Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

STUDY PROTOCOL article

Front. Neurol.

Sec. Experimental Therapeutics

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to alleviate Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis – study protocol for a randomized sham-controlled double-blinded clinical trial

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  • 2MS Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc Afdeling Anatomie & Neurowetenschappen, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
  • 4Rigshospitalet Dansk Multipel Sklerose Center, Glostrup, Denmark
  • 5Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, Kobenhavns Universitet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • 6Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Fatigue is a common and disabling symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS), quantifiable by patient reported outcome instruments such as the Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions (FSMC). The pathophysiology of fatigue remains poorly understood, and effective treatments are limited. Emerging evidence implicates disrupted excitation–inhibition balance in the premotor cortex as a potential culprit of fatigue in MS. Converging evidence now show that such network imbalance can be modulated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). The efficacy of premotor rTMS retuning excitation-inhibition balance, thus improving MS-related fatigue, has yet to be examined in a clinical trial. Methods: This randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel-group trial investigates the efficacy of premotor TMS in treating fatigue in MS. Fifty-eight patients with MS will receive either active or sham TMS targeting the left dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). On five consecutive days, participants will undergo 30-minute sessions using a novel low-frequency (0.72 Hz) paired-pulse repetitive TMS protocol with an interstimulus interval of 33 ms. The primary endpoint is the change in FSMC score six days post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include additional fatigue assessments and quantification of regional γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate concentrations of the targeted PMd, via ultra-high-field (7T) magnetic resonance spectroscopy. We hypothesize that active treatment will result in greater fatigue reduction than sham treatment and correlate positively with an increase in regional GABA in the stimulated premotor region. Exploratory endpoints include structural and functional connectivity changes assessed with 7T resonance imaging and motor cortical excitability changes measured with TMS. Discussion: This study will assess the feasibility and efficacy of a novel low-frequency paired-pulse TMS protocol for fatigue in MS. Repeated neurophysiological measurements of cortical excitation–inhibition balance will yield mechanistic insights and guide future repetitive TMS trials targeting MS-related fatigue. Trial registration: Prospectively pre-registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov with ID NCT06569550. Published August 12th, 2024

Keywords: Fatigue, MR spectroscopy, multiple sclerosis (MS), premotor cortex, Randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation ( rTMS ), transcranial magenetic stimulation (TMS), Ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging

Received: 03 Dec 2025; Accepted: 11 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Nygaard, Madsen, Wiggermann, Cabras, Christiansen, Svatkova, Lundell, Højsgaard Chow, Romme Christensen, Blinkenberg, Sellebjerg and Siebner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Sofus Nygaard
Hartwig Roman Siebner

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.