Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Surg.

Sec. Genitourinary Surgery and Interventions

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1615817

This article is part of the Research TopicCurrent Trends and Topics in Robotic Surgical Education in UrologyView all 4 articles

The Contribution of Personalized Video Feedback to Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Training in Realistic 3D Tumor Kidney Models: Design, Production and Implementation

Provisionally accepted
Ahmet Furkan  SarıkayaAhmet Furkan Sarıkaya1*Kayhan  TarımKayhan Tarım1Ersin  KöseoğluErsin Köseoğlu1Arif  ÖzkanArif Özkan1İbrahim Can  Aykanatİbrahim Can Aykanat1Baris  EsenBaris Esen1Umut Can  KaraarslanUmut Can Karaarslan1Mustafa  MüdüroğluMustafa Müdüroğlu1Şevval  KanlıŞevval Kanlı1Murat Can  KiremitMurat Can Kiremit1Yakup  KordanYakup Kordan1Mevlana Derya  BalbayMevlana Derya Balbay1Tarik  EsenTarik Esen1Serdar  AydınSerdar Aydın2,3Abdullah Erdem  CandaAbdullah Erdem Canda1,4
  • 1Department of Urology, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 3Research Center for Translational Medicine, Koç University, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Türkiye
  • 4RMK AIMES, Rahmi M. Koc Academy of Interventional Medicine, Education, and Simulation, Istanbul, Türkiye

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Traditional surgical training relies on a master-apprentice model, but limitations such as restricted working hours and evolving techniques have led to the integration of simulation-based education. 3D printing has emerged as a valuable tool, offering patient-specific anatomical models to enhance skill acquisition. Personalized video feedback may further refine training outcomes. This study investigates the impact of 3D-printed kidney models and video feedback on skill development in robotic partial nephrectomy training.Forty urology residents without prior robotic surgery experience participated in this study. After completing a standardized theoretical and simulation-based training program, they performed partial nephrectomy on 3D-printed kidney models. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: one received personalized video feedback based on their recorded performance, while the other proceeded without feedback. Surgical performance was evaluated using dissection time, renorrhaphy time, total console time, and the amount of healthy renal parenchyma removed. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare improvements between the groups and assess the impact of video feedback.Initial comparisons between junior and senior residents revealed no significant differences in their first operations, indicating that the e-learning module and proficiency-based simulation training successfully equalized baseline skills. This highlights the value of structured preparatory programs with objective performance targets. Additionally, in our study, the 3D-printed kidney models were produced at a remarkably low cost of only $2.14 per model, offering a highly cost-effective and scalable alternative to cadaveric and animal-based training.Residents who received video feedback showed greater percentage improvement in dissection time compared to the control group (46.63% vs. 23.62%, p = 0.043). The amount of healthy renal parenchyma excised also decreased significantly in the video feedback group (p = 0.048), indicating improved surgical precision. No significant differences were found in renorrhaphy times, suggesting that video feedback primarily enhanced dissection skills.The integration of 3D-printed models with personalized video feedback enhances robotic surgical training. Video feedback improves dissection efficiency and precision, supporting its use as a cost-effective strategy to optimize skill acquisition and shorten the learning curve in complex procedures.

Keywords: Robotic Partial Nephrectomy, 3D-Printed Kidney Models, video feedback, surgical simulation training, Urology Resident Education

Received: 21 Apr 2025; Accepted: 30 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Sarıkaya, Tarım, Köseoğlu, Özkan, Aykanat, Esen, Karaarslan, Müdüroğlu, Kanlı, Kiremit, Kordan, Balbay, Esen, Aydın and Canda. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ahmet Furkan Sarıkaya, Department of Urology, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.