Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Polit. Sci.

Sec. Political Participation

Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1656511

This article is part of the Research TopicConfigurations for Democratic, Economic and Policy Shifts after Popular Uprisings in European NeighbourhoodView all articles

Civil Society and Anti-Corruption Reform in Georgia: Revisiting the Rose Revolution

Provisionally accepted
  • Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This article revisits the role of civil society in Georgia's Rose Revolution of 2003 and its aftermath, with a particular focus on the dynamics of anti-corruption reform. While much of the existing scholarship frames the Rose Revolution within the paradigm of democratic transition and top-down institutional reform, this study highlights the underexplored contribution of civil society actors—organizations, activists, and experts—across three phases of political reconfiguration: before, during, and after the uprising. Drawing on secondary sources, media analysis, and in-depth interviews, the article argues that civil society was not merely a catalyst of mass mobilization but an active agent in shaping both the revolutionary process and subsequent policy outcomes. Prior to the revolution, civil society actors were key in reframing public discontent around issues of corruption. During the uprising, they forged alliances with reformist political forces and played a central role in election monitoring and protest coordination. After the regime change, civil society's influence evolved through the transfer of expertise, personnel, and policy agendas into state institutions. While this institutionalization came at the cost of watchdog independence, it also enabled the implementation of swift and effective reforms. The article contributes to broader debates on civil society's dual role as both a driver of democratic contestation and a partner in governance, particularly in post-revolutionary and transitional settings.

Keywords: Civil society, Rose Revolution, Anti-corruption reform, Georgia, Political opportunity structures, Democratization, contentious politics

Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Aprasidze. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: David Aprasidze, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.