Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are common comorbidities in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and abnormalities in these issues have been found to be closely related to the severity of core behavioral deficits in autism. The enteric nervous system (ENS) plays a crucial role in regulating various aspects of gut functions, including gastrointestinal motility. Dysfunctional wiring in the ENS not only results in various gastrointestinal issues, but also correlates with an increasing number of central nervous system (CNS) disorders, such as ASD. However, it remains unclear whether the gastrointestinal dysfunctions are a consequence of ASD or if they directly contribute to its pathogenesis. This review focuses on the deficits in the ENS associated with ASD, and highlights several high-risk genes for ASD, which are expressed widely in the gut and implicated in gastrointestinal dysfunction among both animal models and human patients with ASD. Furthermore, we provide a brief overview of environmental factors associated with gastrointestinal tract in individuals with autism. This could offer fresh perspectives on our understanding of ASD.
Introduction
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental condition characterized by difficulties in communication and social interaction, as well as repetitive behaviors or interests (Kanner, 1968; Volkmar et al., 2014). It is a growing public health concern, particularly in children, with an estimated prevalence of 1:59 among children and 1:100 among adults.
Apart from the core symptoms, ASD patients also experience various comorbidities, particularly gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (Matson and Goldin, 2013). Research has indicated that individuals with autism frequently experience elevated occurrences of diarrhea, abdominal discomfort, and constipation in comparison to the general population (Horvath et al., 1999; Wasilewska and Klukowski, 2015). GI dysfunction not only affects other complications of ASD but also has a unique relevance to cognitive deficits in autistic individuals. Patients with GI disorders tend to experience more severe social withdrawal and other maladaptive behaviors, such as irritability, are frequently observed in ASD patients with GI issues (Chaidez et al., 2014; Madra et al., 2020). The aforementioned findings suggest that GI dysfunction may have a significant impact on the development of behavioral abnormalities in individuals with ASD, at least in certain subgroups of this population (Table 1). However, it remains unclear whether the gastrointestinal dysfunctions are a consequence of ASD or if they directly contribute to its pathogenesis. This review focuses on the deficits in the ENS associated with ASD, and highlights several high-risk genes for ASD, which are expressed widely in the gut and implicated in gastrointestinal dysfunction among both animal models and human patients with ASD. Furthermore, we provide a brief overview of environmental factors associated with gastrointestinal tract in individuals with autism. This could offer fresh perspectives on our understanding of ASD.
Table 1
| References | Genes | Molecular phenotypes | ASD symptoms | GI dysfunction | Samples | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synaptic dysfunction mutation genes | Soorya et al. (2013) | Shank3 | # | Impaired social interaction, evasive eye contact | Gastroesophageal reflux, constipation or diarrhea | PMS patients |
| James et al. (2019) | Shank3 | Reduced serotonin-positive EECs | # | Reduced DT peristalsis frequency, and prolonged DT transit time | Shank3 KO zebrafish | |
| Sauer et al. (2019) | Shank3 | Decreased Shank3 gene expression in gut epithelial cells compared to wild type controls | # | # | Shank3 KO mice | |
| Hosie et al. (2019) | Nlgn3 | Increased Hu and nNOS myenteric neurons in the small intestine; Unchanged colonic GABAergic neurons | ASD behavior | Diarrhea and chronic gut pain; faster small intestinal transit and unchanged colonic motility | ASD patients; NL3R451C mice | |
| Leembruggen et al. (2020) | Nlgn3 | Unchanged nNOS or calretinin motor neurons | # | Faster colonic motility | Nlgn3−/− mice | |
| Robinson et al. (2023) | Caspr2 | Unchanged organization of neurons within the myenteric plexus; Caspr2 is expressed in enteric sensory neurons in both the small intestine and colon | # | No significant difference in whole GI transit time, altered colonic contractions and accelerated colonic motility | Caspr2−/− mice | |
| Signaling molecule dysfunction-related genes | Marler et al. (2015) | SLC6A4 | Elevated whole-blood serotonin | Alterations in brain, behavior | Lower GI symptoms and constipation | 82 children and adolescents with ASD |
| Margolis et al. (2016) | SLC6A4 | Decreased enteric neurons, increased 5-HT clearance | ASD-like behavior | Slow GI transit and diminished peristaltic reflex activity | SERT Ala56 mice | |
| Bernier et al. (2014) | CHD8 | 50% reduction of enteric neurons | ASD behavior, increased head size | GI disturbance, such as constipation and diarrhea; impairment of GI motility | ASD patients with CHD8 mutations; Zebrafish with CHD8 mutations | |
| Other high-susceptible ASD genes | Whalen et al. (2012) | Tcf4 | # | Stereotypic movements, including arm flapping, hand biting, movement of fingers and wrists | Constipation and gastroesophageal reflux | PTHS patients |
| Grubišić et al. (2015) | Tcf4 | # | # | Reduced gut transit velocities in vivo | TCF4 functional deletion mice | |
| Siper et al., 2017 | Foxp1 | # | Delays in early motor and language milestones, language impairment, | Constipation | Children and adolescents with mutations in FOXP1 | |
| Frohlich et al. (2019) | Foxp1 | # | # | Impaired colonic contractility and prolonged total GI transit | Foxp1+/− mice | |
| Campbell et al. (2009) | c-Met | Over-representation of the Met rs1858830 C allele in ASD individuals with GI dysfunction | Alterations in brain, behavior | Gastrointestinal conditions | ASD individuals with a gastrointestinal condition report | |
| Russo et al. (2009) | c-Met | Decreased HGF levels in the ASD individuals with GI dysfunction | Alterations in brain and behavior | Chronic digestive disease, most with ileo-colonic lymphoid nodular hyperplasia | Serums from autistic children with GI dysfunction |
Susceptibility genes relevance to GI dysfunction in ASD.
# means not mentioned in the reference.
Enteric nervous system
The gastrointestinal tract serves as the exclusive pathway for nutrient absorption, and it plays a crucial role in breaking down food into absorbable nutrients while eliminating waste. Additionally, the GI tract has the ability to defend itself against toxins, physical damage, irritants, and various bacteria that inhabit its length. Fortunately, these complex and essential functions are primarily regulated by the enteric nervous system (ENS), which is a local nervous system (Furness, 2012).
