Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Neurotrauma

A Prognostic Model for Long-Term Outcome in Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Multimodal Neuromonitoring: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Provisionally accepted
Yang  LiYang Li1Kanglin  LIiuKanglin LIiu1XiaoPing  HeXiaoPing He1Yixin  LinYixin Lin2,3Yuan  MaYuan Ma1*
  • 1The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
  • 2Pu'er People's Hospital, Pu'er, China
  • 3Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) remains a leading cause of long-term disability and mortality. While multimodal neuromonitoring (MMM) provides real-time insights into cerebral pathophysiology, its integration into prognostic models for long-term outcomes requires further validation. Objective: To develop and evaluate a prognostic model for 6-month neurological outcomes in msTBI patients using acute-phase multimodal monitoring parameters, clinical variables, and comorbidities. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 143 adult patients with msTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 4–12) who underwent multimodal intracranial monitoring (ICP, CPP, PbtO₂, and cerebral microdialysis) for ≥48 hours at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital between June 2022 and May 2025. Demographic, clinical, and monitoring data from the first 5 days were collected. The primary outcome was neurological function at 6 months, assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE), dichotomized as favorable (GOSE 5–8) or unfavorable (GOSE 1–4). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors, and a prognostic model was constructed and internally validated using ROC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Results: Of 143 patients, 86 (60.1%) had favorable outcomes and 57 (39.9%) had unfavorable outcomes (including 29 deaths). Independent predictors of unfavorable outcome were: older age (adjusted OR 1.055 per year, 95% CI: 1.015–1.098), lower admission GCS (OR 0.713, 95% CI: 0.537–0.947), elevated lactate/pyruvate ratio (LPR) (OR 1.129 per unit, 95% CI: 1.044–1.220), reduced brain tissue oxygen tension (PbtO₂) (OR 0.842 per mmHg, 95% CI: 0.730–0.972), and pre-existing coronary heart disease (OR 3.866, 95% CI: 0.998–14.976). The final model demonstrated excellent discriminative performance with an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI: 0.820–0.944) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.523). A dose-response relationship was observed between the number of abnormal monitoring parameters and risk of poor outcome. Conclusion: A prognostic model incorporating multimodal neuromonitoring parameters (LPR and PbtO₂), age, admission GCS, and coronary heart disease accurately predicts 6-month outcomes in msTBI patients. These findings support the clinical utility of integrated neuromonitoring for early risk stratification and personalized neurocritical care.

Keywords: Traumatic Brain Injury, multimodal monitoring, Prognostic model, brain tissue oxygen, Lactate/pyruvate ratio, Glasgow outcome scale-extended

Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 09 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Li, LIiu, He, Lin and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yuan Ma

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.