CASE REPORT article
Front. Neurosci.
Sec. Translational Neuroscience
Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1666023
Combined Long Nerve Allograft and Nerve Transfer for Functional Recovery of Ulnar Nerve: Case Study with Longitudinal Clinical and Neurodiagnostic Follow-Up
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Orthopaedic Hand Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, United States
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Hand Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, Lubbock, United States
- 4Department of Neurology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Peripheral nerve injuries involving large gaps (>50 mm) are associated with poor outcomes due to delayed axonal regeneration and limited reconstructive options. While autografts are traditionally the gold standard, their use is limited by donor site morbidity and length constraints. Processed nerve allografts have emerged as an alternative, but data on their long-term efficacy, particularly for gaps ≥ 60 mm remain limited. Case Report: We present a case of a 15-year-old male with a 68-mm ulnar nerve gap following trauma reconstructed acutely with a processed nerve allograft. This procedure was performed in conjunction with an anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) to ulnar motor branch transfer and ulnar nerve decompression of potential entrapment sites. Results: Serial assessments over 4.5 years demonstrated substantial recovery. By 16 months, the patient had regained strong grip strength, full range of motion, and near-normal sensory thresholds. At final follow-up, he had returned to all activities without limitations. Serial EMGs confirmed early nascent motor unit recruitment by 3 months, progressive reinnervation at 16 months, and persistent low-amplitude responses at 54 months, suggestive of ongoing but incomplete remyelination. Conclusion: This case provides the longest known electrodiagnostic follow-up of a long-gap ulnar nerve allograft reconstruction. It supports the feasibility of processed allografts for gaps <70 mm and emphasizes the value of long-term EMG monitoring in tracking regeneration. These findings contribute critical data to a sparsely studied domain and help define expectations for complex nerve repairs.
Keywords: allograft, Nerve Transfer, Peripheral nerve surgery, reconstruction, Microsurgery
Received: 15 Jul 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Cushman, Arunachalam Sakthiyendran, Hernandez, Kurtzke and MacKay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Brendan J MacKay, Department of Orthopaedic Hand Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.