Clinical predictors of causative radiographic findings in adults with acute onset diplopia

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to investigate the clinical factors that predict abnormal radiographic findings in adults with acute onset binocular diplopia.

Methods:

Medical records of consecutive patients aged >20 years who presented with acute binocular diplopia were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into positive and negative groups according to radiographic findings. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. The risk factors for positive radiographic findings were investigated, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results:

Among 242 patients (145 males and 97 females), 44 (18.2%) were in the positive group and 198 (81.8%) in the negative group. Patients in the positive group were older (p = 0.005) and had more vasculopathic risk factors (p = 0.038). Severe duction limitation (>50% reduction in motility) was present in 90.9% of patients in the positive group and 56.1% in the negative group (p < 0.001). Abnormal slit lamp findings and pupillary exam abnormalities were also more frequent in the positive group than in the negative group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.036, respectively). Older age, higher intraocular pressure, abnormal slit-lamp findings, exophthalmos, and duction limitation were identified as risk factors for positive radiographic findings. A predictive model generated an AUC of 0.772.

Conclusion:

Older age and vasculopathic risk factors were associated with underlying radiographic pathologies, supporting the recommendation that neuroimaging should not be delayed in those patients. Careful ophthalmic evaluations may guide diagnosis and decision-making for immediate neuroimaging in cases of diplopia.

1 Introduction

Acute-onset strabismus with associated binocular diplopia in adults is not uncommon and has diverse etiologies. Although cranial nerve palsy is the most common cause, other conditions such as orbital disease, neuromuscular junction disorder, and supranuclear disease can also lead to acute binocular diplopia (1, 2). Moreover, serious underlying conditions such as intracerebral aneurysm, brain tumor, pituitary apoplexy, and stroke can pose significant threats to both life and vision (3–6). Therefore, timely and appropriate brain imaging is crucial to guide effective management.

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing the cause of the diplopia (7, 8); however, limitations such as time and cost constraints exist. Given the wide range of potential causes of diplopia, physicians need more nuanced guidance on when to perform timely imaging. Here, we aimed to investigate the risk factors for abnormal radiographic findings in adult patients with acute-onset diplopia.

2 Materials and methods

This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Hospital (IRB number 2202-022-111). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the study’s retrospective nature.

2.1 Patient inclusion

The medical records of consecutive patients aged >20 years who presented with acute binocular diplopia between 2010 and 2020 at the ophthalmology or neurology clinic of a single tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were included if they had undergone a comprehensive ophthalmic assessment and systemic workup, including MRI and laboratory testing. Patients with a history of orbital surgery, strabismus surgery, or known systemic diseases that could influence ocular alignment, such as thyroid eye disease or myasthenia gravis, were excluded. Patients presenting with acute diplopia accompanied by new-onset neurological symptoms were not excluded.

2.2 Ophthalmic assessment

As part of standard care, all patients underwent a complete ophthalmic examination. This examination was conducted by a single, fellowship-trained neuro-ophthalmologist and strabismus surgeon. The ocular deviation angle was measured by prism and alternate cover testing in the primary and secondary gaze positions, and in the up, down, right, left, and tilted gaze positions. Alignment measurements were performed at both 6 and 1/3 m. Additionally, ductions and versions were assessed to evaluate eye movement limitations. Eye movement limitations were classified into three categories based on the subjective assessment of the ophthalmologist: mild, with a limitation of <50% of the normal range; severe, with a limitation of >50% of the normal range; and absent, without ocular motility limitation. Intraocular pressure was measured. Slit lamp and fundus examinations were performed to examine the structural ophthalmic findings. The presence of ptosis or exophthalmos was also assessed. Exophthalmos was examined using Hertel exophthalmometry, and significant exophthalmos was defined as a difference of at least 2 mm between the two eyes.

2.3 MRI assessment

A 1.5-T MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) was used. Each patient underwent MRI imaging that consisted of T2-weighted sequences, and sagittal and coronal T1-weighted sequences, performed before and after gadolinium contrast. The images were evaluated for findings relevant to the pathophysiology of diplopia.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Patients were divided into positive and negative groups according to radiographic findings. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test or paired t-test for continuous variables and the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for frequency variables. The risk factors for positive radiographic findings were investigated using binary logistic regression analysis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 19.0, Chicago, IL, United States) and R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3 Results

A total of 242 patients (145 males and 97 females) were included in this study. Forty-four (18.2%) and 198 (81.8%) patients were included in the positive and negative groups, respectively. Positive radiographic findings included intracranial aneurysm in 6 (13.6%), brain infarction in 1 (2.3%), brain tumor in 9 (20.5%), encephalitis in 1 (2.3%), meningitis in 2 (4.5%), cranial neuritis in 1 (2.3%), carotid-cavernous fistula in 1 (2.3%), orbital disease including orbital mass in 2 (4.5%), idiopathic orbital inflammation (IOI) in 10 (22.7%), and thyroid eye disease (TED) in 11 (25.0%) patients (Table 1).

Table 2 presents the diagnosis of the patients with diplopia. Cranial nerve palsy (124/242 patients, 51.2%) was the most common cause of diplopia. All were single isolated cranial nerve palsies. There were 23 (18.5%) patients with oculomotor palsy, 57 (46.0%) with trochlear palsy, and 44 (35.5%) with abducens palsy. Among these cases, positive radiographic findings were found in 18 (14.5%) patients, with oculomotor palsy having the highest rate (6/23, 26%), followed by abducens palsy (10/44, 22.7%) and trochlear palsy (2/57, 3.5%). Other etiologies include comitant strabismus (32.6%), strabismus caused by orbital disease (12.0%), ocular myasthenia gravis (2.1%), and supranuclear palsy (0.4%).

Patients were older (63.8 ± 13.5 vs. 56.8 ± 17.7 years, p = 0.005) and had more frequent vasculopathic risk factors including diabetes mellitus, hypertension or hypercholesterolemia (25/44 [56.8%] vs. 76/198 [38.4%], p = 0.038) in the positive group than in the negative group. Patients in the positive group were more likely to take medications for underlying systemic comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and others, than those in the negative group (p = 0.038). Other ophthalmic outcomes were found to be different between the groups. Specifically, duction limitations were present in 90.9 and 56.1% of patients in the positive and negative groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Abnormal slit lamp findings that may be affected by the underlying disease were also more frequent in the positive group than in the negative group (p < 0.001), including conjunctival injection in 21 patients (8.7%), chemosis in 7 (2.9%), and episcleral injection in 2 (0.8%). Abnormalities in the pupillary exam were identified in two patients (0.8%) in the positive group and none (0%) in the negative group (p = 0.036); specifically, these patients presented with mid-dilated and fixed pupils. Assessing results of the automated visual field examinations, there were no significant differences between the two groups (Table 3).

Among the patients with cranial nerve palsy, 18 of 124 (14.5%) patients presented with positive radiographic findings. They were older (71.4 ± 7.6 vs. 63.7 ± 13.7 years, p = 0.001) and presented with more frequent pupil involvement (2/18 [11.1%] vs. 0/106 [0%], p = 0.014) compared to patients without positive radiographic findings. Both patients with pupil involvement had oculomotor palsy (caused by herpetic neuritis and intracranial aneurysm, respectively) (Table 4).

Comitant strabismus (79/242 patients, 32.6%) was the second most common cause of diplopia, with exotropia in 27 (34.2%), esotropia in 49 (62.0%), small vertical strabismus in 1 (1.3%), and esotropia combined with small vertical strabismus in 2 (2.5%) patients. Among those with comitant strabismus, only 3 (3.8%) patients had positive radiographic findings (all had esotropia).

Univariate analysis revealed that older age, higher intraocular pressure, abnormal slit-lamp findings, exophthalmos, and severe duction limitations were risk factors for positive radiographic findings (Table 5). A predictive model was created comprising age, intraocular pressure, abnormal slit-lamp findings, exophthalmos, and ocular duction limitations. The AUC was calculated to be 0.772 (Figure 1).

Figure 1

4 Discussion

In this study, 18.2% of patients with acute-onset diplopia who underwent brain MRI had underlying radiographic lesions, many requiring prompt treatment. These included aneurysm (13.6%), IOI (22.7%), brain tumor (20.5%), brain infarction (2.3%), encephalitis (2.3%), meningitis (4.5%), carotid-cavernous fistula (2.3%), and orbital mass (4.5%). With the exception of three meningioma cases, which were managed with periodic follow-up, all conditions required treatment. Ophthalmic findings in these patients differed from those of patients without radiographic abnormalities. Univariate analysis indicated that older age, elevated intraocular pressure, abnormal slit-lamp findings, exophthalmos, and ocular duction limitations were associated with radiographic findings linked to specific disorders.

Cranial nerve palsy is one of the most common causes of acute onset diplopia. Ischemia is the most common etiology, and inflammation, neoplasm, and trauma are also frequent culprits (8–10). Previous studies recommend limited indications for immediate imaging in acute isolated cranial neuropathy cases (11, 12). In the study by Murchison et al. (11), only four of 93 patients (4.3%) over 50 years old with isolated cranial neuropathy (3, 4, 6) had MRI-detected lesions, most of which did not impact treatment or prognosis. Based on their findings, they recommended performing MRI in patients with isolated cranial nerve palsies if they met any of the followings: age < 50 years, history of cancer, presence of additional neurological signs, pupil involvement, partial third cranial nerve palsy, or lack of resolution 3 months after the initial visit. Some have also used vascular risk factors, such as diabetes or hypertension, to support underlying ischemia as the likely cause of acute cranial nerve palsy, thereby suggesting that immediate neuroimaging may be unnecessary in those cases (12).

In contrast, Tamhankar et al. (7) reported that 16.5% of patients aged ≥50 years with isolated cranial nerve palsy demonstrated underlying pathologies other than microvascular ischemia, many of which had important implications for timely intervention. After excluding patients with oculomotor palsies and those with giant cell arteritis, they reported that the incidence of radiographic causative lesions other than presumed microvascular for isolated trochlear and abducens nerve palsies was 4.7% among patients with vasculopathic risk factors. Our findings align with theirs, showing that oculomotor nerve palsy had the highest frequency. They also suggested immediate diagnostic imaging for all cranial nerve palsy patients, since distinguishing ischemic causes from serious intracranial diseases without immediate neuroimaging proved challenging (6, 13).

In this study, half of the patients were diagnosed with a single isolated cranial nerve palsy, and 13.8% had positive radiographic findings, which exceeded the rates reported by Murchison et al. (11) Notably, when considering only patients over 50 years of age, consistent with the criterion established in Murchison’s study (11), the rate of positive findings increased to 17.3% (18 of 105 patients), thereby challenging the use of younger age as a criterion for immediate neuroimaging. Furthermore, positive radiographic findings were more frequent in patients with vascular risk factors in our study. Similarly, Tamhankar et al. (7) found that 61% (11/18) of patients with primary causes of cranial nerve palsy on brain imaging had vasculopathic risk factors. Therefore, we argue against using vascular risk factors or older age as reasons to forego neuroimaging. Pupil involvement was more frequent in the patients with positive radiographic findings, which was in line with the result of the other studies.

The most frequent disease among the patients with associated radiographic findings was orbital disease, including TED and IOI in our study. These patients commonly present with a history of thyroid dysfunction and/or typical exophthalmos and eyelid changes; therefore, these conditions are often diagnosed clinically before imaging (14). Nonetheless, the clinical presentations of these disorders may be subtle (15). In this study, clinically significant exophthalmos was a significant risk factor for positive radiographic findings. Therefore, the examination of orbital signs, including exophthalmometry, may be helpful in the diagnosis of diplopia.

Among patients with comitant strabismus, only 3.8% showed positive MRI findings, all of whom presented with esotropia. Esotropia is a common form of acute comitant strabismus in adults (16). A recent report noted that its frequency is increasing (17). Arnold–Chiari syndrome, brain tumors, or increased intracranial pressure should be suspected (18, 19). Previous studies have shown that patients with acute comitant strabismus without a history of strabismus, occlusion therapy, nystagmus, or an inability to restore binocularity are more likely to have underlying intracranial diseases (20).

Our study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective study that included patients who visited an ophthalmology clinic and underwent MRI due to diplopia. Since participants were excluded if an appropriate ophthalmological evaluation was missing, patients with severe neurological signs or symptoms may have been excluded, leading to selection bias. Second, the diseases represented in this study were broad, and a risk factor analysis for each disease was not performed. Third, the resultant MRIs were evaluated by a single radiologist, without a second radiologist’s confirmation.

In conclusion, 18.2% of the patients with acute-onset diplopia in this study demonstrated various abnormal MRI findings. Vasculopathic risk factors and older age were associated with underlying radiographic pathologies and should not be used as criteria for delayed neuroimaging. A thorough ophthalmologic evaluation, including strabismus examination, examination for anterior segment abnormalities, intraocular pressure, and exophthalmometry, may help ensure a timely diagnosis and facilitate appropriate management for these patients.

References

• 1.

  O'Colmain U Gilmour C MacEwen CJ . Acute-onset diplopia. Acta Ophthalmol. (2014) 92:382–6. doi: 10.1111/aos.12062

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  Kawai M Goseki T Ishikawa H Hoshina M Shoji N . Causes, background, and characteristics of binocular diplopia in the elderly. Jpn J Ophthalmol. (2018) 62:659–66. doi: 10.1007/s10384-018-0617-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  Margolin E Lam CTY . Approach to a patient with diplopia in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. (2018) 54:799–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.045

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  Patel SV Mutyala S Leske DA Hodge DO Holmes JM . Incidence, associations, and evaluation of sixth nerve palsy using a population-based method. Ophthalmology. (2004) 111:369–75. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.05.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  Akagi T Miyamoto K Kashii S Yoshimura N . Cause and prognosis of neurologically isolated third, fourth, or sixth cranial nerve dysfunction in cases of oculomotor palsy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. (2008) 52:32–5. doi: 10.1007/s10384-007-0489-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  Chou KL Galetta SL Liu GT Volpe NJ Bennett JL Asbury AK et al . Acute ocular motor mononeuropathies: prospective study of the roles of neuroimaging and clinical assessment. J Neurol Sci. (2004) 219:35–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.12.003

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  Tamhankar MA Volpe NJ . Management of acute cranial nerve 3, 4 and 6 palsies: role of neuroimaging. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. (2015) 26:464–8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000200

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  Cerulli Irelli E Di Pietro G Fisco G Orlando B Asci F Salamone EM et al . Acute-onset binocular diplopia in neurological unit: aetiological factors and diagnostic assessment. Acta Neurol Scand. (2021) 144:92–8. doi: 10.1111/ane.13425

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  Choi KD Choi SY Kim JS Choi JH Yang TH Oh SY et al . Acquired ocular motor nerve palsy in neurology clinics: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Neurol. (2019) 15:221–7. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2019.15.2.221

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  Danchaivijitr C Kennard C . Diplopia and eye movement disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2004) 75:iv24–31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.053413

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  Murchison AP Gilbert ME Savino PJ . Neuroimaging and acute ocular motor mononeuropathies: a prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol. (2011) 129:301–5. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.25

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  Patel AJ Cavuoto KM . Trends in etiologies, demographics, and neuroimaging in new-onset adult strabismus at an ophthalmic emergency department. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. (2022) 59:269–73. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20220201-01

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  Tamhankar MA Biousse V Ying GS Prasad S Subramanian PS Lee MS et al . Isolated third, fourth, and sixth cranial nerve palsies from presumed microvascular versus other causes: a prospective study. Ophthalmology. (2013) 120:2264–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.04.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  Perros P Neoh C Dickinson J . Thyroid eye disease. BMJ. (2009) 338:b560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b560

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  Bartley GB Fatourechi V Kadrmas EF Jacobsen SJ Ilstrup DM Garrity JA et al . Clinical features of Graves' ophthalmopathy in an incidence cohort. Am J Ophthalmol. (1996) 121:284–90. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(14)70276-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  Burian HM Miller JE . Comitant convergent strabismus with acute onset. Am J Ophthalmol. (1958) 45:55–64. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(58)90223-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  Zhu M Tang Y Wang Z Shen T Qiu X Yan J et al . Clinical characteristics and risk factors of acute acquired concomitant esotropia in last 5 years: a retrospective case–control study. Eye. (2023) 37:320–4. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01939-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  Meng Y Hu X Huang X Zhao Y Ye M Yi B et al . Clinical characteristics and aetiology of acute acquired comitant esotropia. Clin Exp Optom. (2022) 105:293–7. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1914510

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  Schreuders J Thoe Schwartzenberg GW Bos E Versteegh FG . Acute-onset esotropia: should we look inside?J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. (2012) 49:70–2. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20121127-05

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  Hoyt CS Good WV . Acute onset concomitant esotropia: when is it a sign of serious neurological disease?Br J Ophthalmol. (1995) 79:498–501. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.5.498

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar