ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurol., 04 February 2026

Sec. Stroke

Volume 17 - 2026 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1738518

Nomogram to predict symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis-related large-vessel occlusion

  • Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Article metrics

View details

371

Views

28

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

Despite significant advancements in endovascular treatment (EVT) over the past decade, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) persists as a serious complication, especially in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) related to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), which is characterized by complex and calcified plaques. The present study aimed to develop a predictive nomogram for assessing the risk of sICH in AIS patients with ICAS and large-vessel occlusion (LVO) who undergo EVT.

Methods:

We analyzed data from 183 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion (ICAS-LVO) who underwent endovascular treatment (EVT) between January 2022 and December 2023. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). A nomogram was developed based on a multivariable logistic regression model, and the calibration of the model was evaluated using Spiegelhalter’s Z-test.

Results:

In our developed nomogram, elevated D-dimer levels (odds ratio [OR] 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53–5.39; p = 0.001), longer onset-to-recanalization time (OR 1.00; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01; p = 0.004), and larger core infarct volume (OR 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.06; p = 0.002) were identified as independent predictors of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT). The goodness-of-fit of the model was confirmed by a non-significant Spiegelhalter’s Z-test (p = 0.941).

Conclusion:

A nomogram integrating D-dimer levels, onset-to-recanalization time, and core infarct volume offers a reliable and practical method for estimating the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular therapy.

Introduction

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion (ICAS-LVO) presents unique technical challenges. The presence of complex and calcified atherosclerotic plaques often complicates the achievement of successful recanalization. Despite significant advancements in EVT over the past decade, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) remains a serious complication that contributes to poor clinical outcomes (1, 2).

Intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH) location strongly influences both clinical manifestations, prognosis and etiology (3–5). Acute spontaneous lobar intracerebral hemorrhages present a more severe early prognosis compared to deep subcortical hemorrhages (5). Furthermore, the underlying causes exhibit location specificity, with lobar hemorrhages showing a higher association with non-hypertensive vascular pathologies than deep hemorrhages (5).

The complexity of ICAS lesions may increase the risk of sICH following mechanical thrombectomy (MT), making this issue a key concern in clinical practice. sICH is a devastating event, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting an incidence rate of approximately 4.4% (6). However, real-world data suggest that the incidence of sICH may be higher than that observed in clinical trials (7–10). Given these risks, identifying independent predictors of sICH is crucial for optimizing peri-procedural management in patients with LVO.

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical and procedural factors associated with sICH in patients with ICAS-LVO undergoing EVT. A comprehensive understanding of these factors may facilitate the optimization of treatment strategies and enhance clinical decision-making when managing this complex patient population.

Methods

Population and data collection

We conducted a retrospective analysis using prospectively collected data from a comprehensive stroke center, covering the period from January 2022 to December 2023. Informed consent was obtained from patients or their proxies. Eligible participants were those diagnosed with ICAS-LVO stroke, with a time from onset to treatment of less than 24 h, aged 18 years or older, and having a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 5 or higher. Additionally, patients needed to have a premorbid modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 3 or lower. We excluded patients if their occlusion was not due to ICAS-LVO.

Data collection

We collected baseline clinical data including demographics, medical history, NIHSS score, core infarct volume (measured using automated software), and time metrics such as time from symptom onset to groin puncture, time to recanalization, and total procedure duration. Other key data points included the site of occlusion, recanalization outcomes, occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), rescue treatment procedures, and clinical outcomes at 3 months. Two interventional neurologists independently assessed the etiology of the occlusion during the procedure, relying on patient history, risk factors, and angiographic features. Intracranial atherosclerotic disease(ICAD)-related occlusion was defined as either (1) > 70% fixed stenosis at the occlusion site or (2) mild stenosis with reduced blood flow or re-occlusion tendencies observed during the procedure or final angiography.

Diagnosis of SICH

sICH was diagnosed according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification, based on the following criteria: (1) a total NIHSS score increase of ≥4 points compared to pre-worsening scores, (2) a ≥ 2 point increase in a single NIHSS category, (3) the need for intubation, hemicraniectomy, extraventricular drainage, or other significant interventions, (4) absence of alternative explanations for clinical deterioration, and (5) the presence of parenchymal hemorrhage type 2, even if the ischemic infarction contributed to the worsening condition.

Outcome measures

Clinical prognosis was evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 months, with functional independence defined as an mRS score of 2 or lower. A favorable outcome was defined as an mRS score of 3 or lower. Reperfusion was measured using the modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) scale, with successful reperfusion defined as a score of 2b, 2c, or 3.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR 25–75) and compared using the Mann–Whitney U test where applicable. Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages, and analyzed using either the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. We used LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) logistic regression to identify potential predictive factors, followed by multivariate logistic regression to determine significant predictors. Odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were reported. A nomogram was created to visually represent the predictive model, and model fit was assessed using Spiegelhalter’s Z-test. Finally, decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the model’s clinical utility. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (Version 4.4.1,1) with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

A total of 183 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were included in the study. Among them, 22 patients developed sICH, while 161 did not. Table 1 presents the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of patients grouped by sICH and non-sICH. Patients who developed sICH were older (67 vs. 64 years old), had significantly higher D-Dimer levels (1.18 vs. 0.82), higher NIHSS scores at admission (22 vs. 15), larger infarct core volumes (21.9 mL vs. 10.0 mL), longer onset-to-recanalization times (713 min vs. 510 min), and a greater proportion of unfavorable outcomes (mRS 3–6) (81.8% vs. 41.0%).

Table 1

Variables sICH group (n = 22) Non-sICH group (n = 161) p
Age (years, median, IQR) 67.0 (64.8–73.3) 64.0 (56.5–71.0) 0.017
Sex (n/%) 1.0
Male 18 (81.8) 133 (82.6)
Female 4 (18.2) 28 (17.4)
History of hypertension (n/%) 12 (54.5) 67 (41.6) 0.262
History of diabetes (n/%) 6 (27.3) 23 (14.3) 0.126
History of coronary heart disease (n/%) 4 (18.2) 11 (6.8) 0.088
History of atrial fibrillation (n/%) 1(4.5) 2 (1.2) 0.321
History of cerebrovascular disease (n/%) 3 (13.6) 19 (11.8) 0.733
History of smoking history 12 (54.5) 82 (50.9) 0.750
TT (median, IQR) 16.1 (15.7–16.5) 16.5 (15.8–17.7) 0.187
PT (median, IQR) 12.3 (11.7–12.7) 12.7 (11.8–13.1) 0.082
INR (median, IQR) 1.04 (1.01–1.09) 1.01 (1.00–1.02) 0.298
APTT (median, IQR) 29.8 (26.9–38.8) 27.2 (25.6–32.4) 0.597
FIB (median, IQR) 288.8 (266.8–483.9) 294.3 (244.8–373.7) 0.359
D-Dimer (median, IQR) 1.18 (0.83–3.82) 0.82 (0.45–1.52) <0.001
WBC (median, IQR) 9.05 (7.62–13.45) 7.96 (7.38–11.09) 0.270
PLT (median, IQR) 188.0 (156.0–222.0) 203.0 (179.0–234.0) 0.543
IV tPA (n/%) 2 (9.1) 9 (5.6) 0.625
NHISS score (median, IQR) 22 (15–26) 15 (10–22) 0.003
Core infarcted volume (mL, median, IQR) 21.9 (10–71.3) 10.0 (0–30.0) <0.001
Onset-to-recanalisation time (min, median, IQR) 713.0 (581.3–839.3) 510.0 (360.0–751.5) 0.012
Occlusion site (n/%) 0.798
ICA 12 (54.5) 77 (47.8)
MCA 5 (22.7) 48 (29.8)
VA-BA 5 (22.7) 36 (22.4)
mTICI (n/%) 1.0
0-2a 2 (9.1) 17 (10.6)
2b-3 20 (90.6) 144 (89.4)
Rescue treatment (n/%) 0.949
Tirofiban 5 (22.7) 33 (20.5)
Balloon angioplasty 4 (18.2) 28 (17.4)
Stent angioplasty 11 (50.0) 100 (62.1)
mRS score of 3 months after operation (n/%) <0.001
0–2 4 (18.2) 95 (59.0)
3–6 18 (81.8) 66 (41.0)

Characteristics of all patients.

