CORRECTION article

Front. Neurol., 16 May 2025

Sec. Neuro-Otology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1621211

Corrigendum: Task demands influence search strategy selection in otoconia-deficient mice

  • 1. Department of Psychology, Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN, United States

  • 2. Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, United States

Article metrics

View details

696

Views

185

Downloads

In the published article, there was an error in the Results, Small Barnes maze search strategy analysis, Paragraph 2. One statistical result (chi square value) reported in the text was incorrect.

This sentence previously stated:

“A chi-square test for independence revealed that the frequencies of spatial, serial, and mixed strategies were different between training days 1 and 8 for control mice (χ2 (2, N = 64) = 11.22, p < 0.01) and tilted mice (χ2 (2, N = 64) = 6.68, p < 0.05).”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“A chi-square test for independence revealed that the frequencies of spatial, serial, and mixed strategies were different between training days 1 and 8 for control mice [χ2 (2, N = 64) = 11.22, p < 0.01] and tilted mice [χ2 (2, N = 64) = 9.18, p < 0.05].”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

otolith organs, spatial, self-movement, reference memory, Barnes maze

Citation

Yoder RM, Carstensen LC and Jagannathan K (2025) Corrigendum: Task demands influence search strategy selection in otoconia-deficient mice. Front. Neurol. 16:1621211. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1621211

Received

30 April 2025

Accepted

05 May 2025

Published

16 May 2025

Volume

16 - 2025

Edited and reviewed by

Michael Strupp, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ryan M. Yoder

†Present address: Ryan M. Yoder, Department of Psychology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC, United States

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics