ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci., 13 August 2025

Sec. Gut-Brain Axis

Volume 19 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1623165

Altered gut microbial networks and metabolic pathways in multiple system atrophy: a comparative 16S rRNA study

  • 1. Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 2. Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 3. Graduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 4. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, College of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 5. Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 6. College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

  • 7. Neurobiology and Cognitive Science Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Introduction:

The alterations in the gut microbial network in multiple system atrophy (MSA) remain poorly understood. This study aimed to identify key gut microbial interaction networks in MSA through comprehensive multimodal analyses.

Methods:

Demographic information and frozen fecal specimens were collected from 119 participants [MSA, n = 26; Parkinson’s disease (PD), n = 66; healthy control (HC), n = 27]. Raw amplicons of the bacterial 16S rRNA V3–V4 gene region were processed using two methods: DADA2-denoising and clustering into operational taxonomic units. We conducted univariate and multivariable analyses to assess the differential abundance of bacterial genera and predicted metabolic pathways using four statistical methods: ANCOM, ANCOM-BC, ALDEx2, and MaAsLin 2. Interbacterial interactions were assessed using four correlation and two network analyses.

Results:

We consistently observed lower levels of Fusicatenibacter in MSA patients and lower levels of Butyricicoccus in PD patients compared with HCs (q < 0.05), both before and after adjusting for comorbidities, diet, and constipation status. The random forest classifiers effectively differentiated between MSA and PD, achieving high AUCs (0.75–0.78) in 5-fold cross-validation. A significant positive interbacterial interaction between Ruminococcus gnavus group and Erysipelatoclostridium was uniquely observed in MSA patients. Additionally, we identified an increase in the ARGORNPROST-PWY pathway (L-arginine degradation, q = 0.003) and a decrease in the PWY-6478 pathway (GDP-D-glycero-α-D-manno-heptose biosynthesis, q = 0.015) in MSA patients compared with HCs.

Conclusion:

Future studies are warranted to determine whether fecal microbiome-derived signatures can serve as reliable biomarkers for MSA.

1 Introduction

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a rare adult-onset neurodegenerative disorder characterized by glial cytoplasmic inclusions made of misfolded α-synuclein (Schrag et al., 1999; Spillantini et al., 1998). Although both MSA and Parkinson’s disease (PD) are classified as α-synucleinopathies, MSA is characterized by levodopa-unresponsive parkinsonism, autonomic dysfunction, and cerebellar ataxia (). In contrast to PD, MSA progresses more rapidly, leading to severe disability within approximately 5 years and mortality within a decade of symptom onset (Watanabe et al., 2002; Wenning et al., 2013). While current epidemiological studies have failed to establish consistent associations between external environmental risk factors and MSA, internal environmental factors, particularly the gut microbiome, may contribute to the pathogenesis of MSA (Vanacore, 2005).

The gut microbiome plays a significant role in human health and disease through the gut-brain axis, including stimulation of immune responses and production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) (Wang and Kasper, 2014). Numerous studies, including cross-sectional, longitudinal, and meta-analyses, have identified consistent alterations in the gut microbiome associated with PD, such as the enrichment of Bifidobacterium and the depletion of SCFA-producing bacteria like Lachnospiraceae and Faecalibacterium (). Similar to PD, gut microbial alterations may contribute to the pathogenesis of MSA, as patients with MSA exhibit a proinflammatory colonic microbiome, impaired intestinal barrier integrity, and elevated levels of endotoxin-related intestinal inflammatory biomarkers (). Additionally, both MSA and PD exhibit α-synuclein over-deposition (). Dysbiosis of the gut microbiome, together with gut inflammation and hyperpermeability, can lead to α-synuclein seeding and propagation from the enteric nervous system to the central nervous system (CNS) via the vagus nerve (). It is plausible that the gut microbiome contributes to MSA pathogenesis through the gut-brain axis.

In contrast to the growing body of evidence supporting the gut microbiome’s role in the pathogenesis and progression of PD (; Tan et al., 2022), investigations in MSA have proven to be challenging because of its rare incidence and prevalence. Only few studies with limited sample sizes have examined the gut microbial composition in MSA. Furthermore, recent advancements in computational tools and bioinformatic methodologies, coupled with the lack of standardized protocols, can lead to inconsistent results in microbiome research (). This study aimed to identify distinctive gut microbial signatures in MSA through comprehensive multimodal analyses. We employed two amplicon-preprocessing approaches and four statistical methods to enhance the robustness and reproducibility of our findings. Two statistical models were utilized to account for potential confounders, including comorbidities, diet, and constipation status. Through the identification of MSA-specific microbial fingerprints, interaction networks, and relevant metabolic pathways, we sought to advance the capabilities of differential diagnosis and enhance our understanding of the pathogenesis of MSA.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study subjects and collection of fecal specimens

This hospital-based case-control study was carried out at the National Taiwan University Cancer Center (NTUCC), Taipei, Taiwan, from August 2020 to December 2022. Patients meeting the criteria for clinically probable MSA according to the 2022 Movement Disorder Society criteria, as well as patients diagnosed with PD based on the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria, were enrolled by two specialists in movement disorders (S.Y. Cheng, M.C. Kuo) (; Wenning et al., 2022). Each patient underwent a minimum follow-up period of 1 year. Healthy controls (HCs) were recruited from healthy spouses or caregivers of patients, or asymptomatic volunteers at the hospital. Individuals under 40 years old, with concurrent malignancies, cerebrovascular diseases, or known neurodegenerative diseases, were excluded from the study. All subjects completed a face-to-face interview with a structured, semi-quantitative questionnaire adapted from the previous study (). The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS III) score was assessed in PD patients. ().

