Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Polit. Sci.

Sec. Comparative Governance

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1646734

This article is part of the Research TopicHuman Rights and Artificial IntelligenceView all 5 articles

Self-Governing Systems

Provisionally accepted
Jeremy  PittJeremy Pitt1*Asimina  MertzaniAsimina Mertzani1Josiah  OberJosiah Ober2
  • 1Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Stanford University, Stanford, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

A key driver in the digital transformation of commercial, educational, organisational and social systems is the increasing footprint of Artificial Intelligence (AI). This is producing a different kind of hybrid socio-technical system, which consists of interacting human and artificial 'components'. However, beyond the realisation of basic Agentic AI, AI components are likely to be taking over more advisory, supervisory and administrative roles, especially with respect to human components, and potentially without oversight from some external authority. This raises fundamental questions of self-governance -i.e. both operational and constitutional decisions concerning the selection, modification, application and enforcement of social arrangementsas a co-production of meaningful interaction between human and artificial intelligences. Using examples, this paper scopes out the identifying features of such self-governing systems, which raise several critical political questions about the kind of human rights that could reasonably be expected in such systems. This includes agency, voluntary association, empowerment, innovation and metrication, as they relate to this profound shift in our understanding of "humancomputer interaction" and "human-machine teamwork". Finally, given that self-governing social systems don't tend to persist if they can't adapt to a changing environment or resist entropic decay, we consider the idea of continuous self-improvement as a right in itself, from the perspectives of human factors and user experience, and what this implies for human flourishing and the right to human rights in this new techno-political ecology.

Keywords: Self-governance, artificial intelligence, Human Rights, socio-technical systems, Self-Improvement

Received: 13 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pitt, Mertzani and Ober. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jeremy Pitt, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.