MINI REVIEW article
Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. Politics of Technology
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1570384
THE INCLUSION AND PARTICIPATION OF ACTORS INVOLVED IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE GOVERNANCE (AIG) APPLIED TO PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES
Provisionally accepted
- 1Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Monterrey, Mexico
- 2Autonomous University of Nuevo León, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León4, Mexico
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The priority objective is to build a model that complements the provisions of the recent European Union AI regulation, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework that operationalizes the US President's Executive Order 14110 and the first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (ISO/IEC 42001:2023) of the International Standardization Organization (ISO).This objective is a priority because in the Responsibilities articles 28 and 57 of the recent European Union regulations have a deadline of August 2025 and August 2026 to designate an authority responsible for evaluations and testing before AI systems are put into service. The previous objective analyzes the above regulations and provisions, from the perspective of AIGovernance (AIG). That is, the approach seeks to balance the empowerment of algorithms in public administration with the citizen aspiration of empowerment. The method analytically reviews the stages and actions of an Artificial Intelligence system to infer the design and development of the action and responsibilities of the actors involved in the AIG from end to end. The results show the general AIG model of public administration that uses Artificial Intelligence before, during, and after its complete life cycle. The Conclusions demand a holistic vision that includes the social and technical infrastructure
Keywords: AI stages, AI products, Actors involved, AIG actions, AI stages; AI products; actors involved; AIG actions
Received: 03 Feb 2025; Accepted: 14 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Aguirre-Sala. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Jorge Francisco Aguirre-Sala, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Monterrey, Mexico
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.