuclei and Vermal Lobules IX-X
Vestibular primary afferents sprout a thinner collateral branch as the primary afferent passes through the superior and lateral vestibular nuclei and terminates on granule cells in the ipsilateral vermal lobules IXd-X (Figures 1A,C,D). The main branch terminates in each of the five vestibular nuclei. These include the descending, lateral, medial and superior nuclei and the parasolitary nucleus (Psol) (–) (Figure 1B). The thinner collateral branch of the vestibular nerve branches again within the cerebellar cortex and distributes its terminals both sagittally and medio-laterally within vermal lobules IXd-X. Vestibular mossy fibers account for ~90% of the total mossy fiber projection to vermal lobules IXd-X (, –). The mossy fiber branching pattern is illustrated best by the spatial patterning of mossy fiber terminals (MFTs) that originate from the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) after labeling with biotin dextran amine (BDA) () (Figure 1E). A single mossy fiber branch forms ~40 MFTs that contact one of a granule cell's 3-6 dendrites of as many as ~15 granule cells. These synapses include a descending Golgi cell axon terminal (, ). In total, a single mossy fiber makes synaptic contact with ~600 granule cells ().
Figure 1
Each vestibular endorgan, the three semicircular canals, utricular and saccular otoliths, projects to a principal folium within vermal lobules IX-X. However, the projection of MFTs is not restricted to a single folium, but includes other folia within lobules IX-X and as well. MFTs from, say the left posterior semicircular canal (LPC), project primarily to left vermal lobule X, but also, more sparsely to left vermal lobule IXd. The left saccule projects to the left vermal lobule IX, but more sparsely to the left vermal lobule X (). This pattern of distributed projections of vestibular primary afferents could account for the “patchy-mosaic” of granule cell receptive fields described for cutaneous cerebellar cortical areas that appear spatially discontinuous ().
Parallel Fibers Distribute Vestibular Primary Afferent Signals Medio-Laterally Within Vermal Folia
Granule cell axons ascend through the Purkinje cell layer and bifurcate into parallel fibers that run through the planar dendritic trees of Purkinje cells in the molecular layer. The lengths of parallel fibers, ~5 mm (rat) and ~7 mm (cat), adds to the dispersion of mossy fiber signals and assures that fractions of the parallel fibers that traverse dendrites of each Purkinje cell in lobules IXd-X convey information that originates from each of the ipsilateral vestibular endorgans (–). While parallel fibers are numerous, their signals are weak. Fewer than 10% of parallel fibers evoke a detectable synaptic response in Purkinje cells. Based on these measurements, it is estimated that the synchronous discharge of ~150 parallel fibers is necessary to evoke a Purkinje cell action potential ().
A small number of granule cell axons ascend through the Purkinje cell layer and into the molecular layer and make synaptic contact with the overlying Purkinje cell dendritic tree prior to bifurcating into parallel fibers. These ascending axons could potentially counteract the medio-lateral parallel fiber dispersion of endorgan signals by preferentially making synapses on overlying Purkinje cells (, ). However, the density of synapses made by ascending granule cell axons on Purkinje cells is small (≤ 50) relative to the total number of synapses made by parallel fibers, ~200,000, as they pass through the Purkinje cell dendritic tree (, ). Furthermore, the amplitude of the EPSP evoked in Purkinje cells by selective activation of an ascending axon is no greater than that of the EPSP evoked by activation of a single conventional parallel fiber ().
Vestibular Secondary Mossy Fiber Afferents Terminate Bilaterally in the Cerebellum
In contrast to the ipsilateral projections of vestibular primary afferents, vestibular secondary afferents have bilateral projections from the DVN, MVN and SVN to vermal lobules IX-X and hemispheric lobule X (–). Vestibular secondary afferent mossy fibers terminate in more than one lobule and spread medially and laterally as they enter the granule cell layers of lobules IX-X in a pattern that mimics MFTs from the lateral reticular nucleus (Figure 1E) (). The widespread distribution of MFTs onto granule cells contrasts with the narrow sagittal array of climbing fiber projections to Purkinje cell dendrites in lobules IX-X (Figure 1F).
The projection pattern of secondary vestibular afferent mossy fibers is bilateral and not restricted to lobules IX-X. Secondary vestibular afferents from the DVN and MVN also project to lobule VIII, the anterior vermis and paraflocculus (, ). Most of these ascending projections are cholinergic (–).
Purkinje cells in left vermal lobule X receive vestibular primary afferent mossy fiber projections that originate from the left vestibular endorgans. These same Purkinje cells receive vestibular climbing fiber projections that convey vestibular signals from the right inferior olive and right vestibular endorgans. The separate peripheral origins of vestibular climbing and mossy fibers influences how their signals modulate the activity of Purkinje cells.
Vestibular Primary Afferents Project to GABAergic Neurons in the Parasolitary Nucleus
Psol is a cluster of small, cells compacted between the caudal MVN, DVN and solitary nucleus. They are uniformly GABAergic and project to the β-nucleus and dorsomedial cell column (DMCC) of the ipsilateral inferior olive (Figures 2A,D) (, ). The activity of single Psol neurons is modulated by vestibular stimulation during rotation in a three-axis rate table. The modulated activity increases during ipsilateral roll-tilt and decreases during contralateral roll-tilt. By altering the angle of the head with respect to the axis of rotation it is possible to find the plane of rotation at which the modulated activity of a recorded neuron is optimal (Figures 2B,C). Psol neurons are unresponsive to rotation about the vertical axis (). Optimal response planes of Psol neurons are distributed throughout the hemifield, but align primarily with the anterior or posterior semicircular canals (Figure 2C).
Figure 2
Vestibular Primary and Secondary Afferents Project to the Dorsal Y-Group
Psol is one of two pre-olivary nuclei that provides vestibular inputs to the β-nucleus and DMCC. The other originates from the Dorsal Y-group. The ventral Y-group projects to the flocculus (). Primary vestibular afferents and projections from vestibular nuclei terminate on Dorsal Y-group neurons which, in turn, project to the ipsilateral flocculus and nodulus, contralateral oculomotor complex and inferior olive (, –). Neurons from the Dorsal Y-group descend and cross the midline to terminate in the contralateral β-nucleus, DMCC and rostral DC. Dorsal Y-group neurons are immunolabeled by an antibody to aspartate and are excitatory ().
Inferior Olivary Neurons Receive a GABAergic Projection From Psol Neurons
Two olivary nuclei, the β-nucleus and DMCC, receive descending inhibitory projections from the ipsilateral Psol (, ). Sinusoidal roll-tilt about the longitudinal axis modulates the discharge of neurons in the β-nucleus and DMCC. Roll-tilt onto the side contralateral to the recording site increases the discharge rate, and roll-tilt onto the ipsilateral side decreases it. This contralateral responsiveness of neurons in the β-nucleus and DMCC is consistent with the GABAergic projection from Psol. Like Psol neurons, β-nucleus and DMCC neurons have both static and dynamic sensitivity and are unresponsive to rotations about the vertical axis (Figures 3A1,2,B). The optimal response planes of neurons in the β-nucleus are topographically organized. β-nucleus neurons that align with the ipsilateral (right) anterior semicircular canal (RAC) are located caudally and neurons that align with the ipsilateral (right) posterior semicircular canal (RPC) are located rostrally (filled circles) (Figure 3C).
Figure 3
Like the β-nucleus, the DMCC receives descending GABAergic projections from Psol (Figure 2A). Neurons in the DMCC have optimal response planes distributed throughout the contralateral hemifield indicative of a more pervasive otolithic input (, ) (Figures 3D1,2E,F).
Climbing Fibers Are Aligned in Sagittal Zones in Vermal Lobules IX-X
Neurons in the β-nucleus and DMCC project contralaterally to Purkinje cells in vermal lobules IX-X in narrow sagittal zones (, –61). As they enter the cerebellum climbing fibers branch sagittally to synapse upon ~7 Purkinje cells (rat) within a multi-folial sagittal zone (62). A single climbing fiber makes ~500 synaptic contacts (rat) as it entwines Purkinje cell proximal dendrites (63).
Purkinje cells have two action potentials, termed Complex and Simple Spikes (CSs, SSs). CSs are multi-peaked action potentials and discharge at a rate of 0.1–5.0 imp/s. In contrast to the long duration and infrequent discharge of CSs, SSs are single peaked short duration action potentials (0.75-1.25 ms) that discharge at 20–60 imp/s (Figure 4A). Not surprisingly the activity of ~90% of the Purkinje cells recorded in vermal lobules IX-X is modulated by sinusoidal roll-tilt (59, 64, 67) (Figures 4A,B1,2). Consistent with the crossed projection of climbing fibers, the discharge of CSs increases during ipsilateral side-down rotation rather than contralateral side-down rotation characteristic of cells in the inferior olive. Null and optimal planes disclose the origin within both labyrinths of the modulated signal (Figures 4B1,2). The discharge for populations of CSs and MFTs with respect to the sinusoidal vestibular stimulation are similar. Both CSs and MFTs discharge maximally during ipsilateral side-down roll-tilt. By contrast SSs discharge maximally during roll-tilt onto the contralateral side, 180 deg out of phase with climbing and mossy fiber inputs (Figure 4C). These data make problematic the idea that mossy fibers convey the signal that modulates the discharge of SSs since the population mossy fiber signal leads the discharge of SSs by ~160 deg.
Figure 4
The response planes of vestibularly-driven CSs and SSs differ in Purkinje cells depending on the distance of Purkinje cells from the midline of vermal lobules IX-X. A sagittal strip of Purkinje cells, left of the midline, respond optimally during to ipsilateral roll-tilt when the head is maintained at an angle in which the axis of the LPC and RAC align with the longitudinal axis of rotation. In a second sagittal strip, lateral to the medial strip, Purkinje cells respond optimally during to ipsilateral roll-tilt in which the axis of the LAC and RPC align with the longitudinal axis of rotation. A two-dimensional representation of vermal lobules IX-X shows 146 Purkinje cells with optimal planes aligned with either the LPC (green circles) or the LAC (red squares) (Figure 4D). These two sagittal zones are ~800 μm wide in the rabbit. Within either the medial or lateral the amplitude of modulation for both CSs and SSs is maximal at the center of the zone and decreases in either the medial or lateral direction (59). The borders of the two zones overlap. Postural responses are influenced by vestibular stimulation about three different axes. Vestibular stimulation about the rotational axis of the LAC evokes a forward and lateral extension of the ipsilateral fore- and hind-paws. Vestibular stimulation about the rotational axis of the LPC evokes a backward extension of the left paws. These two dimensions are insufficient to maintain balance in a three-dimensional space. Rotation about a third, vertical axis is detected by a horizontal optokinetic signal that originates from the contralateral dorsal cap of Kooy (DC) (68). The climbing fibers that originate from the DC respond optimally to posterior→anterior (P→A) stimulation of the ipsilateral eye (, 64, 69, 70). In rabbits, an optokinetic parasagittal climbing fiber zone of Purkinje cells is interposed between the LPC and LAC zones on the ventral surface of left vermal lobule X. This horizontal optokinetic zone completes the third spatial dimension needed for three-dimensional balance (, , 64) (Figure 4D).
In the mouse cerebellum, sagittal zones for optimal planes of SSs and CSs are consistent with the zones found in rabbit. In the mouse, these physiologically defined zones are ~400 μm wide. The optimal planes of CSs and SSs can be quantified separately and displayed as a polar vector in which the amplitude of the vector corresponds to depth of modulation (M) and the phase angle (ϕ) corresponds to the phase of the response relative to the head position. For example, when ϕ = 0 deg, the peak discharge of a Purkinje cell in the left nodulus is in phase with maximal tilt of the head onto the left side (Figure 4E). When ϕ = 180 deg, the peak Purkinje cell discharge is in phase with peak rightward head tilt. Note that the population vector phase for CSs, ϕ = 56 deg, leads head position. The population vector for SSs, ϕ = 222 deg, lags CSs by 166 deg).
A Three-Axis Floccular Optokinetic Coordinate System Is Composed With Climbing Fiber Signals
Vermal lobule X comprises a hybrid three axis coordinate system that uses signals from the utricular otolith, vertical semicircular canals and a horizontal optokinetic pathway. Three distinct parasagittal climbing fiber zones demarcate the separate termination of these inputs. By contrast the hemispheres of lobule X comprise a three-axis system that uses optokinetic information conveyed by climbing fibers to track head position in three-dimensional visual space. The coordinates of this three-dimensional system roughly align with the orientation of semicircular canals and utricular otoliths also used by lobules IX-X.
Hemispheric lobule X receives a visual projection from the DC. The DC receives an optokinetic signal from the ipsilateral nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) and projects to the contralateral hemispheric and vermal lobule X (, 68, 71–73). While more than 90% of the mossy fiber projections to vermal lobules IX-X are vestibular primary afferent collaterals, the mossy fiber projections to hemispheric lobule X are heterogeneous. The largest mossy fiber projections to the flocculus originate from the dorsomedial medullary reticular formation, paramedian reticular nucleus and the nuclei of the paramedian tracts as well as the raphe nuclei (74).
Neurons in the caudal DC respond to P→A horizontal optokinetic stimulation (HOKS) of the contralateral eye (Figures 5A,B). The peak sensitivity to HOKS is 1 deg/s. The velocity sensitivity of the optokinetic response is reduced by 3 dB at 0.1 deg/s and 10.0 deg/s (75). Two other clusters of neurons in the DC convey information concerning OKS about the posterior axis (PA) and anterior axis (AA) (Figures 5C–E). These two axes lie along the azimuth and form angles of 135 deg (PA) and 45 deg (AA) with respect to the longitudinal axis (, 69, 76). Each cluster in the DC projects to a sagittally arrayed zone in the contralateral flocculus (77, 78).
Figure 5
Vestibular and optokinetic climbing fiber systems in lobules IX-X have a similar organizational structure at the inferior olive and cerebellar cortex. Both systems are organized in three-dimensions. The vestibular system, anchored anatomically in the β-nucleus and DMCC, maintains a true gravitational vertical reference. However, it lacks input from the horizontal semicircular canals for detection of head rotation about the vertical axis. Instead, it relies on a small horizontal optokinetic input from the DC. The optokinetic system, anchored anatomically in the DC, detects self-motion about three axes, but lacks the non-visual dynamic and static sense of self-motion provided by the three semicircular canal ampullae and two otolith maculae.
The distribution of vestibular mossy fiber and vestibular climbing fiber signals assures that information from both labyrinths is represented bilaterally. Purkinje cells in left vermal lobule X (nodulus) receive vestibular primary afferent mossy fiber projections that arise from the left vestibular endorgans. These same Purkinje cells receive vestibular climbing fiber projections that convey vestibular signals from the contralateral inferior olive and right vestibular endorgans.
Floccular Optokinetic Zones Are Demarcated Anatomically and Physiologically
The flocculus, like the uvula-nodulus, has a topographic spatial map represented in its climbing fiber projection. The rabbit flocculus has five transfolial zones (1, 2, 3, 4, and C2) whose borders can be defined both anatomically and physiologically. Anatomically the zone borders in the floccular white matter can be visualized by a histochemical stain for acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (, , 79–81). Climbing fibers from the caudal DC encode HOKS about the vertical axis (VA) to zones 2 and 4. Cells in rostral DC and ventrolateral outgrowth (VLO) detect OKS about the posterior axis (PA) and anterior axis (AA) and project to zones 1 and 3. These two axes lie along the azimuth and form angles of 135 deg (PA) and 45 deg (AA) with respect to the longitudinal axis. Climbing fibers from the rostral medial accessory olive (MAO) project to zone C2, but convey no optokinetic information (, 69, 78, 82). Climbing fibers from the rostral DC in the rabbit encode optokinetic stimulation about the PA and AA and project to zones 1 and 3. Tracer and micro-stimulation studies suggest that these floccular zones have different projection patterns particularly to the vestibular complex (, 81). Microstimulation of the white matter in the rabbit flocculus evokes eye movements consistent with the zone that is stimulated. Microstimulation of zones 2 and 4 evoke horizontal eye movements. Microstimulation of zones 1 and 3 evoke movements about the AA and PA axes (). The function of the C2 compartment may be linked to the control of head movement (83).
Immunohistochemical Zebrin II Parasagittal Zones and Physiological Climbing Fiber Zones in Lobule X
Physiologically defined parasagittal climbing fiber zones can be compared to the parasagittal zones described immunohistochemically using antibodies to Zebrin I and Zebrin II (84, 85) and to histochemical stains for acetylcholinesterase (86) and 5′-nucleotidase (87, 88). The expression of Zebrin II in vermal lobule X intensely labels Purkinje cells with only weakly labeled interlaced Zebrin negative bands (85, 89, 90). The prominent interlaced immunohistochemical zonation is more apparent in vermal lobule IX and the hemisphere of lobule X (flocculus).
Purkinje cells in in lobule X of the pigeon respond to one of the three axes of optokinetic stimulation (91), similar to the physiological pattern of optokinetic responses observed in rabbit (69) and mouse (92). Within a physiological optokinetic zone both zebrin II positive and zebrin II negative Purkinje cells exist. The amplitude of modulated discharge for Purkinje cells located in a zebrin II-positive zone exceeds that of Purkinje cells located in a zebrin II-negative zone. The cause of this difference is unresolved. However, it seems that zebrin II zones are not congruent with the optokinetic and vestibular sagittal zones in lobules IX-X.
The Antiphasic Discharge of CSs and SSs Depends Climbing Fibers
Presently, the origins of the synaptic signals that modulate the discharge of SSs is poorly understood. Often, it is argued that parallel fiber discharge modulates the activity SSs (93–102). If vestibular primary afferents→granule cells→parallel fibers→Purkinje cell were a straight-through pathway, then the discharge of vestibular primary afferents and the discharge of SSs ought to co-vary. However, during sinusoidal roll-tilt these two signals are antiphasic. SSs are also antiphasic with the discharge of CSs (Figures 4B,C,E) (64, 65). It is logically possible that vestibular nuclear neurons, a fraction of which project contralaterally, are the major synaptic driving force that modulates the activity of SSs, but at present there is no evidence that bears on this point. Perhaps the genesis of antiphasic discharge of CSs and SSs in lobules IX-X can be explained by known cerebellar circuitry.
An antiphasic interaction between CSs and SSs can be demonstrated directly by reversibly inactivating the inferior olive. Application of a cooling probe to the ventral brainstem of the rat reduces CS discharge and increases SS discharge (103, 104). The increased SS discharge reduces the spontaneous discharge rate of secondary vestibular neurons and cerebellar nuclear neurons. This cooling effect can be attributed to the decreased olivary activity. When the inferior olive is destroyed by a cocktail of 3-acetylpyridine and harmaline prior to cooling, the increased discharge of SSs evoked by cooling the inferior olive in intact rats does not occur (104–106).
The antiphasic discharge of CSs and SSs following activation of climbing fibers does not depend on the occurrence of a CS in the same Purkinje cell. When climbing fibers are electrically stimulated in the inferior olive, the intensity of the electrical stimulus can be adjusted to be above or below a level needed to evoke a CS in a recorded Purkinje cell. Suprathreshold electrical stimulation evokes a CS and also suppresses the spontaneous discharge of SSs. However, a stimulus that is subthreshold for activating a CS in a recorded Purkinje cell may still cause suppression of its SSs (107). This finding has been replicated, substituting optical stimulation of channel rhodopsin-expressing climbing fibers instead of electrical stimulation. In this instance the spontaneous activity of a Purkinje cell whose climbing fiber is not activated, nevertheless decreases (108). This supports the idea that the suppression is caused by climbing fiber-evoked activation of inhibitory interneurons.
The effects of CSs on the discharge of SSs can be examined by altering the wiring of climbing and mossy fiber projections to the cerebellum. In the native pathway climbing fibers decussate in the ventral brainstem and then project to the contralteral cerebellum. It is possible to mutate this climbing fiber pathway so that the normal crossed contralateral projection is converted to an uncrossed ipsilateral projection. This is accomplished by insertion of the mutation (Ptf1a::cre;Robo3(lox/lox) in mice (109). The normally uncrossed mossy fiber projections remain undisturbed. Purkinje cell recordings from the flocculus of these mutant mice during optokinetic stimulation indicate that the favored P→A directional preference of normal mice is reversed in mutant mice. The CS discharge is now optimal for stimulation in the A→P direction because the uncrossed olivo-cerebellar projection in the mutant. More interesting is that the directional preference of optokinetically-evoked SSs is also reversed in the mutant. If the modulated discharge of SSs was caused by an intact mossy fiber→granule cell→parallel fiber projection, its polarity would not reverse.
Purkinje cells in lobules IX-X receive an excitatory climbing fiber signal from the contralateral β-nucleus and DMCC (Figure 2B). If the climbing fiber input were blocked by making a microlesion in the right β-nucleus, then Purkinje and stellate cells in the left lobules IX-X would retain only a vestibular primary afferent signal while right vermal lobules IX-X would retain both a climbing fiber signal and a vestibular primary signal. The antiphasic discharge of CSs and SSs is disrupted following a microlesion of the right β-nucleus. Such a microlesion leaves some cells in the β-nucleus and DMCC and their climbing fiber projections to Purkinje cells in the contralateral vermal lobules IX-X intact. The CSs and SSs in these Purkinje cells respond to sinusoidal roll-tilt with a normal antiphasic discharge (Figure 6A1). A second group of Purkinje cells retain spontaneously discharging CSs, but they are not driven by vestibular stimulation. The SSs in these Purkinje cells are unresponsive in spite of the fact that their vestibular primary afferent mossy fiber input is not compromised (Figure 6A2). A third group of Purkinje cells lack spontaneous and vestibularly-modulated CSs. In these Purkinje cells, 30/37 SSs cannot be modulated by vestibular roll-tilt (Figure 6A3) (110).
Figure 6
Vestibular primary afferent mossy fibers project exclusively to ipsilateral vermal lobules IX-X. Following a left unilateral labyrinthectomy (UL) Purkinje cells recorded from ipsilateral (left) vermal lobules IX-X retain a normal climbing fiber-evoked antiphasic response of CSs and SSs even though the left vestibular primary afferent mossy fiber signal is effectively removed (Figure 6B1). The climbing fiber pathway to the left vermal lobules IX-X remains intact since it originates from the contralateral (right) labyrinth. Conversely, the antiphasic responses of CSs and SSs in the right vermal lobule IX-X Purkinje cells ipsilateral to the intact labyrinth, are severely impaired (66) because the climbing fiber input to the left vermal lobules IX-X originates from the surgically destroyed (right) labyrinth (Figure 6B2). These recordings are made acutely within 3 h post-UL. Chronic recordings, are made at least 48 h post-UL reveal a strong recovery of CS-induced SS pauses in contralateral Purkinje cells (Figure 6B3). This can be attributed, in part, to the recovery in the activity of secondary neurons that project bilaterally to vermal lobule X (, 111).
Cerebellar Interneurons and the Genesis of Climbing Fiber-Evoked Pauses
Climbing fiber evoked pauses in SS discharge can be viewed at three levels: [1] Spontaneous SS pauses are triggered for 5–10 ms due to the large climbing fiber-induced inactivation by a Ca2+ activated K+ conductance (112). A short-term SS inactivation may also be attributed, in part, to ephaptic coupling of Purkinje cells (113). This climbing fiber-evoked pause of SSs occurs even when GABAergic transmission by interneurons is blocked (114, 115). [2] Long-term depression (LTD), evoked by conjunctive activation of climbing fiber and parallel fiber synapse on a Purkinje cell dendrite has a duration of at least minutes (116–122). [3] A longer pause in SS discharge is induced by climbing fiber-evoked interneuronal inhibition. Three inhibitory interneurons are likely candidates to play this role; Golgi cells, stellate cells and basket cells. This pause is independent of the fast changes in Purkinje cell conductance and lasts 5-100 ms (123–126).
