ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Polit. Sci.
Sec. Peace and Democracy
This article is part of the Research TopicThe securitization of ‘everything’. Towards a new meta-security era of counter-desecuritization attempts?View all 6 articles
A Comparative Study of Italy's Withdrawal from the Belt and Road Initiative and the Baltic States' Withdrawal from the 17+1 Mechanism
Provisionally accepted
- School of History and Culture, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This article applied MDSD and process-tracing to compare the securitization acts of Italy regarding the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and the Baltic states' withdrawal from the 17+1 Mechanism, analyzing them from the dimensions of driving factors and action pathways. The article finds that the securitization acts of both Italy and the Baltic states were driven by factors such as pressure from allies, ideological differences, geopolitical changes, and economic calculations. However, due to differences in national context and primary threat perception, Italy's path aligns more closely with a Utilitarian logic, where actions are determined by a calculation of relative economic gains and alliance relationship cost.The Baltic states' path corresponds more with a logic of ontological security,due to their security reliance on NATO and the Russia-Ukraine war, they emphasized a narrative of ideological confrontation between democracy and authoritarianism in their cooperation with China. In terms of action pathways, Italy engaged in intense political debates over the BRI, the turning point is Draghi goverment tightened the screening of Chinese investment and technology,then Meloni and members of BOI framed China as existential threat. The Baltic states directly use legislative power to constrict Chinese investment and technology in strategic sectors,and framed China as firm alliance of Russia to pose severe threat to EU's security and democracy.
Keywords: Belt and road initiative, 17+1 Mechanism, securitization, Economic security, Sino-European collaboration
Received: 27 Sep 2025; Accepted: 24 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Juanping Liu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.