Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Experimental Therapeutics

Acupuncture for chronic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Provisionally accepted
Ke-Xin  WuKe-Xin Wu1Peng  TangPeng Tang1Yan  ChenYan Chen1Jin  YaoJin Yao1Xin-Yue  ZhangXin-Yue Zhang1Qiong-Nan  BaoQiong-Nan Bao2Ya-Qin  LiYa-Qin Li3Zi-Wen  ChenZi-Wen Chen1Wan-Qi  ZhongWan-Qi Zhong1Man-Ze  XiaMan-Ze Xia1Zheng-Hong  ChenZheng-Hong Chen1,4Zi-han  YinZi-han Yin1*Fan-Rong  LiangFan-Rong Liang1*
  • 1chengdu university of traditional chinese medicine,acupuncture and tuina, Chengdu, China
  • 2The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China
  • 3The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
  • 4University of Tibetan Medicine, Lhasa, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background and purpose: Chronic urticaria (CU) manifests as recurrent skin wheals and itching, considerably impacting patient quality of life. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture treatment for CU using meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA), providing a basis for clinical decision-making. Methods: A systematic search was performed across six English databases, four Chinese databases, and additional resources up to 30 September 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture with Western medicine (WM), sham acupuncture (SA), and waitlist control (WC) were included. The revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool was used to assess methodological quality. Review Manager (version 5.4) and STATA (version 17) were used for statistical analysis and complex modeling, respectively. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to evaluate the evidence level, and TSA was used to estimate the required sample size and evaluate the stability of the study conclusions. Subgroup analyses were performed based on acupuncture methods and control methods. Results: The analysis included 18 studies involving 1,829 patients. Acupuncture demonstrated a significant advantage over SA and WC in reducing the Weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), while no significant difference was observed compared to WM. For secondary outcomes, acupuncture demonstrated a significant advantage over WM, SA, and WC in terms of the This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). TSA's findings indicated that the evidence of reducing UAS7 and DLQI scores with acupuncture for patients with urticaria was conclusive. Meanwhile, the difference between acupuncture and WM regarding serum IgE levels was statistically non-significant. TSA showed that the evidence of improving IgE levels is inconclusive. The incidence of adverse effects associated with acupuncture treatment, including ecchymosis and pain, was higher than that in SA and WC. Conclusion: Acupuncture is a potential therapeutic intervention for CU, capable of reducing the frequency of urticarial episodes and significantly improving patient symptoms and quality of life. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42023480490.

Keywords: chronic urticaria, Acupuncture, Meta-analysis, Trial sequential analysis, Systematic review

Received: 21 Jul 2025; Accepted: 19 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wu, Tang, Chen, Yao, Zhang, Bao, Li, Chen, Zhong, Xia, Chen, Yin and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Zi-han Yin
Fan-Rong Liang

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.