SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Gut-Brain Axis
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1448478
Perturbations in gut microbiota in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review
Provisionally accepted- 1NHC Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment on Brain Functional Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China, Chongqing, China
- 2Jinfeng Laboratory, Chongqing, 401329, China, Jinfeng Laboratory, Chongqing, 401329, China, China
- 3Chongqing Institute for Brain and Intelligence, Chongqing, 401336, China, Chongqing, China
- 4Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- 5College of Basic Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China, Chongqing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurological and developmental disorder commonly accompanied by gut dysbiosis and gastrointestinal symptoms. Accumulating evidence supports a crucial role of gut microbiota dysbiosis in the pathophysiological mechanisms of ASD.However, the alteration of gut microbiota shows high heterogeneity across different studies. This study aims to identify potential biomarkers in the gut microbiota of patients with ASD.We conducted a comprehensive analysis by searching the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases, for studies assessing the changes of gut microbial diversity and taxa in ASD patients and healthy controls using high-throughput sequencing. Vote counting analyses were performed to identify consistently altered gut microbes associated with ASD.Results: Sixty-four studies invoving 189 differentially abundant gut microbial taxa were included.Our synthesis provided no strong evidence for a difference in α-diversity between ASD patients and healthy controls, while studies were relatively consistent in reporting differences in β-diversity.Among 189 taxa, we identified three significantly increased taxa in ASD patients: Eubacteriales, Klebsiella, and Clostridium. Additionally, there were enriched trends of Oscillospira, Dorea, and Collinsella, and depleted trends of Streptococcus, Akkermansia, Coprococcus, and Dialister. These findings suggest that the disrupted intestinal microecology and functional changes in ASD are characterized by an enrichment of pro-inflammatory genera, a reduction of specific probiotics, lactic acid-producing and utilizing bacteria, and an imbalance of anti-inflammatory butyrate-producing bacteria. Substantial heterogeneity across studies concerning demographics and methodologies was also observed.This systematic review contribute to a further understanding of the role of gut microbiota in ASD and support the development of microbiota-based diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for ASD.
Keywords: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Gut Microbiota, Microbial biomarkers, Microbial Diversity, gut-brain axis
Received: 13 Jun 2024; Accepted: 25 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Tao, Zhuocan, Wang, Pu, Liu, Gui, Zhong, Yang, Zhou, Tao, Chen, Chen, Chen, Chen and Xie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Peng Xie, NHC Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment on Brain Functional Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong District, Chongqing 400016, China, Chongqing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.