ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Soil Sci.
Sec. Soil Biology, Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2025.1568292
Abundance and Symbiotic Efficiency of Indigenous Rhizobia Nodulating Faba Bean and Common Bean in Southern Ethiopia
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Plant and Horticulture Science, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
- 2Natural Resource Research Directorate, Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 3Natural Resources Development and Climate Program, Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Institute (ATI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- 4Chemistry Department, College of Natural science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
- 5International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya
- 6Institute of Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans-Ruthenberg-Institute), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The symbiotic association between legumes and indigenous rhizobia is crucial for enhancing legume productivity. However, inconsistent results and suboptimal performance of rhizobia inoculation in promoting legume nodulation have been observed. In this regard, we assessed the abundance and symbiotic efficiency of indigenous rhizobia nodulating faba bean and common bean, as well as the soil factors affecting rhizobia abundance in southern Ethiopia. The study also compared the performance of indigenous rhizobia with commercial strains and mineral nitrogen treatment plants. A total of 132 soil samples were collected from barley, wheat, maize, potato, common bean, faba bean, intercropped common bean and maize, enset, and grazing land. Indigenous rhizobia was isolated and enumerated from these samples. Faba bean (FB) and common bean (CB) rhizobia population ranged from 0.0 to 1.7 x 10 4 and 1.7 x 10 1 to 1.7 x 10 7 cells g -1 soil, respectively. Rhizobia populations were significantly influenced by soil pH, EC, OC, TN, CEC, exchangeable acidity, aluminium, and the host crop occurrence. The isolated indigenous rhizobia demonstrated significant potential in enhancing nodulation, shoot dry weight, and TN accumulation in plants. Symbiotic efficiency indices revealed that over 95% of the indigenous rhizobia were effective in nodulation and shoot dry matter accumulation, indicating that naturally occurring rhizobia are efficient and may reduce the need for commercial inoculants in areas with abundant indigenous populations. However, in areas where rhizobia populations are low, strains isolated from faba bean (33FB, 84FB) and common bean (44CB, 102CB), which outperformed commercial strains should be further evaluated. The results suggest that soil rhizobia population levels should be assessed prior to inoculation to optimize nodulation and crop performance. To this end, it is emphasized to evaluate soil rhizobia strains to assess their stability and competitiveness relative to commercial inoculants across different agroecological conditions.
Keywords: abundance, indigenous rhizobia, Vicia faba, Phaseolus vulgaris, inoculants, Symbiosis
Received: 29 Jan 2025; Accepted: 13 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Geremu, Abera, Lemma and Rasche. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tadele Geremu, Department of Plant and Horticulture Science, College of Agriculture, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.