ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Stroke

Correlation between blood pressure variability and prognosis of endovascular therapy in ischemic stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion

  • 1. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China

  • 2. Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China

  • 3. Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Article metrics

View details

68

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of post-endovascular therapy (EVT) systolic, diastolic, and pulse pressure variability on 3-month functional outcomes in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion. Methods: Patients were classified as having good (mRS 0–2) or poor (mRS 3–6) 90-day outcomes. We compared 48-hour postoperative BP parameters and BPV indices (SD, CV, and ARV). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, baseline NIHSS, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and pre-stroke mRS was used to examine associations between BPV and outcome. Results: The average real variability of systolic blood pressure (SBPARV: 10.08 vs. 7.89, P<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (DBPARV: 8.42 vs. 7.87, P=0.006), and pulse pressure (PPARV: 11.00 vs. 8.26, P<0.001) were significantly higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group. Multivariable logistic regression showed that SBPARV (OR = 2.619, 95% CI 1.606–4.271; P < 0.001) and PPARV (PPARV: 11.00 vs. 8.26, P<0.001) were independently associated with poor prognosis at 3 months. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort, higher postoperative SBP ARV and PP ARV were independently associated with poor 90-day functional outcome after EVT; however, given the small sample size and observational design, the predictive value of BPV parameters is likely limited. BPV may be an epiphenomenon of more severe stroke rather than a causal determinant or clinically actionable target.

Summary

Keywords

blood pressure variability, endovascular treatment, Mechanical thrombectomy, Outcome, Stroke

Received

18 October 2025

Accepted

09 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Tao, Li, Liu, Fan, Zhong, Wang, Yang, Yu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Neng-Wei Yu; Bing-Hu Li

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics