SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Visual Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1449354
Meta-Analysis of Reflexive Attention 1 A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Genes and Reflexive Attention
Provisionally accepted
- 1Brigham Young University, Provo, United States
- 2Pacific Graduate School of Psychology-Stanford PsyD Consortium, Palo Alto, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Defined as the semi-autonomous orientation to either a moving or rapidly appearing stimulus, reflexive attention (RA) is a crucial process for humans. While there are multiple outcomes used to assess RA, their relationships have not been tested. Disruptions in RA often relate to neurodevelopmental disorders, such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder or autism spectrum disorder, so RA might be moderated by age. Additionally, the current academic consensus is that multiple genes influence RA, but this has not been assessed in a meta-analysis. A better understanding of RA using previously collected data will allow us to improve the design of future research studies. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA, we conducted a broad search for potentially relevant articles pertaining to genes associated with RA. Selected studies included those 1) published in English, 2) involving human participants, and 3) referencing specific genetic markers in association with a measure of RA. For subgroup comparisons, we analyzed 14 studies assessing children and 23 assessing adults. We also compared 18 dopamine-related to 19 non-dopamine related studies. Results: The main analysis produced a non-significant overall effect size; however, our most interesting finding was that results varied by age group. We explore this as well as difference by outcome type and the relation of the gene studied to dopamine.Conclusion: Our findings vary by age group. However, due to heterogeneity we recommend more studies to answer some questions about a broader range of neurotransmitters, to include younger age groups, and to clarify difference by outcome type. We discuss issues of relevance to researchers to guide future meta-analyses.
Keywords: Meta-analysis, genetic influence, reflexive attention, development, Children and adults, neurotransmitters
Received: 14 Jun 2024; Accepted: 07 May 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Myres, Christensen and Lundwall. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Rebecca A Lundwall, Brigham Young University, Provo, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.