In the published article, there was an error. In two places in the article, there was information removed for review that was not reinserted for publication.
A correction has been made to Research design, paragraph 2. This paragraph previously stated:
“The study design, hypotheses, and research questions, and the planned analyses were preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) webpage (information removed during peer-review process) before data collection begun. Moreover, the OSF page contains a Supplementary material with detailed information about the measurements, the coding instructions, information about deviations from the pre-registration plan, and other relevant information for reproduction of the study. We adhered to the ethical evaluation procedure established by the Research Ethics Committee at (information removed during peer-review process).”
The corrected paragraph appears below:
“The study design, hypotheses, and research questions, and the planned analyses were preregistered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GBMQY) before data collection begun. Moreover, the OSF page contains a Supplementary material with detailed information about the measurements, the coding instructions, information about deviations from the pre-registration plan, and other relevant information for reproduction of the study. We adhered to the ethical evaluation procedure established by the Research Ethics Committee at Åbo Akademi University.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
right-wing populism, social media, laboratory study, emotional responses, facial expression, self-reports
Citation
Lindholm J, Eklund J, Strandberg K, Carlson T and Andersson S (2024) Corrigendum: Beyond negativity? A laboratory study on emotional responses to populist strategies on social media. Front. Polit. Sci. 6:1484105. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2024.1484105
Received
21 August 2024
Accepted
29 August 2024
Published
13 September 2024
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
6 - 2024
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Lindholm, Eklund, Strandberg, Carlson and Andersson.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jenny Lindholm jenny.lindholm@abo.fi
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.