IQR, Interquartile range; NIHSS, National institutes of health stroke scale; TT, Thrombin time; PT, Prothrombin time; INR, International normalized ratio; FIB, Fibrinogen; APTT, Activated partial thromboplastin time; WBC, White blood cells; PLT, Platelets. IA, intra-arterial; ICA, internal carotid artery; ICH, intracranial hemorrhage; INR, international normalized ratio; IV tPA, intravenous tissue plasminogen activator; MCA, middle cerebral artery; NIHSS, national institutes of health stroke scale.

Among the 22 patients with sICH, IVH was observed in 11 cases (50.0%). At the 3-month follow-up, poor functional outcome (mRS score 4–6) was observed in 9 of these 11 patients with IVH (81.8%). In contrast, among the 11 patients without IVH, 4 (36.3%) had a poor outcome. Prognosis did not differ significantly among these groups (p = 0.091).

AS for sICH location, we observed 27.3% (6/22) cases of lobar, 36.4%(8/22) of deep subcortical, and 36.4%(8/22) of combined (both locations) hemorrhage. No significant difference in prognosis was observed among the groups (p = 0.450).

A total of 27 patients (14.7%) died during the study. Mortality was higher in the sICH group (8/22, 36.4%) than in the non-sICH group (19/161, 11.8%). In the sICH group, 4 in-hospital deaths were all due to cerebral herniation. Among the 4 deaths during the 3-month follow-up, causes included pneumonia (n = 2), cardiac disease (n = 1), and malignant cerebral edema secondary to recurrent infarction (n = 1). In the non-sICH group, there were 3 in-hospital deaths from heart failure and 16 deaths during follow-up, primarily from pneumonia (n = 9) and cardiac disease (n = 7).

Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified D-Dimer (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.53–5.39, p = 0.001), onset-to-recanalization time (OR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00–1.01, p = 0.004), and core infarct volume (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.06, p = 0.002) as independent predictors of sICH (Table 2). The multivariate analysis demonstrated a positive predictive value of 83.3%, a negative predictive value of 95.7%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 94.5%.

Table 2

Variables OR 95% CI p-value
D—dimer 2.87 1.53–5.39 0.001
Onset-to-recanalisation time 1.00 1.00–1.01 0.004
Core infarcted volume 1.04 1.01–1.06 0.002

Multivariable logistic regression for unfavorable prognosis.

OR, Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.

Identification of significant predictors for sICH following EVT

To identify the key predictors of unfavorable outcomes following EVT, the LASSO logistic regression algorithm was applied. This method selected the most significant predictive factors from the variables listed in Table 1. Twenty-two factors with non-zero coefficients were selected based on the optimal lambda value (Figure 1). Finally, eight factors were included in the final model: thrombin time, fibrinogen, white blood cell count, age, D-Dimer, onset-to-recanalization time, core infarct volume, and NIHSS score at admission. These factors were subsequently analyzed through multivariable regression.

Figure 1

Calibration plot comparing actual and predicted probabilities with an ideal diagonal line indicating perfect calibration. The plot includes a logistic calibration curve and a nonparametric curve. Metrics such as Dxy, C (ROC), and Brier are listed with corresponding values, indicating model performance. The logistic calibration closely follows the ideal line, suggesting good model calibration.

Factor selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. The LASSO coefficient profiles of the 22 candidate variables. The LASSO regression analysis.

We then constructed a nomogram model to estimate the likelihood of sICH. Each independent predictor was assigned a score between 0 and 100, with the total score representing the overall probability of developing sICH. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 130 points (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Nomogram for assessing stroke risk based on variables like D-Dimer levels, onset-to-recanalization time, and infarcted core size. Points accumulate to predict sICH risk, ranging from 0.1 to 0.9.

Nomogram for predicting the probability of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy.

Performance and validation of the nomogram

The calibration curve for the nomogram predicting unfavorable prognosis in stroke patients showed strong agreement with actual outcomes (Figure 3). The Spiegelhalter’s Z-test indicated no significant deviation from a perfect fit (p = 0.941), and the Brier score was 0.047, indicating that the nomogram closely aligned with the ideal predictive model. Figure 4 demonstrates that when the risk threshold ranged from 5 to 90%, the nomogram offered a net benefit in predicting sICH after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) compared to treating all or none of the AIS patients.

Figure 3

Chart showing net benefit against risk threshold. The red line represents "Prediction.Nomogram," showing a decrease as risk threshold increases. The green dashed line for "All" decreases linearly, while the blue dashed line for "None" remains constant at zero.

The calibration plot of the nomogram for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage of stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

Figure 4

A line plot shows mean-squared error against the logarithm of lambda values. Red dots represent errors with vertical lines indicating variability. Error decreases and reaches a minimum around Log(lambda) of -4, then increases.

Decision curve analysis (DCA) of the nomogram. x-axis, the threshold probability; y-axis, the net benefit.

Discussion

In this retrospective study, we developed a nomogram incorporating onset-to-recanalization time, core infarct volume, and D-Dimer levels to predict the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with ICAS-LVO following endovascular treatment (EVT). The clinical utility of this model was validated through decision curve analysis (DCA), which demonstrated significant net benefit within specific probability ranges. Early prediction of sICH is crucial for optimizing EVT in ICAS-LVO patients, and this nomogram provides a valuable tool for clinicians to guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes.

Previous studies have shown that the incidence of sICH after thrombectomy is higher in real-world settings than in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (7–10). This is particularly true for patients with ICAS-LVO, where the complexity of ICAS lesions often poses challenges for neurointerventionalists, resulting in longer procedure durations (11, 12). Our study confirmed that longer onset-to-recanalization times are a significant predictor of sICH. This reflects the technical difficulties encountered during EVT for ICAS, as more attempts are often required to achieve successful recanalization. Our findings align with those of Kass-Hout et al. (13) who reported that longer procedure times are independently associated with sICH in patients undergoing thrombectomy for LVO stroke. To minimize the risk of sICH, it is essential to select the most appropriate techniques and devices to reduce procedure duration while achieving effective recanalization.

In our study, baseline infarct core volume also emerged as an independent predictor of sICH. This result is consistent with recent studies that reported an increased risk of sICH in patients with large infarct cores despite the benefits of EVT (14–16). Prior to these RCTs, studies using the ASPECTS score to measure infarct core found that a low ASPECTS score was a predictor of sICH after EVT (7, 17, 18). Several factors may explain why larger infarct cores increase the risk of sICH: reperfusion syndrome due to the rupture of necrotic vessel walls, and increased blood–brain barrier permeability caused by large infarct and edema volumes (19). These conditions are more likely to occur in patients with larger infarct cores, increasing the risk of complications like sICH, which can worsen clinical outcomes. Therefore, the risk–benefit ratio of thrombectomy must be carefully considered in patients with larger infarct cores.

Interestingly, we also found that D-Dimer levels were an independent predictor of sICH. D-Dimer is present in negligible amounts in healthy individuals but rises significantly in patients experiencing thrombotic or hyperfibrinolytic activity (20, 21). Previous studies have linked high D-Dimer levels with thrombotic diseases and stroke (22). Its dual role in hypercoagulation and subsequent fibrinolysis may contribute to hemorrhagic transformation in AIS patients after thrombectomy. Elevated baseline D-Dimer levels may indicate ongoing microthrombosis in the microcirculation of the occluded vessel, leading to extensive activation of the coagulation system, hyperfibrinolysis, and coagulopathic disturbances (23). This finding suggests that D-Dimer levels could be useful for early prediction of hemorrhagic transformation, and may aid in perioperative management by informing decisions on thrombectomy attempts, procedure timing, and the use of antithrombotic or anticoagulant therapies.

Multiple studies have established that the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is independently associated with increased mortality and poorer functional outcomes (24–26). Furthermore, IVH is closely linked to hematoma expansion (HE), a well-recognized predictor of unfavorable prognosis. Evidence also indicates that the detection of IVH on follow-up CT scans independently correlates with early hematoma expansion (27). In our study, patients with IVH extension exhibited a trend of poorer prognosis, which is consistent with previous research (24–26). Future studies could conduct more in-depth analyses by incorporating factors such as IVH severity scores.

This study has several limitations. First, it was a single-center, retrospective study with a relatively small sample size, which limits the generalizability of the findings to other populations and settings. A multicenter, prospective trial is necessary to validate the accuracy of the model. Second, not all potential risk factors were included in the analysis, meaning that additional predictors could enhance the model. Future studies should explore other parameters and investigate whether integrating additional biomarkers could improve the nomogram’s accuracy. Finally, while our study used prospectively collected data and the model showed good discriminative performance, external validation is needed to further assess its robustness and applicability in broader clinical settings.

Future research could integrate multi-omics data—such as genomic, proteomic, or metabolomic profiling of patients—to identify specific biomarkers associated with the occurrence of sICH. Furthermore, in-depth exploration of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and differentiation among hemorrhage subtypes may help develop more targeted prevention and management strategies tailored to sICH resulting from distinct etiological pathways.

Conclusion

A novel nomogram incorporating onset-to-recanalization time, core infarct volume, and D-dimer levels has demonstrated the ability to predict sICH in AIS patients with ICAS-LVO treated with EVT. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further validate the effectiveness of this predictive tool.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not publicly available because they are intended for academic research only. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to HY, .

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

HY: Data curation, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. HZ: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. JJ: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. YuW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Data curation. TL: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Investigation. HL: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Data curation. YaW: Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Investigation.

Funding

The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.

    Mazya M Egido JA Ford GA Lees KR Mikulik R Toni D et al . Predicting the risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in ischemic stroke treated with intravenous alteplase: safe implementation of treatments in stroke (SITS) symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage risk score. Stroke. (2012) 43:1524–31. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.644815

  • 2.

    Valentino F Gentile L Terruso V Mastrilli S Aridon P Ragonese P et al . Frequency and determinants for hemorrhagic transformation of posterior cerebral stroke: posterior ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic transformation. BMC Res Notes. (2017) 10:592. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2889-x

  • 3.

    Greenberg SM Ziai WZ Cordonnier C Dowlatshahi D Francis B Goldstein JN et al . Guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2022) 53:e282–361. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000407

  • 4.

    Sheth KN . Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. (2022) 387:1589–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2201449,

  • 5.

    de Flaquer-Pérez Mendiola JM Arboix A García-Eroles L Sánchez-López MJ . Acute spontaneous lobar cerebral hemorrhages present a different clinical profile and a more severe early prognosis than deep subcortical intracerebral hemorrhages-a hospital-based stroke registry study. Biomedicine. (2023) 11:223.

  • 6.

    Goyal M Menon BK van Zwam WH Dippel DW Mitchell PJ Demchuk AM et al . Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. (2016) 387:1723–31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X,

  • 7.

    Hao Y Yang D Wang H Zi W Zhang M Geng Y et al . Predictors for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2017) 48:1203–9.

  • 8.

    Sugiura Y Yamagami H Sakai N Yoshimura S . Committee of Recovery by endovascular salvage for cerebral ultra-acute embolism -Japan study G. Predictors of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2017) 26:766–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.10.015,

  • 9.

    Venditti L Chassin O Ancelet C Legris N Sarov M Lapergue B et al . Pre-procedural predictive factors of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after thrombectomy in stroke. J Neurol. (2021) 268:1867–75. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10364-x,

  • 10.

    Zaidat OO Castonguay AC Gupta R Sun CHJ Martin C Holloway WE et al . North American solitaire stent retriever acute stroke registry: post-marketing revascularization and clinical outcome results. J Neurointerv Surg. (2018) 10:i45–9.

  • 11.

    Park H Baek JH Kim BM . Endovascular treatment of acute stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis-related large vessel occlusion. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:308. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00308,

  • 12.

    Lee JS Lee SJ Yoo JS Hong JH Kim CH Kim YW et al . Prognosis of acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusion after endovascular treatment. J Stroke. (2018) 20:394–403. doi: 10.5853/jos.2018.01627,

  • 13.

    Kass-Hout T Kass-Hout O Sun CJ Kass-Hout TA Nogueira R Gupta R . Longer procedural times are independently associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke undergoing thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. (2016) 8:1217–20. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012157,

  • 14.

    Huo X Ma G Tong X Zhang X Pan Y Nguyen TN et al . Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:1272–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213379,

  • 15.

    Sarraj A Hassan AE Abraham MG Ortega-Gutierrez S Kasner SE Hussain MS et al . Trial of endovascular Thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med. (2023) 388:1259–71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2214403,

  • 16.

    Yoshimura S Sakai N Yamagami H Uchida K Beppu M Toyoda K et al . Endovascular therapy for acute stroke with a large ischemic region. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386:1303–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2118191,

  • 17.

    Goyal N Tsivgoulis G Chang JJ Malhotra K Pandhi A Ishfaq MF et al . Admission neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic biomarker of outcomes in large vessel occlusion strokes. Stroke. (2018) 49:1985–7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021477,

  • 18.

    Meyer L Bechstein M Bester M Hanning U Brekenfeld C Flottmann F et al . Thrombectomy in extensive stroke may not be beneficial and is associated with increased risk for hemorrhage. Stroke. (2021) 52:3109–17. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033101,

  • 19.

    Nawabi J Kniep H Schon G Flottmann F Leischner H Kabiri R et al . Hemorrhage after endovascular recanalization in acute stroke: lesion extent, collaterals and degree of ischemic water uptake mediate tissue vulnerability. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:569. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00569,

  • 20.

    Weitz JI Fredenburgh JC Eikelboom JW . A test in context: D-dimer. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 70:2411–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.09.024,

  • 21.

    Sendama W Musgrave KM . Decision-making with D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. (2018) 131:1438–43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.08.006,

  • 22.

    Ramos-Pachon A Lopez-Cancio E Bustamante A de la Pérez Ossa N Millán M Hernández-Pérez M et al . D-dimer as predictor of large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2021) 52:852–8. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.120.031657,

  • 23.

    Qiu K Jia ZY Cao YZ Zhao LB Xu XQ Shi HB et al . Early plasma D-dimer as a predictor of acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke. Acta Radiol. (2023) 64:1139–47. doi: 10.1177/02841851221097463,

  • 24.

    Trifan G Arshi B Testai FD . Intraventricular hemorrhage severity as a predictor of outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage. Front Neurol. (2019) 10:217. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00217

  • 25.

    Hallevi H Albright KC Aronowski J Barreto AD Martin-Schild S Khaja AM et al . Intraventricular hemorrhage: anatomic relationships and clinical implications. Neurology. (2008) 70:848–52. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000304930.47751.75,

  • 26.

    Arboix A Rodríguez-Aguilar R Oliveres M Comes E García-Eroles L Massons J . Thalamic haemorrhage vs internal capsule-basal ganglia haemorrhage: clinical profile and predictors of in-hospital mortality. BMC Neurol. (2007) 7:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-7-32

  • 27.

    Li Q Huang YJ Zhang G Lv FJ Wei X Dong MX et al . Intraventricular hemorrhage and early hematoma expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Sci Rep. (2015) 5:11357. doi: 10.1038/srep11357

Summary

Keywords

endovascular treatment, intracranial atherosclerosis, large-vessel occlusion, nomogram, prediction, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage

Citation

Yang H, Zhong H, Jia J, Wang Y, Li T, Liu H and Wang Y (2026) Nomogram to predict symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after mechanical thrombectomy in patients with intracranial atherosclerosis-related large-vessel occlusion. Front. Neurol. 17:1738518. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1738518

Received

03 November 2025

Revised

06 January 2026

Accepted

13 January 2026

Published

04 February 2026

Volume

17 - 2026

Edited by

Marta Iacobucci, Umberto 1 Hospital, Italy

Reviewed by

Adria Arboix, Sacred Heart University Hospital, Spain

Ilker Ilhanli, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Türkiye

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Hongchao Yang,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics