METHODS article
Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. Political Science Methodologies
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1504394
This article is part of the Research TopicMethods in political science – Innovation & DevelopmentsView all 8 articles
Configuring High-Performance Work Systems in Public Administration: A Set-Theoretic Approach to Explain Organizational Performance in Swiss Municipalities
Provisionally accepted- Institut de Hautes Études en Administration Publique, Faculté de Droit, des Sciences Criminelles et d'administration Publique, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) are combinations of human resource (HR) practices designed to enhance organizational performance. Although the configurational approach emphasizes aligning HR practices into coherent bundles (i.e., 'best-fit' approach), empirical research has primarily focused on universalistic (i.e., 'best-practices') approaches, especially in the public sector. This study aims to identify which configurations of HPWS practices and work environments better explain the organizational performance of Swiss municipal administrations. Using a set-theoretic approach, the study analyzes data from 119 Swiss municipalities through a revised two-step Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) combined with formal theory evaluation. The results identify a climate of internal trust and a strong HR system as necessary conditions for high performance. Additionally, six distinct HPWS configurations were found to be sufficient for high performance, while three explained low performance. Thus, this study offers empirical support for the configurational perspective in HRM, emphasizing the causal complexity of HPWS and their impact on organizational performance. The findings also reveal that incentive pay and rewards are either consistently avoided or combined with other motivational practices. This underscore significant challenges related to the motivational dimension of the Ability, Motivation, Opportunity (AMO) framework in the public sector, highlighting the need for future research into how motivational HPWS practices can be effectively implemented in alignment with Public Service Motivation (PSM).
Keywords: high-performance work systems, HRM, Public administration, Organizational performance, Two-step QCA, Configurational approach
Received: 30 Sep 2024; Accepted: 10 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Assanti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Stefano Assanti, Institut de Hautes Études en Administration Publique, Faculté de Droit, des Sciences Criminelles et d'administration Publique, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.