You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 29 January 2025

Sec. Epilepsy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1529409

Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with focal epilepsy

  • 1. Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow, Russia

  • 2. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

  • 3. S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Moscow, Russia

Article metrics

View details

1

Citations

1,8k

Views

375

Downloads

Abstract

Purpose:

This study aims to compare optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) data in individuals with focal epilepsy and healthy individuals and to investigate the effect of antiseizure medications (ASM) on OCTA data.

Methods:

We examined 48 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy and 46 healthy controls. Area and skeleton density of superficial and deep capillary plexuses in the macular area and peripapillary radial capillary plexus were measured.

Results:

In general, no differences in OCTA parameters were found between groups of individuals with epilepsy and healthy individuals. A comparison of individuals with epilepsy with and without comorbid major depressive disorder revealed no differences in OCTA data. However, the area and skeleton densities of the perfused capillary retinal vascular bed in the macular region showed a negative association with the use of valproates and modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery, whereas only the skeleton density of the deep capillary plexus showed a positive association with the use of modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels.

Conclusion:

OCTA revealed different effects of various ASM groups on the perfused macular capillary bed. These findings suggest that OCTA parameters could serve as potential biomarkers for assessing ASM effects on small vessels and capillaries in the brain.

Introduction

Structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a valuable tool in neurodegenerative disorders. Thinning of the ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer, and other retinal structures have been suggested as potential biomarkers for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, multiple sclerosis, and other conditions (1–3). In people with epilepsy (PWE), similar retinal changes detected by structural OCT have also been proposed as a means to detect signs of neurodegeneration and study the effects of drug treatment, among other applications (4, 5).

Approximately 10 years ago, OCT angiography (OCTA) was introduced into clinical practice (6). In ophthalmology, it is mainly used to detect characteristic pathological changes in the ocular vasculature, such as neovascular membranes or non-perfused areas (7). Quantitative OCTA indices are used not only in ophthalmology but also in neurological disorders to measure the impact of disease on the capillary vascular bed (8, 9). However, there are only three reports in the literature on OCTA in PWE, all of which focus on children (10–12). These studies examine OCTA changes in treatment-naïve patients (10) as well as in patients on different antiseizure medications (ASMs).

This study aimed to compare OCTA data in individuals with focal epilepsy and healthy individuals and to investigate the effect of ASM on OCTA.

Materials and methods

Subjects

In this observational cross-sectional study, we included 48 consecutive patients with focal epilepsy admitted to the Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry between October 2020 and August 2021 (Epilepsy group). The inclusion criteria were as follows: individuals aged 18 years or older, with a diagnosis of focal epilepsy, confirmed through consensus of at least two experienced epileptologists, in accordance with the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of epilepsy (13). The exclusion criteria were as follows: smoking; severe psychiatric comorbidities (schizophrenia, psychosis, intellectual disability, or dementia), other than major depressive disorder (MDD); a history of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures; diabetes mellitus; severe somatic, neurological, or ophthalmic disorders (including high myopia >6.0 diopters and previous ocular surgery); and active COVID-19 (ICD U 07.1, U 07.2), based upon a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test.

A total of 24 (50%) of the 48 patients in our cohort had structural focal epilepsy (due to traumatic brain injury, stroke, malformations of cortical development, etc.), while the etiology of the remaining cases of focal epilepsy was unknown. The duration of epilepsy was 14.7 ± 11.9 years, and the age of epilepsy onset was 22.4 ± 16.0 years. Only 14 (29%) of the 48 PWE were seizure-free. Twelve PWE had one to two seizures per year, 10 PWE had less than one seizure per month, and 12 PWE had more than one seizure monthly. Twenty (42%) PWE were drug-resistant.

PWE were not treatment-naïve and had mostly received ASMs from the following groups for ≥14 days before screening: modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels (carbamazepine, lacosamide, lamotrigine, and oxcarbazepine), modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery (pregabalin, gabapentin, levetiracetam, brivaracetam, and ethosuximide), and valproates (valproic acid and sodium valproate) (14).