Fecal specimens were collected with informed consent and with the approval of the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) Research Ethics Committee (REC) (No. 202006060RINB). The specimens were stored in a sterile tube at −80°C until processing. All procedures involving human participants in this study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the NTUH REC and the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the NTUCC REC.

2.2 DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing

Fecal DNA was extracted from 200 mg frozen samples using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The DNA samples were then stored at −20°C. The 341f forward primer and 805r reverse primer were designed to include sequences complementary to the upstream and downstream regions of the 16S rRNA V3–V4 gene segment, along with the Illumina overhang adapter sequences. The dual-index barcodes and the Illumina sequencing adapters were attached to the PCR products using the Nextera XT Index Kit (Illumina, CA, United States). The libraries were cleaned, normalized, pooled, and sequenced using the MiSeq System (Illumina, CA, United States) with V3 reagent for paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bps).

2.3 Preprocessing of amplicons and taxonomic classification

The analyses of microbial composition were primarily conducted utilizing QIIME 2 2022.11 unless otherwise specified (). Two distinct approaches were employed to preprocess the amplicons of 16S rRNA V3-V4 gene segment: denoising using DADA2 and de novo clustering into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a 99% identity threshold (; ). The reference taxonomy was SILVA release SSU Ref NR 138.11 (). Because SILVA does not curate sequences to the species level, species-level information was excluded, and genus-level assignments may mask biologically divergent species. We assembled ecologically informed prior class weights and built a bespoke taxonomy classifier (; ).

2.4 Differential abundance analyses

Multiple algorithms designed for compositional data were used to conduct differential abundance analyses across the study groups and between subjects with and without constipation. These algorithms included: (1) ANalysis of COmposition of Microbiomes (ANCOM) (), (2) ANalysis of COmposition of Microbiomes with Bias Correction (ANCOM-BC) (), (3) ANOVA-Like Differential Expression 2 (ALDEx2) (), and (4) Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models 2 (MaAsLin 2) ().

ANCOM-BC and MaAsLin 2 support multivariable differential abundance analyses. We estimated the differential abundances of genera using two statistical models. Model 1 incorporated constipation status, since it is associated with gut microbial dysbiosis and can potentially lead to spurious associations in microbiome studies of human diseases, particularly in Parkinsonism (; Vujkovic-Cvijin et al., 2020). Model 2 incorporated potential confounders that differed significantly across the study groups, including age, sex, hypertension, constipation status, medications for constipation, and usage of probiotics.

2.5 Correlation between MSA-associated and PD-associated genera

The ranked relative differentials estimated by Songbird were visualized using Qurro (; ). Log ratios were computed between the top and bottom 25% of differentially abundant genera in comparisons of MSA vs. HC and PD vs. HC. The Student’s t-test was used to determine if there was a significant difference between the disease groups and HC. To investigate whether the genera that were more abundant in MSA were also more abundant in PD, and vice versa, log ratios of a genus’s mean relative abundance in MSA vs. HC were plotted against PD vs. HC.

2.6 Using random forest classifiers to predict disease and constipation status

To assess the potential of microbial composition as a predictor of disease status, random forest classifiers were trained. Each analysis focused on either MSA or PD, along with HC, utilizing nested 5-fold cross-validation. Each genus was assigned an importance score by the scikit-learn learning estimator (). The area under the curve (AUC) and confusion matrix were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the classifiers.

2.7 Microbial correlations and networks

Four statistical methods were used to calculate the microbial correlation matrices within each study group: (1) the Spearman’s correlation on centered log-ratio (CLR) transformed data, (2) SparCC, () and Sparse Estimation of Correlations among Microbiomes (SECOM) using (3) linear correlation and (4) distance correlation (). To ensure sufficient representation for correlation analyses while limiting the number of multiple comparisons, genera with a prevalence ≥ 50% and an average abundance ≥ 20 within each study group were included in the correlation analyses.

The inference of microbial networks was conducted using Sparse Cooccurrence Network Investigation for Compositional data (SCNIC) and SParse InversE Covariance Estimation for Ecological Association Inference (SPIEC-EASI) (; Shaffer et al., 2023). Genera with an average abundance < 2 in each study group were excluded.

2.8 Differential pathway abundance analyses

Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States 2 (PICRUSt2) was used to predict the functional abundances of Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and to regroup EC numbers into MetaCyc pathways (; ). The outputs from PICRUSt2 were visualized using STAMP (). Univariate and multivariable differential abundance analyses of MetaCyc pathways were conducted using four statistical methods (ANCOM, ANCOM-BC, ALDEx2, and MaAsLin 2).