The ENS is a vital component of the autonomic nervous system that spans the entire length of the gastrointestinal tract. It consists of a complex network of neurons and glia organized into two ganglionated plexuses in mammals, namely, the submucosal (Meissner’s) plexus located between the muscularis mucosa and circular muscle as well as the outer myenteric (Auerbach’s) plexus situated between the circular and longitudinal muscle (Figure 1). Enteric neurons comprise a diverse population of cells, encompassing intrinsic sensory neurons, ascending and descending interneurons, and motor neurons. The myenteric plexus predominantly houses the neurons that govern intestinal contractile patterns and the circuits that synchronize these patterns with other intestinal behaviors. Meanwhile, the submucosal plexus primarily contains neurons that project to the mucosa and are involved in regulating secretion, vasodilation, and absorption (Furness, 2006). Enteric glia cells (EGCs), the non-neuronal components of the ENS, display diverse morphologies and are situated in distinct microenvironments depending on their location within enteric ganglia, along fiber tracts, or dispersed throughout the smooth muscular or mucosal layers of the gut (Boesmans et al., 2015). Initially regarded as supportive cells surrounding enteric neurons and nerve fibers, emerging research has challenged the traditional characterization of EGCs and demonstrated their involvement in regulating broader gut physiology through interactions with other cell types such as epithelial and immune cells. EGCs modulate synaptic signaling, regulate gut motility patterns, and help maintain intestinal barrier integrity (Seguella and Gulbransen, 2021).
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the enteric nervous system (ENS). The ENS comprises a sophisticated network of neurons and glia organized into two ganglionated plexuses in mammals. The submucosal plexus is situated between the muscularis mucosa and circular muscle, while the outer myenteric plexus is located between the circular and longitudinal muscle layers. Herein, we present an enumeration of the principal cell types within the enteric system: 1, Myenteric/submucosal intrinsic primary afferent neuron; 2, Ascending interneuron; 3, Descending interneuron; 4, Excitatory motor neuron for circular/longitudinal muscles; 5, Inhibitory motor neuron for circular/longitudinal muscles; 6, Vasodilator neuron; 7, Secretomotor neuron; 8, Protoplasmic type I glia; 9, Fibrous type II glia; 10, Subepithelial type III glia; 11, Intramuscular type IV glia. Additionally, the ENS is also innervated by extrinsic nerves, including the vagal and spinal nerves. This figure was created with BioRender.com, with permission.
To maintain whole body homeostasis, the GI tract generates various patterns of motility, including peristaltic, accommodating, mixing and segmenting activities that not only vary according to different regions along the gut but also in response to dietary status (Sanders, 2008). Accumulating evidence has established a consensus that the ENS serves as the primary initiator of intricate motility patterns (Huizinga et al., 2011; Schneider et al., 2019). To “decide” what to do, intrinsic sensory neurons within the ENS respond to the mechanical or chemical stimulation of the intestinal wall. These signals are then transmitted to interneurons that project in both oral (ascending) and anal (descending) directions, ultimately contacting excitatory and inhibitory motor neurons, respectively (Figure 2). The enteric motor neurons activate the contraction and relaxation of the circular and longitudinal muscles through various layers of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)(+) cells, enteric glial cells, and intestinal macrophages (Huizinga and Lammers, 2009; Sanders et al., 2010, 2016).
Figure 2
Schematics illustrating the fundamental circuitry regulating gut contraction and relaxation in normal condition, as well as possible mechanisms for gastrointestinal dysmotility in animal models with certain ASD—associated gene mutation. (A) The essential neuronal network responsible for coordinating peristalsis, a classic gastrointestinal motility pattern, comprises a five-neuron unit featuring an intrinsic sensory or primary afferent neuron (IPAN) that detects mechanical or chemical stimuli from the intestinal lumen. Subsequently, this IPAN activates excitatory or inhibitory motor neurons through ascending or descending interneurons. Consequently, an oral contraction of the intestinal muscle and distal relaxation occur in response to the stimulus. Additionally, enteric glia actively participate in regulating intestinal motility. (B) Potential mechanisms underlying gastrointestinal dysmotility in animal models with specific gene mutations associated with ASD. They include: (i) serotonergic signaling pathway: a reduction in serotonin-positive enteroendocrine cells, as well as alterations in SERT activity, may potentially impact the 5-HT signaling pathway that regulates enteric neuronal development and gastrointestinal motility ①; (ii) inhibitory pathway: aberrant innervation of GI smooth muscle by nNOS neurons, or an increase in the number of nNOS+ neurons or varicosities may lead to elevated levels of NO in the ENS, potentially contributing to gastrointestinal dysmotility in animal models of autism ②③④; (iii) GABA receptor pathway: activation of GABA and GABAA receptors may potentially contribute to gastrointestinal motility, including the modulation of sensitivity toward GABAA receptor modulators, such as alterations in the abundance and/or composition of GABAA receptors ⑤. Additionally, (iv) Alterations in glia activity and an imbalance in the ratio between excitatory and inhibitory neurons within the enteric nervous system may contribute to gastrointestinal dysmotility observed in animal models of autism ⑥⑦. Ach, acetylcholine; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; ChAt, Choline acetyltransferase; GABAA, γ-aminobutyric acid A; NO, nitric oxide; nNOS, neuronal nitric oxide synthase; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide; 5-HT, serotonin. This figure was created with BioRender.com, with permission.
With the advancement of genetically encoded tools, we have gained a profound comprehension of integrated physiology in the GI tract. Recently, it has been elucidated that distinct motor patterns arise from structural variations in the functional organization of enteric circuits (Li et al., 2019). Certain genes, such as Sox6 and Celsr3, are implicated in the organization of enteric neuronal projections that contribute to gastrointestinal motility (Sasselli et al., 2013; Memic et al., 2018).
GI motor disorders frequently co-occur in some individuals with ASD, suggesting the presence of ENS dysfunction. In the following section, we will provide a summary of dysmotility observed in various animal models of ASD induced by gene mutations.
Genetic risk factors relevance to GI comorbidities in ASD
Although genetic risk is a major contributor to idiopathic ASD, the specific genetic alterations underlying most cases have yet to be identified. Many ASD-associated genes encode proteins involved in synapse formation and maintenance. Some of these mutations in synaptic genes have also been found to be expressed in the ENS, such as Shank3 and neuroligin 3 (Huett et al., 2009; Raab et al., 2010; Ellis et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013; Niesler and Rappold, 2021). Additionally, SLC6A4 and CHD8, involved in specific signaling pathways, also play a crucial role in the development of the ENS (Wade et al., 1996; Bernier et al., 2014). Here, we summarize findings from studies utilizing these genetic models and patient data.
Shank3, a well-studied member of the Shank gene family, is located on mouse chromosome 15E3 (human location: 22q13.3) and encodes a scaffolding protein in the postsynaptic density that is involved in clustering or assembling receptors, adhesion molecules, and signaling molecules (Jiang and Ehlers, 2013). Haploinsufficiency of the Shank3 gene causes Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMS), which frequently manifests with autistic or autistic-like behavior among patients (Phelan and McDermid, 2012; Sarasua et al., 2014). Moreover, PMS patients have reported experiencing gastrointestinal distress such as gastroesophageal reflux, cyclical vomiting, diarrhea, and/or constipation (Phelan and McDermid, 2012; Soorya et al., 2013), indicating a correlation between Shank3 mutations and GI functions. In terms of animal models, significant progress has been made in investigating the biological mechanisms underlying gastrointestinal symptoms. For instance, a zebrafish Shank3 mutant model of autism showed that mutations in Shank3 resulted in abnormalities of GI transit and motility due to reductions in serotonin-positive EECs involved in subsequent secretion and peristalsis-associated neural pathways (James et al., 2019). Additionally, Shank3 is expressed in the GI epithelium, and altered GI morphology and microbiota composition, along with elevated levels of zonulin-1 and IL-6, have been observed in Shank3-deficient mice, suggesting that extracerebral factors contribute to the phenotype observed in Shank3-deficient mice (Sauer et al., 2019).
Neuroligin, a postsynaptic cell-adhesion molecule, interacts with presynaptic and intracellular partners, such as neurexins and postsynaptic scaffolding proteins, to facilitate synaptic maturation and transmission (Krueger et al., 2012). Patients with ASD have been found to carry mutations in neuroligin-3 (Nlgn3), resulting in an arginine-to-cysteine substitution at the 451st amino acid residue (R451C; Jamain et al., 2003; Hosie et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2022). GI-related problems, such as diarrhea and chronic gut pain, have also been confirmed in patients with the NL3R451C genetic mutation (Hosie et al., 2019). To investigate potential mechanisms underlying these disorders, two mouse models of autism associated with NLGN3 were utilized: NL3R451C knock-in mice and Nlgn3 KO mice. Both mouse models exhibit gut dysfunction, characterized by faster in vivo small intestinal motility, heightened sensitivity to GABAA receptor modulation in colonic enteric neurons, altered neuronal numbers in the small intestine for NL3R451C mice (Hosie et al., 2019), as well as faster colonic motility and enlarged colonic diameter in Nlgn3 KO mice (Leembruggen et al., 2020). This suggests that NLGN3 exerts a modulatory effect on neural pathways within the ENS, potentially contributing to the pathophysiology of GI disorders in ASD patients with NLGN3 mutations.
Caspr2 (known as CNTNAP2), a member of the Neurexin family that acts as a synaptic cell-adhesion molecule involved in forming trans-synaptic complexes, was the first gene discovered to have rare and common mutations that increase susceptibility to ASD (Alarcon et al., 2008; Penagarikano and Geschwind, 2012). It has been reported that variations in or the absence of Caspr2 have been associated with a range of symptoms related ASD in both human patients and animal models, such as language regression, paresthesia, social impairment (Strauss et al., 2006; Peñagarikano et al., 2011; Penagarikano and Geschwind, 2012). Recently, Robinson’s research revealed that apart from the already known brain regions, Caspr2 is also expressed in enteric sensory neurons of adult mice (Robinson et al., 2023) and lack of Caspr2 alters GI motility suggesting enteric sensory dysfunction may contribute to ASD-related GI symptoms (Robinson et al., 2023).
SLC6A4, encoding the serotonin (5-HT) reuptake transporter (SERT), together with 5-HT, has been demonstrated to play crucial roles in both brain and gut development as well as long-term function (Li et al., 2011; Gershon, 2013; Homberg et al., 2013). Rare mutations in multiple alleles of SLC6A4 that cause hyperserotonemia have been identified as ASD risk factors (Sutcliffe et al., 2005; Veenstra-VanderWeele et al., 2012). Additionally, elevated levels of whole blood serotonin have been consistently observed as a biomarker in approximately 30% of children diagnosed with ASD (Schain and Freedman, 1961; Gabriele et al., 2014; Muller et al., 2016). It has been reported that whole blood serotonin levels are associated with lower GI symptoms, such as abdominal pain, stool retention, and large bowel movements in children and adolescents with ASD. However, functional constipation—the most frequent complaint—is not associated (Marler et al., 2015). As observed in human patients, a knock-in mouse model overexpressing the most common SERT variant (Gly56Ala) in ASD children not only exhibits ASD-like behaviors but also displays abnormalities in the ENS (Margolis et al., 2016). The Gly56Ala mice exhibited ENS hypoplasia, slow gastrointestinal transit, reduced peristaltic reflex activity, and increased proliferation of crypt epithelial cells (Margolis et al., 2016). Alterations in SERT-mediated 5-HT clearance could impact all ENS functions mediated by 5-HT, thus investigating the role of 5-HT and SERT in brain-gut disorders may offer valuable insights into ASD treatment.
CHD8, located on 14q11.2, is a critical player in various processes such as transcriptional regulation, epigenetic remodeling, cell proliferation promotion and RNA synthesis regulation through encoding chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 8 (Thompson et al., 2008; Nishiyama et al., 2012). In 2012, allelic variants of this gene were initially associated with autism (O'Roak et al., 2012a,b); Subsequently, it was identified as one of the few genes recurrently disrupted in the condition. Individuals with a deleterious CHD8 mutation typically exhibit autism marked by macrocephaly, distinctive facial features, and digestive issues (Bernier et al., 2014). It has been reported in a previous review that children with CHD8 mutations exhibit a significantly higher incidence of constipation compared to those without the mutation (60%–26%; Li and Zhou, 2016). Regarding the animal data, disruption of CHD8 in zebrafish reproduces human phenotypic features, such as macrocephaly resulting from expansion of the forebrain/midbrain and impaired gastrointestinal motility due to reduced colonization by postmitotic enteric neurons in the GI tract (Bernier et al., 2014).
Furthermore, other ASD risk genes such as transcription factor 4 (Tcf4), Fork-head box protein P1 (Foxp1), and c-Met have also been implicated in the GI phenotypes of ASD; however, their expression in the ENS has not yet been determined (Campbell et al., 2009; Russo et al., 2009; Horn et al., 2010; Whalen et al., 2012; Peng et al., 2013; Grubišić et al., 2015; Meerschaut et al., 2017; Siper et al., 2017; Frohlich et al., 2019). Mutations in these genes were identified in both patients and mice exhibiting a spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms, including constipation and gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Taken together, the presence of GI abnormalities in autism suggests a potential link between GI dysfunction and the pathophysiology of autism. Further prospective studies on specific subgroups of individuals with ASD are necessary to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal complications. These genetic studies may lead to earlier diagnoses, interventions, and improved treatment for ASD in the future.
Environmental risk factors
In addition to the aforementioned genetic factors, epidemiological studies have indicated that environmental risks also play a crucial role in the development of ASD (Bölte et al., 2018). Here we summarize several biological environmental risk factors: prenatal influences, gut microbiota, and zinc, which alter intestinal characteristics in individuals with autism.
Prenatal/perinatal factors in ASD
Emerging evidence suggests that prenatal factors play a pivotal role in shaping the composition of gut microbiota. The ASD mouse model, induced by maternal immune activation (MIA), exhibits dysbiosis of gut microbiota resembling the clinical features observed in ASD patients (Hsiao et al., 2013; Lim et al., 2017; Tartaglione et al., 2022). Moreover, pre-conceptional microbiota transplantation has the potential to ameliorate MIA-induced neurodevelopmental abnormalities by inhibiting interleukin-17a signaling during gestation (Lammert et al., 2018). The fisssswndings suggest that modulation of the maternal immune response may serve as a potential therapeutic strategy for autism. However, there is limited research investigating the association between prenatal or perinatal factors and gastrointestinal problems involving the ENS in individuals with autism.
Gut microbiota in ASD
The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem that resides in the intestinal tract, consisting of approximately 100 trillion microorganisms, with two bacterial divisions—Bacteroides (~20%) and Firmicutes (~70%)—accounting for 90% of its composition (Eckburg et al., 2005; Qin et al., 2010). In addition to maintaining intestinal homeostasis, the microbiota has been implicated in regulating brain physiology and behavior (Sherwin et al., 2019).
It is well-known that individuals with ASDs often exhibit imbalances in the gut microbiota compared to neurotypical controls, which manifests as alterations in bacterial diversity and a reduction in the abundance of beneficial bacteria (Strati et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2019; Sivamaruthi et al., 2020). Analysis of the fecal microbiota in children with ASDs reveals an overgrowth of pathogenic strains and a significant reduction in the Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes ratio (Adams et al., 2011; Strati et al., 2017; Settanni et al., 2021). For instance, elevated levels of Clostridium and Desulfovibrio were frequently observed in ASD individuals and were found to be correlated with the severity of autism symptoms as well as various gastrointestinal disorders (Song et al., 2004; Parracho et al., 2005). Moreover, alterations in microbial metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), were also discovered to be associated with the severity of ASD (Adams et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2012). Acetate, propionate, and butyrate are all SCFAs produced through the anaerobic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates. Taken together, these studies indicate that certain types of ASDs may exhibit alterations in the composition and function of their gut microbiota, highlighting the potential therapeutic approach of manipulating the gut microbiota for ASD. This primarily involves the use of probiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and microbiota transfer therapy (Cryan et al., 2019). Although modifying the composition of gut microbiota can improve behaviors and gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with ASD or animals, the mechanistic understanding of interactions between microbes and the nervous system remains elusive. Because no specific microbial species has consistently changed across all ASD-related studies so far, which is why controversies always exist.
The ENS is exposed to and engages with the gut microbiota. While the cellular architecture of the ENS is largely established at birth, the process of functional maturation in enteric wiring occurs within the postnatal gut microenvironment under the influence of the gut microbiota (Obata and Pachnis, 2016). Given its crucial role as a key constituent of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, an extensive investigation into the involvement of the ENS in ASD models is warranted. Moreover, it is imperative to consider other variables such as the size of the sample, dietary patterns, and regional disparities that can all contribute to the heterogeneity of gut microbiota (Sivamaruthi et al., 2020). This area of research is still expanding, thus necessitating further investigations with substantial sample sizes of both autistic and neurotypical children who have not undergone antibiotic treatment to identify the precise role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in the development of ASD.
ENS and zinc deficiency in ASD
Zinc, one of the most prominent trace metals, plays a vital role in the development of newborns by regulating neurogenesis, neuronal migration and differentiation, which are essential for shaping cognitive development and maintaining healthy brain function (Zoroddu et al., 2019). However, the prevalence of zinc deficiency has been found to be significantly higher among individuals with ASD compared to age-matched healthy controls (Grabrucker, 2013; Pfaender and Grabrucker, 2014).
Additionally, Zinc is essential for the proper development and maintenance of the gastrointestinal system (Vela et al., 2015). It is signaling may also exert an impact on synaptic plasticity in the peripheral nervous system, particularly in the ENS. Zinc transporter 3 (ZnT3) has been found to be widely distributed in the ENS of both human and pigs (Gonkowski et al., 2009; Wojtkiewicz et al., 2012, 2017a,b), where it plays a crucial role in transporting zinc ions from the cytoplasm into synaptic vesicles. Wojtkiewicz et al. discovered that enteric neurons exhibit varying levels of co-localized ZnT3 alongside other key molecules, including vesicular acetylcholine transporter (vAChT), NOS, and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). The degree of co-localization varies depending on the specific type of enteric plexus involved, implying that both ZnT3 and zinc may play a role in regulating multiple aspects of gut function (Wojtkiewicz et al., 2012). For instance, the majority of myenteric neurons expressing ZnT3 also exhibited immunoreactivity to vAChT and/or nNOS, which are the main excitatory and inhibitory neurons, respectively. This suggests that ZnT3 and Zn may exert a modulatory effect on the activity of both types of neurons, thereby facilitating gut smooth muscle contraction and relaxation coordination. The neurons within the submucosal plexus provide innervation to both blood vessels and secretory functions, while the presence of ZnT3 in the ENS of pig esophagus suggests a potential role for zinc and ZnT3 in sensory and pain signal transduction (Wojtkiewicz et al., 2017b). However, further investigations are necessary to clarify the precise physiological roles of ZnT3 and synaptic vesicles in the ENS across multiple species, enhancing our understanding of the mechanisms linking zinc with ASD.
Conclusions and future prospects
In this review, we primarily summarize the potential role and underlying mechanisms of the ENS in the pathogenesis of comorbid gastrointestinal disorders observed in individuals with autism, focusing on genetic aspects. Additionally, we also present a brief overview of three environmental factors: prenatal influences, gut microbiota, and zinc, which have been implicated to varying extents in autism. Although some existing studies investigating the correlation between the ENS and ASD, there remains a dearth of substantial empirical evidence directly substantiating the link between ENS and ASD. Further investigations are warranted to enhance the existing evidence base. The impact of autism-associated mutations on the ENS presents opportunities for employing extracerebral functional assays and designing preclinical therapies in animal models, thereby enhancing the translational potential of the field involving both the peripheral and central nervous system.
Funding
This work was supported by funding from Shenzhen Science and Technology Projects (grant numbers: JCYJ20200109150700942 and JCYJ20210324140408023), as well as Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant number: 2021A1515110787).
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Statements
Author contributions
XW and ZL conceptualized the review. XW, RT, and ZL wrote and developed the initial drafts of the manuscript. XW developed and formatted the table. ZL organized the figure and wrote and developed advanced drafts of the manuscript with feedback from YZ and JL. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Glossary
| ASD | Autism spectrum disorder |
| ChAt | Choline acetyltransferase |
| CHD8 | Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 8 |
| CNS | Central nervous system |
| DT | Digestive tract |
| EECs | Enteroendocrine cells |
| EGC | Enteric glia cell |
| eGFP | Enhanced green fluorescent protein |
| ENS | Enteric nervous system |
| FOXP1 | Forkhead box protein P1 |
| GI | Gastrointestinal |
| HGF | Hepatocyte growth factor |
| KO | Knock out |
| Met | A human proto-oncogene |
| MIA | Maternal immune activation |
| MP | Myenteric plexus |
| Nlgn3 | Neuroligin-3 |
| nNOS | Neuronal nitric oxide synthase |
| PMS | Phelan-McDermid syndrome |
| PTHS | Pitt–Hopkins syndrome |
| 5-HT | Serotonin |
| SCFAs | Short-chain fatty acids |
| SERT | Serotonin reuptake transporter |
| SMP | Submucous plexus |
| TCF4 | Transcription factor 4 |
| vAChT | Vesicular acetylcholine transporter |
| VIP | Vasoactive intestinal peptide |
| ZnT3 | Zinc transporter 3 |
References
1
Adams J. B. Johansen L. J. Powell L. D. Quig D. Rubin R. A. (2011). Gastrointestinal flora and gastrointestinal status in children with autism – comparisons to typical children and correlation with autism severity. BMC Gastroenterol11:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-11-22
2
Alarcon M. Abrahams B. S. Stone J. L. Duvall J. A. Perederiy J. V. Bomar J. M. et al . (2008). Linkage, association, and gene-expression analyses identify CNTNAP2 as an autism-susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet82, 150–159. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.005
3
Bernier R. Golzio C. Xiong B. Stessman H. A. Coe B. P. Penn O. et al . (2014). Disruptive CHD8 mutations define a subtype of autism early in development. Cells158, 263–276. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.017
4
Boesmans W. Lasrado R. Vanden Berghe P. Pachnis V. (2015). Heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity of glial cells in the mammalian enteric nervous system. Glia63, 229–241. doi: 10.1002/glia.22746
5
Bölte S. Girdler S. Marschik P. B. (2018). The contribution of environmental exposure to the etiology of autism spectrum disorder. Cell Mol Life Sci76, 1275–1297. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2988-4
6
Campbell D. B. Buie T. M. Winter H. Bauman M. Sutcliffe J. S. Perrin J. M. et al . (2009). Distinct genetic risk based on association of MET in families with co-occurring autism and gastrointestinal conditions. Pediatrics123, 1018–1024. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0819
7
Chaidez V. Hansen R. L. Hertz-Picciotto I. (2014). Gastrointestinal problems in children with autism, developmental delays or typical development. J Autism Dev Disord44, 1117–1127. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-1973-x
8
Cryan J. F. O'riordan K. J. Cowan C. S. M. Sandhu K. V. Bastiaanssen T. F. S. Boehme M. et al . (2019). The microbiota-gut-brain Axis. Physiol Rev99, 1877–2013. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2018
9
Eckburg P. B. Bik E. M. Bernstein C. N. Purdom E. Dethlefsen L. Sargent M. et al . (2005). Diversity of the human intestinal microbial Flora. Science308, 1635–1638. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591
10
Ellis M. Taher A. M. Mckeown S. Hill E. L. Bornstein J. C. (2012). Tu1992 the Neuroligin 3 Arg451cys (Nl-3) mouse model of autism shows altered colonic function in vitro. Gastroenterology142:S895. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(12)63479-9
11
Frohlich H. Kollmeyer M. L. Linz V. C. Stuhlinger M. Groneberg D. Reigl A. et al . (2019). Gastrointestinal dysfunction in autism displayed by altered motility and achalasia in Foxp1 (+/−) mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A116, 22237–22245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911429116
12
Furness J. B. (2006). The enteric nervous systemMelbourne: Blackwell Publishing.
13
Furness J. B. (2012). The enteric nervous system and neurogastroenterology. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol9, 286–294. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.32
14
Gabriele S. Sacco R. Persico A. M. (2014). Blood serotonin levels in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol24, 919–929. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.02.004
15
Gershon M. D. (2013). 5-Hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) in the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes20, 14–21. doi: 10.1097/MED.0b013e32835bc703
16
Gonkowski S. Kamińska B. Landowski P. Skobowiat C. Burliński P. Majewski M. et al . (2009). A population of zinc transporter 3−like Immunoreactive neurons is present in the ganglia of human descending Colon. Adv Clin Exp Med18, 243–248.
17
Grabrucker A. M. (2013). Environmental factors in autism. Front Psychiatry3, 118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00118
18
Grubišić V. Kennedy A. J. Sweatt J. D. Parpura V. (2015). Pitt-Hopkins mouse model has altered particular gastrointestinal transits in vivo. Autism Res8, 629–633. doi: 10.1002/aur.1467
19
Homberg J. R. Kolk S. M. Schubert D. (2013). Editorial perspective of the research topic "deciphering serotonin's role in neurodevelopment". Front Cell Neurosci7:212. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2013.00212
20
Horn D. Kapeller J. Rivera-Brugues N. Moog U. Lorenz-Depiereux B. Eck S. et al . (2010). Identification of FOXP1 deletions in three unrelated patients with mental retardation and significant speech and language deficits. Hum Mutat31, E1851–E1860. doi: 10.1002/humu.21362
21
Horvath K. Papadimitriou J. C. Rabsztyn A. Drachenberg C. Tildon J. T. (1999). Gastrointestinal abnormalities in children with autistic disorder. J Pediatr135, 559–563. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(99)70052-1
22
Hosie S. Ellis M. Swaminathan M. Ramalhosa F. Seger G. O. Balasuriya G. K. et al . (2019). Gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients and mice expressing the autism-associated R451C mutation in neuroligin-3. Autism Res12, 1043–1056. doi: 10.1002/aur.2127
23
Hsiao E. Y. Mcbride S. W. Hsien S. Sharon G. Hyde E. R. Mccue T. et al . (2013). Microbiota modulate behavioral and physiological abnormalities associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Cells155, 1451–1463. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.024
24
Huett A. Leong J. M. Podolsky D. K. Xavier R. J. (2009). The cytoskeletal scaffold Shank3 is recruited to pathogen-induced actin rearrangements. Exp Cell Res315, 2001–2011. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.04.003
25
Huizinga J. D. Lammers W. J. (2009). Gut peristalsis is governed by a multitude of cooperating mechanisms. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol296, G1–G8. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.90380.2008
26
Huizinga J. D. Martz S. Gil V. Wang X. Y. Jimenez M. Parsons S. (2011). Two independent networks of interstitial cells of cajal work cooperatively with the enteric nervous system to create colonic motor patterns. Front Neurosci5:93. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00093
27
Jamain S. Quach H. Betancur C. Rastam M. Colineaux C. Gillberg I. C. et al . (2003). Mutations of the X-linked genes encoding neuroligins NLGN3 and NLGN4 are associated with autism. Nat Genet34, 27–29. doi: 10.1038/ng1136
28
James D. M. Kozol R. A. Kajiwara Y. Wahl A. L. Storrs E. C. Buxbaum J. D. et al . (2019). Intestinal dysmotility in a zebrafish (Danio rerio) shank3a;shank3b mutant model of autism. Mol Autism10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0250-4
29
Jiang Y. H. Ehlers M. D. (2013). Modeling autism by SHANK gene mutations in mice. Neuron78, 8–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.03.016
30
Kanner L. (1968). Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Acta Paedopsychiatr35, 100–136. PMID:
31
Krueger D. D. Tuffy L. P. Papadopoulos T. Brose N. (2012). The role of neurexins and neuroligins in the formation, maturation, and function of vertebrate synapses. Curr Opin Neurobiol22, 412–422. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.012
32
Lammert C. R. Frost E. L. Bolte A. C. Paysour M. J. Shaw M. E. Bellinger C. E. et al . (2018). Cutting edge: critical roles for microbiota-mediated regulation of the immune system in a prenatal immune activation model of autism. J Immunol201, 845–850. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701755
33
Leembruggen A. J. L. Balasuriya G. K. Zhang J. Schokman S. Swiderski K. Bornstein J. C. et al . (2020). Colonic dilation and altered ex vivo gastrointestinal motility in the neuroligin-3 knockout mouse. Autism Res13, 691–701. doi: 10.1002/aur.2109
34
Li Z. Chalazonitis A. Huang Y. Y. Mann J. J. Margolis K. G. Yang Q. M. et al . (2011). Essential roles of enteric neuronal serotonin in gastrointestinal motility and the development/survival of enteric dopaminergic neurons. J Neurosci31, 8998–9009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6684-10.2011
35
Li Z. Hao M. M. Van Den Haute C. Baekelandt V. Boesmans W. Vanden Berghe P. (2019). Regional complexity in enteric neuron wiring reflects diversity of motility patterns in the mouse large intestine. elife8:e42914. doi: 10.7554/eLife.42914
36
Li Q. Zhou J. M. (2016). The microbiota-gut-brain axis and its potential therapeutic role in autism spectrum disorder. Neuroscience324, 131–139. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.013
37
Lim J. S. Lim M. Y. Choi Y. Ko G. (2017). Modeling environmental risk factors of autism in mice induces IBD-related gut microbial dysbiosis and hyperserotonemia. Molecular. Brain10:14. doi: 10.1186/s13041-017-0292-0
38
Madra M. Ringel R. Margolis K. G. (2020). Gastrointestinal issues and autism Spectrum disorder. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am29, 501–513. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2020.02.005
39
Margolis K. G. Li Z. Stevanovic K. Saurman V. Israelyan N. Anderson G. M. et al . (2016). Serotonin transporter variant drives preventable gastrointestinal abnormalities in development and function. J Clin Invest126, 2221–2235. doi: 10.1172/JCI84877
40
Marler S. Ferguson B. J. Lee E. B. Peters B. Williams K. C. Mcdonnell E. et al . (2015). Brief report: whole blood serotonin levels and gastrointestinal symptoms in autism Spectrum disorder. J Autism Dev Disord46, 1124–1130. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2646-8
41
Matson J. L. Goldin R. L. (2013). Comorbidity and autism: trends, topics and future directions. Res Autism Spectr Disord7, 1228–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.003
42
Meerschaut I. Rochefort D. Revencu N. Petre J. Corsello C. Rouleau G. A. et al . (2017). FOXP1-related intellectual disability syndrome: a recognisable entity. J Med Genet54, 613–623. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104579
43
Memic F. Knoflach V. Morarach K. Sadler R. Laranjeira C. Hjerling-Leffler J. et al . (2018). Transcription and signaling regulators in developing neuronal subtypes of mouse and human enteric nervous system. Gastroenterology154, 624–636. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.005
44
Muller C. L. Anacker A. M. J. Veenstra-Vanderweele J. (2016). The serotonin system in autism spectrum disorder: from biomarker to animal models. Neuroscience321, 24–41. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.11.010
45
Niesler B. Rappold G. A. (2021). Emerging evidence for gene mutations driving both brain and gut dysfunction in autism spectrum disorder. Mol Psychiatry26, 1442–1444. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0778-5
46
Nishiyama M. Skoultchi A. I. Nakayama K. I. (2012). Histone H1 recruitment by CHD8 is essential for suppression of the Wnt-beta-catenin signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biol32, 501–512. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06409-11
47
Obata Y. Pachnis V. (2016). The effect of microbiota and the immune system on the development and Organization of the Enteric Nervous System. Gastroenterology151, 836–844. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.07.044
48
O'roak B. J. Vives L. Fu W. Egertson J. D. Stanaway I. B. Phelps I. G. et al . (2012a). Multiplex targeted sequencing identifies recurrently mutated genes in autism spectrum disorders. Science338, 1619–1622. doi: 10.1126/science.1227764
49
O'roak B. J. Vives L. Girirajan S. Karakoc E. Krumm N. Coe B. P. et al . (2012b). Sporadic autism exomes reveal a highly interconnected protein network of de novo mutations. Nature485, 246–250. doi: 10.1038/nature10989
50
Parracho H. M. R. T. Bingham M. O. Gibson G. R. Mccartney A. L. (2005). Differences between the gut microflora of children with autistic spectrum disorders and that of healthy children. J Med Microbiol54, 987–991. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46101-0
51
Peñagarikano O. Abrahams B. Herman S. Edward I. Winden K. D. Gdalyahu A. et al . (2011). Absence of CNTNAP2 leads to epilepsy, neuronal migration abnormalities, and Core autism-related deficits. Cells147, 235–246. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.040
52
Penagarikano O. Geschwind D. H. (2012). What does CNTNAP2 reveal about autism spectrum disorder?Trends Mol Med18, 156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.01.003
53
Peng Y. Huentelman M. Smith C. Qiu S. (2013). MET receptor tyrosine kinase as an autism genetic risk factor. Int Rev Neurobiol113, 135–165. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-418700-9.00005-8
54
Pfaender S. Grabrucker A. M. (2014). Characterization of biometal profiles in neurological disorders. Metallomics6, 960–977. doi: 10.1039/C4MT00008K
55
Phelan K. Mcdermid H. E. (2012). The 22q13.3 deletion syndrome (Phelan-McDermid syndrome). Mol Syndromol2, 186–201. doi: 10.1159/000334260
56
Qin J. Li R. Raes J. Arumugam M. Burgdorf K. S. Manichanh C. et al . (2010). A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature464, 59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821
57
Raab M. Boeckers T. M. Neuhuber W. L. (2010). Proline-rich synapse-associated protein-1 and 2 (ProSAP1/Shank2 and ProSAP2/Shank3)-scaffolding proteins are also present in postsynaptic specializations of the peripheral nervous system. Neuroscience171, 421–433. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.041
58
Robinson B. G. Oster B. A. Robertson K. Kaltschmidt J. A. (2023). Loss of ASD-related molecule Caspr2 affects colonic motility in mice. bioRxiv [Preprint].
59
Russo A. J. Krigsman A. Jepson B. Wakefield A. (2009). Decreased serum hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) in autistic children with severe gastrointestinal disease. Biomark Insights4, 181–190. doi: 10.4137/BMI.S3656
60
Sanders K. M. (2008). Regulation of smooth muscle excitation and contraction. Neurogastroenterol Motil20, 39–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2008.01108.x
61
Sanders K. M. Hwang S. J. Ward S. M. (2010). Neuroeffector apparatus in gastrointestinal smooth muscle organs. J Physiol588, 4621–4639. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.196030
62
Sanders K. M. Kito Y. Hwang S. J. Ward S. M. (2016). Regulation of gastrointestinal smooth muscle function by interstitial cells. Physiology (Bethesda)31, 316–326. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00006.2016
63
Sarasua S. M. Boccuto L. Sharp J. L. Dwivedi A. Chen C. F. Rollins J. D. et al . (2014). Clinical and genomic evaluation of 201 patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome. Hum Genet133, 847–859. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1423-7
64
Sasselli V. Boesmans W. Vanden Berghe P. Tissir F. Goffinet A. M. Pachnis V. (2013). Planar cell polarity genes control the connectivity of enteric neurons. J Clin Invest123, 1763–1772. doi: 10.1172/JCI66759
65
Sauer A. K. Bockmann J. Steinestel K. Boeckers T. M. Grabrucker A. M. (2019). Altered intestinal morphology and microbiota composition in the autism Spectrum disorders associated SHANK3 mouse model. Int J Mol Sci20:134. doi: 10.3390/ijms20092134
66
Schain R. J. Freedman D. X. (1961). Studies on 5-hydroxyindole metabolism in autistic and other mentally retarded children. J Pediatr58, 315–320. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(61)80261-8
67
Schneider S. Wright C. M. Heuckeroth R. O. (2019). Unexpected roles for the second brain: enteric nervous system as master regulator of bowel function. Annu Rev Physiol81, 235–259. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021317-121515
68
Seguella L. Gulbransen B. D. (2021). Enteric glial biology, intercellular signalling and roles in gastrointestinal disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol18, 571–587. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00423-7
69
Settanni C. R. Bibbò S. Ianiro G. Rinninella E. Cintoni M. Mele M. C. et al . (2021). Gastrointestinal involvement of autism spectrum disorder: focus on gut microbiota. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol15, 599–622. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1869938
70
Sherwin E. Bordenstein S. R. Quinn J. L. Dinan T. G. Cryan J. F. (2019). Microbiota and the social brain. Science366:587. doi: 10.1126/science.aar2016
71
Siper P. M. De Rubeis S. Trelles M. D. P. Durkin A. Di Marino D. Muratet F. et al . (2017). Prospective investigation of FOXP1 syndrome. Mol Autism8:57. doi: 10.1186/s13229-017-0172-6
72
Sivamaruthi B. S. Suganthy N. Kesika P. Chaiyasut C. (2020). The role of microbiome, dietary supplements, and probiotics in autism Spectrum disorder. Int J Environ Res Public Health17:647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082647
73
Song Y. Liu C. Finegold S. M. (2004). Real-time PCR quantitation of Clostridia in feces of autistic children. Appl Environ Microbiol70, 6459–6465. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6459-6465.2004
74
Soorya L. Kolevzon A. Zweifach J. Lim T. Dobry Y. Schwartz L. et al . (2013). Prospective investigation of autism and genotype-phenotype correlations in 22q13 deletion syndrome and SHANK3 deficiency. Mol Autism4:18. doi: 10.1186/2040-2392-4-18
75
Strati F. Cavalieri D. Albanese D. De Felice C. Donati C. Hayek J. et al . (2017). New evidences on the altered gut microbiota in autism spectrum disorders. Microbiome5:24. doi: 10.1186/s40168-017-0242-1
76
Strauss K. A. Puffenberger E. G. Huentelman M. J. Gottlieb S. Dobrin S. E. Parod J. M. et al . (2006). Recessive symptomatic focal epilepsy and mutant Contactin-associated protein-like 2. N Engl J Med354, 1370–1377. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052773
77
Sutcliffe J. S. Delahanty R. J. Prasad H. C. Mccauley J. L. Han Q. Jiang L. et al . (2005). Allelic heterogeneity at the serotonin transporter locus (SLC6A4) confers susceptibility to autism and rigid-compulsive behaviors. Am J Hum Genet77, 265–279. doi: 10.1086/432648
78
Tartaglione A. M. Villani A. Ajmone-Cat M. A. Minghetti L. Ricceri L. Pazienza V. et al . (2022). Maternal immune activation induces autism-like changes in behavior, neuroinflammatory profile and gut microbiota in mouse offspring of both sexes. Translational. Psychiatry12:9. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02149-9
79
Thompson B. A. Tremblay V. Lin G. Bochar D. A. (2008). CHD8 is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor that regulates beta-catenin target genes. Mol Cell Biol28, 3894–3904. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00322-08
80
Veenstra-Vanderweele J. Muller C. L. Iwamoto H. Sauer J. E. Owens W. A. Shah C. R. et al . (2012). Autism gene variant causes hyperserotonemia, serotonin receptor hypersensitivity, social impairment and repetitive behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A109, 5469–5474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1112345109
81
Vela G. Stark P. Socha M. Sauer A. K. Hagmeyer S. Grabrucker A. M. (2015). Zinc in gut-brain interaction in autism and neurological disorders. Neural Plast2015:972791, 1–15. doi: 10.1155/2015/972791
82
Volkmar F. Siegel M. Woodbury-Smith M. King B. Mccracken J. State M. et al . (2014). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry53, 237–257. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2013.10.013
83
Wade P. R. Chen J. Jaffe B. Kassem I. S. Blakely R. D. Gershon M. D. (1996). Localization and function of a 5-HT transporter in crypt epithelia of the gastrointestinal tract. J Neurosci16, 2352–2364. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-07-02352.1996
84
Wang L. Christophersen C. T. Sorich M. J. Gerber J. P. Angley M. T. Conlon M. A. (2012). Elevated fecal short chain fatty acid and Ammonia concentrations in children with autism Spectrum disorder. Dig Dis Sci57, 2096–2102. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2167-7
85
Wasilewska J. Klukowski M. (2015). Gastrointestinal symptoms and autism spectrum disorder: links and risks—a possible new overlap syndrome. Pediatr Health Med Ther6, 153–166. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S85717
86
Whalen S. Heron D. Gaillon T. Moldovan O. Rossi M. Devillard F. et al . (2012). Novel comprehensive diagnostic strategy in Pitt-Hopkins syndrome: clinical score and further delineation of the TCF4 mutational spectrum. Hum Mutat33, 64–72. doi: 10.1002/humu.21639
87
Wojtkiewicz J. Gonkowski S. Rowniak M. Crayton R. Majewski M. Jalynski M. (2012). Neurochemical characterization of zinc transporter 3-like immunoreactive (ZnT3(+)) neurons in the intramural ganglia of the porcine duodenum. J Mol Neurosci48, 766–776. doi: 10.1007/s12031-012-9855-9
88
Wojtkiewicz J. Makowska K. Bejer-Olenska E. Gonkowski S. (2017a). Zinc transporter 3 (Znt3) as an active substance in the enteric nervous system of the porcine esophagus. J Mol Neurosci61, 315–324. doi: 10.1007/s12031-016-0854-0
89
Wojtkiewicz J. Rytel L. Makowska K. Gonkowski S. (2017b). Co-localization of zinc transporter 3 (ZnT3) with sensory neuromediators and/or neuromodulators in the enteric nervous system of the porcine esophagus. Biometals30, 393–403. doi: 10.1007/s10534-017-0014-1
90
Xu M. Xu X. Li J. Li F. (2019). Association between gut microbiota and autism Spectrum disorder: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Front Psych10:473. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00473
91
Zhang Z. Hou M. Ou H. Wang D. Li Z. Zhang H. et al . (2022). Expression and structural analysis of human neuroligin 2 and neuroligin 3 implicated in autism spectrum disorders. Front Endocrinol13:1067529. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1067529
92
Zhang Q. Wang J. Li A. Liu H. Zhang W. Cui X. et al . (2013). Expression of neurexin and neuroligin in the enteric nervous system and their down-regulated expression levels in Hirschsprung disease. Mol Biol Rep40, 2969–2975. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2368-3
93
Zoroddu M. A. Aaseth J. Crisponi G. Medici S. Peana M. Nurchi V. M. (2019). The essential metals for humans: a brief overview. J Inorg Biochem195, 120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2019.03.013
Summary
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, enteric nervous system, gut motility, genetical factor, environmental factor
Citation
Wang X, Tang R, Wei Z, Zhan Y, Lu J and Li Z (2023) The enteric nervous system deficits in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Neurosci. 17:1101071. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1101071
Received
17 November 2022
Accepted
08 August 2023
Published
24 August 2023
Volume
17 - 2023
Edited by
Paul Yao, Hainan Women and Children's Medical Center, China
Reviewed by
Huawei Zhang, Southern University of Science and Technology, China; Fei Li, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Wang, Tang, Wei, Zhan, Lu and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jianping Lu, szlujianping@126.com; Zhiling Li, zl.li1@siat.ac.cn
†These authors have contributed equally to this work
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.