The diagnosis of comorbid MDD [current depressive episode, (cDE)] was made by a psychiatrist experienced in mood disorders, based on the ICD-10 criteria.

Forty-six age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers formed the control group.

This study adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval from the local ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects before participation.

OCTA

OCTA was performed with the OCT HS-100 (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) using Angio eXpert, OCTA version 2.0 (Tokyo, Japan). The OCT HS-100 is a spectral-domain OCT with a scanning rate of 70.000 A-scans/s and a central wavelength of 855 nm. Its declared axial resolution in tissue is 3 μm, and lateral resolution is 20 μm. Structural OCT was also performed to exclude concomitant ophthalmic disorders.

In all subjects, only the right eye was examined without pupil dilation (the choice between the right and left eyes was made randomly). Scans with signal strength ≥7 were included. To measure quantitative OCTA parameters, two protocols were used. The “OCTA (6 × 6 mm) (Macula)” protocol measures the superficial and deep capillary plexuses in the macular area. This area is divided according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scheme into a central (1 mm diameter) and four parafoveal zones, forming an inner ring (annulus) with an inner diameter of 1 mm and an outer diameter of 3 mm. In the central zone, the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) is measured semi-automatically. The “OCTA (4 × 4 mm) (Disc)” protocol measures the peripapillary radial capillary plexus, which is divided into four peripapillary zones, forming an annulus with a size of 1–3 mm.

All OCTA protocols provide two types of measurements—area density and skeleton density. Area density is “the percentage of white pixels in the region (%).” Skeleton density is defined as follows: “This function transforms the lines of a binary image created from an OCTA image into thin lines and indicates the value obtained by dividing the sum of the length of the thin lines in the region by the area (mm−1)” [OCT HS-100 Operation Manual. Canon Inc., 2019, p.130]. Area density reflects the area of active (perfused) vessels forming the vascular (mostly capillary) bed in a given region. Unlike area density, skeleton density does not depend on the vessels’ size (diameter) and reflects only the number and total length of the vessels. It should be noted that OCTA terminology is not standardized. In other OCTA devices, area density is also referred to as perfusion density, vessel density, or vessel area density. Skeleton density is also referred to as vessel density or skeleton area density, or it may not be measured at all.

To simplify the comparison of area and skeleton density across different groups of patients, this study calculated the average densities in four parafoveal or four peripapillary zones (quadrants).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the R software package, version 4.1.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, http://www.R-project.org, accessed 11 March 2022) and Jamovi software, version 2.3.28 (Jamovi project, https://www.jamovi.org, accessed 06 August 2024). The normality of distributions was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests. Normally distributed variables are presented as mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD), whereas non-normally distributed variables are presented as median (Me) and interquartile range (IQR). A comparison of continuous variables in two groups was performed using Student’s t-test for independent samples, Welch’s t-test, or Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between OCTA parameters and demographic parameters, epilepsy duration, seizure frequency, ASM influence, etc. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Possible MDD influence on OCTA data in individuals with focal epilepsy

A psychiatric evaluation found MDD (cDE) in 25 out of 48 PWE. A comparison of groups of patients with focal epilepsy and concomitant MDD (group MDD (+), n = 25) and with focal epilepsy without MDD (group MDD (−), n = 23) did not show differences in age and sex (Table 1) and did not reveal any differences in OCTA parameters (averages of four quadrants) (Table 2). This corresponds to the results obtained in our previous study (15) and allowed further analysis without taking into account the presence of concomitant MDD.

Table 1

Group MDD (+) n = 25 MDD (−) n = 23 p
Parameter
Age, years, mean ± standard deviation (range) 36.8 ± 10.8
(20–56)
37.5 ± 13.2
(19–69)
0.836a
Sex, F/M, n 20/5 14/9 0.207b

Age and sex of focal epilepsy patients with concomitant MDD—group MDD (+) and without MDD—group MDD (−).

MDD, major depressive disorder; aStudent’s t-test; bFisher’s exact test.

Table 2

Group MDD (+) n = 25 MDD (−) n = 23 pa
Parameter
(averages of four quadrants)
Superficial capillary plexus: area density (%) 38.0*
(37.2–38.5)
37.5*
(36.2–38.4)
0.198
Superficial capillary plexus: skeleton density (mm/mm2) 23.7*
(22.6–24.4)
23.6*
(19.5–24.6)
0.590
Deep capillary plexus: area density (%) 39.5*
(38.0–41.5)
36.9
(26.4–41.0)
0.069
Deep capillary plexus: skeleton density (mm/mm2) 27.4*
(25.8–29.2)
26.9
(16.9–29.6)
0.489
Peripapillary radial capillary plexus: Area density (%) 42.1*
(40.3–43.3)
42.5*
(40.9–44.3)
0.509
Peripapillary radial capillary plexus: Skeleton density, mm/mm2 26.3*
(23.9–27.2)
26.8*
(24.1–27.8)
0.609

Optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in focal epilepsy patients with concomitant MDD—group MDD (+) and without MDD—group MDD (−), median (interquartile range).

MDD, major depressive disorder; aMann–Whitney U-test; *one patient excluded due to incomplete data.

OCTA in individuals with focal epilepsy vs. controls

To study the influence of focal epilepsy on OCTA parameters the comparison was performed between the epilepsy and control groups. Age and sex did not differ in these groups (Table 3). No differences were found in the averaged four quadrants area and skeleton densities (Table 4) and in all other OCTA parameters (Table 5).

Table 3

Group
Epilepsy n = 48 Control n = 46 p
Parameter
Age, years, mean ± SD (range) 37.2 ± 11.9
(19–69)
33.2 ± 10.3
(22–63)
0.093 a
Sex, Female/Male 34/14 37/9 0.341 b

Age and sex of patients in the epilepsy and control groups.

SD, standard deviation; aStudent’s t-test; bFisher’s exact test.

Table 4

Group Epilepsy n = 48 Control n = 46 p
Parameter
(averages of four quadrants)
Superficial capillary plexus: area density (%) 37.9**
(37.0–38.5)
37.9*
(37.3–38.7)
0.321 a
Superficial capillary plexus: skeleton density (mm/mm2) 23.7**
(20.2–24.4)
23.6*
(22.5–24.4)
0.640 a
Deep capillary plexus: area density (%) 39.1*
(30.2–41.5)
39.6**
(37.1–41.0)
0.502 a
Deep capillary plexus: skeleton density (mm/mm2) 27.1*
(20.6–29.5)
27.8**
(24.2–29.0)
0.868 a
Peripapillary radial capillary plexus: Area density (%)
mean ± SD (range)
41.8 ± 2.9**
(32.5–46.5)
42.0 ± 1.8*
(36.5–44.5)
0.630 b
Peripapillary radial capillary plexus: skeleton density, mm/mm2 26.5**
(23.8–27.8)
26.9*
(26.0–27.2)
0.518 a

Optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in the epilepsy and control groups, median (interquartile range).

SD, standard deviation; aMann–Whitney U-test; bWelch’s t-test (Levene’s test p < 0.05); *one subject excluded due to incomplete data; **two subjects excluded due to incomplete data. Differences with the control group are not significant.

Table 5

Group Epilepsy n = 48 Control n = 46 p
Parameter
Foveal avascular zone (mm2)*
Superficial capillary plexus 0.26 ± 0.11
(0.06–0.56)
0.26 ± 0.11
(0.03–0.61)
0.963 a
Deep capillary plexus 0.39 ± 0.11
(0.11–0.58)
0.38 ± 0.13
(0.13–0.64)
0.677 a
Superficial capillary plexus: Area density (%)**
Central subfield 28.57 ± 4.82
(14.5–41.6)
27.48 ± 3.77
(18.3–33.9)
0.226 a
Superior quadrant
Me (IQR)
38.0
(36.7–38.8)
38.4
(37.6–39.4)
0.103 c
Nasal quadrant
Me (IQR)
37.3
(36.2–38.5)
37.3
(36.6–38.5)
0.598 c
Inferior quadrant 38.19 ± 3.16
(22.9–42.8)
38.89 ± 1.40
(35.8–42.1)
0.171 b
Temporal quadrant
Me (IQR)
37.2
(36.0–37.9)
37.2
(36.2–38.2)
0.479 c
Average of four quadrants
Me (IQR)
37.9
(37.0–38.5)
37.9
(37.3–38.7)
0.321 c
Superficial capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2)**
Central subfield 18.3 ± 4.8
(7.1–37.5)
17.4 ± 3.0
(10.2–22.8)
0.289 a
Superior quadrant,
Me (IQR)
23.0
(19.9–24.1)
23.5
(22.4–24.4)
0.124 c
Nasal quadrant,
Me (IQR)
24.0
(21.5–24.8)
23.7
(22.9–24.7)
0.975 c
Inferior quadrant 23.6 ± 4.0
(15.0–40.9)
23.7 ± 1.8
(19.2–26.7)
0.818 b
Temporal quadrant
Me (IQR)
23.5
(20.5–24.3)
23.2
(21.9–24.1)
0.891 c
Average of four quadrants
Me (IQR)
23.7
(20.2–24.4)
23.6
(22.5–24.4)
0.640 c
Deep capillary plexus: Area density (%), Me (IQR)***
Central subfield 33.8 ± 8.1
(7.6–46.6)
35.8 ± 5.7
(17.9–43.2)
0.181 a
Superior quadrant 33.8 ± 9.2
(1.2–43.1)
35.8 ± 6.5
(18.4–44.7)
0.226 a
Nasal quadrant 37.6 ± 7.1
(21.6–44.9)
39.4 ± 5.2
(21.7–45.2)
0.179 b
Inferior quadrant,
Me (IQR)
39.3
(31.8–42.0)
40.0
(37.7–42.2)
0.246 c
Temporal quadrant 36.0 ± 6.8
(16.5–44.4)
38.3 ± 3.9
(25.8–43.0)
0.051 b
Average of four quadrants
Me (IQR)
39.1
(30.2–41.5)
39.6
(37.1–41.0)
0.502 c
Deep capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2)***
Central subfield 24.0 ± 7.1
(4.5–38.4)
25.2 ± 5.1
(10.9–33.3)
0.367 a
Superior quadrant 23.4 ± 7.4
(0.6–32.1)
24.4 ± 5.3
(11.3–31.2)
0.449 a
Nasal quadrant,
Me (IQR)
28.3
(21.0–30.9)
28.4
(25.0–30.2)
0.915 c
Inferior quadrant,
Me (IQR)
28.4
(19.4–29.5)
28.4
(25.4–29.5)
0.515 c
Temporal quadrant,
Me (IQR)
27.0
(21.8–28.9)
27.8
(24.1–29.1)
0.355 c
Average of four quadrants
Me (IQR)
27.1
(20.6–29.5)
27.8
(24.2–29.0)
0.868 c
Peripapillary radial capillary plexus: Area density (%)**
Superior quadrant 42.3 ± 4.1
(32.7–50.1)
42.6 ± 4.4
(31.6–52.5)
0.677 a
Nasal quadrant 39.6 ± 4.8
(24.9–45.4)
39.3 ± 3.3
(32.0–45.8)
0.728 b
Inferior quadrant 42.7 ± 5.1
(29.8–51.9)
43.5 ± 3.7
(32.1–50.0)
0.405 b
Temporal quadrant 42.6 ± 2.6
(32.6–45.8)
43.1 ± 2.0
(36.8–47.8)
0.368 a
Average of four quadrants 41.8 ± 2.9
(32.5–46.5)
42.0 ± 1.8
(36.5–44.5)
0.630 b
Peripapillary radial capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2)**
Superior quadrant 24.3 ± 4.2
(15.1–31.9)
25.0 ± 4.6
(13.0–39.4)
0.454 a
Nasal quadrant 23.2 ± 4.4
(14.7–30.0)
22.8 ± 3.7
(15.8–29.7)
0.704 a
Inferior quadrant 25.5 ± 4.3
(14.6–32.1)
26.3 ± 3.6
(15.1–32.2)
0.349 a
Temporal quadrant 29.0 ± 3.2
(18.5–33.0)
29.9 ± 3.3
(19.5–34.8)
0.191 a
Average of four quadrants
Me (IQR)
26.5
(23.8–27.8)
26.9
(26.0–27.2)
0.518 c

Optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in the epilepsy and control groups, mean ± standard deviation (range).

Me, median; IQR, interquartile range. aStudent’s t-test, bWelch’s t-test (Levene’s test p < 0.05), cMann–Whitney U-test. *Two patients excluded due to incomplete data. **Two patients and one control excluded due to incomplete data. ***One patient and two controls excluded due to incomplete data Differences with the control group are not significant.

Influence of antiseizure medications and other factors on OCTA

Taking into account that more than 60% of PWE received antiseizure medications (ASM) in two to three groups, an analysis of the influence of ASMs and other factors on OCTA in PWE was performed using multivariate linear regression. Demographic parameters (age, sex, education, etc.) and epilepsy features (seizure frequency, epilepsy duration, etc.) did not show any significant impact on OCTA. The ASMs of two groups (valproates and modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery) showed a significant negative effect on the area and skeleton densities of both superficial and deep capillary plexuses in the macular region. In contrast, only the skeleton density of the deep capillary plexus showed a positive association with the use of modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels (Table 6). No similar effects were found for the peripapillary radial capillary plexus.

Table 6

Parameter
Group of ASMs multiple R2 P β
(averages of four quadrants)
Superficial capillary plexus: Area density (%) Valproates 0.156 0.026 −0.295
Modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery −0.233
Superficial capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2) Valproates 0.187 0.012 −0.297
Modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery −0.284
Deep capillary plexus: Area density (%) Valproates 0.256 0.002 −0.439
Modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery −0.197
Deep capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2) Modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels 0.188 0.010 0.273
Valproates −0.243

Influence of antiseizure medications (ASM) on optical coherence tomography angiography parameters: multivariate linear regression results.

β, standardized estimates.

The associations reported in Table 6 are illustrated in Figure 1 and Table 7, which provide a direct comparison of OCTA parameters in patients who received versus those who did not receive a particular group of ASMs, as presented in Table 6. It should be noted that there were no age differences between the compared groups, while groups of patients who received and did not receive modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels differed significantly in terms of sex. However, multiple regression revealed a very weak influence of sex and age on the OCTA parameters studied.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Boxplots of optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in patients who did (YES) and did not (NO) receive a particular group of antiseizure medications (ASMs) as presented in Table 6. Quantitative data are given in Table 7. The position of boxplots of each ASM corresponds to the ASM position in Tables 6, 7.

Table 7

Parameter ASM group ASM (+) ASM (−) pa
(averages of four quadrants)
Superficial capillary plexus: Area density (%) Valproates n1 = 19; n0 = 28 37.3* (35.8–38.0) 38.1
(37.3–38.5)
NS
Modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery
n1 = 16; n0 = 31
37.4*
(37.0–38.0)
38.0
(37.1–38.5)
NS
Superficial capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2) Valproates
n1 = 19; n0 = 28
22.6*
(18.9–23.7)
23.9
(23.2–24.6)
0.033
Modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery
n1 = 16; n0 = 31
22.6*
(18.7–24.4)
23.7
(22.8–24.4)
NS
Deep capillary plexus: Area density (%) Valproates
n1 = 19; n0 = 28
34.9
(25.3–39.3)
39.8
(37.9–41.5)
0.005
Modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery
n1 = 16; n0 = 31
35.4
(28.0–39.2)
39.5
(38.2–41.6)
0.021
Deep capillary plexus: Skeleton density (mm/mm2) Modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels
n1 = 33; n0 = 14
28.9
(26.9–29.8)
23.4
(16.7–25.7)
0.005
Valproates
n1 = 19; n0 = 28
24.9
(15.3–28.6)
28.3
(25.8–29.8)
0.026

Optical coherence tomography angiography parameters in patients who did and did not receive a particular group of antiseizure medications (ASM), median (interquartile range).

ASM (+), ASM (−)—groups of patients who did and did not receive ASM; n1, n0—numbers of patients in these groups. a – Mann–Whitney U-test. *One person excluded due to incomplete data. NS—non-significant.

Figure 1 and Table 7 show that the capillary retinal vascular bed is significantly decreased in patients receiving valproates or modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery while the skeleton density of the deep capillary plexus in patients on modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels is significantly increased.

Discussion

In our study, we examined patients with focal epilepsy who were primarily taking ASMs from three groups: valproates, modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery, and modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels. For the first time, a negative association was found between the area and skeleton densities of both superficial and deep macular capillary plexuses and the use of valproates or modifiers of the presynaptic release machinery, indicating a decrease in the perfused retinal capillary bed. In contrast, the modulators of voltage-gated sodium channels demonstrated a positive association with the skeleton density of the deep capillary plexus, equivalent to an increase in the deeper portion of the perfused retinal capillary bed. When ASMs were not taken into account, OCTA did not show any differences between patients and controls. It could be due to an approximately equal number of prescribed ASMs causing an increase and decrease in the perfused retinal capillary bed.

OCTA is a relatively new technique. There are only a few publications on its use in patients with epilepsy (10–12). All of these studies were conducted in children and included mixed groups of patients with focal and generalized epilepsies. One article compared untreated patients with a control group (12). Another compared children treated with levetiracetam with a control group (11), and a third compared three groups of epilepsy patients taking three different ASMs (carbamazepine, levetiracetam, and valproic acid) with a control group (10). All these studies did not find differences in any indices in superficial and deep capillary macular plexuses as well as in peripapillary radial capillary plexus. Moreover, all three papers found differences in choroidal perfusion, which, compared to controls, was decreased in untreated patients (12) and in patients on valproic acid (10). It was also shown to be decreased in children taking levetiracetam (11); however, this conclusion was not confirmed in another study (10).

With choroidal perfusion decrease in untreated patients (12), it is not clear which part of the decrease in treated persons is due to epilepsy and which is due to ASMs. It should be also noted that unlike superficial and deep capillary macular plexuses or peripapillary radial capillary plexus, which are measured automatically by software incorporated in the OCT equipment, choroidal perfusion was measured on exported images using analysis by the ImageJ program (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). This analysis is not automatic and therefore may produce much more subjective results.

The retina is closely connected to the brain, both structurally and developmentally, and is often considered an extension of it. This relationship is also reflected in the similarities of the vascular system at the micro level, as well as in their comparable vascular reactions. At present, there are no studies on possible associations between OCTA parameters and cerebral blood flow in epilepsy. However, in other diseases, there are examples of strong connections between the changes in OCTA and structural and functional changes in the vascular system of the brain. For example, lower vessel density (aka area density in our study) on OCTA was associated with lower cerebrovascular reactivity to CO2 and higher mean diffusivity on diffusion tensor imaging, reflecting subvisible white matter damage in patients with cerebral small vessel disease (16). Lower vessel density of superficial capillary plexus in this category of patients was associated with white matter hyperintensity scores (17). The results of these and similar studies (18) suggest that OCTA parameters could serve as potential biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease (16–19).

Changes in vascular density (aka skeleton density in our study) of the superficial capillary plexus, correlated with brain perfusion parameters (cerebral blood flow, cerebral blood volume, etc.) in patients with moderate or severe internal carotid artery stenosis (20). In addition to OCTA, other retinal vascular parameters, such as arteriovenous ratio, were correlated with cerebral blood flow, which was shown in patients with bipolar disorder (21).

Based on these data, it can be expected that the effects of ASM on OCTA parameters identified in the present study may be accompanied by similar effects on cerebral capillaries.

There are studies of the influence of ASMs on cerebral blood flow in PWE (22, 23). In one of them, valproate diminished global cerebral blood flow in healthy volunteers, which was consistent with our OCTA findings (22). In another study, lamotrigine was found to reduce perfusion in cortico-thalamo-limbic areas, the orbitofrontal cortex, and the brainstem in patients with drug-naïve idiopathic generalized epilepsy (23). The direction of these changes is not consistent with our OCTA data. However, the opposite changes were observed only in deep capillary plexus skeleton density, and the patients in these studies were quite different. Both of these studies involve expensive, high-tech techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) (22) or single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) (23). If OCTA provides comparable information, it could have an important place in ASM research. This will be the subject of our future studies.

Limitations

The comparison groups of patients who received and did not receive a particular group of ASMs are relatively small, and some patients received ASMs from two or more groups. The reported effects of ASMs on OCTA need to be confirmed in larger groups of patients receiving ASM monotherapy.

The relationship between the capillary vascular bed of the retina and the brain, as suggested by existing literature, was not explored in this study. This topic requires a separate investigation using special methods to assess the condition of small cerebral vessels and cerebral blood flow.

Conclusion

OCTA revealed different effects across various ASM groups on the perfused macular capillary bed. These findings suggest that OCTA parameters could serve as potential biomarkers for assessing ASM effects on small vessels and capillaries in the brain.

Statements

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Research Ethics Committee of the Moscow Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

FR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. AG: Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. AS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Open Access publishing costs were covered by the Moscow Center for Healthcare Innovations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Oleg Savinkov, Anna Troshina, and Natela Davydova for performing OCT and OCTA; and Mikhail Zinchuk and Georgii Kustov for performing the psychiatric examination.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.

    Chan VTT Sun Z Tang S Chen LJ Wong A Tham CC et al . Spectral-domain OCT measurements in Alzheimer’s disease. Ophthalmology. (2019) 126:497510. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.009

  • 2.

    Huang L Wang C Wang W Wang Y Zhang R . The specific pattern of retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. (2021) 268:402332. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10094-0

  • 3.

    Petzold A Balcer LJ Calabresi PA Costello F Frohman TC Frohman EM et al . Retinal layer segmentation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16:797812. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30278-8

  • 4.

    Delazer L Bao H Lauseker M Stauner L Nübling G Conrad J et al . Association between retinal thickness and disease characteristics in adult epilepsy: A cross-sectional OCT evaluation. Epilepsia Open. (2024) 9:23649. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12859

  • 5.

    Duran M Aykaç S Eliaçık S . Evaluation of ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in epilepsy patients. Indian J Ophthalmol. (2023) 71:30538. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2802_22

  • 6.

    Jia Y Tan O Tokayer J Potsaid B Wang Y Liu JJ et al . Split-spectrum amplitude- decorrelation angiography with optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. (2012) 20:471025. doi: 10.1364/OE.20.004710

  • 7.

    de Carlo TE Romano A Waheed NK Duker JS . A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int J Retina Vitreous. (2015) 1:5. doi: 10.1186/s40942-015-0005-8

  • 8.

    Tsokolas G Tsaousis KT Diakonis VF Matsou A Tyradellis S . Optical coherence tomography angiography in neurodegenerative diseases: A review. Eye Brain. (2020) 12:7387. doi: 10.2147/EB.S193026

  • 9.

