SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article
Front. Res. Metr. Anal.
Sec. Research Policy and Strategic Management
Managing Technological Sovereignty: A Systematic Review of Semiconductor Industry Policy and Regional Ecosystem Governance
Provisionally accepted- 1Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macau, Macao, SAR China
- 2School and Hospital of Stomatology, Guangdong Engineering Research Center of Oral Restoration and Reconstruction & Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Applied Research of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
As the semiconductor industry shifts from a logic of efficiency to one of technological sovereignty and supply chain resilience, engineering managers and policymakers face unprecedented uncertainty. While nations are relaunching industrial policies to mitigate geopolitical risks, a critical puzzle remains: why do similar macro-strategies yield divergent outcomes across different regional innovation ecosystems? Existing literature tends to bifurcate between macro-level state competition and micro-level firm strategies, creating a theoretical disconnect. Drawing on Merton's Middle-Range Theory, this study bridges this gap by adopting a "structure-process-function" perspective. We conducted a systematic review of 104 core articles from the Web of Science Core Collection to diagnose the meso-level governance mechanisms that mediate national strategy and regional context. We propose a "dual fit" analytical framework, arguing that policy effectiveness is contingent upon two simultaneous alignments: (1) "Strategy-Execution Fit" (Macro-Meso), where governance mechanisms (Process) must align with national security goals (Structure); and (2) "Execution-Context Fit" (Meso-Micro), where interventions must be embedded within the region's specific endowments and dynamic capabilities. Our findings identify two primary failure modes: "Governance Failure" (misalignment of incentives) and "Contextual Failure" (neglect of absorptive capacity). This study contributes to engineering management theory by providing a multi-level mechanism to diagnose policy-ecosystem fit, offering actionable insights for managing semiconductor supply chains in a fragmented global order.
Keywords: Geopolitics, Innovation Ecosystem Governance, Multi-level Fit, Semiconductor industry, Supply chain resilience, technological sovereignty
Received: 06 Dec 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.
Copyright: © 2026 Cai, Wang, Yin, Ho, Jin, Fang and Hu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Haoqian Hu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