Golgi cells have large somata (10–20 μm) found at the base of the Purkinje cell layer. Their dendrites are oriented sagittally in the molecular layer and have a planar width of 180 μm, comparable to the planar width of Purkinje cells, 120 μm (65). Golgi cell axons branch extensively in the granule cell layer where they co-terminate with mossy fiber terminals on granule cell dendrites in a glomerular plexus (, , 127, 128). Golgi cell axon terminals also contact unipolar brush cells (129). Climbing fibers make synaptic contact with Golgi cell dendrites in the molecular layer (130, 131). Consequently, Golgi cells are in a unique position to regulate the discharge of granule cells and thereby influence parallel fiber input to Purkinje cells and possibly account for the modulation of SSs. The activity of Golgi cells can be recorded in vivo and juxtacellularly labeled to confirm subsequently their identity. The activity Golgi cells in lobules IX-X is modulated sinusoidal vestibular stimulation. Interestingly, Golgi cells are not driven in phase with either CSs or parallel fibers. Rather during sinusoidal roll-tilt they respond during contralateral side-down rotation, in phase with the discharge of SSs and out of phase with the discharge of CSs (ϕ = 180 deg), making it implausible that Golgi cells are responsible for the modulation of SSs during vestibular stimulation (65) (Figure 7A).
Figure 7
Stellate cell axons have lengths of ~250 μm and since they are arrayed throughout the entire molecular layer, make multiple and repeated contact with the dendrites of Purkinje cells (132, 133). The mouse molecular layer contains at least 15 stellate cells/Purkinje cell. Climbing fibers make no direct synaptic contacts onto either basket or stellate cells (128, 134). Rather, the discharge of climbing fibers releases glutamate (“spillover”) in sufficient concentration to excite stellate cell discharge (125, 126, 135–137). Stellate cell axon terminals release GABA onto GABAAα1 receptors on Purkinje cell dendrites.
The discharge of stellate cells is well-modulated during sinusoidal roll-tilt with peak discharge frequency during ipsilateral side-down. The polarization vector for a population of 47 stellate cells (ϕ = 13 deg) suggests that the antiphasic responses of CSs and SSs could be attribute to climbing fiber-evoked stellate cell inhibition of Purkinje neurons (Figure 7B) (65).
Stellate cell inhibition of Purkinje cells initiated by climbing fiber release of glutamate is not the only unconventional aspect of stellate cell synaptic influence on Purkinje cell excitability. If climbing fibers and parallel fibers are stimulated conjunctively in the cerebellar C3 zone of the cat, the stellate cell response to parallel fiber stimulation alone increases (139). Stellate cells express NMDA receptors. When stellate cells are stimulated in tissue slice preparations the stellate cells increase their discharge through a Ca2+ and CaMKII-dependent activation of voltage-gated Na+ channels (140). This signaling pathway lowers the gated action potential threshold by causing a hyperpolarizing shift in voltage gated Na+ channels. The increased discharge lasts for minutes.
Oscillatory Adaptation of Vestibular Circuitry Occurs During Prolonged Roll-Tilt Stimulation
The modulated pattern of discharge CSs in Purkinje cells during sinusoidal rotation about the longitudinal axis is usually invariant for tens of minutes (Figure 4B1). When vestibular stimulation stops, the pattern of CS discharge returns to a spontaneous level. However, the discharge of 5% CSs is not invariant (Figures 8A–E). In these Purkinje cells, the modulated discharge frequency of CSs decreases during repeated sinusoidal roll-tilt at 0.20 Hz (Figure 8D). After ~345 s the vestibular stimulus fails to evoke a CS discharge (141). When sinusoidal stimulation is discontinued, the oscillatory pattern of CSs at 0.20 Hz re-appears (Figure 8E). Approximately 200–300 s after vestibular stimulation stops, this pattern disappears and is replaced with aperiodic spontaneous discharge. This pattern of oscillations, can be temporarily entrained to a different frequency of roll-tilt. An oscillation at 0.20 Hz can be entrained to 0.30 Hz. When the stimulation stops, the entrained oscillation at 0.30 Hz rapidly fades into 0.20 Hz and then back to aperiodic spontaneous activity. While it is tempting to speculate that this adaptive pattern originates in the inferior olive, the same adaptive pattern can be observed in the GABAergic neurons in the Psol (). Possibly the oscillations originate at the Psol or at a more peripheral level. The medial vestibular nucleus has class of secondary neurons that express N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptors (NMDA) (142). In tissue slice experiments the discharge of these neurons oscillates at frequencies of 0.1–0.3 hz with bath application of NMDA (143). The possibility of NMDA receptors in neurons in the MVN and Psol acting similarly to the NMDA receptors in stellate cells has not been explored. Possibly NMDA receptors provide a mechanism by which membrane oscillations induced by vestibular stimulation are controlled by neuromodulators.
Figure 8
The oscillatory discharge of Psol neurons and climbing fibers, while present in anesthetized preparations, have a behavioral analog in unanesthetized rabbits. Sinusoidal linear acceleration of a rabbit along the inter-aural axis for several hours evokes oscillatory vertical eye movements. These eye movements persist for 1–2 min when vestibular stimulation is stopped (144).
Activity of Floccular CSs Influences the Discharge of MVN Neurons
MVN neurons receive optokinetic as well as vestibular signals (145). By recording from MVN neurons before and after the dorsal cap is removed from the optokinetic circuitry the contribution of the DC through the flocculus to visually-modulated MVN activity can be determined (Figure 9A). In paired recordings, both DC and MVN neurons increase their rate of discharge during constant velocity (0.8 deg/sec) of the eye ipsilateral to the MVN and contralateral to the DC (146). At the onset of P→A stimulation the MVN neuron slowly increases its rate of discharge from ~10 imp/s to a maximum of ~60 imp/s over the 25 s interval (Figure 9C). When the optokinetic stimulus reverses direction, the activity of the MVN neuron slowly returns to a steady-state with a 10–15 s decay. When the site of the olivary recording is inactivated by an electrolytic microlesion made through the olivary recording electrode, the response profile of the MVN neuron is altered. The peak modulation is decreases and the slow build up and decay attenuates. The DC microlesion has no effect on MVN activity induced by rotation of the rabbit about the vertical axis (Figure 9B). Consistent with the known circuitry, the optokinetically evoked activity of neurons in the right DC project as climbing fibers to Purkinje cells in the left (contralateral) hemispheric lobule X. The increase in climbing fiber-evoked CSs reduces the discharge of SSs in Purkinje cells, thereby withdrawing Purkinje cell inhibition of the subjacent MVN neurons.
Figure 9
Hemispheric Lobule X Contributes Optokinetic Stabilization to Postural Control
In monkeys, post-rotatory vestibular nystagmus (PRN) is provoked by deceleration following constant velocity horizontal vestibular stimulation. PRN lasts for only a few seconds, but long enough to measure how the plane of PRN changes during pitch. Since monkeys have frontally placed eyes changes in pitch would be expected to alter the plane of PRN within the orbit to keep the plane in space constant. In normal monkeys, this is exactly what happens. In monkeys with bilateral lesions of the lobule X, PRN no longer is executed horizontally in space, but rather is executed horizontally within the orbit (147, 148).
In rabbits the same influence of the gravitational vector and eye movements can be examined by inducing a long-lasting optokinetic after-nystagmus by providing sustained exposure to HOKS. In rabbits, sustained HOKS (1–48 h) evokes an optokinetic after-nystagmus (OKAN II) that lasts for several hours (Figures 10A–E). The velocities of the slow phase of OKAN II vary between 30 and 50 deg/s and exceed the normal range of rabbit slow phase velocities, even exceeding the slow phase velocities induced by a unilateral labyrinthectomy (Figure 10E). During sustained binocular HOKS the gain of the horizontal optokinetic reflex (eye velocity/drum velocity) decreases gradually from ~0.95 at the onset of stimulation to ~0.50 after 36 h of HOKS (Figure 10D). One way of thinking about the genesis of OKAN II is that the animal adapts to a visual environment that moves slowly about the vertical axis. Retinal slip increases as the gain of the optokinetic reflex decreases. When the rabbit is removed from this environment and placed in the dark, eye movements are generated that attempt to restore the adapted stimulus condition without negative feedback. In many rabbits OKAN II would persist at the onset even in an illuminated background since the eyes are moving at velocities that exceed the detection range of direction-selective ganglion cells.
Figure 10
Because OKAN II persists for hours, it is relatively easy to measure the plane of OKAN II and how it is modified by changes when the head is pitched and rolled. In the lateral-eyed rabbit, roll-tilt should yield equivalent results to pitch in monkeys. During rotation about the longitudinal axis in normal rabbits OKAN II remains horizontal in space and compensates for the roll-tilt by moving vertically within the orbit (Figure 11A). OKAN II remains horizontal in space during pitch about the inter-aural axis in both normal and nodulectomized rabbits (Figure 11B). However, in nodulectomized rabbits this gravitational reference is lost (Figure 11C) (151).
Figure 11
Both PRN and OKAN II reflect an imbalance in pre-oculomotor circuitry. It is astounding to consider that during roll-tilt a gravitational vector can be interpreted by cerebellar and brainstem circuitry to perform the same horizontal eye movement in space by executing graded commands for the reciprocal activation of the horizontal and vertical rectus muscles.
During roll-tilt the lobules IX-X are necessary to maintain the plane of OKAN II constant with respect to gravity. This is consistent with the abundance of climbing fiber-encoded signals related to static roll and the absence of climbing fiber-encoded signals from the horizontal canals. Conversely, a nodulectomy has no effect on the gain of the HVOR and causes only a small decrease in the gain of the VVOR. Nor does a nodulectomy disrupt optokinetic suppression of either the HVOR or VVOR (151).
HOKS Evokes Transcription and Expression of Corticotropin Releasing Factor (CRF)
Sustained binocular HOKS evokes OKAN II that lasts 24 h or longer, depending on the parameters of stimulation (150). While the cerebellar flocculus has been the focus of experiments designed to test the role of the inferior olivary neurons in visual-vestibular adaptation, changes observed following sustained HOKS suggest that optokinetic adaptation is already present in optokinetic circuitry prior to its entry to the cerebellum (152, 153). Binocular HOKS in rabbits for 16–48 h increases the transcription and expression of corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) in neurons in the caudal DC contralateral to the eye receiving P→A optokinetic stimulation (Figures 12A–D). If the rabbit is anesthetized and euthanized immediately after HOKS is stopped, neurons in the DC contralateral to the eye that received P→A stimulation have elevated transcription of CRF (Figure 12A). Following 24 h of binocular HOKS an estimate of the hybridized grain densities in neurons in the two DCs yield an estimate of a 4-7X increase of CRF mRNA transcripts in neurons in the DC stimulated in the P→A direction relative to the transcripts in neurons in the contralateral DC. If binocular HOKS is given for 48 h and the rabbit is allowed to recover for 16–18 h in the light before it is anesthetized and euthanized, elevated expression of CRF is still found in neurons in the DC contralateral to the eye stimulated in the P→A direction, with a smaller increase in CRF expression in the DC contralateral to the eye stimulated in the AP direction (Figure 12C). If monocular, HOKS in the null (A→P) direction is given for 48 h and the animal is allowed to recover for 18 h in the dark, then elevated expression of CRF is found in the DC contralateral to the eye previously stimulated in the AP direction (Figure 12D) (154). HOKS is essential to evoke the change in CRF expression. If contour vision is obscured by translucent occluders then no change in CRF expression in DC neurons on either side of the brain is observed (Figure 12B). After HOKS stops these neurons may evince a rebound excitation when the disfacilitatory signal is removed. OKAN II persists in rabbits that recover in the dark. When rabbits recover in the light, OKAN II is suppressed by visual feedback. This effectively uncouples the retinal slip signal from the eye movement signal. A rebound in activity in the caudal DC previously stimulated in the A→P direction could occur if subsequently the caudal DC receives an OKAN II-associated eye movement signal in the form of reduced inhibition from the contralateral NPH. This explanation is consistent with the idea that floccular CSs encode not just retinal slip, but a mixture of retinal slip and eye movement signals (155).
Figure 12
Cerebellar Purkinje cells, particularly those in hemispheric lobule X and vermal lobules IX-X, express CRF binding sites (156–158). Only one of the two CRF receptor subtypes, CRF1, is expressed in the cerebellum (159). CRF receptors belong to the VIP/calcitonin family of G protein-coupled receptors. They are positively coupled to adenylate cyclase. Direct application of CRF onto Purkinje neurons in vitro increases excitability attributed activation of a sodium current and a voltage-dependent potassium current (160). In cerebellar cultures, CRF modulates gene expression via a cAMP pathway (161). This pathway could be responsible for the long-term regulation of calcium-activated potassium conductance and thereby account for the decreased after-hyperpolarization observed in Purkinje cells in vitro after bath application of CRF (162).
