Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Polit. Sci.

Sec. International Studies

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1653205

This article is part of the Research TopicThe New Geopolitical Landscape: Blocs, Values, and Global UncertaintiesView all 4 articles

"Astropolitics" and Weaponisation of Space – Drawing Past Lessons to Address Space Arms' Escalation

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Mondo Internazionale, Milano, Italy
  • 2European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, Brussels, Belgium

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Once a distant dream, today space is not only achievable, but has become the most important domain for both civilian and military purposes. Modern society and its economy have come to vitally rely on space assets for running crucial services, from financial transactions, weather forecasting, telecommunications to navigation. Military operations are also heavily reliant on space to provide intelligence gathering, surveillance and communication capabilities. Once one of the few domains of international cooperation, space has become increasingly competitive, congested and contested. Today Earth's low orbit is comprised of a higher number of national and private actors engaged in strategic competition with each other. While the use of space in support of military operations is not a novel concept, we are witnessing an evolution of space emerging as the critical domain. As it was the case with nuclear weapons during the Cold War, this is translating into a race for national space programs to acquire strategic advantage by constructing developing space and counter-space systems. The objective of this paper is to draw a comparison between the militarization of space and the historical Cold War arms races. While accounting for space-unique challenges, as well as geopolitical considerations, this study highlights how measures from these past frameworks can be nonetheless emulated and implemented into currently available space diplomatic frameworks in order to mitigate risks, reduce misunderstandings, increase certainty, trust and accountability in space

Keywords: Militarization of space, Cold War, Counterspace, outer space treaty (OST), Astropolitics, arms control and disarmament, Geopolitical competition

Received: 24 Jun 2025; Accepted: 18 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ancona. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Francesco Ancona, francescofedericoancona@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.