Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CORRECTION article

Front. Neurosci., 19 August 2025

Sec. Neuroenergetics and Brain Health

Volume 19 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1657693

Correction: Deregulation of mTORC1-TFEB axis in human iPSC model of GBA1-associated Parkinson's disease


Fahad Mubariz&#x;Fahad Mubariz1Afsoon Saadin&#x;Afsoon Saadin1Nicholas LingenfelterNicholas Lingenfelter1Chinmoy SarkarChinmoy Sarkar2Aditi BanerjeeAditi Banerjee3Marta M. Lipinski,Marta M. Lipinski2,4Ola Awad
Ola Awad1*
  • 1Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  • 4Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

A Correction on
Deregulation of mTORC1-TFEB axis in human iPSC model of GBA1-associated Parkinson's disease

by Mubariz, F., Saadin, A., Lingenfelter, N., Sarkar, C., Banerjee, A., Lipinski, M. M., and Awad, O. (2023). Front. Neurosci. 17:1152503. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1152503

There was a mistake in Figure 1E as published. One of the fluorescence image panels in Figure 1E was accidently inserted twice. The marker expression image for VMAT2 in CtrlWT/WT was the same image shown for PD1-GBAWT/N370S iPSC neuron population. The corrected Figure 1 appears below.

Figure 1
Scientific figure illustrating neuronal differentiation protocols and analyses. A: Timeline of neuronal induction, enrichment, and differentiation with specific treatments indicated. B: Images of neuronal rosettes and fluorescence stained for FoxA2 and DAPI. C: Gel images showing expression of TH, AADC, and GAPDH in different cell populations. D: Immunofluorescence images for Tuj1 and TH, with bar graph showing percentage of TH-positive neurons across iPSC lines. E: Images showing VMAT2, MAP2, GIRK2 expression in control and mutant neurons. F: Bar graphs showing fold changes in GCase activity in iPSC neurons. G: Western blot analysis of GCase and β-Actin expression levels.

Figure 1. Generation of human iPSC model of GBA1-associated PD. (A) Schematic overview of the protocol used to differentiate iPSCs to dopaminergic (DA) neurons. Enrichment for midbrain floor-plate (FP) progenitors was initiated by culturing iPSCs-derived embryoid bodies (EBs) for 12 days in the presence of Noggin, SB431542 (SMAD signal inhibitors), CHIR99021 (WNT-β catenin signal activator), Sonic hedgehog (SHH) and Y27632 (ROCK inhibitor), followed by additional 8 days in the presence of FGF8 and BDNF. Neuronal rosettes appearing by day 20, were manually picked and differentiated to DA neurons by culturing in media supplemented with ascorbic acid (AA), cAMP, BDNF, and GDNF for 2–3 weeks. (B) Representative phase contrast image for iPSC-neuronal rosettes appearing around day 20 of the differentiation protocol showing the characteristic appearance. Also shown are immunofluorescence images of neuronal progenitors within the rosettes expressing the floor-plate marker FoxA2 and its overlay with nuclear DAPI. Scale bar = 100um. (C) Representative RT-PCR analysis showing expression of the dopamine synthesis enzymes; Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and Aromatic l-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) in dopaminergic neurons (DAn) and neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) differentiated from WT control (Ctrl WT/WT), GBA1 mutant, and gene-corrected PD iPSC lines. GAPDH is used as a loading control. (D) Representative immunofluorescence images of dopaminergic neuronal cultures (DNCs) differentiated from WT control and the indicated PD iPSC lines. Neurons were co-labeled with the pan-neuronal marker, Tuj1 (red) and the DA neuron marker, TH (green). Also shown in the last panels are the overlay of both markers and an enlargement of TH positive neurons in each line. Scale bar = 100 μm. Bar graph below shows the percentage of TH positive neurons in WT control and the indicated PD DNCs. Neurons were counted in at least 3 different fields per experiment in 2–3 independent experiments. Data represent average ± SEM. (E) Representative immunofluorescence images of WT control and the indicated GBA1 mutant PD DNCs labeled with an antibody to the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2), or the G-protein regulated inward-rectifier potassium channel 2 (GIRK2). Also shown is the overlay of each marker (green) with MAP2 (red) and DAPI (blue). Scale bar = 50 μm. (F) GCase enzyme activity in WT control, GBA1 mutant, and gene-corrected PD NPCs. Data represent average fold activity relative to control in triplicate wells in a representative experiment ± SEM. *p = 0.02 between the indicated groups as assessed by One-way ANOVA. (G) Western blot analysis showing GCase protein levels in WT control, GBA1 mutant, and gene-corrected PD DNCs. Also shown is β-Actin loading control. Bar graph shows fold GCase relative to the WT control. Data represent average ± SEM. n = 3–4 per group. **p = 0.006 (WT vs. PD1), **p = 0.008 (WT vs. PD2), **p = 0.004 (WT vs. PD3), and ****p < 0.0001 between the indicated groups as assessed by One-way ANOVA.

The original version of this article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: GBA1 mutations, Parkinson's disease, transcription factor EB, induced-pluripotent stem cells, autophagy-lysosomal pathway, mammalian target of rapamycin complex1

Citation: Mubariz F, Saadin A, Lingenfelter N, Sarkar C, Banerjee A, Lipinski MM and Awad O (2025) Correction: Deregulation of mTORC1-TFEB axis in human iPSC model of GBA1-associated Parkinson's disease. Front. Neurosci. 19:1657693. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1657693

Received: 01 July 2025; Accepted: 31 July 2025;
Published: 19 August 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: David Mokler, University of New England, United States

Copyright © 2025 Mubariz, Saadin, Lingenfelter, Sarkar, Banerjee, Lipinski and Awad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ola Awad, b2F3YWRAc29tLnVtYXJ5bGFuZC5lZHU=

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.