SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol., 17 November 2023

Sec. Experimental Therapeutics

Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1268626

Effectiveness of acupuncture for pain relief in shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke: a systematic evaluation and Bayesian network meta-analysis

  • TH

    Ting Huang 1

  • HY

    Hongfang Yao 2

  • JH

    Junneng Huang 3

  • NW

    Ning Wang 1

  • CZ

    Chunjun Zhou 1

  • XH

    Xuyang Huang 1

  • XT

    Xiangyuan Tan 1

  • YL

    Yanyan Li 4

  • YJ

    Yuyu Jie 1

  • XW

    Xiang Wang 5

  • YY

    Yu Yang 3

  • YL

    Yingye Liang 3

  • SY

    Siqian Yue 1

  • YM

    Yawen Mao 1

  • SL

    Songxian Lai 1

  • JZ

    Jingyiqi Zheng 1

  • YH

    Yufeng He 3*

  • 1. The First School of Clinical Medicine, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China

  • 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China

  • 3. The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China

  • 4. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanning, China

  • 5. Sainz College of New Medicine, Guangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China

Abstract

Background:

Shoulder-hand syndrome (SHS) is a common complication after stroke, and SHS-induced pain significantly hampers patients’ overall recovery. As an alternative therapy for pain relief, acupuncture has certain advantages in alleviating pain caused by SHS after stroke. However, choosing the best treatment plan from a variety of acupuncture options is still a serious challenge in clinical practice. Therefore, we conducted this Bayesian network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the effectiveness of various acupuncture treatment methods.

Methods:

We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of acupuncture treatment in patients with post-stroke SHS published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science until 9 March 2023. We used the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool to assess the bias risk in the included original studies.

Results:

A total of 50 RCTs involving 3,999 subjects were included, comprising 19 types of effective acupuncture interventions. Compared to single rehabilitation training, the top three interventions for VAS improvement were floating needle [VAS = −2.54 (95% CI: −4.37 to −0.69)], rehabilitation + catgut embedding [VAS = −2.51 (95% CI: −4.33 to −0.68)], and other multi-needle acupuncture combinations [VAS = −2.32 (95% CI: −3.68 to −0.94)]. The top three interventions for improving the Fugl–Meyer score were eye acupuncture [Meyer = 15.73 (95% CI: 3.4627.95)], other multi-needle acupuncture combinations [Meyer = 12.22 (95% CI: 5.1919.34)], and traditional western medicine + acupuncture + traditional Chinese medicine [Meyer = 11.96 (95% CI: −0.59 to 24.63)].

Conclusion:

Multiple acupuncture methods are significantly effective in improving pain and upper limb motor function in post-stroke SHS, with relatively few adverse events; thus, acupuncture can be promoted.

Systematic Review Registration:

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42023410957.

1 Introduction

Stroke is a leading cause of disability in old people. The absolute number of stroke events worldwide increased by 70.0% from 1990 to 2019, making stroke the third leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) (1, 2). Despite early treatment, patients with strokes often have residual sequelae, mainly characterized by hemiparesis. Shoulder hand syndrome (SHS) is a common complication after stroke, with main clinical manifestations including severe pain in the affected shoulder, along nerve distributions and injury regions, hand swelling, and sensory impairment. The incidence rate of SHS is approximately 2%–50%, with a peak incidence at 1–6 months after stroke (3, 4). Hence, this period is critical for the recovery of patients. Severe pain significantly undermines patients’ motivation for recovery, which is detrimental to the expected recovery and their return to society and family, thereby imposing a huge burden on clinical medical work (5).

Currently, treatments for post-stroke SHS pain mainly include oral medication, ganglion radiofrequency ablation, and nerve block. Oral medication can cause adverse reactions such as fatigue, liver and kidney damage, and gastrointestinal dysfunction (6–8). Nerve radiofrequency ablation and nerve block have certain analgesic effects, but as more invasive treatments, they only provide temporary pain relief and patients cannot benefit from them in the medium to long term (9). Therefore, optimizing treatment strategies for post-stroke SHS is a focus of clinical physicians. Chinese medicine acupuncture, through its unique theory of meridians, plays a positive role in treating pain, arthritis, and recovery after stroke. It is safe and effective with few adverse reactions, and it has been internationally recognized as an effective supplement and alternative therapy for pain treatment (10–12).

There are many types of acupuncture, including electroacupuncture, fire needling, warming needles, and catgut embedding. These diversified acupuncture methods have been introduced by some researchers into the treatment of post-stroke SHS, even in combination with other treatments (13). However, selecting the best acupuncture plan in clinical practice remains challenging. Therefore, we conducted this Bayesian network meta-analysis on acupuncture treatment for post-stroke SHS in the hope of providing the best acupuncture combination regimen and basis to assist in medical decision-making.

2 Methods

2.1 Study registration

This network meta-analysis was conducted based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA-NMA) (14). This study has been registered on PROSPERO, and the registration website is https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, (ID: CRD42023410957).

2.2 Eligibility criteria

2.2.1 Inclusion criteria

P (population): patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for post-stroke SHS, regardless of age, race, and gender. Post-stroke SHS is diagnosed according to the “Rehabilitation Evaluation and Treatment of Stroke” and the “2016 China Stroke Diagnosis and Treatment Consensus” (14, 15).

The diagnostic criteria of stroke were formulated according to the “2016 China Stroke Diagnosis and Treatment Consensus.” Diagnostic points are as follows: ① acute onset; ② focal neurological deficit (such as weakness or numbness of one side of face or limb, language disorder); a few patients have comprehensive neurological deficit, which may be accompanied by headache, vomiting, elevated blood pressure, and different degrees of consciousness disorder; ③ symptoms or signs of unlimited duration (when imaging shows responsible lesions) or lasting more than 24 h (when imaging shows no responsible lesions); ④ stroke diagnosed by CT or MRI of the head, with non-cerebral vascular causes excluded.

The diagnostic criteria for shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke were the criteria established by “Rehabilitation Evaluation and Treatment of Stroke.” The diagnosis points are as follows: ① patients have unilateral shoulder and hand pain, skin flushing, skin temperature rising, and finger bending limitation after stroke. ② No evidence of local trauma, infection, and peripheral vascular disease.

I (intervention): studies that use acupuncture in the treatment group.

C (comparison): studies that use rehabilitation, medication, or conventional acupuncture in the control group.

O (outcome): the primary outcome measures are the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Fugl–Meyer motor function assessment scale; the secondary outcome measures are the Barthel index (BI) and shoulder-hand syndrome evaluation scale (SHSS).

S (study design): randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

2.2.2 Exclusion criteria

P (population): studies with severe problems in the diagnostic criteria for post-stroke SHS or SHS caused by other diseases.

I (intervention): (1) studies analyzing the effects of different frequencies and intensities of an intervention method, which are isolated from other intervention methods and cannot be used to estimate the effect size and (2) studies that do not include acupuncture in any of the groups.

C (comparison): none.

O (outcome): studies with serious bias in outcome measure scoring (such as those without baseline assessment or incomplete outcome data).

S (study design): (1) full conference abstracts not published through peer review; (2) studies with a sample size of <10, which are unlikely to achieve ideal statistical power; (3) crossover design studies. As the crossover design can generally achieve the preset statistical power with only a small sample size, we can only extract the results of the first phase of the trial in a systematic review. However, some crossover design studies have a small sample size and do not report the independent results of the first phase, so these studies need to be excluded.

2.3 Data sources and search strategy

RCTs on acupuncture treatment for post-stroke SHS are retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, VIP (Chinese), Wanfang (Chinese), CNKI (Chinese), and Chinese Biomedical (Chinese) databases. There are no restrictions on language and publication years, and the retrieval date is until 12 March 2023. The retrieval is conducted in the form of “subject word + free word,” the search terms for the Chinese databases include “stroke,” “shoulder-hand syndrome,” “painful malnutrition syndrome,” “painful nutritional disorder,” “complex regional pain syndrome,” “reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome,” “acupuncture,” “electroacupuncture,” “warming needle,” “fire needling,” “floating needle,” and “catgut embedding “. The search strategy for the English databases is shown in Supplementary Table S1.

2.4 Study selection

The retrieved studies were imported into EndNote, and duplicate publications were excluded. Then, the titles and abstract were checked to preliminarily select the original studies that met the criteria and download the full text. The full texts were read to select the original RCT studies that met the criteria of this systematic review. The study selection was independently conducted by two researchers (XT and XH), and any disputes were arbitrated by a third researcher (HY) after the search was completed.

2.5 Data extraction

Data extraction was independently performed by two researchers (NW and YJ), and a third researcher (JH) was asked to arbitrate disputes, if any. A data extraction electronic spreadsheet was developed to extract data, including the title, English abstract, first author, year of publication, study design, author’s country, diagnostic criteria, interventional protocol, type of stroke, treatment time, number of cases, gender, age, disease course, follow-up time, outcome measures, selection bias, implementation bias, measurement bias, loss to follow-up bias, reporting bias, and other biases.

2.6 Assessment of study quality/risk of bias in studies

Quality assessment was conducted by two researchers (JH and XH) using Cochrane’s bias risk assessment tool RoB 2.0 (16, 17) to assess the risk of bias in the 50 included original studies. The assessment tool includes the following seven items: randomization process, method of identifying or recruiting participants, bias due to deviation from the expected intervention, missing outcome data, bias in outcome measurement, reporting selection bias, and overall bias. The risk of bias in each domain is classified into three levels: low risk of bias, high risk of bias, and some concerns. After completion, a cross-check would be conducted, and if there was a dispute, a third researcher (TH) was asked to assist in adjudicating. Finally, the risk of bias graph was plotted.

2.7 Outcomes

The primary outcome measures are the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and the Fugl–Meyer upper limb motor function assessment scale. The secondary outcome measures are the Barthel index (BI) and the shoulder-hand syndrome evaluation scale (SHSS). Since our outcome measures are all continuous variables, and there seem to be differences among the studies at baseline, we used the change from baseline to post-treatment as the effect size in the meta-analysis.

2.8 Synthesis methods

This study used a Bayesian random-effects model to compare the effect estimates of various to compare their effectiveness. The Markov chain Monte Carlo method was used for modeling, with four Markov chains running simultaneously, and the annealing times were set to 20,000. The modeling was completed after 50,000 simulation iterations. The deviance information criterion (DIC) was used to compare model fit and global consistency. If there is a closed loop in the network, we would use the node-splitting method to analyze local consistency. In addition, we ranked these interventions based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, and a league table was generated to compare the differences in effectiveness between various interventions. A funnel plot was used to intuitively reflect the heterogeneity among the studies. Analyses were completed in Stata 15.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) and R 4.2.0 (R Development Core Team, Vienna, http://www.R-project.org). A p-value of <0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference.

3 Results

3.1 Study selection

A total of 4,697 relevant articles were retrieved from the databases, including 162 from English databases and 4,535 from Chinese databases. A total of 558 duplicate articles were marked in EndNote and eliminated. After reading the titles and abstracts of the remaining 4,139 articles, we finally determined to download the full texts of 66 articles. According to a full-text review, 50 RCTs (18–67) were eligible and included in this systematic review (as shown in Figure 1; Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 1

3.2 Study characteristics

This study included 50 articles in total, involving 3,999 patients with SHS after stroke, and 2 of them were multi-center RCTs (41, 42). The included articles were published between 2002 and 2022, covering 19 acupuncture treatment methods. There were 11 types of acupuncture combined with other treatments. None of the original studies we included had conflicts of interest. The basic information of the included studies can be found in Table 1.

Table 1

No.First authorYear of publicationStudy designAuthor’s countryPost-stroke SHSInterventional protocolType of Ssroke (hemorrhage/ischemia)Treatment timeNumber of casesTotal populationGender (M/F)AgeDisease course
1Ying Wang2002Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
None8w83
52
13548/35
30/22
62.32 (mean)
62.32 (mean)
45 (d)
45 (d)
2Yongqiang He2022Single-centerChinaDiagnosis, Treatment and Consensus of Cerebrovascular Diseases in China (2016 Edition)Treat 6 (electroacupuncture)
Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
NoneNone40
40
8024/16
26/14
34–80
35–78
15 (d)–4 (m)
15 (d)–4 (m)
3Xinru Li2021Single-centerChinaStroke RehabilitationTreat 1 (rehabilitation)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 7 (warm acupuncture)
No description4w24
24
24
24
9619/5
18/6
15/9
17/7
60.79 ± 12.06
67.54 ± 11.35
63.74 ± 12.45
65.74 ± 12.17
29.14 ± 5.34 (d)
30.45 ± 5.76 (d)
29.52 ± 5.35 (d)
30.24 ± 5.86 (d)
4Juan Yang2011Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 8 (fire needling)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
13/18
12/19
2w31
31
6217/14
18/13
60.85 ± 8.80
63.12 ± 8.33
None
5Qin Xie2011Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 9 (Jin’s three-needle technique)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
0/604w30
30
6013/17
14/16
64.83 ± 8.81
63.80 ± 9.81
None
6Xiaoqiong Hua2022Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
None4w52
53
105None18–75
18–75
15–90 (d)
15–90 (d)
7Liang Zhou2016Single-centerChinaNo descriptionTreat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
None4w20
20
4012/8
11/9
55.9 ± 11.2
56.3 ± 10.9
27.3 ± 9.6 (d)
29.6 ± 8.7 (d)
8Feilin Ni2021Single-centerChinaNeurological RehabilitationTreat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
0/634w31
32
639/22
11/21
67.2 ± 6.5
68.3 ± 8.5
No description
9Qingbo Ju2016Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 11 (eye acupuncture)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
No description4w34
34
6820/14
18/15
54.23 ± 9.37
56.37 ± 10.88
58 ± 10.42 (d)
55 ± 7.34 (d)
10Wenjun Nong2012Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
No description3w40
40
8022/18
25/15
63 ± 7.50
61 ± 9.60
48 ± 9.60 (d)
46 ± 9.80 (d)
11Yimo Feng2015Single-centerChinaClinical Rehabilitation MedicineTreat 1 (rehabilitation)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
No description4w57
69
12683/4363.4 ± 5.3
63.4 ± 5.3
33.1 ± 6.7 (d)
33.1 ± 6.7 (d)
12Xianping Huang2017Single-centerChinaNo descriptionTreat 1 (rehabilitation)
Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine)
29/36
30/35
3w65
65
13034/31
33/32
62.16 ± 5.27
62.12 ± 5.31
40.26 ± 7.24 (d)
40.21 ± 7.27 (d)
13Ranwei Li2020Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
0/624w31
31
6217/14
18/13
57.7 ± 7.4
58.2 ± 6.7
1.2 ± 0.3 (m)
1.3 ± 0.3 (m)
14Lijuan Cao2020Single-centerChinaNeurological RehabilitationTreat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
No description3w39
39
7830/9
28/11
61.4 ± 9.8
60.1 ± 10.7
39.5 ± 24.7 (d)
41.3 ± 23.2 (d)
15Ronghua Zhu2018Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding)
Treat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine)
Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding)
6/24
5 out of 25
5 out of 25
6w30
30
30
9021/9
20/10
21/9
61.6 ± 10.3
59.9 ± 8.7
62.8 ± 7.3
56.3 ± 15.7 (d)
62.7 ± 14.2 (d)
59.1 ± 12.2 (d)
16Xiongjie Chen2015Single-centerChinaClinical Rehabilitation MedicineTreat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
Treat 6 (electroacupuncture)
Treat 18 (gangliolysis)
No description2w20
20
20
60No description42–70
42–70
42–70
1–6 (m)
1–6 (m)
17Zouqin Huang2015Multi-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 6 (electroacupuncture)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
No description8w30
30
6021/9
20/10
61 ± 15
62 ± 8
34.93 ± 17.83 (d)
35.48 ± 20.06 (d)
18Miaojun Lin2016Single-centerChinaNo descriptionTreat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
24/36
26/34
5w60
60
12032/28
27/33
63 ± 4
64 ± 4
7.02 ± 4.03 (m)
8.34 ± 4.29 (m)
19Liwen Xue2007No descriptionChinaNo descriptionTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 6 (electroacupuncture)
5/35
3/37
4w40
40
8025/15
23/17
61.11 ± 7.12
60.72 ± 7.01
1–56 (d)
1–53 (d)
20Ruiqing Li2022Single-centerChinaChinese Standards for Diagnosis and Treatment of Rehabilitation Medicine (Volume 2)Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
15/17
12/20
3w32
32
6418/14
15/17
49 ± 2
54 ± 1
139.6 ± 2.7 (d)
138.9 ± 2.2 (d)
21Yanjie Shang2008Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
No description5w40
40
40
12028/12
27/13
25/15
53.42 ± 6.17
52.38 ± 6.25
51.79 ± 6.14
5.23 ± 1.47 (m)
5.37 ± 1.42 (m)
5.02 ± 1.38 (m)
22Jie Zhan2022Single-centerChinaGuidelines and Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Diseases of the Chinese Society of NeurologyTreat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
9/16
7/17
2w25
24
4916/9
14/10
59.36 ± 8.73
55.50 ± 8.20
59.64 ± 31.07 (d)
68.17 ± 41.09 (d)
23Fanying Meng2014Single-centerChinaStroke RehabilitationTreat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 7 (warm acupuncture)
No description2w30
30
6017/13
16/14
69.3 ± 5.7
68.7 ± 5.2
19.8 ± 3.7 (d)
19.0 ± 2.9 (d)
24Xiaoli Tang2021Single-centerChinaGuidelines and Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebrovascular Diseases in China (2016 Edition)Treat 7 (warm acupuncture)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
12/24
11/25
4w36
36
7221/15
20/16
69.3 ± 7.1
68.9 ± 6.8
33.08 ± 9.54 (d)
32.64 ± 9.22 (d)
25Jun Wang2013Single-centerChinaNeurological RehabilitationTreat 10 (floating needle)
Treat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine)
Treat 17 (western medicine + rehabilitation + Chinese medicine)
12/18
14/16
18/12
4w30
30
30
9016/14
13/17
15/15
61.4 ± 9.7
61.9 ± 9.8
63.2 ± 10.3
3w–6 (m)
3w–5 (m)
3w–6 (m)
26Jinbiao Hong2009Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
8/22
7/23
4w30
30
6014/16
17/13
60.20 ± 9.06
61.50 ± 9.32
31.30 ± 3.11 (d)
31.87 ± 3.30 (d)
27Qian Zhang2015Single-centerChinaChinese Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment StandardsTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
0/604w30
30
6017/13
19/11
62 ± 9
62 ± 9
49.3 ± 8.6 (d)
51.2 ± 9.4 (d)
28Bing Yan2015Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 9 (Jin’s three-needle technique)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
13/17
9/21
2w30
30
6016/14
13/17
41–85
35–85
15 d–153 (d)
17 d–158 (d)
29Tongbo Jiang2016Single-centerChinaNo descriptionTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
0/603w30
31
6018/12
19/11
62 (mean)
58 (mean)
50 (d)
55 (d)
30Chunshui Huang2017Single-centerChinaNeurological RehabilitationTreat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
11/19
8/22
3w30
30
6043/1759 ± 5
59 ± 6
46.8 ± 14.8 (d)
45.4 ± 16.5 (d)
31Zhaohui Zhou2014Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 10 (floating needle)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
37/13
41/9
2w50
50
10026/24
23/27
65 ± 9
66 ± 12
62.2 ± 42.5 (d)
63.7 ± 44.4 (d)
32Wenrong Wan2013Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 1 (rehabilitation)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
56/644w60
60
12034/26
32/28
63 ± 6
60 ± 6
33.0 ± 9.4 (d)
38.4 ± 9.0 (d)
33Bingfeng Xing2019Single-centerChinaNeurological RehabilitationTreat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding)
10/19/1
9/20/1
4w30
30
6016/14
17/13
54.1 ± 9.1
55.8 ± 8.8
3.1 ± 1.2 (m)
3.3 ± 1.0 (m)
34Ning Li2012Multi-centerChinaChinese Rehabilitation Diagnosis and Treatment StandardsTreat 6 (electroacupuncture)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
No description6w60
60
12020/40
19/41
62 ± 12
61 ± 13
28 ± 6 (d)
27 ± 5 (d)
35Jingchun Yin2015Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
5 out of 25
5 out of 25
4w30
30
6020/10
19/11
63 ± 9
62 ± 10
67.17 ± 14.50 (d)
67.10 ± 15.21 (d)
36Jingjun Xie2016Single-centerChinaNo descriptionTreat 6 (electroacupuncture)
Treat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine)
0/804w40
40
8027/13
22/18
50 ± 11
51 ± 10
14d–2 (m)
15d–2 (m)
37Sen Gao2022Single-centerChinaNeurological RehabilitationTreat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
Treat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
11/39
9/42
8w50
51
10628/22
30/21
61 ± 11
63 ± 12
60 ± 24 (d)
58 ± 22 (d)
38Zhihong Zou2021Single-centerChinaStroke RehabilitationTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
25/32
29/26
3w55
57
11234/23
28/27
55.74 ± 8.56
56.02 ± 8.69
49.35 ± 19.56 (d)
51.31 ± 20.24 (d)
39Xueping Yu2017Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
12/17
15/13
2w29
28
5719/10
17/11
56.48 ± 8.53
56.39 ± 8.72
51.13 ± 24.82 (d)
51.54 ± 24.07 (d)
40Shurong Wang2022Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
No description4w30
30
6016/14
15/15
54.83 ± 4.58
54.90 ± 3.49
55.80 ± 25.66 (d)
55.33 ± 20.99 (d)
41Mingming Wang2018Single-centerChinaStroke RehabilitationTreat 6 (electroacupuncture)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
No description4w43
43
8624/19
23/20
56.9 ± 10.3
58.1 ± 9.8
20.3 ± 4.5 (d)
19. 8 ± 3.7 (d)
42Weidong Yang2019Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine)
Treat 6 (electroacupuncture)
No description4w30
30
6018/12
20/10
54–75
51–72
38 ± 11 (d)
35 ± 9 (d)
43Yang Wang2019Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 6 (electroacupuncture)
No description5w36
36
7219/17
16/20
66.7 ± 11.3
65.8 ± 14.5
38.2 ± 16.8 (d)
37.9 ± 19.1 (d)
44Shengsan He2016Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
36/24
34/26
3w60
60
12034/26
32/28
50.66 ± 10.24
48.12 ± 11.98
21.07 ± 8.69 (d)
20.32 ± 8.61 (d)
45Jingchang Huang2013Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 8 (fire needling)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
0/703w
2w
35
35
7019/16
18/17
62 ± 7
60 ± 7
<2 (m)
46Youhua Zeng2019Single-centerChinaChinese Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment StandardsTreat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture)
4w56
56
11229/27
30/26
68 ± 12
69 ± 9
30–99 (d)
15–102 (d)
47Ting Zhang2019Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 12 (special needle operation and technique)
Treat 1 (rehabilitation)
No description4w31
31
6218/13
19/12
53.2 ± 11.2
54.1 ± 10.4
72.3 ± 17.1 (d)
74.9 ± 15.2 (d)
48Fei Huang2018Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Medicine for StrokeTreat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 6 (electroacupuncture)
No description2w30
30
6018/12
20/10
50.7 ± 11.2
52.3 ± 9.8
152.8 ± 99.2 (d)
147.6 ± 85.7 (d)
49Guoqi Chen2018Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb)
Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture)
No description2w36
36
7219/17
18/18
51.5 ± 7.9
53.2 ± 7.6
64.6 ± 39.8 (d)
65.8 ± 38.9 (d)
50Xin Tong2014Single-centerChinaRehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of StrokeTreat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations)
Treat 3 (routine acupuncture)
0/603w30
30
6018/12
21/9
60 ± 9
59 ± 9
45.2 ± 9.6 (d)
46.7 ± 9.1 (d)

Basic information of the included studies.

3.3 Detailed explanation of intervention methods

This systematic review covers 19 acupuncture treatment methods (routine acupuncture).

Point-toward-point needle insertion, warming needles, electroacupuncture, fire needling, Jin’s three-needle technique, floating needle, eye acupuncture, silver needle, trocar needle, spoon-like needle, thumbtack needle, abdominal acupuncture, scalp acupuncture, contralateral blood-letting and contralateral needling, catgut embedding, wrist-ankle acupuncture, balancing acupuncture, eightfold method of the sacred tortoise, four special acupuncture techniques (18, 44, 55, 56, 64), and four special needle insertion methods (36, 42, 46, 47, 60, 63, 66). Affected limb movement during acupuncture was reported in three studies (24, 44, 67). The detailed intervention methods are provided in Supplementary Table S3.

3.4 Results of bias risk assessment

In our 50 included studies, 43 were assessed as having “some concerns” for overall bias and 7 had a high risk of bias. The high risk of bias in the seven studies was because the intervention implementers knew the intervention. Since there was no detailed information on allocation concealment in these 50 RCTs, 43 studies were classified as “some concerns.” Due to the experimental environment, five studies deviated from the predetermined intervention measures and were assessed as having “some concerns.” During the implementation of the intervention, because the evaluators knew the intervention, seven studies were classified as high risk and four as some concerns. The detailed bias risk assessment results are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2

4 Meta-analysis

4.1 VAS

4.1.1 Correlation between intervention methods

This review included 38 studies (19–22, 28–34, 37, 39–46, 48, 50, 52–67) that reported the pain relief effect of multiple acupuncture methods for post-stroke SHS using the VAS scale. The main intervention methods included Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 6 (electroacupuncture), Treat 1 (rehabilitation), Treat 3 (routine acupuncture), and Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb). With the development of acupuncture in recent years, Treat 7 (warming needle), Treat 8 (fire needling), Treat 9 (Jin’s three-needle technique), Treat 10 (floating needle) have also gradually started to be explored for their use in pain relief in SHS after stroke. A detailed comparison of the intervention methods is illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3

4.1.2 Synthesized results

The studies included in this analysis met the overall consistency hypothesis test (p > 0.05), so we used a consistency model for Bayesian network meta-analysis. The results of the analysis show that compared to the routine intervention Treat 1 (rehabilitation), Treat 10 (floating needle), Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding), Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations), Treat 12 (special needle operation and technique), Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb), Treat 8 (fire needling), Treat 7 (warming needle), Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 6 (electroacupuncture), Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture), and Treat 3 (routine acupuncture) could significantly reduce VAS score, (p < 0.05) as shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4

Among these effective intervention methods, the top three were Treat 10 (floating needle), Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding), and Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations), with ranking probabilities of 0.84, 0.83, and 0.82, respectively. At the same time, compared to routine rehabilitation, their improvements in VAS were Treat 10 (floating needle) −2.54 (95% CI: −4.37 to −0.69), Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding) −2.51 (95% CI: −4.33 to −0.68), and Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations) −2.32 (95% CI: −3.68 to −0.94), with significant differences. The detailed results of pairwise comparisons are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Treat 1−2.54 (−4.37, −0.69)−1.98 (−3.23, −0.7)−2.32 (−3.68, −0.94)−1.87 (−3.08, −0.66)−2.51 (−4.33, −0.68)−0.09 (−1.75, 1.59)0.18 (−1.26, 1.62)−0.53 (−1.89, 0.84)−1.63 (−2.84, −0.4)−0.82 (−1.95, 0.32)−1.12 (−2.34, 0.12)−1.69 (−3.46, 0.07)−1.83 (−3.99, 0.36)−0.16 (−2.03, 1.73)
2.54 (0.69, 4.37)Treat 100.56 (−1.38, 2.5)0.22 (−1.7, 2.13)0.66 (−1.29, 2.6)0.03 (−2.11, 2.16)2.45 (0.23, 4.65)2.71 (0.92, 4.49)2.01 (−0.01, 4.01)0.91 (−0.83, 2.64)1.72 (−0.02, 3.45)1.42 (−0.46, 3.29)0.85 (−1.53, 3.2)0.7 (−1.88, 3.29)2.38 (−0.12, 4.89)
1.98 (0.7, 3.23)−0.56 (−2.5, 1.38)Treat 12−0.34 (−1.71, 1.03)0.1 (−1.25, 1.43)−0.53 (−2.46, 1.37)1.89 (0.19, 3.6)2.15 (0.67, 3.63)1.45 (0.23, 2.66)0.35 (−1.19, 1.88)1.15 (0.1, 2.21)0.86 (−0.39, 2.1)0.29 (−1.82, 2.37)0.14 (−1.97, 2.27)1.81 (−0.19, 3.84)
2.32 (0.94, 3.68)−0.22 (−2.13, 1.7)0.34 (−1.03, 1.71)Treat 130.44 (−0.98, 1.85)−0.19 (−2.1, 1.72)2.23 (0.48, 3.99)2.5 (0.99, 3.99)1.79 (0.38, 3.18)0.69 (−0.76, 2.13)1.5 (0.4, 2.58)1.2 (−0.11, 2.5)0.63 (−1.48, 2.71)0.48 (−1.68, 2.66)2.16 (0.06, 4.27)
1.87 (0.66, 3.08)−0.66 (−2.6, 1.29)−0.1 (−1.43, 1.25)−0.44 (−1.85, 0.98)Treat 14−0.63 (−2.55, 1.29)1.79 (0.24, 3.34)2.05 (0.57, 3.55)1.35 (0, 2.69)0.25 (−1.27, 1.77)1.05 (−0.08, 2.2)0.76 (−0.44, 1.96)0.18 (−1.89, 2.25)0.04 (−2.12, 2.24)1.71 (−0.31, 3.77)
2.51 (0.68, 4.33)−0.03 (−2.16, 2.11)0.53 (−1.37, 2.46)0.19 (−1.72, 2.1)0.63 (−1.29, 2.55)Treat 162.42 (0.27, 4.58)2.68 (1.23, 4.15)1.98 (−0.01, 3.97)0.88 (−0.86, 2.63)1.68 (−0.06, 3.45)1.39 (−0.4, 3.19)0.82 (−1.55, 3.16)0.67 (−1.89, 3.26)2.35 (−0.13, 4.84)
0.09 (−1.59, 1.75)−2.45 (−4.65, −0.23)−1.89 (−3.6, −0.19)−2.23 (−3.99, −0.48)−1.79 (−3.34, −0.24)−2.42 (−4.58, −0.27)Treat 180.26 (−1.49, 2)−0.45 (−2.19, 1.29)−1.54 (−3.41, 0.33)−0.74 (−2.36, 0.88)−1.03 (−2.32, 0.25)−1.61 (−3.97, 0.74)−1.75 (−4.2, 0.71)−0.08 (−2.4, 2.27)
−0.18 (−1.62, 1.26)−2.71 (−4.49, −0.92)−2.15 (−3.63, −0.67)−2.5 (−3.99, −0.99)−2.05 (−3.55, −0.57)−2.68 (−4.15, −1.23)−0.26 (−2, 1.49)Treat 2−0.7 (−2.28, 0.86)−1.8 (−3.32, −0.28)−1 (−2.25, 0.25)−1.3 (−2.56, −0.03)−1.86 (−4.02, 0.27)−2.01 (−4.27, 0.26)−0.33 (−2.53, 1.86)
0.53 (−0.84, 1.89)−2.01 (−4.01, 0.01)−1.45 (−2.66, −0.23)−1.79 (−3.18, −0.38)−1.35 (−2.69, 0)−1.98 (−3.97, 0.01)0.45 (−1.29, 2.19)0.7 (−0.86, 2.28)Treat 3−1.1 (−2.71, 0.51)−0.29 (−1.54, 0.96)−0.59 (−1.89, 0.71)−1.16 (−3.31, 0.98)−1.31 (−3.36, 0.77)0.37 (−1.46, 2.23)
1.63 (0.4, 2.84)−0.91 (−2.64, 0.83)−0.35 (−1.88, 1.19)−0.69 (−2.13, 0.76)−0.25 (−1.77, 1.27)−0.88 (−2.63, 0.86)1.54 (−0.33, 3.41)1.8 (0.28, 3.32)1.1 (−0.51, 2.71)Treat 40.8 (−0.55, 2.16)0.51 (−0.96, 1.98)−0.06 (−1.85, 1.7)−0.21 (−2.51, 2.11)1.47 (−0.68, 3.62)
0.82 (−0.32, 1.95)−1.72 (−3.45, 0.02)−1.15 (−2.21, −0.1)−1.5 (−2.58, −0.4)−1.05 (−2.2, 0.08)−1.68 (−3.45, 0.06)0.74 (−0.88, 2.36)1 (−0.25, 2.25)0.29 (−0.96, 1.54)−0.8 (−2.16, 0.55)Treat 5−0.3 (−1.44, 0.84)−0.87 (−2.88, 1.12)−1.01 (−2.96, 0.95)0.66 (−1.32, 2.67)
1.12 (−0.12, 2.34)−1.42 (−3.29, 0.46)−0.86 (−2.1, 0.39)−1.2 (−2.5, 0.11)−0.76 (−1.96, 0.44)−1.39 (−3.19, 0.4)1.03 (−0.25, 2.32)1.3 (0.03, 2.56)0.59 (−0.71, 1.89)−0.51 (−1.98, 0.96)0.3 (−0.84, 1.44)Treat 6−0.57 (−2.64, 1.48)−0.72 (−2.87, 1.46)0.96 (−1.07, 2.99)
1.69 (−0.07, 3.46)−0.85 (−3.2, 1.53)−0.29 (−2.37, 1.82)−0.63 (−2.71, 1.48)−0.18 (−2.25, 1.89)−0.82 (−3.16, 1.55)1.61 (−0.74, 3.97)1.86 (−0.27, 4.02)1.16 (−0.98, 3.31)0.06 (−1.7, 1.85)0.87 (−1.12, 2.88)0.57 (−1.48, 2.64)Treat 7−0.15 (−2.85, 2.6)1.53 (−0.99, 4.09)
1.83 (−0.36, 3.99)−0.7 (−3.29, 1.88)−0.14 (−2.27, 1.97)−0.48 (−2.66, 1.68)−0.04 (−2.24, 2.12)−0.67 (−3.26, 1.89)1.75 (−0.71, 4.2)2.01 (−0.26, 4.27)1.31 (−0.77, 3.36)0.21 (−2.11, 2.51)1.01 (−0.95, 2.96)0.72 (−1.46, 2.87)0.15 (−2.6, 2.85)Treat 81.67 (−0.98, 4.31)
0.16 (−1.73, 2.03)−2.38 (−4.89, 0.12)−1.81 (−3.84, 0.19)−2.16 (−4.27, −0.06)−1.71 (−3.77, 0.31)−2.35 (−4.84, 0.13)0.08 (−2.27, 2.4)0.33 (−1.86, 2.53)−0.37 (−2.23, 1.46)−1.47 (−3.62, 0.68)−0.66 (−2.67, 1.32)−0.96 (−2.99, 1.07)−1.53 (−4.09, 0.99)−1.67 (−4.31, 0.98)Treat 9

Fugl–Meyer league table of network meta-analysis of acupuncture treatment for post-stroke SHS.

Treat 1 (rehabilitation), Treat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine), Treat 3 (routine acupuncture), Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 6 (electroacupuncture), Treat 7 (warm acupuncture), Treat 8 (fire needling), Treat 9 (Jin’s three-needle technique), Treat 10 (floating needle), Treat 11 (eye acupuncture), Treat 12 (special needle operation and technique), Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations), Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb), Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine), Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding), Treat 17 (western medicine + rehabilitation + Chinese medicine), Treat 18 (gangliolysis).

4.1.3 Reporting biases

There appears to be no significant publication bias, as shown in the funnel plot (shown in Figure 5).

Figure 5

4.2 Fugl–Meyer

4.2.1 Correlation between intervention methods

A total of 48 studies (18–32, 34–41, 43–47, 49–67) reported the effect of multiple acupuncture methods on the upper limb motor function of the Fugl–Meyer score in SHS after stroke. The main intervention methods consisted of Treat 1 (rehabilitation), Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 6 (electroacupuncture), Treat 12 (special needle operation and technique). With the application and development of acupuncture in recent years, some special acupuncture therapies have gradually emerged and have been used in the recovery of upper limb motor function in SHS after stroke, such as Treat 8 (fire needling), Treat 9 (Jin’s three-needle technique), Treat 10 (floating needle), Treat 11 (eye acupuncture), and Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine). A detailed comparison of the intervention methods is presented in Figure 6.

Figure 6

4.2.2 Synthesized results

The included studies met the overall consistency hypothesis test (p > 0.05), so we used a consistency model for Bayesian network meta-analysis. The results of the analysis show that compared to Treat 1 (rehabilitation), Treat 11 (eye acupuncture), Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations), Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine), Treat 7 (warm acupuncture), Treat 12 (special needle operation and technique), Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding), Treat 10 (floating needle), Treat 6 (electroacupuncture), Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb), Treat 9 (Jin’s three-needle), Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 8 (fire needling), Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture), and Treat 3 (routine acupuncture) (Figure 7) could significantly increase the Fugl–Meyer score (p < 0.05).

Figure 7

Among these effective intervention methods, the top three are Treat 11 (eye acupuncture), Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations), and Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine), with ranking probabilities of 0.88, 0.84, and 0.75, respectively. At the same time, compared to routine rehabilitation, their improvements in Fugl–Meyer scores were Treat 11 (eye needle) 15.73 (95% CI: 3.4627.95), Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations) 12.22 (95% CI: 5.1919.34), and Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine) 11.96 (95% CI: −0.59 to 24.63). There was a significant difference between the first two, while Treat 11 (eye needle) showed good therapeutic effects. However, due to the small sample size, this result should be interpreted cautiously. The degree of improvement of the intervention method Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine) was not significant. The detailed results of pairwise comparisons are provided in Table 3.

Table 3

Treat 17.98 (−6.57, 22.63)15.73 (3.46, 27.95)9.3 (3.93, 14.66)12.22 (5.19, 19.34)6.92 (1.11, 12.71)11.96 (−0.59, 24.63)8.21 (0.19, 16.17)−0.03 (−7.16, 7.08)1.25 (−4.5, 6.95)5.47 (1.48, 9.54)1.53 (−4.4, 7.44)7.04 (1.95, 12.16)9.65 (3.58, 15.74)2.74 (−7.73, 13.24)6.01 (−3.48, 15.55)
−7.98 (−22.63, 6.57)Treat 107.69 (−11.37, 26.71)1.29 (−13.84, 16.34)4.24 (−11.61, 20.05)−1.06 (−16.51, 14.27)3.99 (−15.27, 23.32)0.21 (−15.93, 16.22)−8 (−23.9, 7.8)−6.76 (−22.12, 8.48)−2.5 (−16.6, 11.46)−6.47 (−21.82, 8.81)−0.94 (−16.16, 14.2)1.64 (−13.69, 16.92)−5.26 (−22.95, 12.43)−1.98 (−19.29, 15.11)
−15.73 (−27.95, −3.46)−7.69 (−26.71, 11.37)Treat 11−6.44 (−19.85, 6.96)−3.51 (−17.59, 10.72)−8.81 (−22.36, 4.77)−3.75 (−21.35, 13.82)−7.53 (−22.17, 7.12)−15.75 (−29.93, −1.59)−14.49 (−28.02, −0.96)−10.25 (−23.12, 2.69)−14.2 (−27.83, −0.59)−8.69 (−21.94, 4.63)−6.09 (−19.78, 7.61)−12.99 (−29.15, 3.19)−9.72 (−25.16, 5.87)
−9.3 (−14.66, −3.93)−1.29 (−16.34, 13.84)6.44 (−6.96, 19.85)Treat 122.93 (−3.68, 9.63)−2.37 (−8.76, 4.01)2.68 (−10.97, 16.39)−1.09 (−9.09, 6.88)−9.32 (−16.38, −2.36)−8.05 (−13.6, −2.53)−3.81 (−9.33, 1.71)−7.77 (−12.93, −2.6)−2.25 (−7.48, 3.02)0.36 (−7.26, 8.01)−6.55 (−16.79, 3.73)−3.28 (−13.4, 6.87)
−12.22 (−19.34, −5.19)−4.24 (−20.05, 11.61)3.51 (−10.72, 17.59)−2.93 (−9.63, 3.68)Treat 13−5.29 (−12.79, 2.05)−0.25 (−14.75, 14.15)−4.01 (−12.68, 4.52)−12.25 (−19.98, −4.68)−10.98 (−17.86, −4.2)−6.72 (−14.09, 0.52)−10.69 (−16.05, −5.47)−5.19 (−11.82, 1.36)−2.59 (−11.65, 6.38)−9.47 (−20.24, 1.22)−6.22 (−17.19, 4.71)
−6.92 (−12.71, −1.11)1.06 (−14.27, 16.51)8.81 (−4.77, 22.36)2.37 (−4.01, 8.76)5.29 (−2.05, 12.79)Treat 145.04 (−8.79, 18.94)1.28 (−7.28, 9.86)−6.95 (−14.67, 0.74)−5.68 (−12.18, 0.83)−1.44 (−7.62, 4.76)−5.4 (−11.49, 0.73)0.12 (−6, 6.28)2.72 (−5.29, 10.78)−4.19 (−14.91, 6.63)−0.92 (−11.38, 9.64)
−11.96 (−24.63, 0.59)−3.99 (−23.32, 15.27)3.75 (−13.82, 21.35)−2.68 (−16.39, 10.97)0.25 (−14.15, 14.75)−5.04 (−18.94, 8.79)Treat 15−3.77 (−18.76, 11.11)−11.99 (−26.52, 2.38)−10.73 (−24.56, 3.06)−6.49 (−19.73, 6.65)−10.44 (−24.35, 3.42)−4.92 (−18.53, 8.6)−2.31 (−16.35, 11.59)−9.23 (−25.57, 7.14)−5.97 (−21.79, 9.86)
−8.21 (−16.17, −0.19)−0.21 (−16.22, 15.93)7.53 (−7.12, 22.17)1.09 (−6.88, 9.09)4.01 (−4.52, 12.68)−1.28 (−9.86, 7.28)3.77 (−11.11, 18.76)Treat 16−8.22 (−15.09, −1.39)−6.95 (−15.45, 1.53)−2.72 (−10.59, 5.16)−6.68 (−13.96, 0.59)−1.15 (−8.96, 6.65)1.44 (−8.1, 11.03)−5.46 (−17.3, 6.42)−2.18 (−14.03, 9.65)
0.03 (−7.08, 7.16)8 (−7.8, 23.9)15.75 (1.59, 29.93)9.32 (2.36, 16.38)12.25 (4.68, 19.98)6.95 (−0.74, 14.67)11.99 (−2.38, 26.52)8.22 (1.39, 15.09)Treat 21.27 (−6.3, 8.9)5.51 (−1.82, 12.85)1.55 (−4.64, 7.79)7.07 (0.78, 13.41)9.68 (0.69, 18.72)2.77 (−8.38, 14.01)6.05 (−5.21, 17.34)
−1.25 (−6.95, 4.5)6.76 (−8.48, 22.12)14.49 (0.96, 28.02)8.05 (2.53, 13.6)10.98 (4.2, 17.86)5.68 (−0.83, 12.18)10.73 (−3.06, 24.56)6.95 (−1.53, 15.45)−1.27 (−8.9, 6.3)Treat 34.23 (−1.76, 10.33)0.28 (−5.72, 6.32)5.79 (−0.05, 11.72)8.4 (0.48, 16.38)1.5 (−8.04, 11.08)4.77 (−4.54, 14.18)
−5.47 (−9.54, −1.48)2.5 (−11.46, 16.6)10.25 (−2.69, 23.12)3.81 (−1.71, 9.33)6.72 (−0.52, 14.09)1.44 (−4.76, 7.62)6.49 (−6.65, 19.73)2.72 (−5.16, 10.59)−5.51 (−12.85, 1.82)−4.23 (−10.33, 1.76)Treat 4−3.96 (−10.08, 2.17)1.55 (−4.17, 7.27)4.16 (−1.94, 10.28)−2.75 (−13.37, 7.95)0.52 (−9.48, 10.53)
−1.53 (−7.44, 4.4)6.47 (−8.81, 21.82)14.2 (0.59, 27.83)7.77 (2.6, 12.93)10.69 (5.47, 16.05)5.4 (−0.73, 11.49)10.44 (−3.42, 24.35)6.68 (−0.59, 13.96)−1.55 (−7.79, 4.64)−0.28 (−6.32, 5.72)3.96 (−2.17, 10.08)Treat 55.52 (−0.07, 11.09)8.11 (0.07, 16.23)1.2 (−8.63, 11.11)4.47 (−5.87, 14.9)
−7.04 (−12.16, −1.95)0.94 (−14.2, 16.16)8.69 (−4.63, 21.94)2.25 (−3.02, 7.48)5.19 (−1.36, 11.82)−0.12 (−6.28, 6)4.92 (−8.6, 18.53)1.15 (−6.65, 8.96)−7.07 (−13.41, −0.78)−5.79 (−11.72, 0.05)−1.55 (−7.27, 4.17)−5.52 (−11.09, 0.07)Treat 62.62 (−5.02, 10.2)−4.3 (−14.74, 6.18)−1.03 (−11.22, 9.12)
−9.65 (−15.74, −3.58)−1.64 (−16.92, 13.69)6.09 (−7.61, 19.78)−0.36 (−8.01, 7.26)2.59 (−6.38, 11.65)−2.72 (−10.78, 5.29)2.31 (−11.59, 16.35)−1.44 (−11.03, 8.1)−9.68 (−18.72, −0.69)−8.4 (−16.38, −0.48)−4.16 (−10.28, 1.94)−8.11 (−16.23, −0.07)−2.62 (−10.2, 5.02)Treat 7−6.89 (−18.79, 4.91)−3.62 (−14.81, 7.53)
−2.74 (−13.24, 7.73)5.26 (−12.43, 22.95)12.99 (−3.19, 29.15)6.55 (−3.73, 16.79)9.47 (−1.22, 20.24)4.19 (−6.63, 14.91)9.23 (−7.14, 25.57)5.46 (−6.42, 17.3)−2.77 (−14.01, 8.38)−1.5 (−11.08, 8.04)2.75 (−7.95, 13.37)−1.2 (−11.11, 8.63)4.3 (−6.18, 14.74)6.89 (−4.91, 18.79)Treat 83.27 (−9.87, 16.41)
−6.01 (−15.55, 3.48)1.98 (−15.11, 19.29)9.72 (−5.87, 25.16)3.28 (−6.87, 13.4)6.22 (−4.71, 17.19)0.92 (−9.64, 11.38)5.97 (−9.86, 21.79)2.18 (−9.65, 14.03)−6.05 (−17.34, 5.21)−4.77 (−14.18, 4.54)−0.52 (−10.53, 9.48)−4.47 (−14.9, 5.87)1.03 (−9.12, 11.22)3.62 (−7.53, 14.81)−3.27 (−16.41, 9.87)Treat 9

VAS league table of network meta-analysis of acupuncture treatment for post-stroke SHS.

Treat 1 (rehabilitation), Treat 2 (rehabilitation + western medicine), Treat 3 (routine acupuncture), Treat 4 (rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 5 (western medicine + rehabilitation + acupuncture), Treat 6 (electroacupuncture), Treat 7 (warm acupuncture), Treat 8 (fire needling), Treat 9 (Jin’s three-needle technique), Treat 10 (floating needle), Treat 11 (eye acupuncture), Treat 12 (special needle operation and technique), Treat 13 (other multi-needle acupuncture combinations), Treat 14 (acupuncture on the non-affected limb), Treat 15 (western medicine + acupuncture + Chinese medicine), Treat 16 (rehabilitation + catgut embedding), Treat 17 (western medicine + rehabilitation + Chinese medicine), Treat 18 (gangliolysis).

4.2.3 Reporting biases

There was no significant publication bias, as shown in the funnel plot (shown in Figure 8).

Figure 8

4.3 Secondary outcome measures

We also analyzed the secondary outcome measures of Barthel index and SHSS. Compared to conventional treatment, various interventions did not significantly improve Barthel index or SHSS. The analysis results of secondary outcome measures are presented in Appendix 1.

5 Discussion

5.1 Summary of the main findings

Our network meta-analysis found that the top five interventions for improving pain according to the VAS scale are floating needle, rehabilitation + catgut embedding, other multi-needle acupuncture combinations, special needle operation and technique, and acupuncture on non-affected limb, which have a significant effect on pain relief. The best five interventions for the Fugl–Meyer score are eye needle, other multi-needle acupuncture combinations, western medicine + acupuncture + traditional Chinese medicine, warming needles, and special needle operation and technique, which could significantly improve upper limb motor function.

We found that rehabilitation + catgut embedding was effective in pain relief. Previous studies have also reviewed this intervention, and the analgesic principle may be a continuous stimulation by absorbable surgical sutures at acupoints, leading to a sterile inflammatory response, and ultimately promoting tissue regeneration (66, 68).

5.2 Comparison with previous studies (other reviews)

Although previous studies have also attempted to analyze the effects of acupuncture treatment on post-stroke SHS, some of them only explored the relative effectiveness of a single type of acupuncture or a certain acupuncture combination with rehabilitation and the control group (69–72). Post-stroke SHS is caused by multiple etiologies. Single therapy may not achieve the ideal pain relief. The clinical practice tends to combine multiple intervention methods, which can help explore more reasonable and effective treatment options. The number of types of acupuncture and studies included in existing network meta-analyses is limited (73), but there are many types of acupuncture. Furthermore, the above studies did not consider the existing types of acupuncture or combined acupuncture treatment methods to comprehensively compare various acupuncture interventions.

The mainstream treatment for post-stroke SHS is still rehabilitation therapy. As an indispensable intervention for treating this disease, it focuses on function recovery. Meanwhile, the obstacles affecting function recovery should be tackled to reduce the chances of patients refusing rehabilitation. Aerobic exercise of the upper limbs is found to reduce pain during the day and during exercise (74, 75). Some studies have reported that the combination of two or more therapies may be more effective than rehabilitation alone. Acupuncture combined with rehabilitation training can significantly help in reducing pain scores, promoting limb motor function recovery, and improving overall effectiveness (69–71, 76).

Drug therapy includes oral calcium channel modulators, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antidepressants, or invasive injections of corticosteroids, bisphosphonates, and botulinum toxin (77, 78). Although drug treatment is convenient and quick, it has limited effects, and long-term use can produce adverse reactions such as hepatorenal and cardiac toxicity, excessive sedation, and drug resistance (79). Some drugs also have the possibility of recurrence after withdrawal and cannot fundamentally control and treat this disease (78, 80–83). In contrast, acupuncture has the advantages of high safety and no toxic side effects and is more easily accepted by patients with heart, liver, and kidney damage.

Neural stimulation, nerve block, and ganglion radiofrequency ablation can avoid the adverse systemic effects induced by drug treatment. Nonetheless, invasive surgery has certain adverse reactions and risks, and the implanted stimulation device may also have problems such as wire disconnection, requiring regular battery replacement (78, 84). A study has even found that the effects of standard high-frequency neurostimulation may be worse than acupuncture or other types of electrical stimulation, and acupuncture can become a promising treatment method for patients with drug-resistant neuropathic pain (84). The nerve block needs to be carried out under ultrasound guidance to improve safety. After a single treatment session, 61.8% of patients still have pain recurrence within 3 months. For chronic pain, it cannot achieve fundamental relief (78, 85–87). Ganglion radiofrequency ablation may cause risks of sensory and motor dysfunction and nerve damage, with small clinical improvement in the VAS score of patients with chronic root pain (88). Its long-term therapeutic effects are still controversial.

The treatment of post-stroke SHS is to relieve pain in the early stage of the disease without affecting the motor function and rehabilitation process of the affected limb. Conventional analgesic drugs, such as opioids and anti-inflammatory drugs, have a variety of side effects such as reduced motor function, induced hyperalgesia, and lethargy (89). At present, acupuncture is widely used for stroke rehabilitation and various pain-related diseases in China, the United States, Europe, and North America. Although acupuncture is an invasive treatment, the incidence of acupuncture-induced adverse reactions is significantly lower than that of many drugs or other recognized medical interventions according to the consensus report for the NIH Conference (90). Acupuncture can reduce the excitability of the pain pathway by reducing excitatory neurotransmitters and promoting inhibitory neurotransmitters (91, 92). Electroacupuncture has been shown to induce peripheral opioid receptors in rats, producing long-term analgesic effects for up to 144 h, improving motor function, and normalizing neurotransmitter metabolism (93). A preclinical study has also shown that acupuncture’s antihyperalgesic effects are associated with 10 peripheral receptors and 8 neurotransmitters (94).

5.3 Advantages and limitations of the study

This systematic review is the first to focus on the advantages of different acupuncture treatment plans to broaden the selection of feasible treatment options in clinical practice. The advantages of different acupuncture treatments are different. There are currently no studies comparing the effectiveness of various types of acupuncture for post-stroke SHS directly or indirectly. Our network meta-analysis includes a large number of studies, integrating various acupuncture intervention methods and comparing the improvement of different acupuncture therapies for post-stroke SHS based on VAS, Fugl–Meyer, Barthel, and SHSS scales. The aim is to provide more comprehensive clinical practice references for acupuncture treatment for post-stroke SHS.

However, there are also several limitations. Since acupuncture is a traditional Chinese treatment method, its promotion in the world is still limited to some extent. The included studies are mainly from China and lack ethnic diversity. Therefore, research and exploration outside China are required to enhance clinical promotion and applicability. The multi-center studies included in our research are relatively few. To acquire more convincing evidence, future studies are desired to verify these results.

6 Conclusion

From the results, we found that the combination of acupuncture and rehabilitation is more effective in improving the overall effectiveness of post-stroke SHS than simple rehabilitation intervention, especially in relieving pain and improving motor function. Floating needle acupuncture and catgut embedding + rehabilitation show good performance in pain relief, but the sample size of floating needle acupuncture is small. Large sample sizes and high-quality studies are required for verification in the future. Most notably, other multi-needle acupuncture combinations and special needle operations and techniques all demonstrate good effects in pain relief and upper limb motor function recovery. This could be related to the inclusion of special needle operation and technique and the combination with the patient’s limb activity during the acupuncture treatment. For patients who fear rehabilitation exercise due to pain, these two acupuncture methods can be considered as the first options. Western medicine + acupuncture + traditional Chinese medicine is also effective in improving Fugl–Meyer, Barthel, and SHSS scores. However, since it is not reflected in the VAS scale, there is currently a lack of effective exploration of its pain relief effect. It is recommended that future research could supplement this gap.

In conclusion, multiple acupuncture treatments have significant effects in treating pain and improving upper limb motor function after a stroke, with fewer adverse events. Hence, acupuncture can be promoted as a treatment method. More high-quality, multi-center collaborative, large-sample studies are warranted to verify our results in future.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

TH: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. HY: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. JH: Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. NW: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing – review & editing. CZ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. XH: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. XT: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YaL: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YJ: Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. XW: Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. YY: Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. YiL: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. SY: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YM: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. SL: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. JZ: Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. YH: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC): Study on the analgesic mechanism of NPP by Tui Na from the regulation of miR-342-3p/IER3 by LNCRNAH19 (No. 82160943) and the Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education of GXUCM:P2X7/NLRP3-based regulation of cellular pyroptosis Exploring the analgesic mechanism of acupressure on neuropathic pain in rats analgesic mechanism in rats with neuropathic pain (No. YCBXJ2023002).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1268626/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1.

    SungHFerlayJSiegelRLLaversanneMSoerjomataramIJemalAet al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. (2021) 71:20949. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660

  • 2.

    PuLWangLZhangRZhaoTJiangYHanL. Projected global trends in ischemic stroke incidence, deaths and disability-adjusted life years from 2020 to 2030. Stroke. (2023) 54:13309. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.122.040073

  • 3.

    KimJYYoonSYKimJJeongYHKimYW. Neural substrates for poststroke complex regional pain syndrome type I: a retrospective case-control study using voxel-based lesion symptom mapping analysis. Pain. (2020) 161:131120. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001816

  • 4.

    ZylukAZylukB. Shoulder-hand syndrome in patients after stroke. Neurol Neurochir Pol. (1999) 33:13142. PMID:

  • 5.

    WalesCMatthewsLRDonellyM. Medically unexplained chronic pain in Australia: difficulties for rehabilitation providers and workers in pain. Work. (2010) 36:16779. doi: 10.3233/wor-2010-1018

  • 6.

    BackonjaMMSerraJ. Pharmacologic management part 2: lesser-studied neuropathic pain diseases. Pain Med. (2004) 5:S4859. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2004.04021.x

  • 7.

    LeeSKYangDSLeeJWChoyWS. Four treatment strategies for complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Orthopedics. (2012) 35:e83442. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20120525-21

  • 8.

    IolasconGMorettiA. Pharmacotherapeutic options for complex regional pain syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother. (2019) 20:137786. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1612367

  • 9.

    SamenCDKSuttonOMRiceAEZaidiMASiddarthanIJCrimmelSDet al. Correlation between temperature rise after sympathetic block and pain relief in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Med. (2022) 23:167989. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac035

  • 10.

    WanRFanYZhaoAXingYHuangXZhouLet al. Comparison of efficacy of acupuncture-related therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Immunol. (2022) 13:829409. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.829409

  • 11.

