Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.

Sec. Brain Imaging Methods

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1638022

Multi-Model Deep Learning for Dementia Detection: Addressing Data and Model Limitations

Provisionally accepted
Areej  BayahyaAreej Bayahya1,2*fares  Jammalfares Jammal1Haneen  BanjarHaneen Banjar1Fathy  Elbouraey EassaFathy Elbouraey Eassa1Omar  TalabayOmar Talabay3Sultan  AlamriSultan Alamri4
  • 1Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 2Software Engineering Department, College of Engineering, University of Business and Technology (UBT), Jeddah 21448, Saudi Arabia, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 3Center of Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
  • 4Department of Family Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia, jeddah, Saudi Arabia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Multiple deep neural network architectures have significantly transformed the field of medical imaging, offering unprecedented capabilities for classification in sMRI. However, this study addressed the limitations of state-of-the-art deep learning models and difficulties encountered by preprocessing data to classify dementia diseases using sMRI images. This study examined the efficacy of eight pretrained CNNs models, as well as ViT, Multimodal attention and CapsNet to evaluate accuracy, specificity and sensitivity in the classification of dementia disease. This study was trained on 10000 images for each class, validated on 3000 images for each class and tested on 850 images in each class which are dementia, MCI, healthy control. The sMRI dataset balanced between all type of classification gained from ADNI 6 . It evaluated the performance of image classification in 2D grid as slices structural sMRI. Among the evaluated models, the 3D-CNN and Multimodal attention exhibited the highest metrics, achieving an accuracy of 84% and 86%respectively, specificity of 83% and 86% respectively, and sensitivity of 84% and 86% respectively. The outcomes showed diminished and biased to some classes in all models. The sensitivity of AD in ViT as well as CapsNet is measured at 100%. In contrast, the precision in ViT as well as CapsNet is achieved in AD 43% while the precision for other classifications is determined to be 0%.This study suggests that the models require improvements in data representation using computer vision methods, or model architecture to enhance overall performance. This study conducts an in-depth analysis of various algorithms, including transformer and caps network when used sMRI to classify dementia disease. It aimed to compare their performance and uncover underlying factors contributing to the suboptimal results in image classification and dementia diagnosis. These models, while effective in certain aspects, often face challenges in feature extraction, accuracy, and computational efficiency.

Keywords: AI, Dementia, Deep neural network, Caps Network, Vit, CNNs

Received: 30 May 2025; Accepted: 28 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bayahya, Jammal, Banjar, Elbouraey Eassa, Talabay and Alamri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Areej Bayahya, Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.