You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CASE REPORT article

Front. Neurol., 11 May 2021

Sec. Neuromuscular Disorders and Peripheral Neuropathies

Volume 12 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.669493

Pembrolizumab-Induced Isolated Cranial Neuropathy: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature

  • 1. Department of Neuro Oncology, University Hospital of the City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy

  • 2. Department of Neurology, University Hospital of the City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy

  • 3. Department of Oncology, University Hospital of the City of Health and Science of Turin, Turin, Italy

  • 4. Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto Hospital, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy

Article metrics

View details

13

Citations

4,7k

Views

1,5k

Downloads

Abstract

Introduction: Anti-PD1 agents are widely used in the treatment of solid tumors. This has prompted the recognition of a class of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), due to the activation of autoimmune T-cells. Pembrolizumab is an anti-PD1 agent, which has been related to an increased risk of various neurological irAE (n-irAEs). Here, we present a rare case of pembrolizumab-induced neuropathy of cranial nerves.

Case Report: A 72-year-old patient was diagnosed with a lung adenocarcinoma in February 2018 (EGFR–, ALK–, and PDL1 90%). According to the molecular profile, pembrolizumab was started. After three administrations, the patient developed facial paresis, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and dysphonia. As brain metastases and paraneoplastic markers were excluded, a drug-related disorder was suspected and pembrolizumab was discontinued. A nerve conduction study and electromyography excluded signs of neuropathy and myopathy at four limbs, and repetitive nerve stimulation was negative. However, altered blink reflex and nerve facial conduction were consistent with an acute neuropathy of the cranial district. Thus, the patient was treated with two cycles of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), which rapidly allowed improvement of both symptoms and neurophysiological parameters. However, the patient died in October 2018 for a progression of lung tumor.

Discussion: Only 16 cases of pembrolizumab-related neuropathies have been described so far. Our case is of particular interest for the isolated involvement of cranial nerves and the prompt response to IVIg.

Conclusion: N-irAEs are insidious conditions that require solid knowledge of onco-immunotherapy complications: it is mandatory not to delay any treatment that would potentially modify the course of a neurological complication.

Introduction

Pembrolizumab (an anti-PD1 agent) may favorably impact the outcome of melanoma and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSMLC) (1, 2). By promoting the activation of T-cells, pembrolizumab fosters the immune response against tumor. However, it may also increase the risk of autoimmune reactions, known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Various neurological irAEs (n-irAEs) have been associated with pembrolizumab: in clinical trials with checkpoint inhibitors, 6.3% of patients on pembrolizumab presented n-irAEs of any type and grade (3). The peripheral nervous system is more likely to be involved than the central nervous system (4). In a recent systematic review focused on pembrolizumab-induced neuromuscular disorders (5), 14 (36%), 13 (33%), 9 (23%), and 3 (8%) of 39 patients on pembrolizumab were reported to develop myopathy, myasthenia gravis, neuropathy, or overlapping disorders, respectively.

Here, we describe a patient who developed a rare acute neuropathy of cranial nerves from pembrolizumab.

Case Report

In February 2018, a 72-year-old man was diagnosed with an adenocarcinoma of the lung (EGFR–, ALK–, and PDL1 amplificated in 90% of the cells). A total-body CT scan and an FDG-PET ruled out the presence of metastases at presentation. Based on the molecular profile, pembrolizumab was started. After three cycles (June 2018), the patient developed fatigue, dizziness, mild bilateral facial palsy (grade III of the House–Brackmann scale), bilateral ptosis and ophthalmoplegia, dysphonia, and dysphagia. As the brain and spine MRI with gadolinium excluded the occurrence of metastases, a neuroimmunological drug-related disorder or a paraneoplastic syndrome was considered, and pembrolizumab was stopped. First, we ruled out the presence of neuromuscular junction disorders: both repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and specific antibody assays—including anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR), anti-muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), and P/Q-type VGCC antibodies—were negative. Second, we tested the markers of immune-mediated neuropathy (anti-MAG, anti-GM1/2, anti-GD1a/b, and anti-GQ1b antibodies) and paraneoplastic syndromes (anti-Tr, anti-CV2/CRMP5, anti-amphiphysin, anti-PNMA2/TaMa, anti-GAD65, anti-recoverin, anti-Ri, anti-Yo, anti-Hu, anti-Zic4, anti-SOX1, and anti-titin antibodies), with negative results. Also, creatine kinase was normal (80 IU/l), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) did not harbor any inflammatory alterations (being cell count 5/mm3 and protein concentration 0.32 g/l). Then, we performed nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) at the limbs and cranial district: while no signs of neuropathy or myopathy were seen at the extremities, the evidence of slightly decreased amplitude of facial nerve conduction and altered blink reflex (lacking both ipsilateral and contralateral R2 components) suggested a diagnosis of a neuropathy involving the cranial nerves (Tables 1A,B). Therefore, in July 2018, the patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg: 0.4 g/kg/5 days), with no use of oral glucocorticoids due to the presence of moderate dysphagia. The therapy was well-tolerated and allowed a prompt relief from dizziness, diplopia, and dysphonia and total remission of facial palsy. Also, NCS of the facial nerves and blink reflex showed a rapid improvement, as both ipsilateral and contralateral R2 components were almost completely restored after the first cycle of IVIg (Tables 1A,B). Due to the rapid improvement of symptoms, the employment of intravenous steroids was not needed, but a second cycle of IVIg was administered in August 2018 to consolidate the result. The neurological condition remained stable until October 2018, when the patient died for a progression of the primary tumor.

Table 1A

Nerve At presentation After 1st cycle of IVIg After 2nd cycle of IVIg
Latency onset Amplitude Latency onset Amplitude Latency onset Amplitude
ms mV Ms mV ms mV
Left n. facialis
Mandible—orbicularis oculi 2.26 2.1 3.2 2.8 2.5 3.4
Mandible—nasalis 3.04 1.57 2.96 2.2 2.11 2.5
Right n. facialis
Mandible—orbicularis oculi 2.65 1.79 3.28 3.3 2.81 3.3
Mandible—nasalis 3.82 2.1 3.04 2.3 3.74 2.3

Nerve conduction study of the facial nerves at presentation, after the first cycle of IVIg, and after the second cycle.

Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude increased to normal values since after the first cycle of therapy.

Table 1B

Stimulation Registration At presentation After 1st cycle of IVIg After 2nd cycle IVIg
R1-latency R2-latency R1-latency R2-latency R1-latency R2-latency
ms RefDev ms RefDev ms RefDev Ms RefDev ms RefDev ms RefDev
Left Left 12.0 1.85 A NA 11.5 1.24 45.7 4.5 12.1 1.93 44.6 4.1
Right A NA 48.6 5.3 43.6 3.9
Difference NA NA −2.9 −2.7 0.96 3.9
Right Right 11.8 1.6 A NA 11.8 1.60 39.6 2.7 11.1 0.75 38.1 2.2
Left A NA 44.9 4.2 37.0 1.92
Difference NA NA −5.2 −4 1.07 −0.31

Latencies of R1 and R2 components of blink reflex at presentation, after the first cycle of treatment, and after the second cycle.

Reference values for NCS n. facialis: at orbicularis oculi, latency ≤ 3.1 ms, amplitude ≥1.0 mV; at nasalis, latency ≤ 4.2 ms, amplitude ≥1.0 mV. Reference values for blink reflex: R1 (ipsilateral), latency ≤ 13 ms, difference ≤ 1.2 ms; R2 (ipsilateral), latency ≤ 41 ms, difference ≤ 5 ms; R2 (contralateral), latency ≤ 44 ms, difference ≤ 7 ms.

A, absent; NA, not applicable; RefDev, deviation from reference.

We identified 24 cases of pembrolizumab-induced neuropathies and/or radiculopathies, mostly reported in small series of single or few patients (Table 2) (618). Melanoma was the primary tumor in 20 cases, whereas only three patients had lung adenocarcinoma (6, 7, 16). Fourteen patients were treated with pembrolizumab as a single agent (three of them had been previously treated with ipilimumab), three with a combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy, and seven with an association of pembrolizumab and ipilimumab. Seven patients developed acute demyelinating polyradiculopathy involving the lower and upper extremities, thus mimicking Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS); three presented involvement of both limbs and cranial district, similar to GBS—Miller Fisher variant; and only five isolated neuropathies of cranial nerves were described (8, 18). Immune-mediated neuropathy occurred with a median latency of four cycles. The diagnostic workup included nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) in 18 patients, lumbar puncture in 14 patients, and dosage of serum antibodies of autoimmune neuropathies or paraneoplastic syndromes in eight cases. CSF harbored albuminocytologic dissociation in five cases (7, 10, 11, 14), while in seven cases, it showed pleocytosis (7, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18), and in two cases, it was normal (18).