CRF is localized in neurons that comprise the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, principally engaged in the neuroendocrine response to stress. Sex differences in the HPA axis are manifest in gonadal sex steroids and neuroactive metabolites. CRF expression may be one of the dynamic antecedents of motion sickness.
HOKS of CSs Evokes Epigenetic Changes in Transcription
Changes in synaptic efficacy observed during LTD last seconds to tens of minutes. The changes in such short-term plasticity involve the translocation of as many as 100 proteins (163). Longer-term changes in synaptic efficacy may also involve changes in gene transcription. Sustained neuronal activity could regulate a variety of transcription factors, each acting on a single gene. Alternatively, neuronal activity could regulate a few transcription factors, each acting on several genes. This second possibility could be realized through the regulation of microRNAs, short, 22 nucleotides, non-proton-coding, RNA that regulates expression of protein-coding mRNAs by repressing their translation or enhancing their degradation (164). Theoretically, a single microRNA may have nucleotide complementarity with as many as 30 different mRNAs, giving it a potential wide regulatory influence (165). Based upon microRNA complementarity, derived from genome databases, as many as one-third of human protein-coding genes may be influenced by microRNAs (166). Functionally, the transcription of most microRNAs is correlated with cellular development, apoptosis (164, 167–172) and microbial defense (164, 173, 174).
HOKS Evokes Increased Transcription of Several microRNAs
The mouse optokinetic pathway offers the opportunity of learning how repeated activation of a climbing fiber synapse changes transcription of microRNAs in floccular Purkinje cells. Specific microRNAs might suppress mRNAs involved in the expression of target proteins related to cellular adaptation. This is especially attractive because it uses circuitry that is well-described physiologically and known to be critical for adaptation at behavioral and cellular levels. It is also attractive because it allows for the measurement of the subcellular consequences of sustained activation of the most powerful synapse in the central nervous system.
Mice are restrained at the center of an optokinetic sphere rotated CCW at 6 deg/s, stimulating the right eye in the P→A direction and the left eye in the A→P direction. The optokinetic pathway from the right retina to the left DC and then to the right flocculus is indicated by a dashed red line (Figures 13A,B). Tissue samples from both the left and right flocculi are collected, RNA extracted and run on a microRNA microarray. The data set from the microarray are plotted in a Volcano plot that includes information about representation of microRNA transcripts, their copy number, frequency of occurrence, and difference in ratio of transcription of the right floccular sample/left floccular sample (Figure 13C). The microRNAs with the largest differential transcription in the left and right flocculi are identified (Figure 13D).
Figure 13
The single microRNA with the largest differential transcription, miR335, is then PCR-amplified and the ratio of the right/left flocculus measured after HOKS stimulation for different durations. Binocular HOKS for 6 h is the minimal duration of stimulation that induces a detectable increase in transcription of miR335 in the right/left flocculus ratio (RF/LF) (Figure 13E). With increasing duration of HOKS RF/LF increases up to 30 h of HOKS, the experimental limit. At 30 h of HOKS, miR335 RF/LF increased 6-fold relative to unstimulated controls. This optokinetically evoked transcriptional change does not occur in two other microRNAs, miR125, and miR147.
A potential role of microRNAs in any HOKS-induced neuronal adaptation is, in part, dependent on the duration of the RF/LF ratio of transcripts after the stimulus stops. The time course of microRNA decay regulates the duration of suppressive effect on its complementary mRNA target and ultimately on the decreased expression of a protein. By exposing mice to a fixed duration of monocular P→A HOKS (24 h) and then delaying anesthesia and euthanasia for fixed intervals, this question is addressed. HOKS-induced miR335 transcripts decay with a time-constant of ~2.5 h (Figure 13F) (176).
Following HOKS, microRNAs can be measured with greater accuracy by collecting floccular samples from the zone within the flocculus that contains only Purkinje cells whose discharge is modulated by HOKS. This is possible because the topography of optokinetically responsive floccular Purkinje cells in the mouse has already been obtained (92) (Figure 14A1). The spindle-shaped single folium flocculus is ~1.2 mm long and includes five separate regions classified by their sensitivity to optokinetic stimulation about three axes. Purkinje cells in the central region respond to HOKS. This central region is flanked by Purkinje cells that respond to stimulation about the anterior and posterior axes (92) (Figure 14A2). Using these improved floccular samples, the right “stimulated” miR335 transcripts increase 18X relative to the “unstimulated” left flocculus miR335 transcripts after 24 h of HOKS.
Figure 14
Increased miR335 transcripts in a cerebellar lysate is not proof that the increase can be localized to Purkinje cells. However, hybridization histochemistry localizes miR335 transcripts to Purkinje cells (Figure 14B). The inserted box shows at a higher magnification that the miR335 hybridization probe labels Purkinje cell cytoplasm, not the nucleus.
The increase and subsequent decay of microRNA transcripts in the flocculus after HOKS could indicate differences in miR335 transcription or changes in cytoplasmic post-transcriptional events or both. Nuclear transcription of microRNAs is preceded by transcription of larger pri-microRNAs. A variety of enzymatic post-transcriptional factors could contribute to the regulation of microRNAs. These factors might confound interpretations concerning increases or decreases in cytoplasmic microRNA transcripts and whether such changes can be attributed to transcription or to post-transcriptional cytoplasmic regulatory events. This question can be answered by measuring transcripts of pri-miR335 and mature miR335 in floccular mRNA samples extracted from “stimulated” and “non-stimulated” flocculi (Figure 14C). Following 24 h of HOKS, pri-miR335 transcripts from the middle zone of the stimulated (right) flocculus increase 28X relative to the transcripts in the unstimulated (left) flocculus. Mature miR335 transcripts increase by 18X.
The nucleotide sequence of miR335, analyzed with the use of two data bases offers a long list of clues as to the likely complementary mRNA targets. However, even under the most stringent conditions, these lists are unacceptably large. The microRNA Registry and EnsEMBL propose more than 149 mRNAs with sufficient complementarity to hybridize with miR335.
As an alternative, mRNA arrays can screen mRNAs whose transcripts decrease after 24h of HOKS. A total of 42 such mRNA transcripts are reduced in the right flocculus by P→A HOKS of the right eye for 24 h (176, 178). Using a more direct approach, miR335 inhibitors can be transfected directly into the posterior vermis to assess possible changes in mRNA transcripts. Combining results from these three methods: [1] miR335 is predicted to be complementary to many transcripts including transcripts of calbindin and 14-3-3-θ a regulatory protein that binds to functionally diverse signaling proteins (179, 180), [2] The transcripts of many proteins including calbindin and 14-3-3-θ decrease following 24 h of HOKS, and [3] Transcripts of calbindin and 14-3-3-θ increase after injection of miR335 inhibitors into cerebellar tissue (175).
Interactions of microRNA and mRNA Transcripts Are Examined in N2A Cells
The interaction of miR335 with its complementary targets could be achieved through interactions within the cerebellar cortex also induced by climbing fiber activity. Alternatively, interactions of miR335 with its target mRNAs can be examined directly in vitro. N2a cells serve as a model system for detecting interactions of miR335 with calbindin and 14-3-3-θ. These three components are expressed natively in N2a cells. The effects of transfecting N2a can with miR335 inhibitors or miR335 precursors on mRNA transcripts for miR335, 14-3-3-θ calbindin and 14-3-3-θ (control) can be measured directly using quantitative PCR. When N2a cells are transfected with a miR335 inhibitor, transcripts of miR335 decrease and transcripts of 14-3-3-θ increase. Transfection of N2a cells with a miR335 precursor increases transcripts of miR335 and decreases transcripts of 14-3-3-θ. The specificity of these effects is strengthened by the lack of changes in 14-3-3-θ transcripts, a control isoform (Figure 14D).
14-3-3-θ, PKC-γ, and GABAAγ2 Are Functionally Linked in Purkinje Cell GABAA Receptors
Increased transcription of miR335, evoked by climbing fiber excitation of Purkinje cells, decreases transcripts of 14-3-3-θ. In cerebellar lysates 14-3-3-θ interacts with PKC-γ, one of numerous constitutively-expressed isoforms of protein kinase C. PKC-γ phosphorylates several proteins expressed in the cerebellum. Immunoprecipitation of 14-3-3-θ co-immunoprecipitates PKC-γ. Immunoprecipitation of 14-3-3-θ also co-immunoprecipitates GABAAγ2, a subunit of the pentameric GABAA receptor involved with its membrane assembly (177, 181–186). This role of these proteins in the assembly of GABAA receptors can be examined in N2a cells in which these proteins are native as is the GABAA receptor. To mimic synaptic activation of N2a cells they are “stimulated” by treatment with 200 nM of phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA), a PKC activator. “Stimulated” cells can be compared with “unstimulated” control cells not treated with PMA. 14-3-3-θ and PKC-γ are “knocked down” by transfecting N2a cells with siRNAs or miRNAs designed specifically to knockdown either 14-3-3-θ or PKC-γ. The objective is to examine how 14-3-3-θ and PKC-γ contribute to the serine phosphorylation of GABAAγ2 in two groups of N2a cells, one treated with 200 nM of PMA and one untreated control. The outcome of this test is that knockdown of either 14-3-3-θ or PKC-γ reduces serine phosphorylation of GABAAγ2 only in N2a cells that also are activated by PMA (Figure 14E).
The possibility that knockdown of either 14-3-3-θ or PKC-γ reduces the cell surface expression of GABAAγ2 is examined with the use of an assay that preferentially biotinylates cell surface proteins (177). Again, one can compare the efficacy of the knockdowns in N2a cells that are treated with PMA in contrast to those that are untreated (Figure 14F). In PMA treated N2a cells knockdowns of either 14-3-3-θ or PKC-γ reduce cell surface expression of GABAAγ2.
If the same interactions of microRNA that occur in N2a cells also occur in Purkinje cells then a possible homeostatic mechanism is at least one of the consequences of sustained HOKS as follows: The gain of the horizontal optokinetic reflex slowly attenuates with sustained HOKS. Sustained HOKS increases transcription of miR335. Increased miR335 transcripts block expression of 14-3-3-θ and PKC-γ mRNAs thereby reducing the serine phosphorylation of GABAAγ2 and reducing its insertion into the post-synaptic membrane. Fewer GABAA receptors reduces inhibition of Purkinje cells and perhaps maintain a constant level of excitability during sustained stimulation.
Plasticity of Neurons in the Medial Vestibular Nucleus
Secondary vestibular neurons share with cerebellar Purkinje cells adaptive characteristics that may account for vestibular compensation and visuo-vestibular calibration (187–190). In secondary vestibular neurons this property depends on changes in the cellular excitability and synaptic responsiveness (191, 192). This adaptation can be investigated in brainstem slices in which high frequency tetanic stimulation of vestibular primary afferents evokes long-term potentiation (LTP) in secondary neurons of the medial vestibular nucleus (MVN). LTP is evoked through the activation of metabotropic glutamate type-1 NMDA receptors. On the other hand, low frequency stimulation evokes long-term depression (LTD) (193). The more relevant characteristic of the stimulation for stimulus-induced plastic changes in EPSP amplitude is the temporal organization of repetitive bursts, probably causing different intracellular levels of postsynaptic Ca2+. Short burst intervals (four trains, 1 s, 100 Hz) induce LTP, longer burst intervals induce LTD. Temporal stimulation sequencies may assure a persistent selectivity of the MVN neuron in response to input from semicircular canals, otolithic receptors and optokinetic signals or to cerebellar output. Moreover, the induction of vestibular LTP and LTD is influenced by sex neurosteroids, as occurs in several areas of the CNS (194). In the MVN 17 beta-Estradiol (E2) and 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) rapidly and oppositely regulate synaptic transmission and plasticity by directly interacting with membrane estrogen and androgen receptors (ERs and ARs) (195–197). Estradiol mediates the LTP, while DHT mediates LTD (Figures 15A–C). A similar influence of estradiol is found in cerebellar Purkinje neurons (198, 199).
Figure 15
Both the occurrence and amplitude of LTP in the MVN of female rats is altered at different phases of the cycle (192, 200). Specifically, high frequency stimulation induces LTP in male rats within seconds (fast-developing LTP). However, this same stimulation elicits variable long-term synaptic effects in female rats; fast-developing LTP or slow-developing LTP or even LTD. LTP amplitude and frequency of occurrence depends on the neural E2 levels, fluctuating according to oestrous phases, with a high probability of inducing fast LTP in dioestrus phase (Figure 15D). A high E2 level decreases LTP by preventing the transformation of testosterone into E2 and facilitating its transformation into DHT (192).
Cerebellar Functions and Cellular Mechanisms
The zonal architecture of visual and vestibular climbing fiber projections to hemispheric and vermal lobules IX-X establishes a three-dimensional optokinetic and vestibular space. These sagittal zones are defined by their afferents and by their projections. The climbing fiber afferents appear to be the primary regulators of Purkinje cell SS discharge frequency. In vermal lobule X, vestibular primary afferent→granule cell→parallel fiber→Purkinje cell signals originate from the three ipsilateral semicircular canals and two otolith organs. These primary afferent signals are mixed with secondary afferent signals from the vestibular nuclei. This mixture of signals modulates the discharges of Purkinje cells in the medial sagittal zone by climbing fiber signals that originate from the contralateral anterior semicircular canal and utricle. More rostrally, in vermal lobules IXa,b, primary vestibular afferents are absent. In their absence, secondary vestibular afferents remain and perhaps additional mossy fiber afferents from neck and shoulder muscle proprioceptors are added to the mix. Climbing fiber projections that originate from the contralateral anterior semicircular canal and utricle persist. In both the caudal and rostral zones, the modulated polarity of CSs and SSs remains the same, although the depth of modulation may vary depending on the intensity of parallel fiber discharge. The outputs of sagittal climbing fiber zones are distributed along a longitudinal gradient to the cerebellar nuclei, vestibular nuclei and other brainstem nuclei. The functions of these sagittal zones encompass a more global view of the same basic signal tailored to different functional subnuclei all of which require an accurate reading of head orientation in space.
Spontaneous increases or decreases in SS discharge can, on occasion, precede as well as follow the occurrence of CSs in the same Purkinje cell (64, 201–204). Under certain stimulus and recording conditions the modulation SS discharge occurs in the absence of modulation of CS discharge. In these instances, the SSs are often regarded as a consequence of a mossy fiber→granule cell→parallel fiber→Purkinje cell throughput that is independent of the climbing fiber pathway with the possible exception of undefined “novel” responses evoked by climbing fibers (201–204). Given the significance of sagittal zones in lobules IX-X it would seem useful to learn if zonal architecture also influences the responses of Purkinje cells in other cerebellar lobules. In lobules IX-X it has been helpful to deploy a variety of well-controlled vestibular and optokinetic stimuli to investigate the discharge characteristics of Purkinje cells. Perhaps a refinement of stimulus conditions would similarly be useful for investigating other cerebellar regions.
At a more molecular level, the potential role of NMDA receptors in homeostatic regulation of the discharge of MVN neurons (205) and cerebellar stellate cells (139, 140) offers the possibility of enhancing our understanding of cellular plasticity within a behavioral context.
Epigenetic factors also may contribute to dynamic regulation of climbing fiber discharge. Stimulus-evoked changes in microRNA transcription provides one of several ways to investigate epigenetic factors that may regulate the synaptic efficacy of Purkinje cell discharge. Climbing fiber-evoked increases in microRNA transcription in Purkinje cells suggests that microRNAs contribute to the homeostatic regulation of proteins critical for Purkinje cell synaptic function. The trick will be to learn how the suppressive effects of microRNAs contribute to the regulation of proteins critical for maintaining and altering synaptic function.
Statements
Author’s note
Cerebellar adaptation to vestibular and optokinetic depends on specialized circuitry that represents three dimensions in a space in which the coordinates correspond physically to the orientation of the semicircular canals and utricular otolith. This circuitry is localized to the hemispheric and vermal lobule X (flocculus and nodulus). The nodular coordinate system senses gravity and head movement around the axes of the vertical semicircular canals and utricular otolith. The flocculus senses low velocity optokinetic stimulation about three axes in the absence of a gravity vector. We review three aspects of vestibular and optokinetic adaptation in which the flocculus and nodulus play an important role. Cerebellar adaptation to sustained optokinetic or vestibular stimulation is revealed physiologically in the persistence of responses after initial stimulation has ceased. It is also shown behaviorally in the persistence of eye movements in the absence of the stimulation that first evoked them. We link these sensory adaptations to epigenetic signaling in Purkinje cells and to stimulus-evoked expression of sex-related peptides, corticotropin releasing factor and neurosteroid 17beta-Estradiol (E2). We suggest that these peptides may also explain, in part, the female predominance in the mal de debarquement disorder.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.
Funding
This research was supported by NEI (EY18561) and by NIDCD (DC006668).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1.
FosterIZHanesDABarmackNHMcCollumG. Spatial symmetries in vestibular projections to the uvula-nodulus. Biol Cybern. (2007) 96:439–53. 10.1007/s00422-006-0136-y
2.
Van der SteenJSimpsonJITanJ. Functional anatomic organization of three-dimensional eye movements in rabbit cerebellar flocculus. J Neurophysiol. (1994) 72:31–46. 10.1152/jn.1994.72.1.31
3.
SimpsonJIGrafWLeonardC. The coordinate system of visual climbing fibers to the flocculus. In: FuchsAFBeckerW editors. Developments in Neuroscience, Vol. 12. Progress in Oculomotor Research. North Holland: Elsevier. (1981). p. 475–84.
4.
YakushevaTBlazquezPMAngelakiDE. Relationship between complex and simple spike activity in macaque caudal vermis during three-dimensional vestibular stimulation. J Neurosci. (2010) 30:8111–26. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5779-09.2010
5.
BilligIBalabanCD. Zonal organization of the vestibulo-cerebellum in the control of horizontal extraocular muscles using pseudorabies virus: I. Flocculus/ventral paraflocculus. Neuroscience. (2004) 125:507–20. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.01.051
6.
CajalSR. Histologie du Système Nerveux de L'homme et des Vertebrés. Paris: Maloine (1911).
7.
SatoFSasakiH. Morphological correlations between spontaneously discharging primary vestibular afferents vestibular nucleus neurons in the cat. J Comp Neurol. (1993) 333:554–6. 10.1002/cne.903330408
8.
BarmackNHBaughmanRWErricoPShojakuH. Vestibular primary afferent projection to the cerebellum of the rabbit. J Comp Neurol. (1993) 327:521–34. 10.1002/cne.903270405
9.
WuHSSugiharaIShinodaY. Projection patterns of single mossy fibers originating from the lateral reticular nucleus in the rat cerebellar cortex nuclei. J Comp Neurol. (1999) 411:97–118. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990816)411:1<97::AID-CNE8>3.0.CO;2-O
10.
BrodalAPompeianoO. The vestibular nuclei in the cat. J Anat. (1957) 91:438–54.
11.
BrodalA. Anatomy of the vestibuloreticular connections and possible “ascending” vestibular pathways from the reticular formation. In: BrodalAPompeianoO editors. Basic Aspects of Central Vestibular Mechanisms. Progress in brain research Vol. 37. Amsterdam, NY: Elsevier Publ. Comp. (1972).
12.
BrodalA. Anatomy of the vestibular nuclei and their connections. In: KornhuberHH editor. Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vestibular System, Morphology, Vol. 6. Berlin: Springer Verlag. (1974). 10.1007/978-3-642-65942-3_9
13.
BarmackNHFredetteBJMugnainiE. Parasolitary nucleus: A source of GABAergic vestibular information to the inferior olive of rat rabbit. J Comp Neurol. (1998) 392:352–72. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19980316)392:3<352::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-0
14.
BarmackNHYakhnitsaV. Vestibular signals in the parasolitary nucleus. J Neurophysiol. (2000) 83:3559–69. 10.1152/jn.2000.83.6.3559
15.
KorteGMugnainiE. The cerebellar projection of the vestibular nerve in the cat. J Comp Neurol. (1979) 184:265–78. 10.1002/cne.901840204
16.
SatoYKandaK-IIkarashiKKawasakiT. Differential mossy fiber projections to the dorsal ventral uvula in the cat. J Comp Neurol. (1989) 279:149–64. 10.1002/cne.902790113
17.
KevetterGAPerachioA. Distribution of vestibular afferents that innervate the sacculus posterior canal in the gerbil. J Comp Neurol. (1986) 254:410–24. 10.1002/cne.902540312
18.
GerritsNMEpemaAHVan LingeADalmE. The primary vestibulocerebellar projection in the rabbit: Absence of primary afferents in the flocculus. Neurosci Lett. (1989) 105:27–33. 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90006-2
19.
AkaogiK-ISatoYIkarashiKKawasakiT. Mossy fiber projections from the brain stem to the nodulus in the cat. An experimental study comparing the nodulus, the uvula and the flocculus. Brain Res. (1994) 638:12–20. 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90627-0
20.
PurcellIMPerachioAA. Peripheral patterns of terminal innervation of vestibular primary afferent neurons projecting to the vestibulocerebellum in the gerbil. J Comp Neurol. (2001) 433:48–61. 10.1002/cne.1124
21.
NewlandsSDPurcellIMKevetterGAPerachioAA. Central projections of the utricular nerve in the gerbil. J Compar Neurol. (2002) 452:11–23. 10.1002/cne.10350
22.
NewlandsSDVrabecJTPurcellIMStewartCMZimmermanBEPerachioAA. Central projections of the saccular utricular nerves in macaques. J Comp Neurol. (2003) 466:31–47. 10.1002/cne.10876
23.
MakladAFritzschB. Partial segregation of posterior crista and saccular fibers to the nodulus and uvula of the cerebellum in mice, its development. Dev Brain Res. (2003) 140:223–36. 10.1016/S0165-3806(02)00609-0
24.
FoxCAHillmanDESiegesmundKADuttaCR. The primate cerebellar cortex: A Golgi and electron microscopic study. In: FoxCASniderRS editors. Progress in Brain Research, Vol.25: The Cerebellum. New York, NY: Elsevier. (1967). p. 174–225. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60965-6
25.
PalkovitsMMagyarPSzentagothaiJ. Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar cortex in the cat. IV. Mossy fiber-Purkinje cell numerical transfer. Brain Res. (1972) 45:15–29. 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90213-2
26.
KasselJShambesGMWelkerW. Fractured cutaneous projections to the granule cell layer of the posterior cerebellar hemisphere of the domestic cat. J Comp Neurol. (1984) 225:458–68. 10.1002/cne.902250311
27.
NapperRMHarveyRJ. Number of parallel fiber synapses on an individual Purkinje cell in the cerebellum of the rat. J Comp Neurol. (1988) 274:168–77. 10.1002/cne.902740204
28.
BrandSDahlALMugnainiE. The length of parallel fibers in the cat cerebellar cortex. An experimental light and electron microscopic study. Exp Brain Res. (1976) 26:39–58. 10.1007/BF00235248
29.
MugnainiE. The length of cerebellar parallel fibers in chicken rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. (1983) 220:7–15. 10.1002/cne.902200103
30.
IsopePBarbourB. Properties of unitary granule cell–>Purkinje cell synapses in adult rat cerebellar slices. J Neurosci. (2002) 22:9668–78. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-22-09668.2002
31.
CohenDYaromY. Patches of synchronized activity in the cerebellar cortex evoked by mossy-fiber stimulation: questioning the role of parallel fibers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1998) 95:15032–6. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.15032
32.
Gundappa-SulurGDe SchutterEBowerJM. Ascending granule cell axon: an important component of cerebellar cortical circuitry. J Comp Neurol. (1999) 408:580–9610.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990614)408:4<580::AID-CNE11>3.0.CO;2-O
33.
HarveyRJNapperRM. Quantitative studies on the mammalian cerebellum. Prog Neurobiol. (1991) 36:437–63. 10.1016/0301-0082(91)90012-P
34.
BrodalATorvikA. The origin of secondary vestibulo-cerebellar fibers in cats; an experimental anatomical study. Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. (1957) 195:550–67.
35.
YamamotoM. Topographical representation in rabbit cerebellar flocculus for various afferent inputs from the brainstem investigated by means of retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase. Neurosci Lett. (1979) 12:29–34. 10.1016/0304-3940(79)91475-7
36.
KotchabhakdiNWalbergF. Cerebellar afferent projections from the vestibular nuclei in the cat: an experimental study with the method of retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase. Exp Brain Res. (1978) 31:591–604. 10.1007/BF00239814
37.
