Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 13 January 2026

Sec. Neuroepidemiology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2025.1653957

Risk factors for 90-day unplanned readmission after open posterior lumbar fusion in the elderly

Hao-Zhen LyuHao-Zhen Lyu1Lang Hu
Lang Hu2*
  • 1Department of Spine Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
  • 2Department of Orthopedics, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang, Hubei, China

Background: The inescapable trend of an aging population has made lumbar fusion increasingly common in elderly individuals. This study aimed to explore the risk factors associated with unplanned readmission within 90 days after open posterior lumbar fusion (OPLF) in elderly patients (≥ 60 years old).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of patients who underwent OPLF at two spine centers between June 2010 and June 2024. Patients were divided into readmission and non-readmission groups according to whether they were unplanned readmitted within 90 days of the primary surgery. Demographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze risk factors for 90-day readmission.

Results: Of the total, 8.6% (157/1826) of elderly patients experienced unplanned readmission within 90 days of the initial surgery. Factors including age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (grade 3), history of diabetes, heart disease, respiratory disease, preoperative malnutrition, severe osteoporosis (T < −3.5), incidental durotomy, surgical segment, and surgical time in the readmission group were significantly higher than those in the non-readmission group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested that higher age (p = 0.040, OR: 1.040, 95% CI: 1.002–1.079), ASA score ≥ grade 3 (p = 0.022, OR: 1.634, 95% CI: 1.074–2.485), heart disease (p = 0.021, OR: 1.971, 95% CI: 1.107–3.511), preoperative malnutrition (p = 0.028, OR: 1.701, 95% CI: 1.058–2.734), severe osteoporosis (p = 0.029, OR: 1.652, 95% CI: 1.054–2.588), surgical segment (p = 0.020, OR: 1.521, 95% CI: 1.067–2.169), and incidental durotomy (p = 0.012, OR: 2.193, 95% CI: 1.189–4.045) were risk factors for unplanned readmission.

Conclusion: We identified seven risk factors associated with unplanned readmission within 90 days after OPLF in elderly patients. This information may assist clinicians in preoperative evaluations of patients to develop better surgical strategies.

Introduction

Population aging is a global trend (1, 2). Reports show that the average age increased from 26.6 years in 1950 to 32.1 years in 2017 (1). Moreover, global life expectancy is projected to increase by 4.4 years for men and 4.4 years for women by 2040. In Japan, Singapore, Spain, and Switzerland, the life expectancy is over 85 years for both men and women, and in 59 countries, including China, life expectancy is projected to exceed 80 years by 2040 (2). Consequently, diseases associated with aging, such as lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD) including lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, are becoming increasingly common in the clinic (3). Reports show that 266 million people (3.63%) worldwide suffer from LDD and lower-back pain annually. With the development of spinal surgery technology, an increasing number of elderly individuals are undergoing lumbar fusion surgery to improve the symptoms of LDD (46). However, this surgery is associated with many procedure-related complications and leads to higher readmission rates relative to those of younger patients (79).

Reasons for readmission after spinal surgery include surgery-related factors such as incision complications, postoperative recurrence, poor improvement of patient symptoms (such as lower-back and leg pain), and other non-surgery-related factors such as respiratory, cardiac, or brain diseases (10).

Several previous studies examined the risk factors for 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission in patients undergoing spinal surgery (738). However, considerable heterogeneity of risk factors was associated with the types of cases (spinal tumor, fracture, degeneration, deformity) (8, 32), types of surgeries (decompression or fusion surgery, minimally invasive or open surgery) (21, 32, 36), surgical approaches (anterior or posterior) (16, 23, 28, 29, 31, 33), and surgical sites (cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine) (33). Moreover, after spinal fusion, older patients were more likely than younger patients to be readmitted. Notably, few studies have examined the risk of early hospital readmission after lumbar fusion in elderly patients (10, 26). However, unlike the generally good postoperative status of younger patients, elderly patients may have a higher rate of unplanned readmission after surgery and more postoperative complications. Based on previous studies, this study aims to explore risk factors of 90-day unplanned readmission after open posterior lumbar fusion (OPLF) surgery in elderly patients (≥ 60 years) to provide better preoperative evaluation and surgical strategies.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent OPLF at two spine centers between June 2010 and June 2024. The hospital ethics committee reviewed and approved the study. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, the informed consent was waived for all patients.

Inclusion criteria

(1) Patients aged ≥ 60 years; (2) patients with LDD who underwent posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery; and (3) patients with at least 3 months of follow-up.

Exclusion criteria

(1) Patients aged < 60 years (2); patients with lumbar fractures, infections, and tumors; (3) patients with a follow-up duration of < 3 months; (4) patients undergoing anterior or lateral lumbar fusion surgery; (5) patients with tumors associated with other systems; and (6) patients readmitted > 90 days after surgery.

Patient screening

Based on the hospital case system, we screened patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery and included or excluded patients based on the criteria described above. In this study, elderly patients were defined as those aged 60 years or older.

Collection of patient information

An independent investigator recorded clinical information of the enrolled patients. The information included patient sex, age, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, smoking status, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, heart diseases, respiratory diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, kidney and urinary diseases, and rheumatoid arthritis), preoperative malnutrition, preoperative anemia, osteoporosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical method, surgical segment, surgical time, and incidental durotomy. Preoperative malnutrition was defined as a preoperative serum albumin level < 35 g/L. Diabetes and hypertension were defined according to the international norms. Brain diseases include cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, degenerative brain disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Heart diseases included cardiac insufficiency, chronic heart failure, arrhythmia, coronary heart disease, and myocardial infarction. Respiratory diseases included pneumonia, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and bronchiectasis. Gastrointestinal diseases included chronic gastroenteritis, gastrointestinal ulcers, hepatitis, cholecystitis with gallstones and cholangitis with bile duct stones. Kidney and urinary diseases included chronic nephritis, chronic renal failure, uremia, prostate enlargement, and kidney, ureter, and bladder stones. Anemia was defined as hemoglobin levels < 110 g/L in women and < 120 g/L in men. Surgical methods included posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), and posterolateral fusion (PLF). PLIF, TLIF, and PLF were all included in OPLF in this study. An incidental durotomy was defined as an incidental intraoperative dural tear. Osteoporosis was defined as a patient with a lumbar spine bone mineral density T-value of less than −2.5 (dual-energy X-ray). Severe osteoporosis was defined as a T-value less than −3.5.

Grouping

The patients were divided into 90-day readmission and non-readmission groups based on readmission within 90 days after surgery. Demographic and clinical information was compared between the two groups.

Statistical methods

A t-test was used to compare age, BMI, surgical time, and surgical segment between the two groups. Chi-square decompression or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare sex, smoking status, comorbidities, preoperative malnutrition, preoperative anemia, osteoporosis, ASA score, surgical segment, and incidental durotomy between the two groups. Univariate logistic was used to assess the association between each variable and patient unplanned readmission 90 days after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for patient readmission 90 days after surgery. SPSS (version.25, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analyses. p-values were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Initially, 4,475 patients who underwent lumbar fusion were included in this study. After excluding 2,369 patients who were younger than 60 years of age, 33 patients with lumbar fractures, 14 patients with lumbar infections, 5 patients with lumbar tumors, 26 patients with a follow-up of less than 3 months, 138 patients who underwent anterior or lateral lumbar fusion surgery, 6 patients with other systemic tumors, and 58 patients who were readmitted more than 90 days after surgery, 1,826 patients were finally included in this study. Of these, 157 (8.6%) patients were unplanned readmitted within 90 days of the initial procedure, and 1,669 (91.4%) patients were not readmitted within 90 days.

We found no significant differences between the two groups in sex, BMI, smoking status, hypertension, brain disease, kidney and urinary diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, preoperative anemia rate, or surgical methods. The values for age (69.9 ± 5.3 vs. 67.7 ± 5.0, p < 0.001), ASA score (42.0% vs. 24.3%, p < 0.001), surgical segment (1.7 ± 1.0 vs. 1.4 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), surgical time (173.0 ± 56.4 vs. 155.6 ± 41.5, p < 0.001), proportion of preoperative malnutrition (22.3% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), diabetes (13.4% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.002), heart disease (13.4% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.001), respiratory disease (12.7% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), severe osteoporosis (18.5% vs. 11.7%, p < 0.001), and incidental durotomy (9.6% vs. 4.3%, p < 0.001) in the 90-day readmission group were significantly higher than those in the non-readmission group (Table 1).

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Patients’ clinical parameters of the two groups.

Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (p < 0.001, OR: 1.083, 95% CI: 1.050–1.117), ASA score (p < 0.001, OR: 2.264, 95% CI: 1.617–3.168), surgical segment (p < 0.001, OR: 1.579, 95% CI: 1.344–1.855), surgical time (p < 0.001, OR: 1.008, 95% CI: 1.005–1.011), preoperative malnutrition (p < 0.001, OR: 2.669, 95% CI: 1.772–4.018), diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001, OR: 2.126, 95% CI: 1.293–3.497), heart disease (p < 0.001, OR: 3.150, 95% CI: 1.886–5.259), respiratory disease (p = 0.001, OR: 2.392, 95% CI: 1.443–3.993), severe osteoporosis (p = 0.015, OR: 1.703, 95% CI: 1.108–2.617) and incidental durotomy (p = 0.004, OR: 2.378, 95% CI: 1.327–4.258) were associated with 90-day unplanned readmission (Table 2).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Univariate logistic regression analysis of 90 days readmission after primary surgery.

Multivariate logistic analysis showed that age (p = 0.040, OR: 1.040, 95% CI: 1.002–1.079), heart disease (p = 0.021, OR: 1.971, 95% CI: 1.107–3.511), ASA score (p = 0.022, OR: 1.634, 95% CI: 1.074–2.485), surgical segment (p = 0.020, OR: 1.521, 95% CI: 1.067–2.169), preoperative malnutrition (p = 0.028, OR: 1.701, 95% CI: 1.058–2.734), severe osteoporosis (p = 0.029, OR: 1.652, 95% CI: 1.054–2.588), and incidental durotomy (p = 0.012, OR: 2.193, 95% CI: 1.189–4.045) were the risk factors for 90-day unplanned readmission after PLF (Table 3). This suggests that the risk of readmission increased by approximately 4% for each year of age after adjusting for confounding factors, such as diabetes, surgical time, and chronic respiratory diseases. Patients with heart disease showed an approximately 1.971 times higher risk of readmission when compared with those who did not have heart disease. Patients who had an ASA score of 3–4 showed an approximately 1.634 times higher risk for readmission when compared with those who had an ASA score of 1–2. The risk of readmission increased by approximately 52.1% for each additional level of surgical segment. Patients with preoperative malnutrition had a risk of readmission that was approximately 1.701 times higher than that of non-malnourished patients. Patients with severe osteoporosis had a risk of readmission approximately 1.652 times higher than that of patients without severe osteoporosis. Patients who underwent incidental durotomy were readmitted approximately 2.193 times more often than those who did not.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of 90 days readmission after primary surgery.

The factors associated with unplanned readmission within 90 days after the initial surgery included surgery-related factors (56.7%, 89/157) and non-surgery-related factors (43.3%, 68/157). Among surgery-related causes, surgical site infection was the most common (29.3%) (Table 4). Other surgery-related factors included poor wound healing (17.2%), internal fixation failure (3.8%), residual symptoms (3.2%), epidural hematoma (1.9%), and ganglionitis (1.3%). Among non-surgery-related causes, heart disease was the most common (10.2%). Other factors unrelated to surgery included hypertension (1.3%), diabetes (4.5%), brain diseases (3.8%), respiratory diseases (5.7%), gastrointestinal diseases (5.1%), kidney and urinary diseases (3.2%), rheumatoid arthritis (0.6%), additional spinal fractures (5.7%), and cervical spine surgery (3.2%).

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Factors for 90 days readmission after primary surgery.

Discussion

As the aging of the population continues to progress, more and more elderly patients are undergoing OPLF surgery. Unlike previous studies, this study specifically explored the risk factors of 90-day readmission after OPLF in elderly patients in order to better formulate a reasonable treatment strategy for the elderly patients. In this study, we found that 8.6% (157/1826) of the elderly patients experienced unplanned readmission within 90 days after the initial surgery. Moreover, we identified higher age, heart diseases, ASA score (≥ grade 3), higher surgical segment, preoperative malnutrition, severe osteoporosis and incidental durotomy as risk factors for 90-day unplanned readmission.

The effect of age on readmission in patients undergoing spinal surgery was demonstrated in several previous studies (8, 9, 16, 19, 25, 31, 32, 35). A recent retrospective study by Taliaferro et al. (8) found that age > 80 years was a risk factor for readmission to the hospital within 90 days after spinal fusion surgery. Bae et al. (9) found that when compared with young patients, elderly patients had a higher 90-day readmission rate after full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy. Elia et al. (19) also found that the average age of the 90-day readmission group (68.58 years old) was significantly higher than that of the 90-day non-readmission group (61.76 years old) following occipitocervical fusion surgery. In this study, we found that older age was a risk factor for readmission within 90 days after OPLF. The risk of readmission increased by approximately 4% for each year of age. Older age may indicate poorer physical condition (such as anemia and malnutrition), more frequent comorbidities (such as diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, respiratory disease, etc.), and less tolerance to surgery under general anesthesia, leading to higher readmission rates soon after surgery.

Heart disease was associated with readmission after lumbar spine surgery in previous studies (15, 23, 31, 34, 35). Shah et al. (15) found that angina pectoris was a risk factor in 30-day readmission after lumbar spinal fusion. Rubel et al. (23) found that acute myocardial infarction was a risk factor for 90-day readmission after elective primary lumbar spine surgery. A recent systematic review by Chen et al. (31) found that heart failure was associated with readmission within 30 days after surgery for LDD. In the present study, we found that cardiac disease was a risk factor for hospital readmission. Patients with heart disease had an approximately 1.971 times higher risk of readmission than those who did not have heart disease. These findings underscore that surgeons should fully inform patients and not neglect management of heart disease to avoid readmission after surgery.

Higher ASA scores were associated with higher readmission rates in several previous studies (7, 11, 16, 21, 22, 28, 31, 32). Kim et al. (7) found that an ASA score of > 2 could predict 30-day readmission after cervical laminoplasty. Wadhwa et al. (11) found that a higher ASA score was associated with 90-day readmission following lumbar spinal surgery. These studies found that in general, an ASA score ≥ 3 was a risk factor for 30-day or 90-day readmission after spinal surgery. In this study, we found that an ASA score ≥ 3 was a risk factor for readmission after OPLF. Patients with an ASA score of 3–4 had an approximately 1.634 times higher risk of readmission than those with an ASA score of 1–2. This suggests to surgeons that more aggressive preoperative conditioning may be necessary in patients with ASA scores ≥ 3.

Longer surgical segments are also associated with early admission after spinal surgery (8, 29, 31, 33). In this study, the surgical segments and durations in the readmission group were significantly higher than those in the non-readmission group. Multivariate logistic analysis suggested that surgical segment, rather than surgical time, was a risk factor for readmission. The risk of readmission increased by approximately 52.1% for each additional level of surgical segment. This finding could be explained by longer surgical segments resulting in longer surgical times, higher blood loss, trauma, and a higher incidence of complications. The interactions between these factors led to an increase in early readmission rates.

Studies showed that the nutritional status of patients affected the results of spinal surgery during the perioperative period (3941). A recent propensity score study by Elsamadicy et al. (39) found that malnourished patients who underwent lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis had significantly higher rates of adverse events, unplanned readmissions, and longer-term lengths of stay than nourished patients. In this study, we also found that patients with preoperative malnutrition had a risk of readmission that was approximately 1.701 times higher than that of non-malnourished patients. This suggests that correcting malnutrition in elderly patients is crucial before undergoing OPLF surgery.

Previous reports showed that osteoporosis affected the clinical outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery (18, 42, 43). A recent study by Lee et al. (18) found that osteoporosis was significantly associated with higher readmission rates, longer hospital stays, and higher medical costs after spinal surgery. Jain et al. (42) also found that osteoporosis was a risk factor for 30-day readmission after 1–2-level elective posterior lumbar fusions. In our study, severe osteoporosis was significantly associated with 90-day readmission. The risk of readmission in patients with severe osteoporosis was approximately 1.652 times higher than that of patients without severe osteoporosis. In addition, of 157 readmitted patients, 6 (3.8%) had failed internal fixation. These results are a reminder to surgeons of the importance of standardized anti-osteoporosis measures after internal fixation and fusion surgery because severe osteoporosis is a risk factor for screw loosening, proximal junctional kyphosis, and revision surgery.

Incidental durotomy has also been associated with early readmission following spinal surgery in previous studies (30, 44). Rumalla et al. (30) found that incidental durotomy was a risk factor for 30-day readmission after degenerative posterior cervical spine surgery. Kohls et al. (44) found that incidental durotomy was related to 90-day readmission after lumbar discectomy. In this study, we found that patients who underwent incidental durotomy were approximately 2.193 times more likely to be readmitted than those who did not. The main causes included poor wound healing or surgical-site infections caused by incidental durotomy. Consequently, meticulous surgery should be performed on elderly patients to avoid incidental durotomy.

As reported by Lee et al. (10), in elderly patients (> 70-years-old), the reason for readmission within 360 days after degenerative lumbar spine surgery is often more related to non-surgical-site issues rather than those directly related to surgery. In this study, we found that 56.7% (89/159) of readmissions were due to surgery-related factors vs. 43.3% (68/157) to non-surgery-related factors.

These results strongly suggest that surgeons should consider more factors to reduce unplanned readmission rates in elderly patients.

Limitations

First, the retrospective nature of this study might have led to unavoidable biases, such as the selection of cases and surgical methods. Second, although the patients in this study were from two spine centers, the overall volume of data in the study is still limited. Additionally, this retrospective design spanning 14 years (2010–2024) may ignore the substantial evolution in surgical techniques, perioperative care protocols, and patient selection criteria over this period, which may potentially confounding results; temporal trends were acknowledged but not adjusted for. Surgical techniques were not stratified; although PLIF, TLIF, and PLF were grouped under OPLF, outcomes may differ by approach, possibly obscuring specific risk patterns. Additionally, both centers are in China, which may limit generalizability to healthcare systems with different perioperative protocols and discharge practices. Finally, the study did not include all factors, such as some very rare comorbidities including immunodeficiency, thrombocytopenia, Sjogren’s syndrome, uterine prolapse, varicose veins, sarcopenia, pre-operative paraspinal muscle status, etc., as these comorbidities only exist in a very small number of patients. Additionally, the socioeconomic factors such as the patient’s medical insurance type and marital status were not included in this study. Thus, we concluded that these factors should not be considered.

Conclusion

We found that seven risk factors were associated with unplanned readmission within 90 days in elderly patients after undergoing OPLF. These factors included older age, heart diseases, ASA scores ≥ grade 3, higher surgical segments, preoperative malnutrition, severe osteoporosis, and incidental durotomy. This information may assist clinicians in performing better preoperative evaluations resulting in better surgical strategies.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The ethics committee waived the requirement of written informed consent for participation from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Author contributions

H-ZL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. LH: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Project administration.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. GBD 2017 Population and Fertility Collaborators. Population and fertility by age and sex for 195 countries and territories, 1950-2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. (2018) 392:1995–2051. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32278-5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Foreman, KJ, Marquez, N, Dolgert, A, Fukutaki, K, Fullman, N, McGaughey, M, et al. Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016-40 for 195 countries and territories. Lancet. (2018) 392:2052–90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31694-5,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ravindra, VM, Senglaub, SS, Rattani, A, Dewan, MC, Härtl, R, Bisson, E, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Global Spine J. (2018) 8:784–94. doi: 10.1177/2192568218770769,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bae, HW, Rajaee, SS, and Kanim, LE. Nationwide trends in the surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2013) 38:916–26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182833e7c,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Martin, BI, Mirza, SK, Spina, N, Spiker, WR, Lawrence, B, and Brodke, DS. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2019) 44:369–76. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lopez, CD, Boddapati, V, Lombardi, JM, Lee, NJ, Saifi, C, Dyrszka, MD, et al. Recent trends in medicare utilization and reimbursement for lumbar spine fusion and discectomy procedures. Spine J. (2020) 20:1586–94. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.558

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ranti, D, Mikhail, CM, Ranson, W, Cho, B, Warburton, A, Rutland, JW, et al. Risk factors for 90-day readmissions with fluid and electrolyte disorders following posterior lumbar fusion. Spine. (2020) 45:E704–12. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003412,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Taliaferro, K, Rao, A, Theologis, AA, Cummins, D, Callahan, M, and Berven, SH. Rates and risk factors associated with 30-and 90-day readmissions and reoperations after spinal fusions for adult lumbar degenerative pathology and spinal deformity. Spine Deform. (2022) 10:625–37. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00446-9,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bae, J, Ifthekar, S, Lee, SH, Shin, SH, Keum, HJ, Choi, YS, et al. Risk factors for ninety-day readmissions following full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy for 1542 patients in the biggest spine institutes in Korea. Eur Spine J. (2023) 32:2875–81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07662-z,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Lee, JJ, An, SB, Kim, TW, Shin, DA, Yi, S, Kim, KN, et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with hospital readmission within 360 days after degenerative lumbar spine surgery in elderly patients. World Neurosurg. (2019) 126:e196–207. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.293,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wadhwa, RK, Ohya, J, Vogel, TD, Carreon, LY, Asher, AL, Knightly, JJ, et al. Risk factors for 30-day reoperation and 3-month readmission: analysis from the quality and outcomes database lumbar spine registry. J Neurosurg Spine. (2017) 27:131–6. doi: 10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16714

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Bernatz, JT, and Anderson, PA. Thirty-day readmission rates in spine surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus. (2015) 39:E7. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS1534,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mohanty, S, Lad, MK, Casper, D, Sheth, NP, and Saifi, C. The impact of social determinants of health on 30 and 90-day readmission rates after spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. (2022) 104:412–20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00496,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shah, KC, Dominy, C, Tang, J, Geng, E, Arvind, V, Pasik, S, et al. Significance of hospital size in outcomes of single-level elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a nationwide readmissions database analysis. World Neurosurg. (2021) 155:e687–94. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.122,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Shah, AA, Devana, SK, Lee, C, Bugarin, A, Lord, EL, Shamie, AN, et al. Prediction of major complications and readmission after lumbar spinal fusion: a machine learning-driven approach. World Neurosurg. (2021) 152:e227–34. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.080,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kuris, EO, Veeramani, A, McDonald, CL, DiSilvestro, KJ, Zhang, AS, Cohen, EM, et al. Predicting readmission after anterior, posterior, and posterior interbody lumbar spinal fusion: a neural network machine learning approach. World Neurosurg. (2021) 151:e19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.114,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Badiee, RK, Chan, AK, Rivera, J, Molinaro, A, Chou, D, Mummaneni, PV, et al. Smoking is an independent risk factor for 90-day readmission and reoperation following posterior cervical decompression and fusion. Neurosurgery. (2021) 88:1088–94. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa593,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lee, CK, Choi, SK, An, SB, Ha, Y, Yoon, SH, Kim, I, et al. Influence of osteoporosis following spine surgery on reoperation, readmission, and economic costs: An 8-year Nationwide population-based study in Korea. World Neurosurg. (2021) 149:e360–8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.021,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Elia, C, Takayanagi, A, Arvind, V, Goodmanson, R, von Glinski, A, Pierre, C, et al. Risk factors associated with 90-day readmissions following Occipitocervical fusion-a Nationwide readmissions database study. World Neurosurg. (2021) 147:e247–54. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.031,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Fields, MW, Lee, NJ, Hong, DY, Para, A, Boddapati, V, Mathew, J, et al. Cervical spinal fusion in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a national analysis of complications and 90-day readmissions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2021) 46:E23–30. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003753,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Oh, TK, Ryu, JH, Han, JWO, Koo, CH, and Jeon, YT. Factors associated with a 30-day unplanned readmission after elective spine surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. (2021) 30:191–9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06541-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Elsamadicy, AA, Ren, X, Kemeny, H, Charalambous, L, Sergesketter, AR, Rahimpour, S, et al. Independent associations with 30-and 90-day unplanned readmissions after elective lumbar spine surgery: a national trend analysis of 144 123 patients. Neurosurgery. (2019) 84:758–67. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy215

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rubel, NC, Chung, AS, Wong, M, Lara, NJ, Makovicka, JL, Arvind, V, et al. 90-day readmission in elective primary lumbar spine surgery in the inpatient setting: a nationwide readmissions database sample analysis. Spine. (2019) 44:E857–64. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002995

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Elia, CJ, Arvind, V, Brazdzionis, J, von Glinski, A, Schell, BA, Pierre, CA, et al. 90-day readmission rates for single level anterior lumbosacral interbody fusion: a Nationwide readmissions database analysis. Spine. (2020) 45:E864–70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003443,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wang, A, Si, F, Wang, T, Yuan, S, Fan, N, du, P, et al. Early readmission and reoperation after percutaneous Transforaminal endoscopic decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence and risk factors. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. (2022) 15:2233–42. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S388020,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Puvanesarajah, V, Nourbakhsh, A, Hassanzadeh, H, Shimer, AL, Shen, FH, and Singla, A. Readmission rates, reasons, and risk factors in elderly patients treated with lumbar fusion for degenerative pathology. Spine. (2016) 41:1933–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001631,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Puvanesarajah, V, Hassanzadeh, H, Shimer, AL, Shen, FH, and Singla, A. Readmission rates, reasons, and risk factors following anterior cervical fusion for cervical spondylosis in patients above 65 years of age. Spine. (2017) 42:78–84. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001663

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Schafer, E, Bazydlo, M, Schultz, L, Park, P, Chang, V, Easton, RW, et al. Rates and risk factors associated with 90-day readmission following cervical spine fusion surgery: analysis of the Michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC) registry. Spine J. (2020) 20:708–16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.01.003,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Patel, V, Metz, A, Schultz, L, Nerenz, D, Park, P, Chang, V, et al. Rates and reasons for reoperation within 30 and 90 days following cervical spine surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis of the Michigan spine surgery improvement collaborative (MSSIC) registry. Spine J. (2023) 23:116–23. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.005,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Rumalla, K, Smith, KA, and Arnold, PM. National Rates, causes, risk factors, and outcomes associated with 30-day and 90-day readmissions following degenerative posterior cervical spine surgery utilizing the Nationwide readmissions database. Neurosurgery. (2017) 81:740–51. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyx063,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Chen, LY, Chang, Y, Wong, CE, Chi, KY, Lee, JS, Huang, CC, et al. Risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmission following surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review. Global Spine J. (2023) 13:563–74. doi: 10.1177/21925682221116823,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Pugely, AJ, Martin, CT, Gao, Y, and Mendoza-Lattes, S. Causes and risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (2014) 39:761–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000270

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wang, MC, Shivakoti, M, Sparapani, RA, Guo, C, Laud, PW, and Nattinger, AB. Thirty-day readmissions after elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions among US Medicare beneficiaries. Spine J. (2012) 12:902–11. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.09.051,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Mueller, KB, Hou, Y, Beach, K, and Griffin, LP. Development and validation of a point-of-care clinical risk score to predict surgical site complication-associated readmissions following open spine surgery. J Spine Surg. (2024) 10:40–54. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-89,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Wang, D, Liao, W, Hu, H, Lei, X, Zheng, X, and Jin, D. Risk factors for ninety-day readmission following cervical surgery: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. (2022) 17:477. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03377-x,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Akamnonu, C, Cheriyan, T, Goldstein, JA, Lafage, V, Errico, TJ, and Bendo, JA. Unplanned hospital readmission after surgical treatment of common lumbar pathologies: rates and causes. Spine. (2015) 40:423–8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000759

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Karamian, B, Kothari, P, Toci, G, Lambrechts, MJ, Canseco, J, Mao, J, et al. Effect of drain duration and output on perioperative outcomes and readmissions after lumbar spine surgery. Asian Spine J. (2023) 17:262–71. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0073,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Sastry, RA, Hagan, M, Feler, J, Abdulrazeq, H, Walek, K, Sullivan, PZ, et al. Time of discharge and 30-day re-presentation to an acute care setting after elective lumbar decompression surgery. Neurosurgery. (2023) 92:507–14. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002233

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Elsamadicy, AA, Havlik, J, Reeves, BC, Koo, AB, Sherman, J, Lo, SFL, et al. Effects of preoperative nutritional status on complications and readmissions after posterior lumbar decompression and fusion for spondylolisthesis: a propensity-score analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. (2021) 211:107017. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107017,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. He, Z, Zhou, K, Tang, K, Quan, Z, Liu, S, and Su, B. Perioperative hypoalbuminemia is a risk factor for wound complications following posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. (2020) 15:538. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02051-4,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Yang, YF, Yu, JC, Xiao, Z, Kang, YJ, and Zhou, B. Role of pre-operative nutrition status on surgical site infection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study. Surg Infect. (2023) 24:942–8. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.051,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Jain, D, Singh, P, Kardile, M, and Berven, SH. A validated preoperative score for predicting 30-day readmission after 1-2 level elective posterior lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J. (2019) 28:1690–6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05937-y,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lechtholz-Zey, EA, Gettleman, BS, Ayad, M, Mills, ES, Shelby, H, Ton, A, et al. The effect of osteoporosis on complications and reoperation rates after surgical management of adult thoracolumbar spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta analysis. Glob Spine J. (2024) 14:21925682241250031. doi: 10.1177/21925682241250031,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Kohls, MR, Jain, N, and Khan, SN. What are the rates, reasons, and risk factors of 90-day hospital readmission after lumbar discectomy?: an institutional experience. Clin Spine Surg. (2018) 31:E375–80. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000672,

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: elderly, lumbar degenerative diseases, open posterior lumbar fusion, readmission within 90 days, risk factors

Citation: Lyu H-Z and Hu L (2026) Risk factors for 90-day unplanned readmission after open posterior lumbar fusion in the elderly. Front. Neurol. 16:1653957. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1653957

Received: 25 June 2025; Revised: 09 December 2025; Accepted: 10 December 2025;
Published: 13 January 2026.

Edited by:

Amir Faisal, Sumatra Institute of Technology, Indonesia

Reviewed by:

Daniela Burguêz, Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Brazil
Amir Fayyazi, St. Luke's University Health Network, United States

Copyright © 2026 Lyu and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lang Hu, SGxhbmc4NjEwMTBAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.