Table 2

Author Patients Cancer
diagnosis
Treatment Cycles to
onset of
n-irAE
Neurological presentation Diagnostic workup Diagnosis Pembrolizumab
stopped
Management of
the n-irAE
Outcome
(of the
n-irAE)
Limb
weakness
and/or
sensory
disorder
Cranial nerve
involvement
CSF NCS/EMG/
evoked
potentials
Autoimmune
antibodies
Exclusion of
paraneoplastic
syndrome
Aya et al. (6) 1 Melanoma Pembrolizumab (previous treatments: IFN-alpha, dacarbazine, and ipilimumab) 1 Yes Yes
(palsy of
the abducens
nerve)
NA Sensory peripheral polyneuropathy NA NA Vasculitic neuropathy (confirmed by nerve and muscle biopsy) Yes Oral and intravenous glucocorticoids Improved
de Maleissye et al. (7) 2 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 Yes Yes
(facial palsy)
Pleocytosis (45 cells/mm3), slight increase of proteins
(0.56 g/l)
No A-C
dissociation
Demyelinating polyradiculopathy NA Yes GBS, Miller-Fisher variant Yes IVIg Improved
3 Melanoma Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab 6 Yes No Normal cells count; slight increase of proteins
(0.74 g/l)
A-C
dissociation
Demyelinating polyradiculopathy NA Yes CIDP Yes Oral and intravenous glucocorticoids + PEX Not improved
Zimmer et al. (8) 4 Melanoma Pembrolizumab (previous treatments: IFN-alpha, dacarbazine, and ipilimumab) 4 NA Yes
(paresis of the
oculomotor
nerve)
NA NA NA NA Neuritis of the oculomotor nerve Yes Prednisolone Improved
5 Melanoma Pembrolizumab (previous treatments: IL2, dabrafenib/trametinib and ipilimumab) 11 Yes No NA NA NA NA GBS Yes Prednisolone Improved
Diamantopoulos et al. (9) 6 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 1 Yes No NA Axonal polyneuropathy
and myositis
Ab
anti-neuronal antigens - Ab anti-gangliosides - Ab related to myositis -
Yes Overlapping axonal polyneuropathy and myositis Yes Methylprednisolone
+ IVIg + PEX
Deceased
Kao et al. (10) 7 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 10 Yes No Normal cell
count (2 cells/
mm3); slight increase of proteins
(0.71 g/l)
A-C
dissociation
Demyelinating polyradiculopathy Ab anti-GM1 - Ab anti-GD1b - Yes GBS Yes Prednisone + IVIg Improved
8 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 6 Yes No NA Mixed axonal
and demyelinating
polyneuropathy
NA NA Peripheral mixed demyelinating and axonal neuropathy Yes Prednisone Improved
9 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 20 Yes Yes
(facial palsy, dysphonia)
Pleocytosis (12 cells/mm3); slight increase of proteins
(0.95 g/l)
No A-C dissociation Demyelinating polyradiculopathy Ab anti-GM1/2 - Ab anti-GD1a/b - Ab anti-GQ1b - Yes GBS, Miller-Fisher variant Yes IVIg Improved
Sepúlveda et al. (11) 10 Melanoma Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab 23 Yes No No cells; slight increase of proteins
(0.67 g/l)
A-C dissociation Axonal
polyradiculopathy
Ab anti-neuronal antigens - Ab anti-gangliosides - Yes GBS, AMAN variant Yes IVIg + PEX Improved
Yost et al. (12) 11 Melanoma Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab 3 months after pembrolizumab dismissal No Yes
(facial palsy, dysphonia)
Pleocytosis (12 cells/mm3); high proteins level
(1.95 g/l)
No A-C dissociation Altered blink reflex (absent R1/R2 responses) Ab anti-GM1/2 - Ab anti-GD1a/b - Ab anti-GQ1b - Yes Isolate acute neuropathy of facial nerve Yes Methylprednisolone + IVIg Improved
Fellner et al. (13) 12 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 18 weeks after first pembrolizumab administration Yes No Pleocytosis (58 cells/mm3); high proteins level
(2.27 g/l)
No A-C dissociation Demyelinating polyradiculopathy Ab anti-GD1b - Ab anti-GQ1b - Ab anti-MAG Ab anti-neuronal antigens - Yes GBS Yes Methylprednisolone Improved
Manam et al. (14) 13 Lung adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab + carboplatin and pemetrexel 2 Yes No Slight increase of proteins (0.68 g/l); no cell count reported. A-C dissociation (as reported by authors) NA NA Yes GBS Yes Methylprednisolone + IVIg + PEX Improved
14 Melanoma Pembrolizumab + dabrafenib and trametinib 2 Yes No Slight increase of proteins (0.56 g/l); no cell count reported. A-C dissociation (as reported by authors) Demyelinating polyradiculopathy Ab anti-GM1 - Yes GBS Yes PEX Deceased (due to the n-irAE)
Ong et al. (15) 15 Lung adenocarcinoma Pembrolizumab 2 Yes Yes
(facial palsy)
NA Demyelinating polyradiculopathy NA Yes GBS, Miller-Fisher variant Yes Methylprednisolone + IVIg Improved
Dubey et al. (16)§ 16 NA Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab 1 NA Yes (bilateral facial palsy) NA NA NA NA Bilateral acute neuropathy of facial nerves NA NA NA
17 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 Yes No NA Lumbosacral radiculopathy and peripheral sensory neuropathy NA NA GBS Yes None Improved
18 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 1 Yes No NA Length-dependent sensory and motor axonal polyneuropathy NA NA Acute sensory and motor axonal polyneuropathy No Gabapentin 100 mg twice a day Improved
19 Lung adenocarcinoma Erlotinib + pembrolizumab 1 Yes No NA Multiple proximal mononeuropathy of left upper arm NA NA Neuralgic amyotrophy Yes Prednisone 60 mg daily Improved
Muralikrishnan et al. (17) 20 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 2 Yes No Pleocytosis (17 cells/mm3); slight increase of proteins
(0.78 g/l)
No A-C dissociation Demyelinating polyradiculopathy Ab anti-gangliosides - Ab anti-MAG - NA GBS Yes Methylprednisolone + IVIg + PEX Improved
Vogrig et al. (18) 21 Melanoma Pembrolizumab 1 No Yes
(visual loss)
Pleocytosis (34 cells/mm3), normal protein content No A-C dissociation NA NA NA Optic neuropathy Yes None Improved
22 Melanoma Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab 6 months after pembrolizumab initiation No Yes (visual loss) Normal No A-C dissociation Altered visual evoked potentials (VEPs) NA NA Optic neuropathy Yes Methylprednisolone Not improved
23 Melanoma Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab NA No Yes
(visual / hearing loss)
Normal No A-C dissociation Altered visual evoked potentials (VEPs) NA NA Optic neuropathy / auditory neuropathy Yes Methylprednisolone + PEX Not improved
24 Melanoma Ipilimumab + pembrolizumab 1 month after pembrolizumab initiation No Yes
(palsy of the abducens nerve)
Mild pleocytosis (6 cells/mm3), normal protein content No A-C dissociation NA NA NA Abducens nerve neuropathy Yes Oral glucocorticoids Improved

Pembrolizumab-induced neuropathy: review of literature.

The authors reported “13 weeks after first pembrolizumab administration”: it would indicate four and 11 cycles for patients 5 and 6, respectively, as pembrolizumab was administered every 3 weeks, according to authors' note.

No exact number of cycles has been provided by the authors.

§

A fifth case of a patient undergoing ipilimumab and pembrolizumab who developed an immune-related neuropathy is mentioned, but not described in the paper.

Ab, antibodies; A-C dissociation, albuminocytologic dissociation; GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; IFN-alpha, interferon-alpha; IL2, interleukin 2; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulins; NA, not applicable; PEX, plasma exchange.

Discussion

Pembrolizumab-induced acute neuropathy is a rare n-irAE. It is not clear whether the association with other checkpoint inhibitors could drive synergically the onset of the condition. Based on our review of literature, neurological symptoms, such as limb weakness and/or sensory disorders, as well as brainstem and cranial nerve deficits, usually appear soon after the initiation of pembrolizumab and should be carefully investigated in order to rule out differential diagnoses, especially CNS metastases or paraneoplastic syndromes. MRI of the brain and the spine, CSF analysis, neurophysiological studies, and laboratory tests for autoimmune neuropathies and paraneoplastic syndromes are the most useful procedures for the diagnosis. For instance, in cases of polyradiculopathy, MRI of the spine with gadolinium may reveal root enhancement, although this is not a regular finding: in a recent series (16), only two of five cases with facial neuropathies and four of six cases with polyradiculoneuropathy demonstrated gadolinium enhancement of cranial nerves or spinal nerve roots, respectively. CSF may be normal in a minority of cases, whereas it usually harbors some abnormalities, such as pleocytosis with or without increased protein level (19) or albuminocytologic dissociation; the prevalence and clinical meaning of autoimmune antibodies, which may be common in n-irAE affecting the CNS [as recently reported by Sechi et al. (20)], are not clearly determined so far; finally, although data provided by different authors are heterogeneous, NCS and EMG seem to have a higher sensitivity and specificity than laboratory tests.

We described a peculiar case of a lung adenocarcinoma patient who developed an acute neuropathy of cranial nerves from pembrolizumab. Cranial nerve disorders may be observed among patients developing neuropathies from checkpoint inhibitors, as reported by Dubey et al. (16): in this series, seven out of 19 patients with peripheral n-irAEs showed cranial nerve involvement, with or without meningitis, and six had non-length-dependent polyradiculopathies with or without cranial nerve disorders. However, as far as we know, only five cases of pembrolizumab-induced isolated neuropathy of cranial nerves have been described so far: all those cases are described in melanoma patients (8, 18), while only three patients with lung adenocarcinoma have been reported, and none of them presented an exclusive involvement of cranial nerves as in our case. Whether the over-representation of melanoma patients might just reflect the larger employment of pembrolizumab in this tumor or there is a causative correlation should be investigated in further studies. Our patient shares some features with other cases reported in literature: he presented with immune-related neuropathy only after three cycles of pembrolizumab; dismissal of the drug produced clinical benefits; and antibodies of autoimmune neuropathies were not detected by laboratory tests. However, he also presented peculiar features. First, CSF analysis did not show albuminocytologic dissociation or slight pleocytosis, as commonly seen in similar cases; second, he developed a multineuropathy of cranial nerves with no involvement of the extremities; furthermore, he presented with a complex disorder of multiple nerves: in fact, symptoms and signs due to the involvement of the III, IV, VI, VII, IX, and X nerves were all present, and NCS and altered blink reflex confirmed the damage of facial nerves and revealed a subclinical impairment of the trigeminal nerves. Conversely, in other cases of isolated pembrolizumab-derived cranial nerve disorders, patients have been usually reported to have mononeuropathies (mostly facial palsies) or involvement of few cranial nerves (18). Finally, IVIg therapy (not associated to steroids) dramatically impacted the clinical course of the disease, with an improvement of both symptoms and neurophysiological tests since the first cycle: in literature, only two patients were treated with IVIg alone (9, 10), while the most common strategies were a combination of steroids, plasma exchange, and/or IVIg.

Conclusion

In case of immune-mediated neuropathy, pembrolizumab should be dismissed immediately. According to our experience, IVIg can be a useful and effective treatment: nevertheless, a combination of steroids and/or plasma exchange should be considered based on clinical severity.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.

Ethics statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2021.669493/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.

    Wang L Ma Q Yao R Liu J . Current status and development of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for lung cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. (2020) 79:106088. 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.106088

  • 2.

    Simeone E Grimaldi AM Festino L Trojaniello C Vitale MG Vanella V et al . Immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: a novel scenario of new toxicities and their management. Melanoma Manag. (2019) 6:MMT30. 10.2217/mmt-2019-0005

  • 3.

    Cuzzubbo S Javeri F Tissier M Roumi A Barlog C Doridam J et al . Neurological adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: review of the literature. Eur J Cancer. (2017) 73:18. 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.001

  • 4.

    Bruna J Argyriou AA Anastopoulou GG Alemany M Nadal E Kalofonou F et al . Incidence and characteristics of neurotoxicity in immune checkpoint inhibitors with focus on neuromuscular events: experience beyond the clinical trials. J Peripheral Nerv Syst. (2020) 25:1717. 10.1111/jns.12371

  • 5.

    Johansen A Christensen SJ Scheie D Højgaard JLS Kondziella D . Neuromuscular adverse events associated with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. Neurology. (2019) 92:663. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007235

  • 6.

    Aya F Ruiz-Esquide V Viladot M Font C Prieto-Gonzàlez S Prat A et al . Vasculitic neuropathy induced by pembrolizumab. Ann Oncol. (2017) 28:4334. 10.1093/annonc/mdw613

  • 7.

    de Maleissye MF Nicolas G Saiag P . Pembrolizumab-induced demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. N Engl J Med. (2016) 375:2967. 10.1056/NEJMc1515584

  • 8.

    Zimmer L Goldinger SM Hofmann L Loquai C Ugurel S Thomas I et al . Neurological, respiratory, musculoskeletal, cardiac and ocular side-effects of anti-PD-1 therapy. Eur J Cancer. (2016) 60:21025. 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.024

  • 9.

    Diamantopoulos PT Tsatsou K Benopoulou O Anastasopoulou A Gogas H . Inflammatory myopathy and axonal neuropathy in a patient with melanoma following pembrolizumab treatment. J Immunother. (2017) 40:2213. 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000172

  • 10.

    Kao JC Liao B Markovic SN Klein CJ Naddaf E Staff NP et al . Neurological complications associated with anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies. JAMA Neurol. (2017) 74:121622. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1912

  • 11.

    Sepúlveda M Martinez-Hernandez E Gaba L Victoria I Sola-Valls N Falgàs N et al . Motor polyradiculopathy during pembrolizumab treatment of metastatic melanoma. Muscle Nerve. (2017) 56:E1627. 10.1002/mus.25672

  • 12.

    Yost MD Chou CZ Botha H Block MS Liewluck T . Facial diplegia after pembrolizumab treatment. Muscle Nerve. (2017) 56:E201. 10.1002/mus.25663

  • 13.

    Fellner A Makranz C Lotem M Bokstein F Taliansky A Rosenberg S et al . Neurologic complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Neuro-Oncol. (2018) 137:6019. 10.1007/s11060-018-2752-5

  • 14.

    Manam R Martin JL Gross JA Chaudhary D Chowdhary S Espinosa PS et al . Case reports of pembrolizumab-induced acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Cureus. (2018) 10:e3371−1. 10.7759/cureus.3371

  • 15.

    Ong S Chapman J Young G Mansy T . Guillain–Barré-like syndrome during pembrolizumab treatment. Muscle Nerve. (2018) 58:E810. 10.1002/mus.26101

  • 16.

    Dubey D David WS Amato AA Reynolds KL Clement NF Chute DF et al . Varied phenotypes and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated neuropathies. Neurology. (2019) 93e1093–103. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008091

  • 17.

    Muralikrishnan S Ronan LK Coker S Rauschkolb PK Shirai K . Treatment considerations for patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who develop pembrolizumab-induced guillain-barré toxicity: a case report. Case Rep Oncol. (2020) 13:438. 10.1159/000504930

  • 18.

    Vogrig A Muàiz-Castrillo S Joubert B Picard G Rogemond V Skowron F et al . Cranial nerve disorders associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Neurology. (2021) 96:e86675. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011340

  • 19.

    Berzero G Picca A Psimaras D . Neurological complications of chimeric antigen receptor T cells and immune-checkpoint inhibitors: ongoing challenges in daily practice. Curr Opin Oncol. (2020) 32:60312. 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000681

  • 20.

    Sechi E Markovic SN McKeon A Dubey D Liewluck T Lennon VA et al . Neurological autoimmunity and immune checkpoint inhibitors: autoantibody profiles and outcomes. Neurology. (2020) 95:10632. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010632

Summary

Keywords

pembrolizumab, anti-PD1 agents, neurological immune-related adverse effects, immune-related neurological complications, autoimmune neuropathy, case report

Citation

Bruno F, Palmiero RA, Ferrero B, Franchino F, Pellerino A, Milanesi E, Soffietti R and Rudà R (2021) Pembrolizumab-Induced Isolated Cranial Neuropathy: A Rare Case Report and Review of Literature. Front. Neurol. 12:669493. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.669493

Received

18 February 2021

Accepted

25 March 2021

Published

11 May 2021

Volume

12 - 2021

Edited by

Chiara Briani, University of Padua, Italy

Reviewed by

Paola Sandroni, Mayo Clinic, United States; Roser Velasco, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Spain

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Francesco Bruno

This article was submitted to Neuromuscular Disorders and Peripheral Neuropathies, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics