You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurol., 29 January 2024

Sec. Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1369793

Corrigendum: Distinct neural substrates support phonological and orthographic working memory: implications for theories of working memory

  • 1. Maryland Neuroimaging Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States

  • 2. Cognitive Science Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States

  • 3. Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States

Article metrics

View details

1k

Views

461

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for Figure 4 as published. The color assignments to the different clusters in Figure 4 were incorrect. Phonological Working Memory should be associated with the green color, not the magenta color. Orthographic Working Memory should be associated with the magenta color, not the green color. The corrected legend appears below with the color names correctly assigned to their respective cognitive functions.

SVR-LSM results for Phonological Working Memory (green) and Orthographic Working Memory (magenta). Clusters projected onto a left hemisphere standard MNI152 cortical surface using mni2fs (56). Each image depicts the results using thresholds which, from left to right, are based on increasingly more lenient thresholds from the permutation analysis. Although there is some overlap (white) at the two most lenient thresholds, there is none at the more conservative max and 10th voxel thresholds.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

working memory, phonological working memory, orthographic working memory, multivariate lesion symptom mapping, working memory deficits, buffer theories, embedded processes theories

Citation

Purcell J, Rapp B and Martin RC (2024) Corrigendum: Distinct neural substrates support phonological and orthographic working memory: implications for theories of working memory. Front. Neurol. 15:1369793. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1369793

Received

12 January 2024

Accepted

15 January 2024

Published

29 January 2024

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

15 - 2024

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jeremy Purcell

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics