ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Ocean Sustain.
Sec. Marine Governance
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/focsu.2025.1548400
This article is part of the Research TopicParticipatory and Just Governance: Empowering Local and Indigenous CommunitiesView all articles
Exploring power dynamics and bricolage practices in diverse cases of marine resource conflicts
Provisionally accepted- 1Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
- 2Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 3Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Oslo, Norway
- 4University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This study investigates how bricolage practices challenge institutional arrangements and power dynamics in transformations of marine resource conflicts. Strategies for economic growth based on underpinning blue economy narratives are driving marine conflicts and shaping their dynamics in diverse ways. There has been limited study on how a variety of affected actors are acting to transform marine conflicts towards institutionalized, sustainable and equitable outcomes. In response, this study explores the power dynamics of how fisher bricoleurs in concert with others, such as NGOs, are creatively drawing on resources to shape marine conflicts in Norway, Brazil and South Africa. These are collaborative efforts by fishers with others to amplify their voices, enhance accountability, and address conflicts more equitably and sustainably. The bricolage power framework adopted for studying marine sustainability conflicts underscores the importance of collective action and collaborative partnerships to change conflict relations and outcomes by challenging various institutional practices and dominant power structures. In particular, the Brazilian and South African cases demonstrate how marginalized actors, through creative bricolage practices, can adapt and reinvent regulatory processes to challenge unjust practices and foster more inclusive and adaptive governance structures. However, we urge caution about being overly optimistic regarding the sustainability of these shifts. While grassroots actors in concert with others have shown potential to reform institutions toward more sustainable and equitable relations, these efforts remain isolated and arguably have not led to systematic transformations in the respective cases discussed here.
Keywords: power, Marine resource conflicts, blue economy, Resistance, Bricolage, Sustainability Change
Received: 19 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Saunders, Prado, Knol-Kauffman, Sowman, Tafon and Gilek. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Fred Saunders, Södertörn University, Huddinge, Sweden
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.