Erratum: Bibliometrics effects of a new paper level classification

An Erratum on
Bibliometrics effects of a new paper level classification

by Peña-Rocha, M., Gómez-Crisóstomo, R., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., and Moya-Anegón, F. d. (2025). Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 10:1531758. doi: 10.3389/frma.2025.1531758

Due to a production error, there was a mistake in Figures 1, 2, 4–8 as published. The current figure order is incorrect and has led to a mismatch between the figures and the captions.

The corrected figures appear below.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Comparison between the total weights of each Scopus area according to the system used.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Scopus areas network diagram.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Average weight and percentage of documents assigned to a single area according to the system used.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Relative frequencies histogram according to classification weights.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Normalised impact difference evolution.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Normalised impact standard deviation difference by area.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Excellence distribution at 10% in Scopus areas with paper-by-paper system.

The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original article has been updated.