    FengZCuiSYangHWangYZhouXWongJet al. Acupuncture for neuropathic pain: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:1076993. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1076993

  • 12.

    BirchSRobinsonN. Acupuncture as a post-stroke treatment option: a narrative review of clinical guideline recommendations. Phytomedicine. (2022) 104:154297. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154297

  • 13.

    ProsperityL. Acupuncture and moxibustion (seven-year planning textbook forhigher Chinese medicine schools in the new century). China Traditional Chinese Medicine Press (2012). 165p,176p,180p and 186p.

  • 14.

    Neurology CMA. The 2016 edition of the Chinese cerebrovascular disease diagnosis and consensus, vol. 106People’s Medical Publishing House (2016). 150 p.

  • 15.

    HongshiLPulianZ. Rehabilitation assessment and treatment of stroke. Huaxia Publishing House (1996) 149150. 60p and 83p.

  • 16.

    HuttonBSalantiGCaldwellDMChaimaniASchmidCHCameronCet al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. (2015) 162:77784. doi: 10.7326/m14-2385

  • 17.

    HigginsJPTSavovićJPageMJElbersRGSterneJAC. Chapter 8: assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial In: HigginsJPTThomasJChandlerJCumpstonMLiTPageMJet al, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020): The Cochrane Collaboration (2020)

  • 18.

    YinWTaoYYufengGYuanshiLBaojuanGWentaiXet al. Observation on therapeutic effects of different acupoint selection methods combined with systematical rehabilitation on shoulder-hand syndrome after apoplexy. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2002) 2:124. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2002.02.005

  • 19.

    YongqiangHTiemingMYunfaXLeiW. Immediate effect study and FMRI study of electroacupuncture on scalp acupuncture treatment of shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med. (2022) 40:1614. doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2022.01.038

  • 20.

    XinruLDesongZXiaoguangWXinhongX. Clinical observation on warm acupuncture and moxibustion for trigger points in patients with stage I shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. China J Tradit Chin Med Pharm. (2021) 36:56713.

  • 21.

    JuanYQuanDNengguiX. Curative effect observation of fire needle on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome in early stage. China J Tradit Chin Med Pharm. (2011) 26:96771.

  • 22.

    QinXLixingZJunHDexiongH. Effects of Jin’s three-needle acupuncture therapy combined with rehabilitation training in patients with shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. Chin J Rehabil Med. (2011) 26:7203. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2011.08.006

  • 23.

    XiaoqiongHYanjieLHeweiQKunRShuchenZHaoyuanL. Clinical study on treatment of qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome of shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke with wax-mud Moxibustion. J Beijing Univ Tradit Chin Med. (2022) 45:73844. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2157.2022.07.015

  • 24.

    LiangZGenyingZTongcaiTJunjieSXiangmingY. Effects of acupuncture from Tiaokou to Chenshan and exercise on shoulder-hand syndrome at stage I after stroke. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. (2016) 22:957. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2016.01.021

  • 25.

    FeilinNChangpingCHuiXFengmeiQQunH. Effect of warm-unblocking therapy using moving cupping and acupoints moxibustion in stroke patients with shoulder-hand syndrome. Chin J Integr West Med. (2021) 41:45660. doi: 10.7661/j.cjim.20201008.189

  • 26.

    QingboJPengqinW. Clinical research on the treatment of shoulder hand syndrome after stroke by eye-acupuncture cooperated with ironing analgesia. J Basic Chin Med. (2016) 22:96096. doi: 10.19945/j.cnki.issn.1006-3250.2016.07.035

  • 27.

    WenjunNZhaoxiaDPingAYuhuaWYanyunLXiuhongXet al. Effect of silver needle with systematical rehabilitation on shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract. (2012) 18:10710. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2012.02.003

  • 28.

    YimoFSulanM. Acupuncture combined with infrared acupoint irradiation and rehabilitation treatment of 126 cases of clinical observation on shoulder hand syndrome after stroke. Laser J. (2015) 36:1957. doi: 10.14016/j.cnki.jgzz.2015.04.195

  • 29.

    XianpingHZichaoW. Effect of acupuncture combined with rehabilitation exercise on Fugl–Meyer score and quality of life in patients with shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. Chin Arch Tradit Chin Med. (2017) 35:2199202. doi: 10.13193/j.issn.1673-7717.2017.08.077

  • 30.

    RanweiLJunGJinDYingYShuangLWeihongSet al. Effect of the contralateral needling therapy on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Acupunct Res. (2020) 45:1526. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.190478

  • 31.

    LijuanCYanTWeiZYuanLHaiHQianLet al. Analysis of the clinical effect on post-stroke shoulder hand syndrome stage I treated with the along-meridian trochar acupuncture therapy. Acupunct Res. (2020) 45:65761. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.200164

  • 32.

    RonghuaZMeiYJunlongDXinhanZHuiBLeiSet al. Treatment of stroke patients with shoulder-wrist syndrome by acupoint catgut embedding and surface electromyogram biofeedback therapy. Acupunct Res. (2018) 43:3803. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.170491

  • 33.

    XiongjieCXiaoGXuexiaGYanliXShiqiuD. Clinical efficacy on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome (stage 1) treated byelectro-acupuncture at dorsal root of auric Le. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2015) 31:224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2015.08.009

  • 34.

    HuangZPeiJWangWSongYHanZSongYet al. Clinical observation of acupuncture plus medicine and function training for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2015) 34:5114. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2015.06.0511

  • 35.

    MiaojunLHaofengGQiaogingHRundongT. Clinical observation on the treatment of post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome by Fuyang buried thread method. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2016) 35:11625. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2016.10.1162

  • 36.

    LiwenXQunLJingqingS. Clinical observation on penetration needling combined with electroacupuncture for treatment of poststroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2007) 7:4913. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2007.07.007

  • 37.

    RuiqingLYiyingWTingqinMLihongZJianyunZJingwenLet al. Clinical observation on wrist-ankle acupuncture for shoulder-hand syndrome phase I after stroke. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2022) 42:7215. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210813-k0001

  • 38.

    YanjieSChengchengMYuyingCDongshengWLingliK. Clinical study on acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy for treatment of Poststroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2008) 5:3313. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2008.05.017

  • 39.

    ZhanJAiYZhanLPanRWangYDongCet al. Effect of abdominal acupuncture combined with routine rehabilitation training on shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Integr Med Res. (2022) 11:100805. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2021.100805

  • 40.

    FanyingMJinW. Effect of warm acupuncture stimulation of Waiguan (Te 5) on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Acupunct Res. (2014) 39:22831. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.2014.03.012

  • 41.

    TangXLPanHY. Muscle regions of meridians warm needling method plus pricking Jing-well points for blood-letting in the treatment of shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. J Acupunct Tuina Sci. (2021) 19:2919. doi: 10.1007/s11726-021-1260-x

  • 42.

    JunWXiaoCHuanhuanNChunshuiHCuiwenZJiWet al. The efficacy of floating stabbing combined with rehabilitation training for the treatment of shoulder pain in shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2013) 33:2948. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2013.04.005

  • 43.

    JinbiaoHPengjieSYiqinYShouxiangYZenghuiY. Observation on therapeutic effect of opposing needling for treatment of poststroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2009) 29:2058. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2009.03.013

  • 44.

    Zhang QianSXWenpengWPengyuZ. Observations on the efficacy of along-meridian distal point selection in treating post-cerebral infarction shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2015) 34:2979. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2015.04.0297

  • 45.

    BingYLixiongWNengguiXYongfengLZhuoxinYLingWet al. Observations on the efficacy of Jin’s three needles plus twelve Jing-well points in treating post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2015) 34:6058. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2015.07.0605

  • 46.

    TongboJTongyanMBingW. Observations on the efficacy of superficial needling plus external washing with Chinese herbal medicine in treating post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2016) 35:78991. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2016.07.0789

  • 47.

    ChunshuiHWenzhaoFAnshengYXiaoCJiW. Penetration acupuncture at Baxie(EX-UE 9) combined with rehabilitation for swelling hand of post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2017) 37:1214. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2017.02.004

  • 48.

    ZhaohuiZLixingZZhenhuCJianyingLYanhuiLGanghuiJet al. Post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome treated with floating-needle therapy combined with rehabilitation training: a randomized controlled trial. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2014) 34:63640. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2014.07.006

  • 49.

    WenrongWTianleiWShaoluCYinlongZWeiZQiuyanWet al. Acupuncture combined with rehabilitation for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2013) 33:9704. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2013.11.026

  • 50.

    BingfengXMinHXinZKainaZShengpengDHonghongW. Short-term and long-term efficacy of PGLA thread-embedding therapy in treatment of stagei post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Acupunct Res. (2019) 44:7625. doi: 10.13702/j.1000-0607.180805

  • 51.

    NingLi, and, FengweiTianWangChengweiYuPengmingZhouXiWenQian, and, et al. Therapeutic effect of acupuncture and massage for shoulder-hand syndrome in hemiplegia patients: a clinical two-center randomized controlled trialJ Tradit Chin Med. (2012) 32:343349, doi: 10.1016/S0254-6272(13)60035-7

  • 52.

    JingchunYGuopingZGuihuaZHongqiaoF. Therapeutic observation of acupuncture at the interiorly-exteriorly related meridians plus rehabilitation training for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2015) 34:710. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2015.01.0007

  • 53.

    JingjunXJinxiaL. Therapeutic observation of electroacupuncture plus rehabilitation for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2016) 35:14235. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2016.12.1423

  • 54.

    Gao SenMXChunyingLJieSHaikuoY. Wang Ju-Yi’s meridian diagnosis method combined with Bobath rehabilitation training for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome type I. Chin Acupunct Moxibust. (2022) 42:2832. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20210202-k0011

  • 55.

