ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. International Studies
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpos.2025.1657108
This article is part of the Research TopicThe New Geopolitical Landscape: Blocs, Values, and Global UncertaintiesView all 4 articles
The Evolution of Financial Architecture supporting the BRICS: reshaping the global financial order?
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- 2Universidade Portucalense Infante Dom Henrique, Porto, Portugal
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The financial architecture underpinning the BRICS has undergone significant evolution, reflecting broader changes in global economic governance. As a coalition of major emerging economies, the BRICS have sought to develop alternative financial mechanisms that enhance economic cooperation, reduce dependence on Western-dominated institutions, and promote a multipolar global financial order. This study explores the structural dynamics of these financial arrangements, analyzing their evolution, operational structures, and implications for global financial governance. A key component of this architecture is the New Development Bank (NDB), created to finance infrastructure and sustainable development projects within the BRICS countries and beyond. The NDB, together with other mechanisms such as the Contingent Reserve Arrangement (CRA), represents a strategic effort to provide alternative sources of financing while mitigating external financial vulnerabilities. This research, based on the analysis of official policy documents, aims to answer the following research questions: To what extent does the financial architecture developed by the BRICS, particularly through the New Development Bank and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement, represent a counterinstitutionalization strategy in relation to global financial governance? Can the patterns of action and cooperation promoted by the BRICS through their financial mechanisms be interpreted as evidence of the Chinese revisionist vision embodied by the BRICS? Our first hypothesis is that it is possible to state that the BRICS constitute a challenge to international financial governance based on the counter-institutionalization strategy. In this way, the BRICS do not seek to replace the established global governance system, but rather to change it, generating adaptations. The second hypothesis, in turn, is that the BRICS appear to have incorporated the Chinese vision of global governance, by configuring themselves as a revisionist group and not a "full reformist" group, which means that the strategies of contesting the status quo seek to complement existing institutions and norms and not to replace them. By examining the evolution and structural dynamics of these financial arrangements, this study contributes to a broader understanding of the role of emerging economies in reshaping the global financial order.
Keywords: BRICS, New Development Bank, financial order, de-dollarisation, governance
Received: 30 Jun 2025; Accepted: 15 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Santiago and de Castro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Anabela Rodrigues Santiago, anabela.santiago@ua.pt
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.