Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

REVIEW article

Front. Neurosci.

Sec. Neural Technology

This article is part of the Research TopicClinically meaningful applications and evaluations of brain-computer interfacesView all articles

A Systematic Review of the Effects of Brain-Computer Interface on Lower Limb Motor Function, Balance Function, and Activities of Daily Living in Stroke Patients

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Tongji University, Shanghai, China
  • 2Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China
  • 3Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: To systematically evaluate the effects of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology on lower limb motor function, balance function, and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Methods: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases, with an additional manual search. The search period was from database inception to March 2024. The PEDro scale was used to assess the quality of the studies, the GRADE system was applied to evaluate the evidence quality for outcome measures, and Meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 17.0 software. Results: The systematic review included nine studies. The methodological quality, assessed using the PEDro scale, yielded an average score of 6.9, which corresponds to a moderate-to-low certainty of evidence. The Meta-analysis showed that BCI technology significantly improved lower limb motor function (MD = 3.52, 95% CI [2.03, 5.00], P < 0.001) and activities of daily living (MD = 6.08, 95% CI [1.81, 10.35], P = 0.01), but had no significant effect on balance function (MD = 4.82, 95% CI [-1.53, 11.16], P = 0.14). Subgroup analysis showed that the effect size in the acute and subacute phases was 3.89, and in the recovery phase, it was 3.12, both of which were statistically significant. In terms of intervention methods, the effect size for MI-BCI was 2.73, and for BCI-Robot, it was 4.60, both statistically significant. Regarding intervention dosage, the effect size for 2.5–10 hours was 2.60, and for 12–20 hours, it was 5.46, both statistically significant. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that BCI-based interventions have a beneficial effect on lower limb motor function and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Interventions initiated during the acute or subacute phase, with a total dose exceeding 12 hours, appear to be associated with superior outcomes. However, the certainty of this evidence is moderate to low, necessitating further validation. Future research should prioritize large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials to definitively establish the efficacy of BCI technology and elucidate its optimal implementation protocols.

Keywords: Brain-computer interface, Stroke, Lower limb motor function, Systematic review, Balance function

Received: 05 Jun 2025; Accepted: 21 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Li and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Hairong Liu, liuhaironglhr@126.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.