    Augustin AJ Atorf J . The value of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) in neurological diseases. Diagnostics. (2022) 12. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020468

  • 10.

    Gultutan P Nalcacioglu P Icoz M Yilmaz D Citak Kurt AN . Ocular hemodynamics in epileptic children treated with antiepileptic drugs. Eur J Ophthalmol. (2024) 34:84351. doi: 10.1177/11206721231207507

  • 11.

    Kaderli A Kayılıoğlu H Kaderli ST Karalezli A . Effect of levetiracetam on ocular perfusion measure with optical coherence tomography angiography. Arq Bras Oftalmol. (2024) 87:e20220269. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2022-0269

  • 12.

    Nalcacioglu P Igoz M Gultutan P Yilmaz D Citak Kurt AN . Ocular perfusion characteristics of children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. (2023) 42:103582. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103582

  • 13.

    Scheffer IE Berkovic S Capovilla G Connolly MB French J Guilhoto L et al . ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. (2017) 58:51221. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709

  • 14.

    Löscher W Klein P . The pharmacology and clinical efficacy of Antiseizure medications: from bromide salts to Cenobamate and beyond. CNS Drugs. (2021) 35:93563. doi: 10.1007/s40263-021-00827-8

  • 15.

    Zinchuk M Popova S Guekht A Shpak A . Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. J Affect Disord. (2024) 361:40914. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.039

  • 16.

    Wiseman SJ Zhang JF Gray C Hamid C Valdés Hernández M Del C et al . Retinal capillary microvessel morphology changes are associated with vascular damage and dysfunction in cerebral small vessel disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2023) 43:23140. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221135658

  • 17.

    Wang X Wei Q Wu X Cao S Chen C Zhang J et al . The vessel density of the superficial retinal capillary plexus as a new biomarker in cerebral small vessel disease: an optical coherence tomography angiography study. Neurol Sci. (2021) 42:361524. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05038-z

  • 18.

    Lee JY Kim JP Jang H Kim J Kang SH Kim JS et al . Optical coherence tomography angiography as a potential screening tool for cerebral small vessel diseases. Alzheimers Res Ther. (2020) 12:73. doi: 10.1186/s13195-020-00638-x

  • 19.

    Biffi E Turple Z Chung J Biffi A . Retinal biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease: A systematic review. PLoS One. (2022) 17:e0266974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266974

  • 20.

    Liu J Wan J Kwapong WR Tao W Ye C Liu M et al . Retinal microvasculature and cerebral hemodynamics in patients with internal carotid artery stenosis. BMC Neurol. (2022) 22:386. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02908-7

  • 21.

    Mio M Grigorian A Zou Y Dimick MK Selkirk B Kertes P et al . Neurovascular correlates of retinal microvascular caliber in adolescent bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. (2023) 320:8190. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.082

  • 22.

    Gaillard WD Zeffiro T Fazilat S DeCarli C Theodore WH . Effect of valproate on cerebral metabolism and blood flow: an 18 F-2-Deoxyglusose and 15 O water positron emission tomography study. Epilepsia. (1996) 37:51521. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00602.x

  • 23.

    Joo EY Hong SB Tae WS Han SJ Seo DW Lee KH et al . Effect of lamotrigine on cerebral blood flow in patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. (2006) 33:7249. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-0029-7

Summary

Keywords

optical coherence tomography angiography, epilepsy, antiseizure medications, retinal capillaries, major depressive disorder

Citation

Rider F, Guekht A and Shpak A (2025) Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with focal epilepsy. Front. Neurol. 16:1529409. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1529409

Received

16 November 2024

Accepted

13 January 2025

Published

29 January 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited by

Georgia Ramantani, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Reviewed by

Serpil Demirci, Süleyman Demirel University, Türkiye

Antonio Giulio Gennari, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Switzerland

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Flora Rider,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics