Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article

Front. Ocean Sustain.

Sec. Marine Governance

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/focsu.2025.1584927

This article is part of the Research TopicThe Road to Implementation of the UN High Seas Treaty 2023View all articles

The BBNJ Clearing-House Mechanism: Considerations for its diverse functions, users, and sources

Provisionally accepted
Christine  GaebelChristine Gaebel1,2*Harriet  Harden-DaviesHarriet Harden-Davies1,2Marjo  Kristiina VierrosMarjo Kristiina Vierros2Mariana  CaldeiraMariana Caldeira1,2Luciana  CoelhoLuciana Coelho2,3Kahlil  HassanaliKahlil Hassanali4Alumita  SekinaraiAlumita Sekinarai2Júlia  Schütz VeigaJúlia Schütz Veiga2
  • 1University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 2Nippon Foundation - University of Edinburgh Ocean Voices Programme, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 3International Consultant, Law of the Sea and Ocean Governance, São Luís, Brazil
  • 4Institute of Marine Affairs, Chaguaramas, Trinidad and Tobago

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Adopted in 2023, the Agreement for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agreement) is a significant milestone for multilateralism and is expected to promote a more holistic and cooperative approach to biodiversity governance. Central to realising these ambitions, however, is the necessity for the best available science, knowledge, and information to inform and guide implementation. To support and facilitate the sharing of science, knowledge, and information, the BBNJ Agreement establishes a Clearing-House Mechanism (ClHM). Importantly, the ClHM is envisioned to play an integral and multifaceted role across the implementation of the BBNJ Agreement. It is to serve as a central data, knowledge, and information repository hosting data, information, and documents relating to the four elements under the Agreement, namely Marine Genetic Resources, Area-Based Management Tools, Environmental Impact Assessments, and Capacity-Building and the Transfer of Marine Technology. Moreover, it is to facilitate and advance data sharing and collaboration, act as a hub to match capacity development needs with opportunities, and more. The multifaceted functions, wide scope of information, and diversity of end-users of the BBNJ ClHM, highlight the intricate but critical task of designing and operationalising a fit-for-purpose ClHM for biodiversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction. Here, we aim to provide insights on what this might entail. Through a comprehensive analysis of the envisioned functions of the ClHM and an exploration of lessons learned from existing mechanisms and databases, we identify and discuss key considerations which are critical for implementing and operationalising a fit-for-purpose BBNJ ClHM.

Keywords: BBNJ, Clearing-house mechanism, Ocean governance, UNCLOS, data sharing, science-policy, Institutional arrangements

Received: 28 Feb 2025; Accepted: 26 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gaebel, Harden-Davies, Vierros, Caldeira, Coelho, Hassanali, Sekinarai and Schütz Veiga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Christine Gaebel, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.