REVIEW article
Front. Neurol.
Sec. Diagnostic Neuropathology
An Australian brain bank and the future of alcohol and major neuropsychiatric disorders research
Julia Stevens 1
Caine C Smith 1
Dhiraj Maskey 1
Mario Novelli 1
Jennifer Bronfenbrener 1
Markus Johannes Hofer 2
Greg Trevor Sutherland 1
1. School of Medical Sciences and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia, NSW, 2006
2. School of Life and Environmental Sciences and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Darlington, Australia, NSW, 2006
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Post-mortem human brain banks are a key resource for researching brain diseases. The New South Wales Brain Tissue Resource Centre (BTRC) is a brain bank that uniquely focuses on the recruitment, preparaZon and disseminaZon of Zssue from paZents with alcohol use disorder and controls. Our controls are prospecZvely followed through their lifeZme via a self-reported quesZonnaire and yearly updates, and this standardised data allows future matching to disease cases based on individual study needs. Brain banks are expensive to run, and their sustainability is an ever-present topic of concern worldwide. In this review we explore how the BTRC is adapZng to a changing research environment by updates to our banking pipeline, before considering different models whereby brain banks can add greater value to research of the brain and other organs. Firstly, brain Zssue research is undergoing a major transformaZon with the rapid uptake of single cell and spaZal pla`orms. Brain banks must ensure that their protocols are opZmised and updated to match the requirements of these new pla`orms. The BTRC has moved to rapid fixaZon of Zssue and is trialling freezing protocols that minimise cytoarchitectural damage. Second, post-mortem brain banks are inherently retrospecZve and cannot ordinarily contribute to research during a donor's lifeZme. Yet brain banks can also expand their por`olio to include clinical samples and derivaZves such as cell lines, and this may promote greater donor interest in subsequent brain donaZon. Third, brain banks have tradiZonally run as stand-alone operaZons given their unique reliance on invasive autopsies and whole organ banking. However, with the increased interest in brain-body interacZons mulZ-organ Zssue banks, holding both clinical and post-mortem samples could enable the discovery of general disease mechanisms. Lastly, the single cell and spaZal pla`orms are producing data at a phenomenal rate. Rather than seeing data derived from Zssue disseminated to disparate repositories, banks could curate the data in-house and enable dry-lab research alongside their tradiZonal focus on Zssue studies. Overall, post-mortem brain banking is an important part of the brain research environment, but the banking pipeline must be designed to maximise benefits for donors and future generaZons.
Summary
Keywords
alcohol use disorder, biobanking, Neuropathology, Neuroscience, Post-mortem brain
Received
14 November 2025
Accepted
15 January 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Stevens, Smith, Maskey, Novelli, Bronfenbrener, Hofer and Sutherland. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Greg Trevor Sutherland
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.