ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Neurorehabilitation
This article is part of the Research TopicRehabilitation of Mechanically Ventilated and Tracheostomized PatientsView all 10 articles
Weaning in early neurological-neurosurgical rehabilitation in Germany (NurBeat) – Results from a Nationwide online survey
Provisionally accepted- 1Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- 2Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- 3VAMED Klinik Schloss Pulsnitz GmbH, Pulsnitz, Germany
- 4Rheinisch-Westfalische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- 5Bezirksklinikum Mainkofen, Deggendorf, Germany
- 6Jade Hochschule - Studienort Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- 7Deutsche Gesellschaft für Atmungstherapie (DGA) e.V., Oldenburg, Germany
- 8BDH-Klinik Greifswald gGmbH, Greifswald, Germany
- 9Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurorehabilitation (DGNR) e.V., Bonn, Germany
- 10Universitat Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
- 11MEDIAN Clinic Bad Tennstedt, Bad Tennstedt, Germany
- 12Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Gesellschaft für Außerklinische Beatmung und Intensivversorgung (DIGAB) e.V.), Göttingen, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background In Germany, on approximately 1100 beds early neurological-neurosurgical rehabilitation (ENNR) is provided to patients with neurological illness needing weaning from mechanical ventilation. Institutions specialized in weaning in ENNR contribute to maintain ICU capacities in acute care hospitals and to reduce the number of patients needing home intensive care. Nationwide structural data on ENNR weaning centers – combined with detailed patient characteristics – are lacking, creating challenges for healthcare planning, resource allocation, and understanding national weaning capacity. Methods In June 2022, an online survey to collect structural data on institutions and wards and cross-sectional clinical data from mechanically ventilated neurological patients was sent to the members of the weaning commission of the DGNR, to participants of a preceding study, and to institutions recruited by personal communication. Findings Data from 24 institutions, 46 wards and 182 patients were recorded. Institutions showed wide variability in diagnostic and therapeutic resources, but most relied on multidisciplinary teams and intensive monitoring, reflecting the high medical complexity of this population. The most frequent primary diagnoses were ischemic stroke (n=27, 15%), intracerebral hemorrhage (n=21, 12%), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (n=12, 7%), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (n=12, 7%). The most frequent comorbidities were coronary heart disease (n=40, 22%), left ventricular failure (37, 20%), and COPD (37, 20%). Mechanical ventilation was predominantly invasive (n=180, 99%), and the median number of days on mechanical ventilation during the stay in ENNR was 22 (IQR 9 – 41) days, and the median duration of ventilation was 18 (IQR 10-24) hours during the last 24h before data collection. Fourteen (8%) patients needed renal replacement therapy. Palliative limitations of therapy were implemented in n=22 (12%). Interpretation Institutions providing weaning in ENNR commonly treat older, medically complex patients who have been pretreated in acute intensive care units and who present with severe neurological illness and cardiopulmonary comorbidities. Multidisciplinary teams deliver rehabilitation, intensive care, and palliative care to meet their needs.
Keywords: Decannulation, earlyneurological-neurosurgicalrehabilitation, Mechanicalventilation, neurocritical care, neurointensive care, Weaning
Received: 06 Sep 2025; Accepted: 05 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Summ, Frers, Klausen, Otto-Sobotka, Pohl, Röhrig, Schmidt-Wilcke, Schröder, Timmer, Weigel, Platz and Groß. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Martin Groß
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
