Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Endovascular and Interventional Neurology

This article is part of the Research TopicNeurocardiology: The Science of Heart-Brain InteractionsView all 5 articles

A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Cognitive Function and Carotid Atherosclerosis: Global Trends and Hotspots

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Ningbo Medical Center Li Huili Hospital Laboratory, Ningbo, China
  • 2Hubei Provincial Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Wuhan, China
  • 3South China University of Technology Center for Brain Computer Interfaces and Brain Information Processing, Guangzhou, China
  • 4Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 5The Second People's Hospital of Lishui, Lishui, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Cognitive impairment associated with carotid atherosclerosis has attracted growing attention in recent years due to its implications in neurodegenerative diseases and vascular dementia. However, the knowledge structure and research trends in this interdisciplinary field remain unclear. Methods: This study conducted a comprehensive bibliometric analysis based on the Web of Science Core Collection and Scopus databases. Publications from 1995 to 2025 related to "cognitive function" and "carotid atherosclerosis" were retrieved, yielding 3,823 unique articles after deduplication using the bibliometrix R package. CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and ggplot2 were applied to visualize publication trends, co-authorship, co-citation networks, keyword clustering, and burst detection. Results: The number of publications has increased steadily since 2005, with a notable acceleration after 2016. China and the United States are the leading contributors, with Capital Medical University and Harvard Medical School as prominent institutions. Highly cited papers are primarily guideline-based or cohort studies. Keyword clustering revealed three major thematic areas: (1) clinical assessment and epidemiological features of cognitive impairment, (2) neurodegenerative and vascular dementia mechanisms, and (3) cellular injury pathways involving inflammation and oxidative stress. Recent citation bursts of keywords such as "microglia," "postoperative cognitive dysfunction," and "cerebral small vessel disease" indicate a shift toward translational and clinical research. Animal models (e.g., bilateral carotid artery occlusion) and mechanistic studies on neuroinflammation, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and microglial activation have emerged as key areas of focus. Conclusions: This bibliometric study outlines the evolution, hotspots, and future directions of research on cognitive function and carotid atherosclerosis. While research output has grown significantly, particularly in China, international collaboration remains uneven. Emerging evidence highlights the critical role of vascular pathology and neuroinflammation in cognitive decline, offering new avenues for diagnosis and intervention. Limitations include potential database bias and a lack of qualitative content assessment. Future work should integrate broader data sources and in-depth analyses to enhance the understanding of this complex domain.

Keywords: Cognitive Function, carotid atherosclerosis, Bibliometrics, Neuroinflammation, visual analysis

Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 02 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sun, Zheng, Chen and Liuyin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Qi Sun
Guopeng Chen
Jin Liuyin

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.