2.9 Statistical analyses

The categorical variables are presented as count (percentage), while the numeric variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables across the study groups. Comparisons of age across the study groups were performed using the ANOVA with the Tukey’s post-hoc test. The Student’s t-test was used to compare age of onset and disease duration between MSA and PD. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistical significance.

The Supplementary material provided details on the microbial composition analyses. The features were collapsed at the genus level before subsequent analyses. To control false discovery rates, q values derived from the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure were used in differential abundance analyses (ANCOM, ALDEx2, and MaAsLin 2), except for ANCOM-BC, which adopted the Holm-Bonferroni method as its default approach. Q values < 0.05 were considered statistical significance. The analyses were carried out using R packages2 and SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States) ().

3 Results

3.1 Clinicodemographic characteristics

A total of 119 participants (MSA, n = 26; PD, n = 66; HC, n = 27) were enrolled. After quality control, 24 MSA, 52 PD, and 27 HC samples remained after DADA2-denoising, while 24 MSA, 50 PD, and 27 HC samples remained after OTU-clustering. Table 1 presents the clinicodemographic characteristics of the study subjects with qualified fecal specimens using both approaches. The PD patients were older than the MSA patients and HCs (p < 0.01). In addition, a greater proportion of MSA and PD patients reported experiencing constipation, taking medications for constipation, and using probiotics compared with HCs (p < 0.01). The PD patients displayed mild motor symptoms according to the UPDRS III score (15.2 ± 12.0). Among PD patients, those with constipation had higher UPDRS III scores (p = 0.011, Supplementary Table 1).

TABLE 1

CharacteristicsMSAPDHCP-value
No.245027
Sex0.058
 Male13 (54.2%)26 (52.0%)7 (25.9%)
 Female11 (45.8%)24 (48.0%)20 (74.1%)
Age (years)62.0 ± 8.473.7 ± 8.467.1 ± 9.2< 0.001
(MSA vs. HC: 0.093, PD vs. HC: 0.005, MSA vs. PD: < 0.001)
Age (years)< 0.001
 40–491 (4.2%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
 50–595 (20.8%)4 (8.0%)5 (18.5%)
 60–6915 (62.5%)12 (24.0%)13 (48.2%)
 70–793 (12.5%)21 (42.0%)7 (25.9%)
 ≥ 800 (0.0%)13 (26.0%)2 (7.4%)
Hypertension0.042
 Yes6 (25.0%)19 (38.0%)16 (59.3%)
 No18 (75.0%)31 (62.0%)11 (40.7%)
Diabetes mellitus0.606
 Yes2 (8.3%)9 (18.0%)3 (11.1%)
 No22 (91.7%)41 (82.0%)24 (88.9%)
Hyperlipidemia0.124
 Yes6 (25.0%)13 (26.0%)13 (48.2%)
 No18 (75.0%)37 (74.0%)14 (51.9%)
Cigarette smoking0.313
 Yes0 (0.0%)1 (2.0%)2 (7.4%)
 No24 (100.0%)49 (98.0%)25 (92.6%)
Alcohol consumption1.000
 Yes0 (0.0%)1 (2.0%)1 (3.7%)
 No24 (100.0%)49 (98.0%)26 (96.3%)
Constipation< 0.001
 Yes19 (79.2%)28 (56.0%)7 (25.9%)
 No5 (20.8%)22 (44.0%)20 (74.1%)
Medications for constipation0.008
 Yes12 (50.0%)17 (34.0%)3 (11.1%)
 No12 (50.0%)33 (66.0%)24 (88.9%)
Usage of probiotics< 0.001
 Yes12 (50.0%)25 (50.0%)2 (7.4%)
 No12 (50.0%)25 (50.0%)25 (92.6%)
Daily vegetables1.000
 Yes16 (66.7%)34 (68.0%)19 (70.4%)
 No8 (33.3%)16 (32.0%)8 (29.6%)
Daily yogurt1.000
 Yes1 (4.2%)4 (8.0%)2 (7.4%)
 No23 (95.8%)46 (92.0%)25 (92.6%)
Age of onset (years)59.5 ± 8.169.6 ± 8.6< 0.001
Disease duration (years)2.0 ± 1.34.1 ± 4.60.004
UPDRS III15.2 ± 12.0

Clinicodemographic characteristics.

The categorical variables are presented as count (percentage). The numeric variables are presented as mean ± SD. The Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to compare age. The Student’s t-test was used to compare age of onset and disease duration between MSA and PD. HC, healthy control; MSA, multiple system atrophy; PD, Parkinson’s disease; UPDRS III, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III.

3.2 Alpha diversities and beta diversities

There were no significant differences in the observed number of features, the Shannon’s diversity index, or the Faith’s phylogenetic diversity across the study groups using either DADA2-denoising or OTU-clustering. The structures of the microbial composition are depicted in Supplementary Figure 1. A notable distinction in beta diversities, as indicated by unweighted and weighted UniFrac distances, was observed between MSA and HC in PERmutational Multivariate ANalysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) (q < 0.05, Supplementary Table 2; ). On the other hand, not all beta diversity measurements between PD and HC, or between MSA and PD, were significantly different.

3.3 Univariate differential abundance analyses

As shown in Table 2, Fusicatenibacter consistently exhibited a significantly lower abundance in MSA than in HC across all four algorithms using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering. Furthermore, Butyricicoccus was significantly less abundant in MSA than in HC when ANCOM-BC was used. On the other hand, a significant decrease in Butyricicoccus abundance was observed in PD compared with HC across all algorithms, except ALDEx2. When comparing MSA and PD, only ANCOM-BC identified Limosilactobacillus as exhibiting a significantly greater abundance in PD using DADA2-denoising (q = 0.016).

TABLE 2

MSA vs. HCPD vs. HCMSA vs. PD
ANCOMGenusCLRW valueGenusCLRW valueGenusCLRW value
DADA2-denoisingFusicatenibacter−2.08120Butyricicoccus−1.3899
OTU-clusteringFusicatenibacter−1.95209Butyricicoccus−1.38190
ANCOM-BCGenusLFCq valueGenusLFCq valueGenusLFCq value
DADA2-denoisingFusicatenibacter−2.08< 0.001Butyricicoccus−1.290.019Limosilactobacillus−0.910.016
Faecalibacterium−1.850.024
Butyricicoccus−1.500.015
OTU-clusteringFusicatenibacter−1.93< 0.001Butyricicoccus−1.43< 0.001
Butyricicoccus−1.370.010
ALDEx2GenusEffectq value WiGenusEffectq value WiGenusEffectq value Wi
DADA2-denoisingFusicatenibacter−0.690.024
OTU-clusteringFusicatenibacter−0.760.020
MaAsLin 2GenusCoefficientq valueGenusCoefficientq valueGenusCoefficientq value
DADA2-denoisingFusicatenibacter−2.260.013Butyricicoccus−1.760.008
OTU-clusteringFusicatenibacter−2.720.013Butyricicoccus−2.010.008

Significant genera identified in differential abundance analyses.

In ANCOM, the W value represents the number of tests showing significant differences in the ratios of a particular genus and the other genera between the two study groups. The CLR represents the difference in the means of centered log-ratio-transformed relative abundance of a genus between the two study groups. In ANCOM-BC, the LFC quantifies the effect of study group on the bias-corrected absolute abundance of a particular genus. The q values were determined using the Holm-Bonferroni method. In ALDEx2, the “effect” is determined by calculating the median difference in the CLR-transformed probabilities between the study groups and dividing it by the maximum difference in the CLR-transformed probabilities within the study groups through 128 Monte Carlo samplings. The q value for the Wilcoxon rank test was determined using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and is represented as q value Wi. In MaAsLin 2, the “coefficient” refers to the effect size in the linear model, representing the difference between categorical variables. The q values were determined using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. A positive CLR/LFC/“effect”/“coefficient” suggests that the genus is more abundant in the first study group. The genera highlighted in bold were identified using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering. ALDEx2, ANOVA-Like Differential Expression 2; ANCOM, ANalysis of COmposition of Microbiomes; ANCOM-BC, ANalysis of COmposition of Microbiomes with Bias Correction; CLR, centered log-ratio; HC, healthy control; LFC, log fold change; MaAsLin 2, Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models 2; MSA, multiple system atrophy; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; PD, Parkinson’s disease.

3.4 Multivariable differential abundance analyses

The differential abundances of genera were estimated after adjusting for potential confounders in two models. Model 1 included constipation status, while Model 2 included age, sex, hypertension, constipation status, medications for constipation, and usage of probiotics. Fusicatenibacter and Butyricicoccus remained significantly less abundant in MSA and PD, respectively, than in HC (p < 0.01, Supplementary Table 3). The effect size exhibited consistency with those observed in the univariate analyses.

In multivariable ANCOM-BC, Phascolarctobacterium exhibited a lower abundance in MSA than in HC in Model 1 using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering (q < 0.05, Supplementary Table 4). In Model 2, both multivariable ANCOM-BC and multivariable MaAsLin 2 identified Butyricicoccus as being less abundant and Intestinibacter as being more abundant in MSA compared with HC (q < 0.05, Supplementary Tables 4, 5).

3.5 MSA-associated genera and PD-associated genera were correlated

The ranked relative differentials are illustrated in Figure 1A. Compared with those in HC, genera exhibiting greater abundances in MSA tended to be more abundant in PD, and vice versa. At the same time, genera with a lower abundance in MSA generally displayed a reduced abundance in PD, and vice versa. Figure 1B displays the log ratios between the top and bottom 25% of differentially abundant genera between MSA and HC, as well as between PD and HC, across the three study groups. The genera that differentiated MSA from HC were capable of differentiating PD from HC, and vice versa (p < 0.005). Both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering yielded similar results (Supplementary Figure 2). Figure 1C displays the log ratios of the mean relative abundances of genera (MSA vs. HC against PD vs. HC). The Pearson correlation coefficients of the genera identified through DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering were both 0.66 (p < 0.001).

FIGURE 1

3.6 Using random forest classifiers to predict disease status and identify genera with high importance scores

The AUCs of MSA-HC classifier and PD-HC classifier were 0.74 and 0.78 using DADA2 denoising (Supplementary Figure 3). When using OTU-clustering, the AUCs of MSA-HC classifier and PD-HC classifier were 0.67 and 0.78. The random forest classifiers built for differentiating between MSA and PD had AUCs of 0.78 and 0.75 using DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering, respectively. Supplementary Table 6 presents the confusion matrices, which illustrate the sensitivity and specificity of the predictive performance.

Table 3 lists the genera with importance scores ≥ 0.05 in the random forest classifiers. Fusicatenibacter had the highest importance score in MSA-HC classifiers, while Butyricicoccus had the highest importance score in PD-HC classifiers. Additionally, using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering, Faecalibacterium and Blautia were found to have importance scores 0.05 in MSA-HC classifiers and PD-HC classifiers, respectively. In MSA-PD classifiers, the identified genus was Collinsella.

TABLE 3

MSA-HC classifierPD-HC classifierMSA-PD classifier
GenusImportance scoreGenusImportance scoreGenusImportance score
DADA2-denoising
Fusicatenibacter0.066Butyricicoccus0.057Collinsella0.063
Faecalibacterium0.054Blautia0.054Uncultured genus within Oscillospiracea0.055
OTU-clustering
Fusicatenibacter0.220Butyricicoccus0.160Collinsella0.095
Faecalibacterium0.094Collinsella0.076
Enterorhabdus0.053Blautia0.061
Escherichia-Shigella0.052Eggerthella0.051

Crucial genera in random forest classifiers.

Genera with higher importance scores demonstrated greater efficacy in distinguishing disease status. The importance scores were determined by the scikit-learn learning estimator. Genera with importance scores ≥ 0.05 are displayed. Genera highlighted in bold were identified using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering. HC, healthy control; MSA, multiple system atrophy; PD, Parkinson’s disease.

3.7 Microbial correlations

Table 4 presents the significant interbacterial correlations identified through the correlation analyses. Only correlations discovered using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering are shown. No interbacterial correlation was found when employing the Spearman’s correlation on CLR-transformed data or SparCC after controlling for false discovery rates. On the other hand, SECOM using linear correlation and distance correlation revealed three significant correlations: (1) Ruminococcus torques group * Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 (in MSA), (2) Eggerthella * Anaerostipes (in HC), and (3) Butyricicoccus * Anaerostipes (in HC). The microbial correlation matrices of MSA using DADA2-denoising are displayed in Figure 2. The Spearman’s correlation and SparCC exhibited similar patterns of interbacterial correlations, while SECOM produced sparse correlation matrices. SECOM revealed an additional interbacterial correlation using distance correlation compared with linear correlation in MSA. Supplementary Figures 4-1 to 4-5 present the remaining correlation matrices.

TABLE 4

MSAHCPD
Interbacterial correlationCoefficientP-valueInterbacterial correlationCoefficientP-value
Spearman’s correlation
SparCC
SECOM-linear
Ruminococcus torques group * Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003-0.84/-0.690.003/0.004Blautia * Eubacterium hallii group0.64/0.760.002/ < 0.001
Eggerthella * Anaerostipes-0.81/-0.80< 0.001/<0.001
Butyricicoccus * Anaerostipes0.70/0.600.002/0.003
SECOM-distance
Ruminococcus torques group * Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-0030.90/0.770.005/0.004Eggerthella * Anaerostipes0.87/0.79< 0.001/<0.001
Butyricicoccus * Anaerostipes0.76/0.69< 0.001/0.002

Significant interbacterial correlations identified in correlation analyses.

The interbacterial correlations listed above were identified using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering. In SECOM-linear, the “coefficient” represents the Pearson correlation coefficient, while in SECOM-distance, the “coefficient” refers to the distance correlation coefficient. The statistics preceding and following the slashes were obtained using DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering, respectively. HC, healthy control; MSA, multiple system atrophy; PD, Parkinson’s disease.

FIGURE 2

3.8 Microbial networks

Significant interbacterial interactions were identified in the network analyses using both DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering. In MSA, the positive interbacterial interaction of Ruminococcus gnavus group * Erysipelatoclostridium was consistently observed using both SCNIC and SPIEC-EASI (Figure 3 and Supplementary Table 7). This positive interaction was found to be unique to MSA, as it was not detected in the SCNIC or SPEC-EASI networks of PD and HC using either DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering (Supplementary Figures 5–1, 5–2).

FIGURE 3

3.9 Differential pathway abundance analyses

Univariate differential abundance analyses of MetaCyc pathways were conducted using four statistical methods (ANCOM, ANCOM-BC, ALDEx2, and MaAsLin 2). The ARGORNPROST-PWY pathway, a metabolic pathway leading to L-arginine degradation (), was significantly more abundant in MSA than in HC using DADA2-denoising across all four algorithms (Figures 4A, B and Supplementary Tables 8, 9). A similar trend was observed using OTU-clustering, although the results did not reach statistical significance. On the other hand, the PWY-6478 pathway, a metabolic pathway responsible for GDP-D-glycero-α-D-manno-heptose biosynthesis (), was significantly less abundant in MSA than in HC in certain algorithms (Figures 4C, D and Supplementary Tables 8, 9). When comparing MSA with PD, no pathway consistently exhibited a significantly differential abundance.

FIGURE 4

The differential abundances of MetaCyc pathways were further assessed after adjusting for potential confounders in two models. A significantly increased abundance of the ARGORNPROST-PWY pathway and a decreased abundance of the PWY-6478 pathway in MSA compared with HC were still identified using multivariable ANCOM-BC and multivariable MaAsLin 2, respectively (q < 0.05, Supplementary Tables 10, 11).

3.10 Constipation status was not a confounder

Because constipation may serve as a primary confounder in this study, we examined the associations between constipation status and microbial signatures. There were no significant differences in the alpha diversities between subjects with and without constipation. PERMANOVA revealed no significant differences in the beta diversities associated with constipation status (Supplementary Figures 6–1, 6–2). Furthermore, no genera exhibited a significantly differential abundance between subjects with and without constipation using either DADA2-denoising or OTU-clustering. The sensitivity analyses, including only HCs for comparison, yielded similar negative results.

Distinct genera associated with constipation status were identified in different study groups using random forest classifiers (Supplementary Table 12). The random forest classifiers for predicting constipation status in HC had AUCs of 0.77 and 0.78 using DADA2-denoising and OTU-clustering, respectively. However, when applied to MSA or PD, these classifiers exhibited limited ability to differentiate constipation status. The AUCs ranged from 0.27 to 0.57, suggesting that constipation status was associated with a distinct gut microbial shift in the disease groups compared with HC (Supplementary Table 13). In summary, the changes in gut microbiome in MSA and PD could not be attributed to constipation status.

4 Discussion

Previous studies have failed to consistently identify the gut microbial signatures associated with MSA and did not take potential confounders into consideration. In MSA, only higher levels of Akkermansia and lower levels of Blautia and Faecalibacterium were observed in more than one study (; ; Wan et al., 2019). Besides, only one of them directly compared the gut microbial composition and connections between MSA and PD using a simple co-abundance network analysis (). In this study, comprehensive multimodal analyses were conducted to reveal the altered gut microbial compositions in MSA compared with PD and HC.

To minimize the false-positive findings caused by discrepancies between the statistical methods, univariate multimodal analyses were conducted. Consistent reductions in the abundances of Fusicatenibacter and Butyricicoccus were observed in MSA and PD, respectively, in comparison with HC. Similar to other SCFA-producing bacteria, reduced levels of Fusicatenibacter and Butyricicoccus have been associated with PD (). Studies have also shown a positive correlation between the abundance of Butyricicoccus and the levels of SCFAs in PD (). Taken together, the mechanism underlying the relationship between Fusicatenibacter and MSA likely involves the anti-inflammatory effects of SCFAs, which is partially consistent with PD.

Only Limosilactobacillus exhibited a notable difference in abundance between MSA and PD in the univariate analyses. Limosilactobacillus reuteri is a well-studied probiotic bacterium known for its antimicrobial and immunomodulatory effects (). It can stabilize the blood-brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction associated with maternal immune activation in rodents and strengthening the gut epithelial barrier in adults (; ). Furthermore, a randomized controlled trial demonstrated the efficacy of a probiotic mixture containing Limosilactobacillus reuteri in alleviating constipation in PD (Tan et al., 2021). The lower levels of Limosilactobacillus in MSA compared with PD may accelerate the immune response from the gut-blood barrier to the BBB.

In multivariable analyses, Phascolarctobacterium exhibited lower abundances, while Intestinibacter exhibited higher abundances in MSA than in HC. Phascolarctobacterium is capable of producing propionate by fermenting succinate (Watanabe et al., 2012). Given the diverse functions of succinate, including serving as a metabolite for cross-feeding and regulating intestinal homeostasis (), the associations between Phascolarctobacterium and neurodegenerative diseases have shown inconsistent results. On the other hand, Intestinibacter was found to be more abundant in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (). However, the relationship between Intestinibacter and PD has not been consistent across studies.

Although α-synuclein deposits predominate in neurons in PD, in MSA they mainly accumulate in oligodendrocytes (Spillantini et al., 1998). Distinct microbial communities in MSA versus PD may generate different signaling mediators, such as bacterial amyloidogenic proteins or metabolites like SCFAs, contributing to cell type-specific α-synuclein aggregation (Schmitt et al., 2023). SCFAs produced by the gut microbiome can modulate neuronal function and microglial maturation (Silva et al., 2020). Of note, among plasma SCFAs derived from the gut microbiome, acetic and propionic acids were decreased in MSA but increased in PD (; ; Yang et al., 2022). Consequently, MSA and PD may be characterized by distinct patterns of gut microbial dysbiosis that lead to divergent plasma SCFA levels, ultimately affecting different neuronal populations and driving disease-specific α-synuclein pathology.

We further conducted an ensemble learning method using random forest classifiers to leverage the comprehensive gut microbial composition to differentiate between MSA, PD, and HC. The AUCs of the random forest classifiers ranged from 0.75 to 0.78, suggesting the potential utility of the gut microbiome in differentiating MSA from PD. Collinsella, which had importance scores > 0.05 in MSA-PD classifiers, is capable of producing SCFAs (). Collinsella exhibits a greater abundance in numerous neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) (), and early PD (). Notably, Collinsella was also found to increase with the stage and duration of PD (Zhang et al., 2020). Although the random forest classifiers based on the gut microbiome could differentiate MSA from PD, it was difficult to trace exactly how a prediction was made, limiting their direct clinical application. Furthermore, external validation in independent cohorts is needed to confirm common gut microbial alterations across populations.

It is debatable whether a single bacterial genus can significantly impact the host’s health status. Therefore, we utilized correlation analyses and network analyses to investigate the underlying structure of gut microbial compositions across the study groups. In MSA, a positive correlation between Ruminococcus torques group and Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 was identified in SECOM using both linear and distance correlation. Additionally, a positive interaction between Ruminococcus gnavus group and Erysipelatoclostridium was observed in SCNIC and SPIEC-EASI networks of MSA. Ruminococcus torques and Ruminococcus gnavus are mucosa-associated bacteria that can produce SCFAs by degrading mucin (). These bacteria may contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease by either providing substrates for non-mucolytic bacteria or producing proinflammatory polysaccharides (Wiredu Ocansey et al., 2023). Furthermore, an increased abundance of Ruminococcus torques has been observed in DLB and multiple sclerosis (; Thirion et al., 2023). On the other hand, Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 and Erysipelatoclostridium have been shown to exhibit increased abundances in PD (; Rosario et al., 2021). Erysipelatoclostridium was also positively related to the severity of PD (). It is plausible that an interwoven metabolic interaction between these coupled bacteria is responsible for the observed positive correlations in MSA.

Notably, functional inference using PICRUSt2 predicted a significant increase in the abundance of the ARGORNPROST-PWY pathway and a significant decrease in the abundance of the PWY-6478 pathway in MSA compared with HC. The ARGORNPROST-PWY pathway leads to the degradation of L-arginine, the primary substrate for nitric oxide (NO) synthesis (). NO is an important regulator of the CNS, promoting optimal cerebral blood flow, regulating synaptic plasticity, and modulating neurosecretion (Virarkar et al., 2013). A previous study reported decreased nitrate levels, the degradation product of NO, in the cerebrospinal fluid of MSA patients, indicating reduced CNS production of NO (). L-arginine itself can act as an immunosuppressive agent. In a rat model of cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, L-arginine inhibits the microglial inflammatory response, thereby exerting a neuroprotective effect (). In PD and AD, agmatine, a metabolite of L-arginine, can reduce oxidative stress and decreases neuronal apoptosis by inhibiting excitatory amino acid-induced neurotoxicity (Xu et al., 2018). L-arginine also inhibits the aggregation of amyloidogenic β-sheet structures by interacting with the hydrophobic regions of proteins (). Taken together, the accelerated degradation of L-arginine may contribute to the susceptibility to α-synuclein aggregation in MSA.

On the other hand. the PWY-6478 pathway is responsible for the GDP-D-glycero-α-D-manno-heptose biosynthesis (). Heptoses are common components of proinflammatory lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) present on the surface of gram-negative bacterial cells (). Gut microbial dysbiosis can lead to excessive leakage of LPS from the gut lining. LPSs primarily bind to toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on immune cells, causing excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines. Chronic neuroinflammation and neuronal cell death elicited via the gut-brain axis are key components of neurodegenerative diseases (). MSA patients have been shown to exhibit increased TLR4 expression in their colonic mucosa (). Despite TLR4’s role in the secretion of inflammatory mediators, it may also promote intestinal homeostasis and is essential for protection against epithelial injury and bacterial invasion (). In our study, the decreased abundance of the PWY-6478 pathway in MSA may be associated with downregulation of intestinal TLR4 and a reduced reparative response to intestinal injury. More studies are needed to elucidate the roles of LPSs and TLR4 in the gut environment of MSA. Despite a moderate correlation between the genera associated with MSA and PD, investigations into the underlying metabolic mechanisms deserve more attention.

Our study has several limitations. First, the sample size was relatively small due to the rarity of MSA, which limited the statistical power to detect additional genera and metabolic pathways associated with MSA and PD. Furthermore, the limited number of subjects precluded the use of statistical matching techniques; therefore, we conducted multivariable analyses to control for potential confounders. Second, the associations between diseases and changes in the gut microbiome were established through the study’s cross-sectional design. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether the identified microbial shifts are upstream, downstream, or incidental to MSA pathogenesis. Although the comprehensive multimodal analyses lend our study relatively robust internal validity, open datasets for external validation are needed to confirm these gut microbiome-derived signatures. We carefully controlled for potential confounders in the statistical analyses. Nonetheless, information on constipation status and daily intake of vegetables and yogurt was self-reported and assessed using a subjective true/false question, which may have introduced bias. Finally, while statistical tests did not show a significant influence of constipation on the observed microbial differences in MSA and PD, constipation may still exert residual confounding effects, as certain dysbiosis could be exclusively related to constipation in MSA patients.

In summary, our study provides the first evidence of pivotal alterations in gut microbial networks and metabolic pathways specific to MSA. Through comprehensive multimodal analyses, consistent findings were identified, particularly the decreased abundance of Fusicatenibacter in MSA. Although the genera associated with MSA and PD showed a moderate correlation, our correlation and network analyses revealed unique interbacterial interactions specific to MSA, including a novel positive correlation between Ruminococcus gnavus group and Erysipelatoclostridium. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to establish the clinical utility of fecal microbiome-derived signatures that incorporate interbacterial interactions in MSA. Furthermore, we identified significantly altered metabolic pathways in MSA, such as an increase in the ARGORNPROST-PWY pathway and a decrease in the PWY-6478 pathway. Experimental validation, such as shotgun metagenomic sequencing, should be performed to validate these functional predictions. This provides new directions for future studies on microbial metabolic interactions. Our findings may contribute to the differential diagnosis of MSA and enhance our understanding of its underlying pathogenesis.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in the Sequence Read Archive under the accession number PRJNA1289896.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the National Taiwan University Cancer Center Research Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

P-CL: Methodology, Conceptualization, Data curation, Software, Writing – original draft, Formal Analysis, Visualization. S-YC: Writing – review and editing, Resources, Funding acquisition. C-CL: Investigation, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis. Y-KW: Investigation, Writing – review and editing, Formal Analysis. YT: Resources, Funding acquisition, Writing – review and editing, Supervision, Project administration. M-CK: Data curation, Conceptualization, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Writing – review and editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taiwan (grant numbers NTUCCS-112-13, NTUCCS-113-13); the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan (grant numbers 109-2314-B-002-120-MY3, 111-2320-B-002-043-MY2, 112-2314-B-002-117-MY2); the National Taiwan University Hospital Bei-Hu Branch, Taiwan (grant number 11405); the Chemicals Administration, Ministry of Environment, Taiwan (grant number 113DA014); the National Environmental Research Academy, Taiwan (grant number 113FB005); and the “Center for Advanced Computing and Imaging in Biomedicine” from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan (grant number NTU-113L900703).

Acknowledgments

We thank Chia-Lang Hsu from the Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital for providing biochemical and bioinformatic assistance. We deeply appreciate the staff of the Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core Lab, Centers of Genomic and Precision Medicine, National Taiwan University for conducting 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The authors declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1623165/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

MSA, multiple system atrophy; PD, Parkinson’s disease; SCFA, short-chain fatty acid; CNS, central nervous system; NTUCC, National Taiwan University Cancer Center; HC, healthy control; UPDRS III, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale Part III; NTUH, National Taiwan University Hospital; REC, Research Ethics Committee; OTU, operational taxonomic unit; ANCOM, ANalysis of COmposition of Microbiomes; ANCOM-BC, ANalysis of COmposition of Microbiomes with Bias Correction; ALDEx2, ANOVA-Like Differential Expression 2; MaAsLin 2, Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear Models 2; AUC, area under the curve; CLR, centered log-ratio; SECOM, Sparse Estimation of Correlations among Microbiomes; SCNIC, Sparse Cooccurrence Network Investigation for Compositional data; SPIEC-EASI, SParse InversE Covariance Estimation for Ecological Association Inference; PICRUSt2, Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States 2; EC, Enzyme Commission; SD, standard deviation; PERMANOVA, PERmutational Multivariate ANalysis of Variance; BBB, blood-brain barrier; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; DLB, dementia with Lewy bodies; NO, nitric oxide; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; TLR4, toll-like receptor 4.

References

Summary

Keywords

multiple system atrophy, Parkinson’s disease, gut microbiome, 16S rRNA, differential abundance analyses, correlation and network analyses

Citation

Liu P-C, Cheng S-Y, Li C-C, Wang Y-K, Tseng YJ and Kuo M-C (2025) Altered gut microbial networks and metabolic pathways in multiple system atrophy: a comparative 16S rRNA study. Front. Neurosci. 19:1623165. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1623165

Received

06 May 2025

Accepted

18 July 2025

Published

13 August 2025

Volume

19 - 2025

Edited by

Soumyadev Sarkar, Arizona State University, United States

Reviewed by

Keiichi Nakahara, Kumamoto University, Japan

Luigia Turco, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Italy

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Ming-Che Kuo, ;

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics