ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. International Studies
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1651223
This article is part of the Research TopicThe New Geopolitical Landscape: Blocs, Values, and Global UncertaintiesView all articles
The Geopolitical Landscape and Russia's Position in Multidimensional Political Space
Provisionally accepted- 1Sochava Institute of Geography Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk, Russia
- 2Irkutskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, Irkutsk, Russia
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Since 2022, the concept of unfriendly countries has emerged in the political discourse due to the publication of the corresponding list by the Russian government. Concurrently, the countries and regions included in this list possess a de facto distinct position in relation to Russia, exhibiting varied levels of engagement with Russia. Despite the longstanding conceptualization of states as either friendly or hostile in political science, dating back to the seminal works of Klingberg (1941) and A. Walfers (1962), contemporary discourse in the field continues to explore the development of novel methodologies for the identification of international coalitions. This article offers a novel interpretation of the scale of friendliness-hostility from the perspective of political geography. It presents an algorithm developed by the author to assess the degree of friendliness-hostility among geopolitical subjects. This algorithm is based on a set of data, including diplomatic status, level of integration, military exercises, sanctions regimes, visa policy, coherence of votes in the UNGA, and image in the media. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted, encompassing a five-year period from 1990 to 2024, to ascertain the political disposition of the surrounding subjects toward Russia. The study's findings indicate that the emergence of the two "flanks of unfriendliness" from the west and east of Russia occurred in a gradual fashion throughout the post-Soviet period. Concurrently, there was a parallel strengthening of the consolidation of the intra-Eurasian space. However, this consolidation does not occur with a sufficient degree of symmetry and tension. The consolidation of the intra-Eurasian space is illustrated cartographically. The focus of this study is Siberia, which, due to the aforementioned changes, is now considered the geographical heart of Greater Eurasia. The conclusion summarizes the results, emphasizing the dynamism of the geopolitical situation and the need for further study of interactions in the sphere of international relations in precise and quantitative categories and measurements. It also outlines further research using the presented algorithm for identifying the degree of international friendliness-hostility.
Keywords: Russia1, Siberia2, geopolitical attitudes3, greater eurasia4, political geography5, geopolitical landscape6, geopolitics7
Received: 21 Jun 2025; Accepted: 04 Aug 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Fartyshev. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Arseniy Nikolaevich Fartyshev, Sochava Institute of Geography Siberian Branch Russian Academy of Sciences, Irkutsk, Russia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.