MINI REVIEW article
Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. Political Participation
This article is part of the Research TopicCognitive Biases and Populist Success: Political Identification in Right-wing and Left-wing PopulismView all articles
Understanding Voter Heterogeneity: An Integrated Psychological Framework
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Political and Social Science, Universita degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- 2Department of Political Science, Universita degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This paper builds on a comprehensive review of the main studies examining differences between right-and left-wing voters. Specifically, it identifies six key dimensions underlying these differences (personality; cognition; motivation; emotionality; social attitudes and group perception; time perspective) and advances the need to apply a mixed-method approach to assess them. By integrating existing insights with a multidimensional approach, the study seeks to provide a more systematic understanding of the psychological and ideological traits that distinguish voters across the political spectrum.
Keywords: electoral differences, Psychological attitudes, in-group, out-group, Authoritarianism, time perspective
Received: 19 Sep 2025; Accepted: 17 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 De Santis and Morini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Lavinia De Santis, lavinia.desantis@phd.unipi.it
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
