Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Neurosci.

Sec. Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience

Auditory object segmentation amplifies prediction error signals in a complex MMN paradigm

Provisionally accepted
Fran  López-CaballeroFran López-Caballero*Dylan  SeeboldDylan SeeboldHayley  RhorerHayley RhorerLauren  FowlerLauren FowlerJack  KavanaghJack KavanaghSophia  YiSophia YiAlfredo  SklarAlfredo SklarBrian  A CoffmanBrian A CoffmanDean  F SalisburyDean F Salisbury
  • Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology Research Laboratory, Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Auditory deviance detection depends on the segmentation of sound sequences into perceptually meaningful units, which provide the basis for predictive models. Complex mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigms, including dual-rule designs, place higher demands on these processes because regularities are defined by relationships across tones rather than by single features. However, it remains unclear how facilitation of auditory segmentation influences MMN. To address this, we compared MMN elicited during a dual-rule paradigm under continuous versus temporally segmented (750 ms gap) conditions in thirty-two participants using simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings. Two 50-ms binaural pure tones were presented in pairs. Tone A was a 1 kHz stimulus biased to the right ear, and Tone B was a 1.2 kHz stimulus biased to the left ear. Within each pair, tones followed with a 330 ms Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA), with standards consisting of A-B pairs (85.6%) and deviants of A-A pairs (14.3%). Two conditions were used: a No-Gap condition, where pairs followed continuously with a 330 ms SOA, and a Gap condition, where pairs were separated by a longer 750 ms SOA. Results at EEG FCz revealed dual-rule MMN amplitudes (130-230 ms) were not significantly different between No-Gap and Gap conditions (t(29) = 0.93; p = .36; d = .17). Conversely, MEG source-localized responses in bilateral primary auditory cortex (A1) revealed larger MMN responses in the Gap condition relative to No-Gap (F(1,31) = 26.07, p < .001, ƞ𝑝2 = .457). This suggests that temporal segmentation facilitates the grouping of tone pairs into perceptual objects, allowing the auditory system to form predictions not only at the level of individual tones, but also at the level of the tone pair as a perceptual unit. Deviants in this context violate both low-level features (pitch and location) and the higher-order pair structure, producing larger prediction error signals. These results provide insight into how the auditory system integrates local and higher-order regularities, offering a mechanistic link between auditory scene analysis and hierarchical predictive coding in complex auditory environments.

Keywords: Complex Mismatch Negativity, auditory scene analysis, Auditory segmentation, MEG, source solutions

Received: 30 Aug 2025; Accepted: 14 Nov 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 López-Caballero, Seebold, Rhorer, Fowler, Kavanagh, Yi, Sklar, Coffman and Salisbury. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Fran López-Caballero, lopezcaballerofj@upmc.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.