ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Pediatric Neurology

Safety and Effectiveness of Diazepam Nasal Spray in Patients with Rett Syndrome and Seizure Clusters: Post Hoc Analyses from a Long-Term Safety Study and Survey of Severity and Burden

  • 1. Center for Rare Neurological Diseases LLC, Norcross, United States

  • 2. Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, United States

  • 3. The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, United States

  • 4. Hackensack Meridian Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, United States

  • 5. Northeast Regional Epilepsy Group, New York, United States

  • 6. Neurelis, Inc, San Diego, United States

  • 7. Florida Atlantic University Charles E Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, United States

  • 8. University of Hawai'i at Manoa John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, United States

  • 9. Neurelis Inc, San Diego, United States

Article metrics

View details

224

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Introduction: Rett syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with epilepsy that influences motor/communication skills, behavior, and other systems. Clinical experiences for these patients are not well described. Methods: This post hoc analysis consists of a patient subgroup with Rett syndrome enrolled in an open-label, single-arm, safety study. Age-and weight-based doses of diazepam nasal spray (5–20 mg) were administered to patients (aged 6-65 years) for seizure clusters. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded, and days between seizure clusters (SEIzure interVAL [SEIVAL]) from Period 1 (P1; days 1–90) to Period 4 (P4; days 271–360) were calculated. Caregivers completed surveys describing experiences with diazepam nasal spray and Rett syndrome. Results: Rates of TEAEs (87.5%), serious TEAEs (12.5%), and treatment-related TEAEs (18.8%) in patients with Rett syndrome (n=16) who received diazepam nasal spray were comparable to the overall pediatric safety population (87.2%, 35.9%, and 14.1%, respectively; n=78), as was use of second doses (proxy for effectiveness) (18.4% and 11.4%). Increase in SEIVAL was also similar (P1=7.6, P4=25.0 days and P1=13.0, P4=25.9 days). Most (n=12; 75.0%) remained in the study ≥12 months. All caregivers felt diazepam nasal spray was very/extremely easy to use; 63.6% were able to return to normal activities within an hour of administration. Caregiver perceptions of clinical severity and caregiver affect were stable from baseline to final visits; scores for individuals using diazepam nasal spray were numerically higher. Conclusion: Diazepam nasal spray has safety and effectiveness profiles consistent with the full study population and was easy to use.

Summary

Keywords

caregiver, developmental epileptic encephalopathy, Natural variability, questionnaire, Rescue therapy, SEIVAL, Seizure clusters

Received

09 September 2025

Accepted

29 January 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Tarquinio, Wheless, Segal, Rabinowicz and Carrazana. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Daniel Tarquinio

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics