ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg., 15 April 2025

Sec. Pediatric Surgery

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1511055

Bibliometric analysis of hypospadias from 1998–2023


Dezhi Su
Dezhi Su1*Xiaowei LiXiaowei Li1Sha LiSha Li2Kun WangKun Wang1Gangquan WuGangquan Wu1Guomin Zhai

Guomin Zhai1*
  • 1Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Dongguan, Guangdong, China
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fifth Hospital in Wuhan, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Introduction: To analyze the development trends and research hotspots in the field of hypospadias through bibliometric analysis.

Methods: Utilizing three bibliometric mapping tools-bibliometrix R package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace, we summarized the overview information of the retrieved literature. We conducted analyses on the co-occurrence and development trends of authors, institutions, countries, and keywords.

Results: A total of 3,647 hypospadias-related publications were included, with contributions from 14,633 authors. The keyword co-occurrence network identified seven clusters related to the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of hypospadias. Researchers have primarily focused on the genetic mechanisms of hypospadias, the role of environmental factors, surgical outcomes, anesthesia techniques, and patient satisfaction post-surgery. Emerging research hotspots include the precise selection of surgical flap sources, genomic alterations, and the correlation with syndromes related to disorders of sex development, all of which show strong potential for future breakthroughs.

Discussion: Bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the research hotspots and development trends in hypospadias, thereby enriching the field of hypospadias research.

1 Introduction

Hypospadias is a common birth defect in boys that affects the genitals and is characterized by an abnormal positioning of the urethral opening due to atypical development of the urethral corpus spongiosum (1). Hypospadias often coexists with other genital abnormalities such as penile curvature and irregular penile skin. In addition to its anatomical implications, hypospadias significantly impacts the patient's physiological and mental well-being. Epidemiological studies indicate that hypospadias is one of the most prevalent congenital structural penile malformations, ranking second only to cryptorchidism in male genital birth defects. The incidence of hypospadias is increasing, currently affecting approximately 1 in 200–250 individuals, and as a result it has attracted considerable attention within the medical community (2). Despite ongoing research, the exact cause of hypospadias remains unknown due to its complex pathogenesis and diverse clinical presentations. Some cases are associated with specific syndromes, which complicates both the study and treatment of the condition (3). Surgical intervention is the primary treatment for hypospadias, with approximately 300 surgical techniques available. However, regardless of the chosen method, postoperative complications are common, posing risks to the physical and mental health of affected children. As such, addressing how to minimize complications and improve surgical success rates is a critical issue in the medical field (4). Recent years have witnessed a surge in domestic and international research on hypospadias, leading to the expansion of academic literature and information overload. This abundance of data not only complicates the identification of current research trends in the field but also hampers new research initiatives, limiting the scope and depth of exploration. Given this intricate research landscape, streamlining the integration of information and identifying useful directions for research are essential for advancing hypospadias studies.

Bibliometrics, a method that involves the statistical analysis of published research to extract measurable data, illustrates how knowledge is utilized in publications, offers a comprehensive understanding of the research field, and sheds light on the evolution and changes within the research area. Bibliometrics also assists in identifying influential studies or scholars, providing researchers with a clearer perspective on research topics and uncovering the strengths and weaknesses of research. As a result, bibliometric analysis has gained popularity across various fields in recent years (5).

Fardod O'Kelly et al. have conducted bibliometric analyses of the top 150 highly cited publications on hypospadias. Doğan G et al. have also performed bibliometric analyses on the publications of hypospadias. Together, these studies have provided valuable insights into future research trends and have created new knowledge framework maps for researchers (6, 7). However, there remains a lack of comprehensive systematic analysis of the literature on hypospadias. With the increasing number of publications on this topic, it is crucial to systematically review the scientific knowledge structure within the literature, understand research trends, and identify hotspots in the field. Building on previous research, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of the literature on hypospadias from 1998–2023, with the aim of comprehensively assessing research trends and hotspots using the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database and tools such as CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and R-Bibliometrix. The analysis focused on the publication volume, citation frequency, research trends, major authors, research institutions, and keywords in the hypospadias literature. The ultimate goal of this research was to pinpoint research hotspots and forecast future development trends in the field.

2 Data source and search strategies

For our database selection, we chose the widely recognized Web of Science for our bibliometric analysis. We conducted a comprehensive search of the WOSCC database for publications related to hypospadias from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2023 (8). All searches were completed and downloaded on January 3, 2024, to prevent bias from daily database updates. Two authors independently verified the downloaded literature, and any disputed documents were resolved through full-text reading and discussions with corresponding authors. The search strategy used “hypospadias” as the search term, as the term “hypospadias mesh” was not found in PubMed. The inclusion criteria were limited to English-language articles or review articles. Initially, 6,078 documents were identified, with 4,525 meeting the criteria. After screening titles and abstracts, 3,647 articles that specifically focused on hypospadias were selected and imported into CiteSpace for deduplication, resulting in no duplicate documents being included, as outlined in Figure 1.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Data screening process.

2.1 Method

In the current academic landscape, there is a range of bibliometric analysis visualization software available for scholars to utilize. For the present study, we opted to use CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and bibliometrix, all of which are well-established tools in the field, parameters were used for each method are summarized in Table 1. CiteSpace, created by Dr. Chen Chaomei from the Chinese Academy of Science and Technology, is specifically designed for document co-citation analysis. We used CiteSpace (version 6.2.R6) to conduct quality control measures, examine keyword prominence, and identify notable paper citations (8). VOSviewer (version 1.6.20) was employed to generate metrological maps based on co-occurrence data, providing visualizations in terms of networks, overlays, and densities. The visual map produced by VOSviewer uses nodes to represent various entities, including authors, journals, and keywords, with the node size indicating the frequency, line thickness denoting the connection strength, and the node color representing clusters or chronological aspects (9). We also employed R software and bibliometrix to monitor publication timelines and output levels of highly productive authors.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Specific parameter settings for tool.

3 Results

3.1 Overview of publications

The publication of scholarly articles is often regarded as a measure of advancement within a particular academic field (10). Fluctuations in publication rates can directly reflect shifts in the accumulation of scientific knowledge. The descriptive analysis was conducted using CiteSpace to examine the number of publications and growth trends. The study sample included 3,647 publications from 687 journals, authored by 14,633 individuals, representing 9,667 institutions across 487 countries. Among these publications, 3,298 were articles and 349 were reviews. The distribution of publications by year is illustrated in Figure 2. The annual publication count remained relatively stable from 1998–2016, indicating sustained interest in the field by scientists. However, there was a noticeable increase in annual publications from 2020–2023, exceeding 200, as well as a positive upward trend with consistent growth.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Annual publication.

3.2 Author, institution, and country

3.2.1 Author

A total of 14,633 authors were identified in the literature search, with an average of four authors per article. The authors' publication volume and co-citation data were analyzed and visualized using VOS. The top five authors with the highest publication volume and citation counts are summarized in Table 2. According to Price's law, the minimum number of core authors in a field is calculated as m=0.749×nmax, where nmax represents the number of papers by the most prolific authors in the field. With nmax = 36 based on Citespace statistics, m is approximately 4.49. Therefore, authors who have published five or more papers are considered core authors in the field, totaling 370 individuals. The number of core authors with ≥5 papers is illustrated in Figure 3, while the number of co-citations reflects the authors' influence in the research field, as depicted in Figure 4 (11).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. The top five authors with the highest publication volume and citation counts.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Author publication volume.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Author co-citation analysis.

We conducted a brief review of the literature published by the top five cited authors. Baskin's research focuses on the anatomy and pathophysiology of hypospadias, as well as genetic research and advancements in surgical techniques. Nordenskjold's study emphasizes the genetics and molecular biology of hypospadias, including the identification and functional analysis of related genes. Fukami primarily investigates the molecular mechanisms of hypospadias, particularly the association between disorders of sexual development (DSD) and hypospadias. Snodgrass is renowned for developing and enhancing surgical techniques for hypospadias, notably the Snodgrass technique (also known as TIP). Hayashi delves into the surgical management of hypospadias and the assessment of long-term outcomes, encompassing postoperative complications and functional recovery (1221).

Figure 4 illustrates the author collaboration analysis, showcasing 370 core authors who have published 5 or more papers, categorized into 74 author groups. Through an examination of the authors' citation network, 217 authors with more than 100 citations were grouped into six author clusters (Figure 4). The connections between circles represent collaborations among authors, with the circle size indicating the number of citations. The total link strength (TLS) metric reflects the impact of an author's published papers on other participating authors in the study. Notably, Baskin, Laurence S holds the highest TLS value (n = 1,645), followed by Nordenskjold, Agneta (n = 1,093).

R software and bibliometrix were utilized to analyze the relationship between publication time and the quantity of publications by extremely productive authors within the particular research domain, as depicted in Figure 5.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Publication volume and time distribution of prolific authors.

3.2.2 Institution

The identified documents were published by 3,537 research institutions, with 148 institutions publishing more than ten articles. The top 10 institutions collectively published 541 documents, representing 14.8% of the total publications, as depicted in Figure 6. The top three institutions in terms of published documents were the University of California, San Francisco (n = 99), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (n = 67), and the Karolinska Institute (n = 63). Notably, Baskin, Laurence S is a prolific scholar at the University of California, San Francisco, while Agneta Nordenskjold is a prolific scholar at the Karolinska Institute.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Institution publication volume.

3.2.3 Country

Based on the analysis conducted by VOSviewer, a total of 3,647 articles were collected from 112 countries. The top five countries/regions with the highest number of published articles, including the United States (n = 978, 26.8%), China (n = 382, 10.5%), Turkey (n = 257, 7%), the United Kingdom (n = 234, 6%), and Italy (n = 207, 5.7%). Together, these five countries accounted for 56% of the total publication count. Each node in the visualization represents a specific country or region, with the node size reflecting the number of published papers. The connections between nodes indicate collaborative efforts between countries, with a notable collaboration observed between the United Kingdom and the United States. The United States had a higher total link strength compared to other countries, suggesting a higher level of cooperation, as shown in Figure 7. This trend is supported by the greater number of articles from European and American countries in comparison to those from Asian, African, and Latin American nations.

Figure 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Country publication volume.

3.3 Analysis of journals and co-cited academic journals

A total of 687 journals have collectively published 3,647 articles on hypospadias, with 134 journals contributing more than 5 articles each. Among the top five journals in terms of article count, the Journal of Pediatric Urology holds the first position, with 394 articles, followed by the Journal of Urology, with 330 articles, and Urology, with 148 articles. The top five most cited journals are detailed in Table 3. The impact of a journal is determined by the number of co-citations it receives, indicating its influence within a specific field. Notably, there are 13 journals that have garnered over 1,000 citations each. The most cited journal is the Journal of Urology, with 12,208 citations, followed by the Journal of Pediatric Urology, with 4,588 citations, as showed in Figure 8.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Top five journals by publication volume.

Figure 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Journal co-citation analysis.

3.4 Keyword co-occurrence analysis

Keywords play a vital role in summarizing research content and pinpointing trends. To uncover research trends and popular topics, we selected 895 keywords that appeared at least six times out of a total of 8,856 keywords in the literature. These keywords were then analyzed for co-occurrence using VOSviewer. In the realm of network visualization, keyword cluster analysis is divided into seven distinct groups, as depicted in Figure 9. The largest cluster (red) encompasses 228 articles centered on analysis of the differential diagnosis, genetics, and molecular biology of hypospadias. This cluster explores topics such as “46, XY disorders of sex development,” “receptor gene,” and “srd5a2,” shedding light on the causes of sexual development abnormalities and genetic mechanisms behind hypospadias.

Figure 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Keyword clustering analysis.

The second cluster (green), comprising 191 articles, delves into the connection between hypospadias and cryptorchidism within testicular hypoplasia syndrome, investigating environmental endocrinology through terms such as “testicular dysgenesis syndrome,” “androgen receptor,” and “endocrine-disrupting chemicals.” This cluster examines how external substances may impact androgen levels during embryonic development or disrupt the pathways leading to hypospadias.

The third cluster (blue), consisting of 135 articles, focuses on clinical research related to hypospadias, with keywords such as “anterior urethroplasty,” “buccal mucosal graft,” and “hypospadias complications.” This cluster evaluates the pros, cons, and potential complications of different surgical techniques and tissue types used in urethral contouring.

Cluster four (n = 123) (yellow) primarily focuses on clinical research related to the surgical treatment of hypospadias. This cluster is characterized by keywords such as “1-stage repair,” “dartos flap,” “dermal graft,” “granuloplasty,” and “incised-plate urethroplasty.” The research in this cluster explores the use of flap tissue from various sources to shape and cover the urethra, as well as the analysis of clinical outcomes of surgical interventions.

Cluster five (n = 101) (purple) delves into the impact of maternal and external factors on fetal birth defects, particularly within the genitourinary system, in children with hypospadias during the fetal period. Keywords such as “aetiology,” “birth defects,” and “assisted reproduction” are prevalent in this cluster, with evidence suggesting that the disease originates during embryonic development.

Cluster six (n = 74) (cyan) focuses on the study of complications following hypospadias surgery in adults, as well as parents' perspectives on childhood surgery for hypospadias. This cluster, containing keywords such as “adult hypospadias,” “decision making,” and “erectile function,” examines the evaluation of surgical outcomes in children with hypospadias by their families, long-term complications post-surgery, and the application of machine learning methods in hypospadias research.

Cluster seven (n = 43) (orange) primarily focuses on anesthesia-related topics in hypospadias surgery, with key terms including “anesthesia,” “caudal block,” and “neurotoxicity.” The research in this cluster investigates the impact of various anesthesia techniques on postoperative complications, pain management, and potential toxic effects in pediatric patients undergoing hypospadias surgery.

3.5 Analysis of development trends

In the analysis of keyword co-occurrence trends, researchers utilize time indicators to track shifts in research focus over a specific period. Visualizing keyword emergence shows that, in the past 2 decades, research on hypospadias has evolved from general clinical surgical methods to more precise flap selection and genomic studies. Advances in genetics and molecular biology have prompted a transition from enhancing surgical techniques to exploring pathogenesis, including gene identification, function, and environmental influences on hypospadias. Recent developments in gene editing, stem cell research, and tissue engineering have enabled a more precise investigation of hypospadias pathogenesis and the selection of optimal materials for urethral reconstruction, setting the stage for gene therapy and improved postoperative functional outcomes as in Figure 10.

Figure 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. Keyword burst analysis.

4 Discussion

In this study, we delve into the historical evolution and advancement of hypospadias literature throughout different time periods. Prior to the 19th century, there were early descriptions and initial treatment attempts, with sporadic mentions in ancient medical texts but lacking systematic research and treatment approaches. Simple surgical procedures aimed to reconstruct the urethra, but faced challenges, with low success rates and numerous postoperative complications. From the late 19th century to the early 20th century, research primarily concentrated on improving surgical techniques, with a plethora of papers discussing the efficacy and enhancement methods of various surgical approaches. John W. Duckett's introduction of the “island flap” technique significantly enhanced surgical success rates and became the standard method in the mid to late 20th century (22). Subsequently, scholars compared different surgical techniques and explored strategies to prevent and manage postoperative complications. In the 1970s, “Meatal Advancement and Glanuloplasty” were proposed for mild hypospadias. In 1994, Warren Snodgrass developed the “tubular incision plate urethroplasty” (TIP), which is now widely utilized in various hypospadias repairs and is regarded as a cutting-edge technology in modern hypospadias surgery. Key research areas during this period included innovation and refinement of surgical techniques, as well as the management of complications (23).

By the beginning of the 21st century, advancements in genetics and molecular biology prompted a shift in research towards gene identification, functional studies, and the impact of environmental factors on hypospadias. Notable researchers, including Agneta Nordenskjold and Maki Fukami, investigated the genetic basis of hypospadias, highlighting the involvement of genes such as CXorf6 in urethral development. Laurence S. Baskin and his team studied the effects of environmental toxins, such as endocrine disruptors, on hypospadias occurrence, revealing the complex interplay between genetics and the environment (24). In the 2010s, a surge in research focused on new technologies, personalized surgical approaches, regenerative medicine, and gene therapy for treating hypospadias. Innovative technologies such as 3D printing and high-resolution imaging, along with interdisciplinary collaboration, have allowed researchers to explore the anatomical complexities of hypospadias and develop personalized surgical strategies. Moreover, progress in stem cell and tissue engineering has advanced regenerative medicine for hypospadias, with ongoing studies on the use of stem cells to regenerate urinary tract tissues for improved function (25). Additionally, the emergence of gene editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas9 has provided researchers with new insights into the causes of hypospadias in animal models, highlighting the potential of gene therapy in this field (26).

5 Conclusion

This study has some limitations. First, the deadline for the analyzed publications was December 31, 2023, but the WOSCC data are continuously updated. Therefore, the gathered literature may not capture the latest developments in 2024, while the older literature may have incomplete data. Second, contributions from non-English literature may have been overlooked due to language selection restrictions. Despite these limitations, the study is significant as it systematically summarizes the knowledge structure and research frontiers of hypospadias research using bibliometrics and visual analysis. This report highlights new research hotspots and directions, indicating future breakthroughs in research and treatment with advancements in 3D printing, stem cell technology, and gene editing. Personalized treatment strategies targeting specific genetic variants are expected to improve efficacy and reduce complications. Furthermore, understanding the effects of environmental pollutants on sex hormone synthesis and signaling will lead to the development of public health strategies to mitigate exposure to endocrine disruptors, thereby improving the current scenario. Future research should focus on individualized treatment and effective prevention methods to enhance overall understanding of trends in the field.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

DS: Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Validation. XL: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft. SL: Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft. KW: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. GW: Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft. GZ: Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. Dongguan Municipal Science and Technology Bureau for Social Development 2023 Key Projects (20231800935622).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Ottenhof SR, de Graaf P, Soeterik TF, Neeter LM, Zilverschoon M, Spinder M, et al. Architecture of the corpus spongiosum: an anatomical study. J Urol. (201) 196(3):919–25. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL. Hypospadias, all there is to know. Eur J Pediatr. (2017) 176(4):435–41. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2864-5 Erratum in: Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Oct;176(10):1443. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2971-3.28190103

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Piñeyro-Ruiz C, Chorna NE, Pérez-Brayfield MR, Jorge JC. Severity-dependent profile of the metabolome in hypospadias. Front Pediatr. (2020) 8:202. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00202

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. He Z, Yang B, Tang Y, Mao Y. Analysis of factors associated with postoperative complications after primary hypospadias repair: a retrospective study. Transl Androl Urol. (2022) 11(11):1577–85. doi: 10.21037/tau-22-691

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zhang B, Tian M, Zhu J, Zhu A. Global research trends in atherosclerosis-related NF-κB: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2021 and suggestions for future research. Ann Transl Med. (2023) 11(2):57. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. O'Kelly F, Nason GJ, McLoughlin LC, Flood HD, Thornhill JA. A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945–2013). J Pediatr Urol. (2015) 11(2):85.e1–85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Doğan G, İpek H. The evolution of hypospadias publications: a bibliometric approach. Rev Int Androl. (2021) 19(4):224–33. doi: 10.1016/j.androl.2020.03.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Baminiwatta A, Solangaarachchi I. Trends and developments in mindfulness research over 55 years: a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in web of science. Mindfulness. (2021) 12(9):2099–116. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01681-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Bukar UA, Sayeed MS, Razak SFA, Yogarayan S, Amodu OA, Mahmood RA. A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX. (2023) 11:102339. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chasapi A, Promponas VJ, Ouzounis CA. The bioinformatics wealth of nations. Bioinformatics. (2020) 36(9):2963–5. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa132

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Qingtao F, Yun D, Haitao X, Lei Z. Research on core authors analysis about information science area in China based on bibliometrics. Theory Pract. (2020) 6(03):105–19. doi: 10.3772/j.issn.2095-915x.2020.03.009

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Baskin LS. New insights into hypospadias: next-generation sequencing reveals potential genetic factors in male urethral development. Eur Urol. (2021) 79(4):516–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Baskin LS. Anatomical studies of the fetal genitalia: surgical reconstructive implications. Adv Exp Med Biol. (2002) 511:239–49. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0621-8_14

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wedell A, Ritzén M, Nordenskjöld A. Boy or girl? molecular mechanisms in sex differentiation. Lakartidningen. (2000) 97(5):449–57.10707496

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Söderhäll C, Körberg IB, Thai HT, Cao J, Chen Y, Zhang X, et al. Fine mapping analysis confirms and strengthens linkage of four chromosomal regions in familial hypospadias. Eur J Hum Genet. (2015) 23(4):516–22. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.129

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yoshida T, Matsumoto K, Miyado M, Miyashiro Y, Sago H, Horikawa R, et al. Quantification of androgens and their precursors in full-term human placenta. Eur J Endocrinol. (2021) 185(5):K7–K11. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-0312

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Igarashi M, Wada Y, Kojima Y, Miyado M, Nakamura M, Muroya K, et al. Novel splice site mutation in MAMLD1 in a patient with hypospadias. Sex Dev. (2015) 9(3):130–5. doi: 10.1159/000380842

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Snodgrass W. Tubularized, incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. (1994) 151(2):464–5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)34991-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Snodgrass WT. Flap versus graft 2-stage repair of severe hypospadias with chordee. J Urol. (2015) 193(3):760–1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.12.063

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Nakane A, Kato T, Kurokawa S, et al. Demonstration of postoperative effectiveness in ventral lengthening using a tunica vaginalis flap for severe penile curvature with hypospadias. Urology. (2010) 76(1):101–6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.08.080

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Hayashi Y, Mizuno K, Moritoki Y, Nakane A, Kato T, Kurokawa S, et al. Can spongioplasty prevent fistula formation and correct penile curvature in TIP urethroplasty for hypospadias? Urology. (2013) 81(6):1330–5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.005

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Hollowell JG, Keating MA, Snyder HM 3rd, Duckett JW. Preservation of the urethral plate in hypospadias repair: extended applications and further experience with the onlay island flap urethroplasty. J Urol. (1990) 143(1):98–100. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39878-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Snodgrass WT, Nguyen MT. Current technique of tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair. Urology. (2002) 60(1):157–62. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01620-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Govers LC, Phillips TR, Mattiske DM, Rashoo N, Black JR, Sinclair A, et al. A critical role for estrogen signaling in penis development. FASEB J. (2019) 33(9):10383–92. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802586RR

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Siapno AED, Yi BC, Daniels D, Bolagani A, Kwan L, Walker D, et al. Measurement accuracy of 3-dimensional mapping technologies versus standard goniometry for angle assessment. J Pediatr Urol. (2020) 16(5):547–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.08.021

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Webber DM, MacLeod SL, Bamshad MJ, Shaw GM, Finnell RH, Shete SS, et al. Developments in our understanding of the genetic basis of birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. (2015) 103(8):680–91. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23385

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hypospadias, bibliometric analysis, bibliometrix R package, VOSviewer, CiteSpace

Citation: Su D, Li X, Li S, Wang K, Wu G and Zhai G (2025) Bibliometric analysis of hypospadias from 1998–2023. Front. Surg. 12:1511055. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1511055

Received: 14 October 2024; Accepted: 24 March 2025;
Published: 15 April 2025.

Edited by:

Aniruddh Deshpande, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Australia

Reviewed by:

Coriness Piñeyro-Ruiz, Central University of the Caribbean, Puerto Rico
Veerabhadra Radhakrishna, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, India

Copyright: © 2025 Su, Li, Li, Wang, Wu and Zhai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dezhi Su, MzkzMTI0NzU0QHFxLmNvbQ==; Guomin Zhai, emhnbTEwMTZAMTYzLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.