SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Res. Metr. Anal.
Sec. Scholarly Communication
This article is part of the Research TopicResearch Ethics and Integrity in the Artificial Intelligence EraView all 11 articles
Artificial Intelligence in the Retraction Spotlight: Trends, Causes and Consequences of Withdrawn AI Literature through a Systematic Bibliometric Review
Provisionally accepted
Kannan Sridharan1*
Gowri Sivaramakrishnan2- 1Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
- 2Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Bahrain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research has introduced new challenges to academic integrity, with increasing concerns about AI-related article retractions. This study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of retracted AI-related articles to characterize their prevalence, causes, and impact on scholarly communication. A systematic search was performed in Scopus using the terms "Artificial Intelligence" OR "AI" AND "retract*" without restrictions on publication year or language. From an initial yield of 1,152 articles, 335 retracted publications met inclusion criteria after duplicate removal and screening. Bibliometric parameters including publication timelines, journal metrics, citation counts, and retraction characteristics were analyzed using VOS Viewer, Bibliometrix, and SPSS. Statistical tests assessed correlations between key variables. The analysis revealed that 46.3% (155/335) of retractions occurred in 2023, with a median retraction time of 550 days post-publication. Engineering accounted for 30.4% (102/335) of retractions, while 72.2% (243/335) originated from China. Compromised peer review was the most common retraction reason, though 37.9% (127/335) lacked specific justification. Strikingly, 51.1% (172/335) of retracted articles-maintained field citation ratios >1, indicating persistent scholarly influence. Articles in special issues showed significantly faster submission-to-acceptance timelines (p=0.016). Journal editors initiated 98.5% (330/335) of retractions, while author responses revealed disagreement in 35.4% (34/96) of cases where feedback was available. This study highlights systemic vulnerabilities in AI-related research publication, particularly concerning peer review integrity and prolonged retraction timelines. The continued citation of retracted articles underscores the need for improved retraction alert systems. These findings call for stronger ethical guidelines and technological safeguards to maintain trust in AI-driven scholarly outputs.
Keywords: AI, artificial intelligence, publication ethics, Retractions, Scientific Misconduct
Received: 01 Nov 2025; Accepted: 17 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Sridharan and Sivaramakrishnan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kannan Sridharan
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.