BrodalABrodalP. Observations on the secondary vestibulocerebellar projections in the macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res. (1985) 58:62–74. 10.1007/BF00238954
38.
ThunnissenIEEpemaAHGerritsNM. Secondary vestibulocerebellar mossy fiber projection to the caudal vermis in the rabbit. J Comp Neurol. (1989) 290:262–77. 10.1002/cne.902900207
39.
EpemaAHGerritsNMVoogdJ. Secondary vestibulocerebellar projections to the flocculus and uvulo-nodular lobule of the rabbit: A study using HRP and double fluorescent tracer techniques. Exp Brain Res. (1990) 80:72–82. 10.1007/BF00228849
40.
BarmackNHBaughmanRWEckensteinFP. Cholinergic innervation of the cerebellum of the rat by secondary vestibular afferents. In: CohenBTomkoDLGuedryF editors. Sensing and Controlling Motion: Vestibular and Sensorimotor Function. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences. (1992). p. 566–79. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb25236.x
41.
BarmackNHBaughmanRWEckensteinFP. Cholinergic innervation of the cerebellum of rat, rabbit, cat monkey as revealed by choline acetyltransferase activity immunohistochemistry. J Comp Neurol. (1992) 317:233–49. 10.1002/cne.903170303
42.
TagoHMcGeerPLMcGeerEGAkiyamaHHershLB. Distribution of choline acetyltransferase immunopositive structures in the rat brainstem. Brain Res. (1989) 495:271–97. 10.1016/0006-8993(89)90221-7
43.
BarmackNHBaughmanRWEckensteinFPShojakuH. Secondary vestibular cholinergic projection to the cerebellum of rabbit rat as revealed by choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry, retrograde orthograde tracers. J Comp Neurol. (1992) 317:250–70. 10.1002/cne.903170304
44.
NelsonBJAdamsJCBarmackNHMugnainiE. A comparative study of glutamate decarboxylase immunoreactive boutons in the mammalian inferior olive. J Comp Neurol. (1989) 286:514–39. 10.1002/cne.902860409
45.
BarmackNHFagersonMFredetteBJMugnainiEShojakuH. Activity of neurons in the beta nucleus of the inferior olive of the rabbit evoked by natural vestibular stimulation. Exp Brain Res. (1993) 94:203–15. 10.1007/BF00230288
46.
LangerTFuchsAFScudderCAChubbMC. Afferents to the flocculus of the cerebellum in the Rhesus macaque as revealed by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol. (1985) 235:1–25. 10.1002/cne.902350102
47.
BlazquezPPartsalisAGerritsNMHighsteinSM. Input of anterior and posterior semicircular canal interneurons encoding head-velocity to the dorsal Y group of the vestibular nuclei. J Neurophysiol. (2000) 83:2891–904. 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2891
48.
SatoYKawasakiT. Target neurons of floccular caudal zone inhibition in Y-group nucleus of vestibular nuclear complex. J Neurophysiol. (1987) 57:460–80. 10.1152/jn.1987.57.2.460
49.
WylieDRDeZeeuwCIDiGiorgiPLSimpsonJI. Projections of individual Purkinje-cells of identified zones in the ventral nodulus to the vestibular and cerebellar nuclei in the rabbit. J Compar Neurol. (1994) 349:448–63. 10.1002/cne.903490309
50.
WentzelPRWylieDRRuigrokTJDe ZeeuwCI. Olivary projecting neurons in the nucleus prepositus hypoglossi, group y and ventral dentate nucleus do not project to the oculomotor complex in the rabbit and the rat. Neurosci Lett. (1995) 190:45–8. 10.1016/0304-3940(95)11496-J
51.
PartsalisAMZhangYHighsteinSM. Dorsal Y group in the squirrel monkey. I. Contribution of the cerebellar flocculus to neuronal responses in normal and adapted animals. J Neurophysiol. (1995) 73:632–50. 10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.632
52.
KumoiKSaitoNTanakaC. Immunohistochemical localization of γ-aminobutyric acid- and aspartate-containing neurons in the guinea pig vestibular nuclei. Brain Res. (1987) 416:22–3. 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91492-2
53.
KaufmanGDAndersonJHBeitzAJ. Otolith-brain stem connectivity: Evidence for differential neural activation by vestibular hair cells based on quantification of FOS expression in unilateral labyrinthectomized rats. J Neurophysiol. (1993) 70:117–27. 10.1152/jn.1993.70.1.117
54.
AlleyKBakerRSimpsonJI. Afferents to the vestibulo-cerebellum and the origin of the visual climbing fibers in the rabbit. Brain Res. (1975) 98:582–9. 10.1016/0006-8993(75)90375-3
55.
HoddevikGHBrodalA. The olivocerebellar projection studied with the method of retrograde axonal transport of horseradish peroxidase. V. The projections to the flocculonodular lobe and the paraflocculus in the rabbit. J Comp Neurol. (1977) 176:269–80. 10.1002/cne.901760208
56.
GroenewegenHJVoogdJ. The parasagittal zonation within the olivocerebellar projection I. Climbing fiber distribution in the vermis of cat cerebellum. J Comp Neurol. (1977) 174:417–88. 10.1002/cne.901740304
57.
TanJGerritsNMNanhoeRSimpsonJIVoogdJ. Zonal organization of the climbing fiber projection to the flocculus nodulus of the rabbit: A combined axonal tracing acetylcholinesterase histochemical study. J Comp Neurol. (1995) 356:23–50. 10.1002/cne.903560103
58.
VoogdJGerritsNMRuigrokTJ. Organization of the vestibulocerebellum. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1996) 781:553–79. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb15728.x
59.
FushikiHBarmackNH. Topography reciprocal activity of cerebellar Purkinje cells in the uvula-nodulus modulated by vestibular stimulation. J Neurophysiol. (1997) 78:3083–94. 10.1152/jn.1997.78.6.3083
60.
BarmackNHYakhnitsaV. Cerebellar climbing fibers modulate simple spikes in cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:7904–16. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-21-07904.2003
61.
AnderssonGOscarssonO. Climbing fiber microzones in cerebellar vermis and their projection to different groups of cells in the lateral vestibular nucleus. Exp Brain Res. (1978) 32:565–79. 10.1007/BF00239553
62.
SchildRF. On the inferior olive of the albino rat. J Comp Neurol. (1970) 140:255–60. 10.1002/cne.901400302
63.
PalaySLChan-PalayV. Cerebellar Cortex: Cytology and Organization. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (1974). 10.1007/978-3-642-65581-4
64.
BarmackNHShojakuH. Vestibular visual signals evoked in the uvula-nodulus of the rabbit cerebellum by natural stimulation. J Neurophysiol. (1995) 74:2573–89. 10.1152/jn.1995.74.6.2573
65.
BarmackNHYakhnitsaV. Functions of interneurons in mouse cerebellum. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:1140–52. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3942-07.2008
66.
BarmackNHYakhnitsaV. Modulated discharge of Purkinje and stellate cells persists after unilateral loss of vestibular primary afferent mossy fibers in mice. J Neurophysiol. (2013) 110:2257–74. 10.1152/jn.00352.2013
67.
YakhnitsaVBarmackNH. Antiphasic Purkinje cell responses in mouse uvula-nodulus are sensitive to static roll-tilt and topographically organized. Neuroscience. (2006) 143:615–26. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.006
68.
KooyFH. The inferior olive in vertebrates. Folia Neurobiol. (1916) 10:205–369.
69.
GrafWSimpsonJILeonardCS. Spatial organization of visual messages of the rabbit's cerebellar flocculus. IComplex I, and simple spike responses of Purkinje cells. J Neurophysiol. (1988) 60:2091–121. 10.1152/jn.1988.60.6.2091
70.
TakedaTMaekawaK. Olivary branching projections to the flocculus, nodulus uvula in the rabbit. II. Retrograde double labeling study with fluorescent dyes. Exp Brain Res. (1989) 76:323–32. 10.1007/BF00247892
71.
MaekawaKSimpsonJI. Climbing fiber responses evoked in vestibulocerebellum of rabbit from visual system. J Neurophysiol. (1973) 36:649–66. 10.1152/jn.1973.36.4.649
72.
SimpsonJIAlleyKE. Visual climbing fiber input to rabbit vestibulocerebellum: a source of direction-specific information. Brain Res. (1974) 82:302–8. 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90610-6
73.
MaekawaKTakedaT. Electrophysiological identification of the climbing and mossy fiber pathways from the rabbit's retina to the contralateral cerebellar flocculus. Brain Res. (1976) 109:169–74. 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90388-7
74.
Büttner-EnneverJAHornAK. Pathways from cell groups of the paramedian tracts to the floccular region. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (1996) 781:532–40. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1996.tb15726.x
75.
BarmackNHHessDT. Multiple-unit activity evoked in dorsal cap of inferior olive of the rabbit by visual stimulation. J Neurophysiol. (1980) 43:151–64. 10.1152/jn.1980.43.1.151
76.
LeonardCSSimpsonJIGrafW. Spatial organization of visual messages of the rabbit's cerebellar flocculus. I. Typology of inferior olive neurons of the dorsal cap of Kooy. J Neurophysiol. (1988) 60:2073–90. 10.1152/jn.1988.60.6.2073
77.
KusunokiMKanoMKanoM-SMaekawaK. Nature of optokinetic response zonal organization of climbing fiber afferents in the vestibulocerebellum of the pigmented rabbit. I. The flocculus. Exp Brain Res. (1990) 80:225–37. 10.1007/BF00228151
78.
KanoMKanoM-SKusunokiMMaekawaK. Nature of optokinetic response zonal organization of climbing fiber afferents in the vestibulocerebellum of the pigmented rabbit. II. The nodulus. Exp Brain Res. (1990) 80:238–51. 10.1007/BF00228152
79.
De ZeeuwCIWylieDRDiGiorgiPLSimpsonJI. Projections of individual Purkinje cells of identified zones in the flocculus to the vestibular cerebellar nuclei in the rabbit. J Comp Neurol. (1994) 349:428–47. 10.1002/cne.903490308
80.
TanJSimpsonJIVoogdJ. Anatomical compartments in the white matter of the rabbit flocculus. J Comp Neurol. (1995) 356:1–22. 10.1002/cne.903560102
81.
SatoYYamamotoFShojakuHKawasakiT. Neuronal pathway from floccular caudal zone contributing to vertical eye movements in cats - role of group y nucleus of vestibular nuclei. Brain Res. (1984) 294:375–80. 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91054-0
82.
De ZeeuwCIGerritsNMVoogdJLeonardCSSimpsonJI. The rostral dorsal cap ventrolateral outgrowth of the rabbit inferior olive receive a GABAergic input from dorsal group Y the ventral dentate nucleus. J Comp Neurol. (1994) 341:420–32. 10.1002/cne.903410311
83.
De ZeeuwCIKoekkoekSK. Signal processing in the C2 module of the flocculus and its role in head movement control. Prog Brain Res. (1997) 114:299–320. 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63371-3
84.
HawkesRGravelC. The modular cerebellum. Prog Neurobiol. (1991) 36:309–27. 10.1016/0301-0082(91)90004-K
85.
HawkesRLeclercN. Antigenic map of the rat cerebellar cortex: The distribution of parasagittal bands as revealed by monoclonal anti-Purkinje cell antibody mabQ113. J Comp Neurol. (1987) 256:29–41. 10.1002/cne.902560104
86.
BoegmanRJParentAHawkesR. Zonation in the rat cerebellar cortex: patches of high acetylcholinesterase activity in the granular layer are congruent with Purkinje cell compartments. Brain Res. (1988) 448:237–51. 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91261-9
87.
ScottTG. A unique pattern of localization within the cerebellum of the mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. (1964) 122:1–7. 10.1002/cne.901220102
88.
EisenmanLMHawkesR. 5′-nucleotidase and the MABQ113 antigen share a common distribution in the cerebellar cortex of the mouse. Neurosci. (1989) 31:231–5. 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90045-6
89.
GravelCEisenmanLMSassevilleRHawkesR. Parasagittal organization of the rat cerebellar cortex: Direct correlation between antigenic Purkinje cell bands revealed by mabQ113 the organization of the olivocerebellar projection. J Comp Neurol. (1987) 265:294–310. 10.1002/cne.902650211
90.
FujitaHOh-NishiAObayashiSSugiharaI. Organization of the marmoset cerebellum in three-dimensional space: lobulation, aldolase C compartmentalization and axonal projection. J Comp Neurol. (2010) 518:1764–91. 10.1002/cne.22301
91.
LongRMPakanJMPGrahamDJHurdPLGutierrez-IbanezCWylieDR. Modulation of complex spike activity differs between zebrin-positive and -negative Purkinje cells in the pigeon cerebellum. J Neurophysiol. (2018) 120:250–62. 10.1152/jn.00797.2017
92.
SchonewilleMLuoCRuigrokTJVoogdJSchmoleskyMTRuttemanMet al. Zonal organization of the mouse flocculus: physiology, input, output. J Comp Neurol. (2006) 497:670–82. 10.1002/cne.21036
93.
GhezCThachWT. The cerebellum. In: KandelERSchwartzJJesselTM editors. Principles of Neuroscience. New York, NY: Elsevier (2000). p. 832–52.
94.
AppsRGarwiczM. Anatomical and physiological foundations of cerebellar information processing. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2005) 6:297–311. 10.1038/nrn1646
95.
BloedelJRBrachaV. Cerebellar functions. In: BinderMDHirokawaNWindhorstU editors. Encyclopedic Reference of Neuroscience. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. (2009). p. 667–71. 10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_917
96.
EbnerTJBloedelJR. Role of climbing fiber afferent input in determining responsiveness of Purkinje cells to mossy fiber inputs. J Neurophysiol. (1981) 45:962–71. 10.1152/jn.1981.45.5.962
97.
ArmstrongDMEdgleySA. Discharges of interpositus Purkinje cells of the cat cerebellum during locomotion under different conditions. J Physiol. (1988) 400:425–45. 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017130
98.
NagaoS. Role of cerebellar flocculus in adaptive interaction between optokinetic eye movement response and vestibulo-ocular reflex in pigmented rabbits. Exp Brain Res. (1989) 77:541–51. 10.1007/BF00249607
99.
KanoMKanoM-SMaekawaK. Simple spike modulation of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar nodulus of the pigmented rabbit to optokinetic stimulation. Neurosci Lett. (1991) 128:101–4. 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90769-P
100.
LisbergerSGPavelkoTABronte-StewartHMStoneLS. Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. II. Changes in the responses of horizontal gaze velocity Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus. J Neurophysiol. (1994) 72:954–73. 10.1152/jn.1994.72.2.954
101.
WalterJTKhodakhahK. The linear computational algorithm of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J. Neurosci. (2006) 26:12861–72. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4507-05.2006
102.
ThachWT. Discharge of Purkinje cerebellar nuclear neurons during rapidly alternating arm movements in the monkey. J Neurophysiol. (1968) 31:785–97. 10.1152/jn.1968.31.5.785
103.
MontaroloPGRaschiFStrataP. Are the climbing fibres essential for the Purkinje cell inhibitory action. Exp Brain Res. (1981) 42:215–8. 10.1007/BF00236909
104.
BenedettiFMontaroloPFStrataPTempiaF. Inferior olive inactivation decreases the excitability of the intracerebellar lateral vestibular nuclei in the rat. J Physiol. (1983) 340:195–208. 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014758
105.
De MontignyCLamarreY. Rhythmic activity induced by harmaline in the olivocerebello-bulbar system of the cat. Brain Res. (1973) 53:81–95. 10.1016/0006-8993(73)90768-3
106.
LlinásRVolkindRA. The olivo-cerebellar system: Functional properties as revealed by harmaline-induced tremor. Exp Brain Res. (1973) 18:69–87. 10.1007/BF00236557
107.
BloedelJRRobertsWJ. Action of climbing fibers in cerebellar cortex of the cat. J Neurophysiol. (1971) 34:17–31. 10.1152/jn.1971.34.1.17
108.
MathewsPJLeeKHPengZHouserCROtisTS. Effects of climbing fiber driven inhibition on Purkinje neuron spiking. J Neurosci. (2012) 32:17988–97. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3916-12.2012
109.
BaduraASchonewilleMVogesKGallianoERenierNGaoZet al. Climbing fiber input shapes reciprocity of Purkinje cell firing. Neuron. (2013) 78:700–13. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.018
110.
BarmackNHYakhnitsaV. Microlesions of the inferior olive reduce vestibular modulation of purkinje cell complex and simple spikes in mouse cerebellum. J Neurosci. (2011) 31:9824–35. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1738-11.2011
111.
RisLDe WaeleCSerafinMVidalPPGodauxE. Neuronal activity in the ipsilateral vestibular nucleus following unilateral labyrinthectomy in the alert guinea pig. J Neurophysiol. (1995) 74:2087–99. 10.1152/jn.1995.74.5.2087
112.
McKayBEEngbersJDMehaffeyWHGordonGRMolineuxMLBainsJSet al. Climbing fiber discharge regulates cerebellar functions by controlling the intrinsic characteristics of purkinje cell output. J Neurophysiol. (2007) 97:2590–604. 10.1152/jn.00627.2006
113.
HanKSChenCHKhanMMGuoCRegehrWG. Climbing fiber synapses rapidly and transiently inhibit neighboring Purkinje cells via ephaptic coupling. Nat Neurosci. (2020) 23:1399–409. 10.1038/s41593-020-0701-z
114.
JohanssonFJirenhedDARasmussenAZuccaRHesslowG. Memory trace timing mechanism localized to cerebellar Purkinje cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2014) 111:14930–4. 10.1073/pnas.1415371111
115.
WulffPSchonewilleMRenziMDataLSassoe-PognettoMDataLet al. Synaptic inhibition of Purkinje cells mediates consolidation of vestibulo-cerebellar motor learning. Nat Neurosci. (2009) 12:1042–9. 10.1038/nn.2348
116.
ItoMSakuraiMTongroachP. Climbing fibre induced depression on both mossy fibre responsiveness glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells. J Physiol. (1982) 324:113–34. 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014103
117.
ItoMKarachotL. Long-term desensitization of quisqualate-specific glutamate receptors in Purkinje cells investigated with wedge recording from rat cerebellar slices. Neurosci Res. (1989) 7:168–71. 10.1016/0168-0102(89)90058-8
118.
SakuraiM. Synaptic modification of parallel fibre-Purkinje cell transmission in in vitro guinea-pig cerebellar slices. J Physiol. (1987) 394:463–80. 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016881
119.
CrépelFJaillardD. Pairing of pre- postsynaptic activities in cerebellar Purkinje cells induces long-term changes in synaptic efficacy in vitro. J Physiol. (1991) 432:123–41. 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018380
120.
NarasimhanKLindenDJ. Defining a minimal computational unit for cerebellar long-term depression. Neuron. (1996) 17:333–41. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80164-6
121.
CrepelF. Role of presynaptic kainate receptors at parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses in induction of cerebellar LTD: interplay with climbing fiber input. J Neurophysiol. (2009) 102:965–73. 10.1152/jn.00269.2009
122.
ItoM. Historical review of the significance of the cerebellum the role of Purkinje cells in motor learning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. (2002) 978:273–88. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb07574.x
123.
MidtgaardJ. Membrane properties synaptic responses of Golgi cells stellate cells in the turtle cerebellum in vitro. J Physiol. (1992) 457:329–54. 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp019381
124.
DzubayJAJahrCE. The concentration of synaptically released glutamate outside of the climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic cleft. J Neurosci. (1999) 19:5265–74. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-13-05265.1999
125.
CarterAGRegehrWG. Prolonged synaptic currents and glutamate spillover at the parallel fiber to stellate cell synapse. J Neurosci. (2000) 20:4423–34. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-12-04423.2000
126.
SzapiroGBarbourB. Multiple climbing fibers signal to molecular layer interneurons exclusively via glutamate spillover. Nat Neurosci. (2007) 10:735–42. 10.1038/nn1907
127.
EcclesJCLlinásRSasakiK. The mossy fibre-granule cell relay of the cerebellum and its inhibitory control by Golgi cells. Exp Brain Res. (1966) 1:82–101. 10.1007/BF00235211
128.
HámoriJSzentágothaiJ. Lack of evidence of synaptic contacts by climbing fibre collaterals to basket and stellate cells in developing rat cerebellar cortex. Brain Res. (1980) 186:454–7. 10.1016/0006-8993(80)90990-7
129.
DuguéGPDumoulinATrillerADieudonnéS. Target-dependent use of coreleased inhibitory transmitters at central synapses. J Neurosci. (2005) 25:6490–8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1500-05.2005
130.
DesclinJC. Early terminal degeneration of cerebellar climbing fibers after destruction of the inferior olive in the rat. Synaptic relationships in the molecular layer. Anat Embryol. (1976) 149:87–112. 10.1007/BF00315087
131.
HámoriJSzentágothaiJ. Participation of Golgi neuron processes in the cerebellar glomeruli: an electron microscope study. Exp Brain Res. (1966) 2:35–48. 10.1007/BF00234359
132.
EcclesJCItoMSzentágothaiJ. The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag (1967). 10.1007/978-3-662-13147-3
133.
Chan-PalayVPalaySL. The stellate cells of the rat's cerebellar cortex. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch. (1972) 136:224–48. 10.1007/BF00519180
134.
PouzatCHestrinS. Developmental regulation of basket/stellate cell–>Purkinje cell synapses in the cerebellum. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:9104–12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-23-09104.1997
135.
WadicheJIJahrCE. Multivesicular release at climbing fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Neuron. (2001) 32:301–13. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00488-3
136.
NishiyamaHLindenDJ. Pure spillover transmission between neurons. Nat Neurosci. (2007) 10:675–7. 10.1038/nn0607-675
137.
EkerotCFJörntellH. Parallel fibre receptive fields of Purkinje cells and interneurons are climbing fibre-specific. Euro J Neurosci. (2001) 13:1303–10. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01499.x
138.
PinaultD. A novel single-cell staining procedure performed in vivo under electrophysiological control: morpho-functional features of juxtacellularly labeled thalamic cells and other central neurons with biocytin or neurobiotin. J Neurosci Methods. (1996) 65:113–36. 10.1016/0165-0270(95)00144-1
139.
JörntellHEkerotCF. Receptive field plasticity profoundly alters the cutaneous parallel fiber synaptic input to cerebellar interneurons in vivo. J Neurosci. (2003) 23:9620–31. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-29-09620.2003
140.
AlexanderRPDBowieD. Intrinsic plasticity of cerebellar stellate cells is mediated by NMDA receptor regulation of voltage-gated Na(+) channels. J Physiol. (2021) 599:647–65. 10.1113/JP280627
141.
BarmackNHShojakuH. Vestibularly induced slow oscillations in climbing fiber responses of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar nodulus of the rabbit. Neurosci. (1992) 50:1–5. 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90376-D
142.
De WaeleCVibertNBaudrimontMVidalPP. NMDA receptors contribute to the resting discharge of vestibular neurons in the normal and hemilabyrinthectomized guinea pig. Exp Brain Res. (1990) 81:125–33. 10.1007/BF00230108
143.
SerafinMKhatebADe WaeleCVidalPPMühlethalerM. Medial vestibular nucleus in the guinea-pig: NMDA-induced oscillations. Exp Brain Res. (1992) 88:187–92. 10.1007/BF02259140
144.
KleinschmidtHJCollewijnH. A search for habituation of vestibulo-ocular reactions to rotatory and linear sinusoidal accelerations in the rabbit. Exp Neurol. (1975) 47:257–67. 10.1016/0014-4886(75)90255-1
145.
HennVYoungLFinleyC. Vestibular nucleus units in alert monkeys are also influenced by moving visual fields. Brain Res. (1974) 71:144–9. 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90198-X
146.
BarmackNH. Inferior olive and oculomotor system. Prog Brain Res. (2005) 151:269–91. 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)51009-4
147.
AngelakiDEHessBJM. Lesion of the nodulus ventral uvula abolish steady-state off- vertical axis otolith response. J Neurophysiol. (1995) 73:1716–20. 10.1152/jn.1995.73.4.1716
148.
WearneSRaphanTCohenB. Control of spatial orientation of the angular vestibuloocular reflex by the nodulus and uvula. J Neurophysiol. (1998) 79:2690–715. 10.1152/jn.1998.79.5.2690
149.
EricksonRGBarmackNH. A comparison of the horizontal and vertical optokinetic reflexes of the rabbit. Exp Brain Res. (1980) 40:448–56. 10.1007/BF00236153
150.
BarmackNHNelsonBJ. Influence of long-term optokinetic stimulation on eye movements of the rabbit. Brain Res. (1987) 437:111–20. 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91532-0
151.
BarmackNHErricoPFerraresiAFushikiHPettorossiVEYakhnitsaV. Cerebellar nodulectomy impairs spatial memory of vestibular optokinetic stimulation in rabbits. J Neurophysiol. (2002) 87:962–75. 10.1152/jn.00528.2001
152.
BarmackNHYoungWSIII. Optokinetic stimulation increases corticotropin-releasing factor mRNA in inferior olivary neurons of rabbits. J Neurosci. (1990) 10:631–40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-02-00631.1990
153.
ErricoPBarmackNH. Origins of cerebellar mossy climbing fibers immunoreactive for corticotropin-releasing factor in the rabbit. J Comp Neurol. (1993) 336:307–23. 10.1002/cne.903360211
154.
BarmackNHErricoP. Optokinetically-evoked expression of corticotropin-releasing factor in inferior olivary neurons of rabbits. J Neurosci. (1993) 13:4647–59. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-11-04647.1993
155.
FrensMAMathoeraALvan derSJ. Floccular complex spike response to transparent retinal slip. Neuron. (2001) 30:795–801. 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00321-X
156.
DeSouzaEB. Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors in the rat central nervous system: Characterization regional distribution. J Neurosci. (1987) 7:88–100. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-01-00088.1987
157.
MadtesPCKingJS. Distribution of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) binding sites in the opossum cerebellum. Neuropeptides. (1995) 28:51–8. 10.1016/0143-4179(95)90074-8
158.
MadtesPCKingJS. The temporal spatial development of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) binding sites CRF afferents in the opossum cerebellum. J Chem Neuroanat. (1996) 11:231–41. 10.1016/S0891-0618(96)00164-0
159.
GilliganPJRobertsonDWZaczekR. Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor modulators: Progress and opportunities for new therapeutic agents. J Med Chem. (2000) 43:1641–60. 10.1021/jm990590f
160.
LibsterAMTitleBYaromY. Corticotropin-releasing factor increases Purkinje neuron excitability by modulating sodium, potassium, Ih currents. J Neurophysiol. (2015) 114:3339–50. 10.1152/jn.00745.2015
161.
BarthelFLoefflerJP. Characterization genetic analysis of functional corticotropin- releasing hormone receptors in primary cerebellar cultures. J Neurochem. (1993) 60:696–703. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03203.x
162.
FoxEAGruolDL. Corticotropin-releasing factor suppresses the afterhyperpolarization in cerebellar Purkinje neurons. Neurosci Lett. (1993) 149:103–7. 10.1016/0304-3940(93)90358-R
163.
SanesJRLichtmanJW. Can molecules explain long-term potentiation?Nat Neurosci. (1999) 2:597–604. 10.1038/10154
164.
CullenBR. Transcription and processing of human microRNA precursors. Mol Cell. (2004) 16:861–5. 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.12.002
165.
RobinsHPressWH. Human microRNAs target a functionally distinct population of genes with AT-rich 3' UTRs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2005) 102:15557–62. 10.1073/pnas.0507443102
166.
LewisBPBurgeCBBartelDP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell. (2005) 120:15–20. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035
167.
AmbrosV. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. (2004) 431:350–5. 10.1038/nature02871
168.
ReinhartBJSlackFJBassonMPasquinelliAEBettingerJCRougvieAEet al. The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. (2000) 403:901–6. 10.1038/35002607
169.
HarfeBD. MicroRNAs in vertebrate development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. (2005) 15:410–5. 10.1016/j.gde.2005.06.012
170.
KosikKS. The neuronal microRNA system. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2006) 7:911–20. 10.1038/nrn2037
171.
SchrattGMTuebingFNighEAKaneCGSabatiniMEKieblerMet al. A brain-specific microRNA regulates dendritic spine development. Nature. (2006) 439:283–9. 10.1038/nature04367
172.
BushatiNCohenSM. microRNA functions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. (2007) 23:175–205. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123406
173.
BartelDP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. (2004) 116:281–97. 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
174.
ZengYCaiXCullenBR. Use of RNA polymerase II to transcribe artificial microRNAs. Methods Enzymol. (2005) 392:371–80. 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)92022-8
175.
BarmackNHQianZYakhnitsaV. Long-term climbing fibre activity induces transcription of microRNAs in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. (2014) 369:20130508. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0508
176.
BarmackNHQianZYakhnitsaV. Climbing fibers induce microRNA transcription in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neuroscience. (2010) 171:655–65. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.09.039
177.
QianZMicorescuMYakhnitsaVBarmackNH. Climbing fiber activity reduces 14-3-3-θ regulated GABAA receptor phosphorylation in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Neurosci. (2012) 201:34–45. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.021
178.
BarmackNHQianZ. Activity-dependent expression of calbindin in rabbit floccular Purkinje cells modulated by optokinetic stimulation. Neuroscience. (2002) 113:235–50. 10.1016/S0306-4522(02)00008-8
179.
AitkenA. 14-3-3 and its possible role in co-ordinating multiple signalling pathways. Trends Cell Biol. (1996) 6:341–7. 10.1016/0962-8924(96)10029-5
180.
BergDHolzmannCRiessO. 14-3-3 proteins in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. (2003) 4:752–62. 10.1038/nrn1197
181.
MossSJDohertyCAHuganirRL. Identification of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase protein kinase C phosphorylation sites within the major intracellular domains of the beta 1, gamma 2S, gamma 2L subunits of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor. J Biol Chem. (1992) 267:14470–6. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)49736-6
182.
KrishekBJXieXBlackstoneCHuganirRLMossSJSmartTG. Regulation of GABAA receptor function by protein kinase C phosphorylation. Neuron. (1994) 12:1081–95. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90316-6
183.
BrandonNJDelmasPKittlerJTMcDonaldBJSieghartWBrownDAet al. GABAA receptor phosphorylation functional modulation in cortical neurons by a protein kinase C-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. (2000) 275:38856–62. 10.1074/jbc.M004910200
184.
MeierJGrantynR. Preferential accumulation of GABAA receptor gamma 2L, not gamma 2S, cytoplasmic loops at rat spinal cord inhibitory synapses. J Physiol. (2004) 559:355–65. 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066233
185.
HerringDHuangRSinghMDillonGHLeidenheimerNJ. PKC modulation of GABAA receptor endocytosis and function is inhibited by mutation of a dileucine motif within the receptor beta 2 subunit. Neuropharmacology. (2005) 48:181–94. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.09.015
186.
TerunumaMXuJVithlaniMSieghartWKittlerJPangalosMet al. Deficits in phosphorylation of GABA(A) receptors by intimately associated protein kinase C activity underlie compromised synaptic inhibition during status epilepticus. J Neurosci. (2008) 28:376–84. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4346-07.2008
187.
PrechtWShimazuHMarkhamCH. A mechanism of central compensation of vestibular function following hemilabyrinthectomy. J Neurophysiol. (1966) 29:996–1010. 10.1152/jn.1966.29.6.996
188.
JohnstonARSecklJRDutiaMB. Role of the flocculus in mediating vestibular nucleus neuron plasticity during vestibular compensation in the rat. J Physiol. (2002) 545:903–11. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.024281
189.
BoydenESKatohARaymondJL. Cerebellum-dependent learning: the role of multiple plasticity mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. (2004) 27:581–609. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144238
190.
LisbergerSGMilesFA. Role of primate medial vestibular nucleus in long-term adaptive plasticity of vestibuloocular reflex. J Neurophysiol. (1980) 43:1725–45. 10.1152/jn.1980.43.6.1725
191.
GrassiSFrondaroliADieniCScarduzioMPettorossiVE. Long-term potentiation in the rat medial vestibular nuclei depends on locally synthesized 17beta-estradiol. J Neurosci. (2009) 29:10779–83. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1697-09.2009
192.
GrassiSFrondaroliAScarduzioMDieniCVBrecchiaGBoitiCet al. Influence of sex and estrous cycle on synaptic responses of the medial vestibular nuclei in rats: role of circulating 17beta-estradiol. Brain Res Bull. (2012) 87:319–27. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2011.11.008
193.
ScarduzioMPanichiRPettorossiVEGrassiS. The repetition timing of high frequency afferent stimulation drives the bidirectional plasticity at central synapses in the rat medial vestibular nuclei. Neuroscience. (2012) 223:1–11. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.039
194.
TozziABellingacciLPettorossiVE. Rapid estrogenic and androgenic neurosteroids effects in the induction of long-term synaptic changes: implication for early memory formation. Front Neurosci. (2020) 14:572511. 10.3389/fnins.2020.572511
195.
GrassiSFrondaroliADi MauroMPettorossiVE. Influence of testosterone on synaptic transmission in the rat medial vestibular nuclei: estrogenic and androgenic effects. Neuroscience. (2010) 171:666–76. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.09.035
196.
GrassiSScarduzioMPanichiRDall'AglioCBoitiCPettorossiVE. Opposite long-term synaptic effects of 17beta-estradiol and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone and localization of their receptors in the medial vestibular nucleus of rats. Brain Res Bull. (2013) 97:1–7. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2013.05.006
197.
ScarduzioMPanichiRPettorossiVEGrassiS. Synaptic long-term potentiation and depression in the rat medial vestibular nuclei depend on neural activation of estrogenic and androgenic signals. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e80792. 10.1371/journal.pone.0080792
198.
DieniCVSullivanJAFaralliMContemoriSBiscariniAPettorossiVEet al. 17 beta-estradiol synthesis modulates cerebellar dependent motor memory formation in adult male rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem. (2018) 155:276–86. 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.08.011
199.
DieniCVFerraresiASullivanJAGrassiSPettorossiVEPanichiR. Acute inhibition of estradiol synthesis impacts vestibulo-ocular reflex adaptation and cerebellar long-term potentiation in male rats. Brain Struct Funct. (2018) 223:837–50. 10.1007/s00429-017-1514-z
200.
PettorossiVEFrondaroliAGrassiS. Cyclic estrogenic fluctuation influences synaptic transmission of the medial vestibular nuclei in female rats. Acta Otolaryngol. (2011) 131:434–9. 10.3109/00016489.2010.536992
201.
BellCCGrimmRJ. Discharge properties of Purkinje cells recorded on single double microelectrodes. J Neurophysiol. (1969) 32:1044–55. 10.1152/jn.1969.32.6.1044
202.
McDevittCJEbnerTJBloedelJR. The changes in Purkinje cell simple spike activity following spontaneous climbing fiber inputs. Brain Res. (1982) 237:484–91. 10.1016/0006-8993(82)90460-7
203.
SatoYMiuraAFushikiHKawasakiT. Short-term modulation of cerebellar Purkinje cell activity after spontaneous climbing fiber input. J Neurophysiol. (1992) 68:2051–62. 10.1152/jn.1992.68.6.2051
204.
SendhilnathanNSemeworkMGoldbergMEIpataAE. Neural correlates of reinforcement learning in mid-lateral cerebellum. Neuron. (2020) 106:188–98 e5. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.021
205.
deWaeleCSarafinMKhatebAYabeYVidalPPMuhlethalerM. Medial vestibular nucleus in the guninea-pig: apamin-induced rhthmic burst firing - an in vitro and in vivo study. Exp Brain Res. (1993) 95:213–22. 10.1007/BF00229780
Summary
Keywords
vestibular, inferior olive, Purkinje cell, microRNA, semicircular canal, otolith, corticotropin releasing factor, cerebellum
Citation
Barmack NH and Pettorossi VE (2021) Adaptive Balance in Posterior Cerebellum. Front. Neurol. 12:635259. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.635259
Received
30 November 2020
Accepted
16 February 2021
Published
09 March 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Michael Strupp, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany
Reviewed by
Dan M. Merfeld, The Ohio State University, United States; Hans Straka, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany; Yoon-Hee Cha, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Barmack and Pettorossi.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Neal H. Barmack barmackn@ohsu.edu
This article was submitted to Neuro-Otology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.