In the published article, there was an error in Materials and methods. Participants, paragraph 4. The stated inclusion criteria was not strict enough and previously stated “vertigo and characteristic positional nystagmus (torsional nystagmus in the Dix-Hallpike test, horizontal nystagmus in the Roll test) during the posturography, with the nystagmus lasting no more than 1 min.” This should have been “vertigo and characteristic positional nystagmus (torsional nystagmus in the Dix-Hallpike test, horizontal nystagmus in the Roll test) during the posturography.” The corrected paragraph appears below:
(2) Failed at least one of the following vestibular function tests:
-
- no recognizable P1 and N1 waves can be seen in either test ear at 100 dB SPL and/or bilateral asymmetry ratio (AR) of amplitude ≥1.6, measured by the c-VEMP.
-
- horizontal angular VOR gain < 0.8 (< 0.7 for vertical direction) with saccade wave, measured by the v-HIT.
-
- vertigo and characteristic positional nystagmus (torsional nystagmus in the Dix-Hallpike test, horizontal nystagmus in the Roll test) during the posturography.
-
- reduced caloric response (sum of bithermal, 24 and 50°C maximum peak slow phase velocity (SPV) on each side < 12°/s), and/or unilateral weakness (UW) ≥25%.
In the published article, the reference “Guidetti G, Guidetti R, Manfredi M, Manfredi M. Vestibular pathology and spatial working memory. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. (2020) 40:72–8. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-2189,” was not cited in the article. The citation has now been inserted as reference (34) in Discussion, Contribution of vestibular function on visuospatial cognitive outcomes, paragraph 1 and should read:
This is in line with previous work that short-term spatial memory was impaired in patients with chronic vestibular dysfunction during computerized CBT, with 4.11 ± 1.07 and 5.29 ± 0.77 for the forward span of older patients and controls, respectively (34).
In the published article, there was also an error in Supplementary Table 1 as published. In the table “Hearing performance of the better ear” should have been “Hearing performance of the better ear (n, %)”. Supplementary Table 1 has been updated in the Supplementary material of the published article.
The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
vestibular dysfunction, recurrent vertigo, aging, visuospatial ability, computerized test system
Citation
Zhang X, Huang Y, Xia Y, Yang X, Zhang Y, Wei C, Ying H and Liu Y (2023) Corrigendum: Vestibular dysfunction is an important contributor to the aging of visuospatial ability in older adults–Data from a computerized test system. Front. Neurol. 14:1166687. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1166687
Received
15 February 2023
Accepted
13 March 2023
Published
30 March 2023
Volume
14 - 2023
Edited and reviewed by
Jian-hua Zhuang, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Zhang, Huang, Xia, Yang, Zhang, Wei, Ying and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yuhe Liu liuyuhefeng@163.com
This article was submitted to Neuro-Otology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.