The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
REVIEW article
Front. Public Health
Sec. Substance Use Disorders and Behavioral Addictions
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371497
This article is part of the Research Topic Substance Use Disorder: Above and Beyond Addiction, Volume II View all 5 articles
Psychosocial Treatment Options for Adolescents and Young Adults with Alcohol Use Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Provisionally accepted- Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
Introduction: Psychosocial intervention is imperative for treating alcohol use disorder (AUD), but there is no comprehensive evidence regarding its effectiveness. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in treating AUD among adolescents and young adults.In this systematic review and meta-analysis, articles were searched from EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Also, articles were retrieved from gray literature. The quality of articles has been assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment.Result: A total of 12 randomized controlled trials were included. Integrated family and CBT, CBT, guided self-change, and ecologically based family therapy had a mild effect in reducing alcohol use frequency. On the other hand, integrated motivational enhancement therapy and CBT (-0.71 [95% CI: -0.97, -0.45]) and common elements treatment approaches (4.5 [95% CI: 6.9, 2.2]) had the highest effect size for reducing alcohol use frequency and amount, respectively. In conclusion, most of the interventions had no significant effect on different drinking outcomes. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of combined interventions surpassed that of the single interventions. The effect of psychosocial interventions on abstinence was inconclusive. Therefore, future studies will explore alternative, newly emerged third-wave therapeutic approaches.
Keywords: alcohol use disorder, Psychosocial Interventions, adolescents, young adults, Systematic review
Received: 16 Jan 2024; Accepted: 22 Apr 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Belay, Wah, Wong, Lam, LIU, Yang, Mao, Wu and Ho. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ka Yan Ho, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.