Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Neurosci.

Sec. Perception Science

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1662018

This article is part of the Research TopicEmerging talents in Human Neuroscience: Psychophysiology and Cognitive Neuroscience 2025View all 3 articles

Mapping Body-Related Research within the Experimental Landscape of Anorexia Nervosa: A Scoping Review

Provisionally accepted
Sofia  GentiliSofia Gentili1*Valentina  MeregalliValentina Meregalli1Gaia  RissoGaia Risso1,2Serena  GiovanniniSerena Giovannini1Eugenia  ZambonEugenia Zambon1Michela  BassolinoMichela Bassolino2Andrea  SerinoAndrea Serino3Angela  FavaroAngela Favaro1Enrico  CollantoniEnrico Collantoni1
  • 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
  • 2HES-SO Valais-Wallis Institut Gesundheit, Sion, Switzerland
  • 3MySpace Lab, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Universite de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex psychiatric disorder characterized not only by restrictive eating behaviors and fear of weight gain, but also by emotional dysregulation, cognitive rigidity, and a profound disturbance in bodily experience. While bodily disturbance is clinically central, its multifaceted and pre-reflective nature has made it difficult to investigate experimentally. This scoping review aims to map the experimental case-control literature on AN from the past 15 years, with particular attention to how studies on body representation are represented within the broader field of AN research, both in terms of their prevalence and their subdivision into specific thematic domains. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they involved an experimental task comparing individuals with AN to healthy controls. The search yielded 603 eligible studies, each classified into one or more thematic domains: cognition, emotion/social cognition, food-related processing, reward, and body representation. Among these, 164 studies addressed body representation and were further categorized into five subdomains: body image, perception of other bodies, body schema, sensory processing, and interoception. While studies on cognition, emotion, reward, and food processing often used standardized paradigms and showed moderate methodological consistency, research on the bodily domain was notably heterogeneous. This reflects both the conceptual complexity of corporeality and the lack of unified frameworks for its empirical investigation. A recent shift toward multisensory and embodiment-based paradigms suggests increasing interest in implicit and integrative models of body representation. By identifying patterns, gaps, and emerging trends, this review underscores the need for greater conceptual clarity and interdisciplinary convergence. Advancing the experimental study of body representation in AN may support more comprehensive models of the disorder and enhance our understanding of bodily experience in psychiatric conditions.

Keywords: Anorexia Nervosa, Eating Disorders, experimental psychology, body, interoception, multisensory integration

Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 26 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gentili, Meregalli, Risso, Giovannini, Zambon, Bassolino, Serino, Favaro and Collantoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sofia Gentili, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.