    ZhihongZYuleiWJianLJunW. Effect of white tiger shaking head needling combined with rehabilitation training on pain and upper limb motor function in the treatment of Shsas. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2021) 37:1925. doi: 10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.021238

  • 56.

    Xue-PingYHong-TaoCHui-HuiM. Therapeutic effect of Baihu Yaotou needling on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2017) 33:214. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2017.02.007

  • 57.

    Wang ShurongLG. Application research of spoon needle acupressure combined with shoulder triple needling in treatment of post-stroke SHS. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2022) 38:3740. doi: 10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.022073

  • 58.

    MingmingWBaoqiangWShengzhaoCXiangT. Clinical observation of electro-acupuncture combined with medicated cake moxibustion treating post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome of phase I. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2018) 34:125. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2018.02.004

  • 59.

    WeidongYYanjieM. Therapeutic observation of electroacupuncture plus mirror therapy for shoulder-hand syndrome stage I after cerebral stroke. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2019) 38:4926. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2019.05.0492

  • 60.

    YangWYujuYZhongmeiDNaihaoHFanYJiuL. Efficacy observation of surrounding electro-acupuncture combined with Tcm fumigation on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2019) 35:325. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2019.07.010

  • 61.

    ShengsanHShiyiG. Evaluation of abdominal acupuncture and rehabilitation treatment for shoulder-hand syndrome (period I) after stroke. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2016) 32:113. doi: 10.19917/j.cnki.1005-0779.2016.09.004

  • 62.

    ChangjinHYingjieHYanhuaW. Clinical observations on fire needle acupuncture at muscular attachments for the treatment of post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2013) 32:6279. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0957.2013.08.627

  • 63.

    YouhuaZYehuaBFangGMinZYinaW. Clinical observation of Ling Gui Ba Fa for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome stage I. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2019) 38:13269. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2019.12.1326

  • 64.

    TingZJieyuWYaoxiangM. Clinical effects of balanced acupuncture combined with Bobath therapy on post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2019) 35:236.

  • 65.

    FeiH. Clinical study of thumb-tack needling combined with electro-acupuncture and rehabilitation treating post-stoke shoulder-hand syndrome. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2018) 34:258. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0779.2018.10.008

  • 66.

    GuoqiCHaiyanZXinyiWLimingY. Clinical observation of point-to-point scalp acupuncture combined with body acupuncture in the treatment of shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke. J Clin Acupunct Moxibust. (2018) 34:2931.

  • 67.

    XinTDandanLYanWYujueW. Therapeutic observation of early-stage shoulder-hand syndrome after ischemic stroke treated with acupuncture at distal points plus exercise. Shanghai J Acupunct Moxibust. (2014) 33:6079. doi: 10.13460/j.issn.1005-0957.2014.07.0607

  • 68.

    LeemJKimHJoHGJeonSRHongYParkYet al. Efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture combined with conventional acupuncture for chronic low Back pain: a study protocol for a randomized, controlled, Assessor-blinded, multicenter clinical trial. Medicine. (2018) 97:e10790. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000010790

  • 69.

    WeiXHeLLiuJAiYLiuYYangYet al. Electroacupuncture for reflex sympathetic dystrophy after stroke: a meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2019) 28:138899. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.02.010

  • 70.

    LeiSDaiFXueFHuGZhangYXuXet al. Acupuncture for shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke: an overview of systematic reviews. Medicine. (2022) 101:e31847. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000031847

  • 71.

    LiuSZhangCSCaiYGuoXZhangALXueCCet al. Acupuncture for post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:433. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00433

  • 72.

    PengLZhangCZhouLZuoHXHeXKNiuYM. Traditional manual acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy for shoulder hand syndrome after stroke within the Chinese healthcare system: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. (2018) 32:42939. doi: 10.1177/0269215517729528

  • 73.

    WangRQWuQZHuangCHRaoWF. Network meta-analysis of 4 acupuncture therapies for shoulder hand syndrome after stroke. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. (2021) 41:5639. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.20200325-k0011

  • 74.

    TopcuogluAGokkayaNKUcanHKarakuşD. The effect of upper-extremity aerobic exercise on complex regional pain syndrome type I: a randomized controlled study on subacute stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. (2015) 22:25361. doi: 10.1179/1074935714z.0000000025

  • 75.

    SmartKMWandBMO’ConnellNE. Physiotherapy for pain and disability in adults with complex regional pain syndrome (Crps) types I and ii. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2016) 2:CD010853. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010853.pub2

  • 76.

    FengSTangMHuangGWangJHeSLiuDet al. Emg biofeedback combined with rehabilitation training may be the best physical therapy for improving upper limb motor function and relieving pain in patients with the post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front Neurol. (2022) 13:1056156. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1056156

  • 77.

    ChauvineauVCodinePHérissonCPellasFPélissierJ. What is the place of diphosphonates in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome I?Ann Readapt Med Phys. (2005) 48:1507. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.11.004

  • 78.

    BerthelotJM. Current management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome (complex regional pain syndrome type I). Joint Bone Spine. (2006) 73:4959. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2005.11.022

  • 79.

    SendrasoaFARanaivoIMRaheriveloAJRapelanoro RabenjaFRamarozatovoLS. Adverse effects of long-term oral corticosteroids in the Department of Dermatology, Antananarivo, Madagascar. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. (2021) 14:133741. doi: 10.2147/ccid.S332201

  • 80.

    KalitaJMisraUKumarABhoiSK. Long-term prednisolone in post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Physician. (2016) 19:56574. doi: 10.36076/ppj/2016.19.565

  • 81.

    CorradoASantoroNCantatoreFP. Extra-skeletal effects of bisphosphonates. Joint Bone Spine. (2007) 74:328. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.06.005

  • 82.

    SantamatoARanieriMPanzaFSolfrizziVFrisardiVStolfaIet al. Role of biphosphonates and lymphatic drainage type Leduc in the complex regional pain syndrome (shoulder-hand syndrome). Pain Med. (2009) 10:17985. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00539.x

  • 83.

    MatayoshiSShimodozonoMHirataYUedaTHorioSKawahiraK. Use of calcitonin to prevent complex regional pain syndrome type I in severe hemiplegic patients after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. (2009) 31:17739. doi: 10.1080/09638280902795573

  • 84.

    CruccuGAzizTZGarcia-LarreaLHanssonPJensenTSLefaucheurJPet al. Efns guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain. Eur J Neurol. (2007) 14:95270. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01916.x

  • 85.

    TaskaynatanMAOzgulATanAKDincerKKalyonTA. Bier block with methylprednisolone and lidocaine in CRPS type I: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. (2004) 29:40812. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2004.05.007

  • 86.

    HanKRKimCChaeYJKimDW. Efficacy and safety of high concentration lidocaine for trigeminal nerve block in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Int J Clin Pract. (2008) 62:24854. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01568.x

  • 87.

    KanaanTAbusalehRAbuasbehJAl JammalMAl-HadedSAl-RafaiahSet al. The efficacy of therapeutic selective nerve block in treating lumbar radiculopathy and avoiding surgery. J Pain Res. (2020) 13:29718. doi: 10.2147/jpr.S276331

  • 88.

    AlbayrakIApiliogullariSOnalOGungorCSaltaliALevendogluF. Pulsed radiofrequency applied to the dorsal root ganglia for treatment of post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome: a case series. J Clin Anesth. (2016) 33:1927. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.059

  • 89.

    RowbothamMCWallaceM. Evolution of analgesic tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia over 6 months: double-blind randomized trial incorporating experimental pain models. J Pain. (2020) 21:103146. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.01.005

  • 90.

    NIN Consensus Development Panel on Acupuncture. Acupuncture. JAMA. (1998) 280:151824. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.17.1518

  • 91.

    BelskayaGNStepanovaSBMakarovaLDSergienkoDAKrylovaLGAntimonovaKV. Acupuncture in the prevention and treatment of stroke: a review of foreign studies. Vopr Kurortol Fizioter Lech Fiz Kult. (2020) 97:6877. doi: 10.17116/kurort20209702168

  • 92.

    DouBLiYMaJXuZFanWTianLet al. Role of neuroimmune crosstalk in mediating the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of acupuncture on inflammatory pain. Front Neurosci. (2021) 15:695670. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.695670

  • 93.

    WangYHackelDPengFRittnerHL. Long-term antinociception by electroacupuncture is mediated via peripheral opioid receptors in free-moving rats with inflammatory hyperalgesia. Eur J Pain. (2013) 17:144757. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00325.x

  • 94.

    TrentoMMSMoréAOODuarteECWMartinsDF. Peripheral receptors and Neuromediators involved in the antihyperalgesic effects of acupuncture: a state-of-the-art review. Pflugers Arch. (2021) 473:57393. doi: 10.1007/s00424-020-02503-0

Summary

Keywords

acupuncture, post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome, pain relief, systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis

Citation

Huang T, Yao H, Huang J, Wang N, Zhou C, Huang X, Tan X, Li Y, Jie Y, Wang X, Yang Y, Liang Y, Yue S, Mao Y, Lai S, Zheng J and He Y (2023) Effectiveness of acupuncture for pain relief in shoulder-hand syndrome after stroke: a systematic evaluation and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 14:1268626. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1268626

Received

01 August 2023

Accepted

23 October 2023

Published

17 November 2023

Volume

14 - 2023

Edited by

Massimiliano Valeriani, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital (IRCCS), Italy

Reviewed by

Mostafa Meshref, Al-Azhar University, Egypt; Leonardo Pellicciari, IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences of Bologna (ISNB), Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yufeng He,

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics